As a clinician or clinical researcher, it is all too tempting to jump on board and try the latest ⁄ greatest treatments, especially those derived from adult stroke rehabilitation. Although such ‘best-guess’ approaches could work, one would miss important details that could take some of the guesswork out by developing theoretically driven treatments that are derived from basic research. In an elegant review, Martin et al. 1 demonstrate the importance of basic neuroscience research in providing a strong theoretical basis for pediatric rehabilitation efforts. They chronicle a decade of work establishing and testing an animal (feline) model of cerebral palsy (CP). The model focuses on the developing corticospinal tract (CST), the primary pathway underlying skilled behaviors. They review a series of studies in which they demonstrate a protracted period of CST development, with the maturity of CST terminations in the spinal cord closely paralleling skill acquisition. Specifically, they show that as in humans, cats initially have bilateral CST terminations, with ipsilateral projections subsequently eliminated and contralateral projections maintained during development. Their studies also show that this early rewiring is activity dependent, with competition between the two cortices playing an important role. Importantly, they further show that early damage to the brain may alter the development of these connections. These findings imply that perinatal damage to the developing CST as occurs in CP may be exacerbated by reduced activity in the contralateral motor cortex, associated with the emerging developmental disregard of the affected extremity. Thus there is a vicious cycle whereby lesions reduce movement, which in turn prohibits normal neural development of the circuitry underlying movement. More recently, Martin et al. have demonstrated that increasing the competitiveness of the contralateral CST after cortical inactivation can reestablish normal development of the damaged system. This was demonstrated separately by electrical stimulation of the affected cortex, as well as silencing the unaffected cortex. Similarly, constraining the unaffected limb as done in constraintinduced movement therapy has a similar effect, and in all of these approaches, rebalancing activity between the two cortices results in restoration of motor function. Of course, it should be realized that chemical inactivation of the motor cortex is not identical to the heterogeneous damage found in children with CP, which often involves gray and white matter. Never