Contralateral Breast Dose Research Articles

Dosimetric Comparison of CPAP and DIBH for Left-sided Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy

PurposeDespite the increasing interest in using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in radiotherapy (RT), direct comparisons with the more widely employed deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) have been limited. This planning study aimed to offer comprehensive geometric and dosimetric evidence by comparing CPAP and DIBH-based RT plans. Materials and MethodsA retrospective dataset of 35 left-sided breast cancer patients with planning CT (pCT) scans under three breathing conditions (free breathing, CPAP with 10 cmH2O pressure, and DIBH) was collected. Volumetric arc therapy plans aimed for 95% dose coverage to 95% of the planning target volume with a maximum dose below 107%. A comparative dosimetric analysis among the three plans was conducted. Additionally, geometric differences were assessed by calculating the minimum distance between the heart and the clinical target volume (CTV) in each pCT. ResultsCPAP and DIBH plans demonstrated comparable mean heart doses (1.05 Gy), which were significantly lower than the FB plan (1.34 Gy). The maximum dose to the left anterior descending artery was smallest in the CPAP plan (4.44 Gy), followed by DIBH (4.73 Gy) and FB (7.33 Gy). Other organ-at-risk doses for CPAP and DIBH were similar, with mean contralateral breast doses of 2.27 and 2.21 Gy, mean ipsilateral lung doses of 4.09 and 4.08 Gy, V20 at 6.11 and 6.31%, and mean contralateral lung doses of 0.94 and 0.92 Gy, respectively. No significant difference was found in the minimum heart-to-CTV distance between CPAP and DIBH. DIBH exhibited the greatest lung volume (3908 cc), followed by CPAP (3509 cc), and FB (2703 cc). ConclusionThe comparison between CPAP and DIBH shows their similarity in both geometric and dosimetric aspects, providing strong evidence for CPAP's effectiveness and feasibility in RT. This suggests its potential as an alternative to DIBH for left-sided breast cancer patients.

A Comparative Analysis of Implant-sparing Plan Versus Conventional Plans Utilizing Helical Tomotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Breast Reconstruction.

To compare implant sparing irradiation with conventional radiotherapy (RT) using helical (H) and TomoDirect (TD) techniques in breast cancer patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). The dosimetric parameters of 40 patients with retropectoral implants receiving 50.4 Gy delivered in 28 fractions were analyzed. Three plans were created: H plan using conventional planning target volume (PTV) that included the chest wall, skin, and implant; TD plan using conventional PTV; and Hs plan using implant-sparing PTV. The H, TD, and Hs plans were compared for PTV doses, organ-at-risk (OAR) doses, and treatment times. Dose distribution in the Hs plan was less homogeneous and uniform than that in the H and TD plans. The TD plan had lower lung, heart, contralateral breast, spinal cord, liver, and esophagus doses than the Hs plan. Compared to the Hs plan, the H plan had lower lung volume receiving 5Gy (V5) (39.1±3.9 vs. 41.2±3.9 Gy; p<0.001), higher V20 (12.3±1.3 vs. 11.5±2.6 Gy; p=0.02), and higher V30 (7.5±1.6 vs. 4.4±1.7 Gy; p<0.001). H plan outperformed Hs plan in heart dosimetric parameters except V20. The Hs plan had significantly lower mean implant doses (43.4±2.1 Gy) than the H plan (51.4±0.5 Gy; p<0.001) and the TD plan (51.9±0.6 Gy; p<0.001). Implementing an implant sparing technique for silicone dose reduction decreases lung doses. Conventional H and TD plans outperform the implant sparing helical plan dosimetrically. Because capsular contracture during RT is unpredictable, long-term clinical outcomes are required to determine whether silicon should be spared.

Locoregional breast radiotherapy including IMN: optimizing the dose distribution using an automated non-coplanar VMAT-technique

Background Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) offers better conformity, homogeneity and sparing of the heart and ipsilateral lung for locoregional radiotherapy in left-sided breast cancer compared to three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). However, conventional coplanar VMAT (cVMAT) can result in higher doses to the normal tissue on the contralateral side. This study investigates a non-coplanar VMAT-technique (ncVMAT) to mitigate this issue. Material and methods CT series of 20 left sided breast cancer patients were included for planning of locoregional breast radiotherapy including internal mammary nodes (IMN). Three treatment plans; 3D-CRT, cVMAT and ncVMAT, were generated for each patient with a prescription dose of 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions. Both VMAT-techniques consisted of a single arc in the axial plane, while ncVMAT included an additional arc in the sagittal plane. All plans were optimized to cover the clinical target volume (CTV) by 38.05 Gy for the breast and 36.05 Gy for lymph nodes, with as low as possible dose to organs at risk. Results Full CTV coverage was achieved for all plans. Both cVMAT and ncVMAT delivered more conformal and homogeneous target doses than 3D-CRT. Doses to the heart and ipsilateral lung were significantly lower with ncVMAT compared to both cVMAT and 3D-CRT. ncVMAT reduced doses to both the contralateral breast and lung compared to cVMAT and achieved levels similar to 3D-CRT for the contralateral breast and moderately higher doses for the contralateral lung. Delivery of high doses (>30 Gy) to the contralateral side was completely avoided with ncVMAT, contrary to the results for cVMAT and 3D-CRT. Conclusion ncVMAT reduced doses to the heart and ipsilateral lung as compared to both cVMAT and 3D-CRT. All contralateral dose metrics were reduced with the novel ncVMAT technique compared to cVMAT, and the mean contralateral breast doses were similar to 3D-CRT.

Comparison of Early Outcomes of Stereotactic Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation vs. Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy-Based FAST-FORWARD Whole Breast Irradiation for Breast Cancer

Despite evidence supporting APBI from 8 published prospective randomized trials enrolling over 10,000 women, the uptake of APBI in clinical practice is surprisingly low. This is being exacerbated by a new, convenient, and safe shortened WBI schedule. Here, we report the dosimetric and early outcome analyses of the first >1000 patients treated at our institution since the first adoption of stereotactic APBI and the ultra-hypofractionated WBI regimen. From 2016 to 2022, 801 women with breast cancers in the suitable or cautionary categories according to the ASTRO APBI consensus panel guidelines, received 30 Gy in 5 fractions (92%) either using a robotic stereotactic radiation system (83%) or stereotactic volumetric-based arc therapy (VMAT, 17%). Between 2020 and 2022, 468 women, who were not candidates for APBI and not undergoing any regional irradiation received 26 Gy in 5 fractions using VMAT to the whole breast with the addition of cardiac sparing technique in left-sided breast cancer patients. Tumor bed boosts were delivered in 99% of FF-WBI patients. We evaluated dose-volume histogram parameters for target volumes and organs-at-risk and radiation-related toxicities during RT or within 6 months after the end of RT. Target volume coverage was acceptable in both groups, with mean 96% of the target volumes receiving 95% of the prescribed doses and 0 cm3 within target volumes exceeding 105% of the prescribed doses. S-APBI resulted in small, but statistically significant, reductions in the radiation dose delivered to the ipsilateral breast, contralateral breast, lungs, heart, and coronary artery compared with FF-WBI. Comparing WBI to APBI, the mean contralateral breast dose, ipsilateral lung V20 Gy, mean contralateral lung dose, and mean heart dose, were reduced by 89%, 78%, 73%, and 29%, respectively. With median follow-up periods of 32 months for s-APBI and 19 months for FF-WBI, acute toxicity was assessable in all patients. The risks of any grade acute toxicity were 21% for s-APBI and 25% for FF-WBI (p = .117). Among them, grade 2 rates were 1.3% in both groups and no severe toxicity has been reported. We found s-APBI and VMAT-based FF WBI were associated with favorable dosimetric and acute toxicity profiles. However, considering significantly less irradiated volume in the breast, lungs, and heart, APBI with advanced available technique options should be considered over any WBI-based approach for patients at low risk for local recurrence.

Trends in Radiation Dose to the Contralateral Breast During Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy.

Over 4 million survivors of breast cancer live in the United States, 35% of whom were treated before 2009. Approximately half of patients with breast cancer receive radiation therapy, which exposes the untreated contralateral breast to radiation and increases the risk of a subsequent contralateral breast cancer (CBC). Radiation oncology has strived to reduce unwanted radiation dose, but it is unknown whether a corresponding decline in actual dose received to the untreated contralateral breast has occurred. The purpose of this study was to evaluate trends in unwanted contralateral breast radiation dose to inform risk assessment of second primary cancer in the contralateral breast for long-term survivors of breast cancer. Individually estimated radiation absorbed doses to the four quadrants and areola central area of the contralateral breast were estimated for 2,132 women treated with radiation therapy for local/regional breast cancers at age <55 years diagnosed between 1985 and 2008. The two inner quadrant doses and two outer quadrant doses were averaged. Trends in dose to each of the three areas of the contralateral breast were evaluated in multivariable models. The population impact of reducing contralateral breast dose on the incidence of radiation-associated CBC was assessed by estimating population attributable risk fraction (PAR) in a multivariable model. The median dose to the inner quadrants of the contralateral breast was 1.70 Gy; to the areola, 1.20 Gy; and to the outer quadrants, 0.72 Gy. Ninety-two percent of patients received ≥1 Gy to the inner quadrants. For each calendar year of diagnosis, dose declined significantly for each location, most rapidly for the inner quadrants (0.04 Gy/year). Declines in dose were similar across subgroups defined by age at diagnosis and body mass index. The PAR for CBC due to radiation exposure >1 Gy for women <40 years of age was 17%. Radiation dose-reduction measures have reduced dose to the contralateral breast during breast radiation therapy. Reducing the dose to the contralateral breast to <1 Gy could prevent an estimated 17% of subsequent radiation-associated CBCs for women treated under 40 years of age. These dose estimates inform CBC surveillance for the growing number of breast cancer survivors who received radiation therapy as young women in recent decades. Continued reductions in dose to the contralateral breast could further reduce the incidence of radiation-associated CBC.

Proton therapy for reducing heart and cardiac substructure doses in Indian breast cancer patients.

Indians have a higher incidence of cardiovascular diseases, often at a younger age, than other ethnic groups. This higher baseline risk requires consideration when assessing additional cardiac morbidity of breast cancer treatment. Superior cardiac sparing is a critical dosimetric advantage of proton therapy in breast cancer radiotherapy. We report here the heart and cardiac-substructure doses and early toxicities in breast cancer patients treated post-operatively with proton therapy in India's first proton therapy center. We treated twenty breast cancer patients with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) from October 2019 to September 2022, eleven after breast conservation, nine following mastectomy, and appropriate systemic therapy, when indicated. The most prescribed dose was 40 GyE to the whole breast/chest wall and 48 GyE by simultaneous integrated boost to the tumor bed and 37.5 GyE to appropriate nodal volumes, delivered in 15 fractions. Adequate coverage was achieved for clinical target volume (breast/chest wall), i.e., CTV40, and regional nodes, with 99% of the targets receiving 95% of the prescribed dose (V95% > 99%). The mean heart dose was 0.78 GyE and 0.87 GyE for all and left breast cancer patients, respectively. The mean left anterior descending artery (LAD) dose, LAD D0.02cc, and left ventricle dose were 2.76, 6.46, and 0.2 GyE, respectively. Mean ipsilateral lung dose, V20Gy, V5Gy, and contralateral breast dose (Dmean) were 6.87 GyE, 14.6%, 36.4%, and 0.38 GyE, respectively. The dose to heart and cardiac substructures is lower with IMPT than published photon therapy data. Despite the limited access to proton therapy at present, given the higher cardiovascular risk and coronary artery disease prevalence in India, the cardiac sparing achieved using this technique merits consideration for wider adoption in breast cancer treatment.

Contralateral breast cancer risk in patients with breast cancer and a germline-BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant undergoing radiation.

Radiation-induced secondary breast cancer (BC) may be a concern after radiation therapy (RT) for primary breast cancer (PBC), especially in young patients with germline (g)BRCA-associated BC who already have high contralateral BC (CBC) risk and potentially increased genetic susceptibility to radiation. We sought to investigate whether adjuvant RT for PBC increases the risk of CBC in patients with gBRCA1/2-associated BC. The gBRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers diagnosed with PBC were selected from the prospective International BRCA1/2 Carrier Cohort Study. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to investigate the association between RT (yes vs no) and CBC risk. We further stratified for BRCA status and age at PBC diagnosis (<40 and >40 years). Statistical significance tests were 2-sided. Of 3602 eligible patients, 2297 (64%) received adjuvant RT. Median follow-up was 9.6 years. The RT group had more patients with stage III PBC than the non-RT group (15% vs 3%, P < .001), received chemotherapy more often (81% vs 70%, P < .001), and received endocrine therapy more often (50% vs 35%, P < .001). The RT group had an increased CBC risk compared with the non-RT group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.12 to 1.86). Statistical significance was observed in gBRCA2 (HR = 1.77; 95% CI = 1.13 to 2.77) but not in gBRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers (HR = 1.29; 95% CI = 0.93 to 1.77; P = .39 for interaction). In the combined gBRCA1/2 group, patients irradiated when they were younger than or older than 40 years of age at PBC diagnosis showed similar risks (HR = 1.38; 95% CI = 0.93 to 2.04 and HR = 1.56; 95% CI = 1.11 to 2.19, respectively). RT regimens minimizing contralateral breast dose should be considered in gBRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers.

Wide Tangent Photon Field Versus Electron Field in the Treatment of Internal Mammary Lymph Nodes in Patients With Left Breast Cancer: A Decision-Making Flowchart

This study of internal mammary lymph node chain (IMC) irradiation in patients with left breast cancer aimed at comparing the merits of using, on one hand, a dedicated direct IMC electron field versus a wide tangent photon field covering both breast and IMC on the other. The objective was to produce guidelines allowing clinicians to readily determine the preferred method for each patient. For 19 patients with cancer of the left breast/chest wall, we produced 2 treatment plans each using a different technique: the electron technique using 2 standard opposed photon tangents covering only the breast or chest wall along with a matching adjacent electron field targeting the IMC only or the wide tangent technique using 2 opposed wide tangents covering simultaneously IMC and breast or chest wall. All plans were then optimized for acceptable target coverage. For patients where the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) was located outside of the wide tangent fields (13 patients), the wide tangent technique resulted in lower dose to the LAD, left lung, and heart. When the LAD was inside the wide tangents (6 patients), dose was lower with the electron technique for LAD and heart. In all cases, regardless of LAD location, the wide tangent technique returned strictly superior dose homogeneity but much higher right (contralateral) breast dose. A flowchart was produced based on LAD location that allows the clinician to readily determine the preferred technique for each patient without having to perform and compare 2 treatment plans, thus saving valuable planning time.

Contralateral breast radiation doses in breast cancer patients treated with helical tomotherapy.

We aimed to evaluate contralateral breast doses calculated with a Treatment Planning System (TPS) and verified with metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) detectors in patients with early-stage breast cancer (BC) who received helical tomotherapy (HT) after breast-conserving surgery. The dosimetric data of 30 patients (15 left-sided and 15 right-sided) with BC treated with 50.4 Gy to the whole breast and 64.4 Gy to the tumor bed in 28 fractions were analyzed. TPS doses were calculated and MOSFET doses were measured in the contralateral breast (CB) at cranial, caudal, and midpoint and 2 cm lateral to the central point. TPS and MOSFET doses were compared in the entire cohort as well as by tumor location (inner vs outer quadrant) and planning target volume of the breast (<1200 cc vs ≥1200 cc). The average doses at superior, inferior, central, and lateral points calculated with the TPS were 0.26 ± 0.15 cGy, 0.21 ± 0.09 cGy, 0.65 ± 0.14 cGy, and 0.50 ± 0.11 cGy, respectively, and were 0.37 ± 0.16 cGy, 0.34 ± 0.12 cGy, 0.60 ± 0.18 cGy, and 0.34 ± 0.15 cGy, respectively in MOSFET readings. Except for the central point, TPS-calculated doses and MOSFET readings were differed. The doses to the CB in patients with inner and outer quadrant tumors were not significantly different. In patients with large breasts, MOSFET doses were higher at superior and lateral points than TPS doses, but TPS doses were greater at inferior points. MOSFET readings were higher than TPS calculated doses in patients with inner or outer quadrant tumors in small or large breast volumes. The dose calculated by the TPS and that measured by MOSFET differed by a very small amount. The maximum dose to the CB administered at the midpoint was 1.8 Gy, as calculated using the TPS and confirmed using MOSFET detectors, in patients with early-stage BC undergoing breast-only radiotherapy with HT.

Dosimetric evaluation of different radiotherapy techniques in mastectomized left-sided breast cancer.

Inclusion of internal mammary lymph nodes in mastectomized left breast cancer radiotherapy may lead to high dose receiving risk of the heart, lung, and contralateral breast. The aim of this study is to compare the dosimetric differences of field-in-field (FIF), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), seven-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (7F-IMRT), and helical tomotherapy (HT) planning techniques for mastectomized left breast cancer. Computed tomography images of ten patients treated with the FIF technique were used to compare four different treatment planning techniques. Planning target volume (PTV) included chest wall and regional lymph nodes. The heart, left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), left and whole lung, thyroid, esophagus, and contralateral breast were identified as organs-at-risks (OARs). Except for HT, a single isocenter in PTV and bolus of thickness 0.3 cm on the chest wall was used. Complete and directional blocks were applied in HT, and the dosimetric parameters of PTV and OARs for four different techniques were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. 7F-IMRT, VMAT, and HT were superior to the FIF technique in providing homogeneous dose distribution covering the PTV (P < 0.0001). Mean doses (Dmean) of the contralateral breast and esophagus, lung, and body-PTV V5 (volume receiving 5 Gy) were reduced in FIF, whereas in the HT, Heart Dmean, LAD Dmean , Dmax, healthy tissue (body-PTV) Dmean , heart and left lung V20, and thyroid V30 were significantly reduced (P < 0.0001). FIF and HT techniques were found to be significantly advantageous over 7F-IMRT and VMAT for OARs. Using those three multiple-beam techniques reduced high-dose volumes of healthy tissues and organs in mastectomized left breast cancer radiotherapy but also increased low-dose volumes and contralateral lung and breast doses. Complete and directional blocks applied in HT reduce heart, lung, and contralateral breast doses.

HYPORT adjuvant acute toxicity and patient dosimetry quality assurance results – Interim analysis

BackgroundHYPORT adjuvant trial is a randomised phase III open-label noninferiority trial comparing standard moderately hypofractionated 3 week adjuvant radiation therapy in breast cancer with a novel 1-week schedule. The trial was initiated in March 2019 and is open to recruitment with a total sample size of 2100. We report the results of dosimetric quality assurance, acute toxicity and pre planned first interim safety analysis in the first 271 patients. MethodsStage I–III breast cancer planned for adjuvant radiation therapy to the breast/chest-wall (along with regional nodes as indicated) were randomised to receive 40 Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks or 26 Gy/5 fractions/1 week. For simultaneous integrated boost, the patients in the control arm received 8 Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks, while those in the experimental arm received 6 Gy/5 fractions/1 week (to the tumour bed). For sequential boost, the prescribed dose was 12 Gy/4 fractions/4 days in both arms. Compliance to pre specified dosimetric parameters and acute toxicities were evaluated. ResultData of the first 271 patients was analysed of whom 104 patients received tumour bed boost using SIB. All mandatory dosimetric criteria were met apart from one patient with a higher contralateral breast dose due to optimal internal mammary nodal coverage. Overall three patients (1.1%) experienced grade 3 radiation dermatitis (none received SIB), no other Grade 3 or higher toxicities reported. ConclusionThis acute toxicity interim analysis demonstrates that hypofractionated adjuvant radiotherapy with SIB for patients with breast cancer is feasible, and associated with minimal severe acute toxicities.

Prone Breast and Lymph Node Irradiation in 5 or 15 Fractions: A Randomized 2 × 2 Design Comparing Dosimetry, Acute Toxicity, and Set-Up Errors

PurposeProne whole breast irradiation results in lower dose to organs at risk compared with supine position, especially lung dose. However, the adoption of prone position for whole breast irradiation + lymph node irradiation remains limited and data on lymph node irradiation in 5 fractions are lacking. Although the study was ended prematurely for the primary endpoint (breast retraction at 2 years), we decided to report acute toxicity for prone and supine positions and 5 and 15 fractions. Additionally, dosimetry and set-up accuracy between prone and supine positions were evaluated. Methods and MaterialsA randomized open-label factorial 2 × 2 design was used for an acute toxicity comparison between prone and supine positions and 5 and 15 fractions. The primary endpoint of the trial was breast retraction 2 years after treatment. In total, 57 patients were evaluated. Dosimetry and set-up errors were compared between prone and supine positions. All patients were positioned on either our in -house developed prone crawl breast couch or a Posirest-2 (Civco). ResultsNo difference in acute toxicity between prone and supine positions was found, but 5 fractions did result in a lower risk of desquamation (15% vs 41%; P = .04). Prone positioning resulted in lower mean ipsilateral lung dose (2.89 vs 4.89 Gy; P < .001), mean thyroid dose (3.42 vs 6.61 Gy; P = .004), and mean contralateral breast dose (0.41 vs 0.54 Gy; P = .007). No significant difference in mean heart dose (0.90 vs 1.07 Gy; P = .22) was found. Set-up accuracy was similar between both positions. ConclusionsUnfortunately, the primary endpoint of the trial was not met due to premature closure of the trial. Acceleration in 5 fractions resulted in a lower risk of desquamation. Prone positioning did not influence acute toxicity or set-up accuracy, but did result in lower ipsilateral mean lung dose, thyroid dose, and contralateral breast dose.

Dose to contralateral breast from whole breast irradiation by automated tangential IMRT planning: comparison of flattening-filter and flattening-filter-free modes.

BackgroundThe most common secondary cancer is contralateral breast (CLB) cancer after whole breast irradiation (WBI). The aim of this study was to quantify the reduction of CLB dose in tangential intensity modulated radiotherapy (t-IMRT) for WBI using flattening-filter-free (FFF) beams.Materials and methodsWe generated automated planning of 20 young breast cancer patients with limited user interaction. Dose-volume histograms of the planning target volume (PTV), ipsilateral lung, heart, and CLB were calculated. The dose of PTV, the most medial CLB point, and the CLB point below the nipple was measured using an ionization chamber inserted in a slab phantom. We compared the two t-IMRT plans generated by FFF beams and flattening-filter (FF) beams.ResultsAll plans were clinically acceptable. There was no difference in the conformal index, the homogeneity for FFF was significantly worse. For the ipsilateral lung, the maximum dose (Dmax) was significantly higher; however, V20 showed a tendency to be lower in the FFF plan. No differences were found in the Dmax and V30 to the heart of the left breast cancer. FF planning showed significantly lower Dmax and mean dose to the CLB. In contrast to the calculation results, the measured dose of the most medial CLB point and the CLB point below the nipple were significantly lower in FFF mode than in FF mode, with mean reductions of 21.1% and 20%, respectively.ConclusionsT-IMRT planning using FFF reduced the measured out-of-field dose of the most medial CLB point and the CLB point below the nipple.

Abstract P3-19-21: Semi-lateral decubitus position using Alexandria left breast board-16. A prospective study regarding dose distribution and reproduciblity

Abstract Purpose: Organs at risk sparing without compromising adequate coverage to the target volumes is the main challenge during left breast cancer adjuvant radiation therapy. Advanced radiotherapy techniques have been investigated to improve the dose distributions and to reduce toxicities. These techniques includes deep inspiration breath hold, accelerated partial-breast irradiation, Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy. Supine positioning (SP) is the most commonly used and the standard tangent set-up for breast radiotherapy. Our purpose is to compare the Semi-lateral decubitus position(SLDP) versus SP regarding the dose distribution to the left Chest wall/Whole breast (WB), ipsilateral left axilla, contra-lateral breast, thyroid, spinal cord, ipsilateral lung, heart, LAD (Left Anterior Descending Artery), as well as determining the reproducibility of the Alexandria left breast board-16 (ALB-16) by portal image verification. Methods: We invented a new breast board ALB-16 to induce SLDP allowing tilting the patient towards the right side, elevating the patient's left side at a certain angle adjusted according to the patient’s body surface area and the gantry width of the CT simulator. Simulation process was performed in two different positions whilst the patients were freely breathing, the first scan in SLDP and the second in SP. Fifty women with a left sided breast cancer who underwent either mastectomy or lumpectomy were enrolled in this study for dosimetric comparison between the SLDP and the SP. The mean radiotherapy dose to the CW/WB, axilla, thyroid, left lung, heart, LAD, Spinal cord and the contra-lateral right breast in SLDP and the SP for the same patient were compared. Secondly, analysis was conducted on the fifty patients who were treated in SLDP by ALB-16 in comparison with a control group treated in SP to determine ALB-16 reproducibility. Results: On dosimetric analysis of the two positions, SLDP was found to significantly decrease the mean dose to the heart when compared with SP (2.2Gy vs. 2.9Gy respectively), LAD (5.4Gy vs. 7.2Gy) and the Spinal cord Dmax (7.5Gy vs. 12.6Gy) with a (p&amp;lt;0.01), while maintaining a similar coverage to the axillary lymph nodes levels I, II and III and the SCV group (91.13%, 89.9%, 88.9% and 93.9% vs. 91.3%, 90.2%, 89.5% and 94.1% respectively)(p =0.73, 0.37, 0.29 and 0.67) SLDP improved coverage to the target PTV mean dose (95.2% vs. 94.2%, p&amp;lt;0.01). SLDP decreased the mean dose to the contralateral breast (2.27Gy vs. 2.52Gy, p= 0.08). However, it achieved slightly a higher mean dose to the thyroid gland (79.8Gy vs. 16.8Gy, p= 0.56). The mean dose to the ipsilateral lung was slightly higher than SP (22.5% vs. 20.3%) with a statistically significant difference (p&amp;lt;0.01). For the secondary analysis, setup error in lateral (x) direction was higher in SLDP (0.66cm vs.0.49cm, p=0.028), setup error in vertical (y) direction in SLDP was lower than SP (0.39cm vs. 0.55cm, P=0.013). For the changes in longitudinal direction (Z), there was a slight difference between both positions (0.49cm vs. 0.39cm, p= 0.56). The length of deviation vector (3D vector) was (0.95cm in SLPD vs.0.87 in SP), the mean difference between vector lengths was only (0.08 cm) and this difference wasn’t statistically significant (p= 0.441) indicating the overall reproducibility of the ALB-16 breast board in comparison to standard supine breast board. Conclusions: ALB-16 Breast board is considered a reproducible method of setup for patients receiving left breast cancer adjuvant radiotherapy. It is comparable with the conventional supine breast board in regards of setup errors variability. SLDP spared the heart, LAD and the spinal cord, with a better WB/CW PTV coverage. SLDP can be used in patients whom regional nodal irradiation is indicated while maintaining low contralateral breast dose. Citation Format: Omar Saeed Emam, Mohamed Abouegylah, Rasha Elsaka, Amr Munir, Fady Aziz, Abdelsalam Attia Ismail, Amr Abdelaziz Elsaid. Semi-lateral decubitus position using Alexandria left breast board-16. A prospective study regarding dose distribution and reproduciblity [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-19-21.

Breast Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) Reduces Organ at Risk Exposure, Treatment Time and Duration in Partial Breast Irradiation

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> Interest has rapidly grown in past years in reducing the duration and volume of adjuvant radiation therapy for women with early-stage breast cancer. One such technique that accomplishes both is breast SBRT. We undertook an IRB-approved prospective clinical trial of 30 Gy/5fx SBRT to study local recurrence outcomes and skin toxicity in women who were suitable for partial breast irradiation (PBI) according to ASTRO guidelines. Here we report the plan quality, organ-at-risk dosimetry, and treatment efficiency for the treated patients. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> We accrued 20 women to the trial, with 19 treatments available for analysis at time of submission. 16 were treated in prone, and 3 in the supine position. Women had bioabsorbable fiducial markers placed at time of surgery, which we used for cavity delineation, patient alignment, and intrafraction triggered imaging. We added a 1cm CTV and 0.3cm PTV expansion to the cavity. Plans were delivered in five consecutive days. In addition to trial outcomes, we catalogued plan quality according to conformity (RTOG), R50 (V50%/V100%), OAR exposure, as well as treatment delivery time. Plans were delivered with 7-13 co-planar IMRT fields (median MUs/fx = 2189) with 10MV FFF beams on an Edge linear accelerator. <h3>Results</h3> Median lumpectomy cavity size was 7.2 ± 3.6 cc. Median PTV size was 78.3 ± 25.7 cc. Conformity (RTOG_median = 1.04 ± 0.03) and gradient (R50_median = 3.1 ± 0.4) of all plans were excellent. Heart dose was low for left and right-sided plans (103.4 ± 52.9 & 59.14 ± 21.7) was cGY respectively. Mean ipsilateral breast dose was 750 ± 257 cGY, mean contralateral breast dose was 142 ± 74 cGY. Median beam & total treatment times 4.5 ± 2.4 and 12.7 ± 10.2 min per fraction. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Breast SBRT is an exceptional and convenient means of adjuvantly treating lumpectomy cavities with partial breast irradiation that spares OARs including non-at-risk ipsilateral breast tissue and allows patients to finish their treatment courses within one week with little to no additional time on the treatment table. Bioabsorbable fiducial markers facilitated lumpectomy cavity delineability and were also useful for patient positioning and intrafraction motion monitoring. Future work will assess the viability of condensing treatment to a single fraction to further reduce treatment burden on patients.

Comparison of whole breast dosimetry techniques - From 3DCRT to VMAT and the impact on heart and surrounding tissues.

IntroductionVarious techniques for whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT) have been reported to increase dose to contralateral tissues. Heart dose is of critical importance as there is no apparent dose threshold below which there is no risk. The aim of this study was to compare planning techniques for WBRT that achieves the best target dosimetry and lowest organ at risk (OAR) dose.MethodsThirty early‐stage whole breast patient datasets, 15 each left‐ and right‐sided cases, were retrospectively selected. Five techniques were generated for each data set: three‐dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT), hybrid intensity modulated radiation therapy (HYI), hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) – (HYV), reduced arc VMAT – bowtie (BT), and BT flattening filter free (FFF) – (BTFFF). Plan goals and OARs were evaluated and compared between techniques.ResultsBT had the highest median conformity index (CI) values (0.82, IQR: 0.80–0.85 left and 0.83, IQR 0.80–0.86 right). BT recorded lower mean heart doses (median value 1.19Gy, IQR: 0.90–1.55), and BTFFF recorded lower heart V2.5 Gy, V5 Gy; median 3.96% (IQR: 2.90–6.80) and 0.90% (IQR: 0.50–1.50) respectively for left‐sided patients. There was a statistically significant difference in all ipsilateral lung measures, (p < 0.001) with BTFFF producing significantly lower doses across all measures: mean, V5 Gy, V10 Gy and V20 Gy.ConclusionOverall BT and BTFFF techniques produced lower OAR doses and equivalent PTV coverage for WBRT. BT and BTFFF techniques increased contralateral lung and breast doses; however, these were within prescribed tolerances and comparable to results published in the literature.

ATM Variants in Breast Cancer: Implications for Breast Radiation Therapy Treatment Recommendations.

Advances in germline genetic testing have led to a surge in identification of ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) variant carriers among breast cancer patients, raising numerous questions regarding use of breast radiation therapy (RT) in this population. A literature search using PubMed identified articles assessing association(s) between the germline ATM variant status and the risk of toxicity after breast RT. An expert panel of breast radiation oncologists, genetic counselors, and basic scientists convened to review the association between ATM variants and radiation-induced toxicity or secondary malignancy risk and to determine any impact on breast RT recommendations. Carriers of pathogenic variants in ATM have a 2- to 4-fold increased risk for developing breast cancer. ATM variants do not consistently increase risks of toxicities after RT, except possibly among patients with the single nucleotide variant c5557G>A (rs1801516), in whom a small increased risk for the development of both acute and late radiation effects has been identified. In most breast cancer patients with ATM variants, the excess 5-year absolute risk of developing a secondary contralateral breast cancer (CBC) after radiation is extremely low. The exception is in women younger than 45 years old with deleterious rare ATM missense variants, who may be at higher risk for developing a radiation-induced CBC over time. Adjuvant radiation is safe for most breast cancer patients who harbor ATM variants. The possible exceptions are patients with the variant c5557G>A (rs1801516) and patients younger than 45 years old with certain rare deleterious ATM variants, who may be at higher risk for developing CBC. These latter patients should be counseled regarding this potential risk, and every effort should be made to minimize the contralateral breast dose. However, the inconsistency of published data limits precise recommendations, magnifying the need for further prospective studies and the development of a centralized database cataloging RT outcomes and genetic status.

Harmonization of breast cancer radiotherapy treatment planning in the Netherlands.

The aim was to reach consensus in The Netherlands on which parameters should be used to evaluate breast cancer radiotherapy (RT) plans. A Benchmark Case with delineated planning target volumes (PTVs) and Organs At Risk (OARs) was sent to all Dutch radiotherapy centres in combination with a questionnaire, with the request to generate RT plans prescribing 15 times 2.67Gy for four different treatment indications according to the institutional irradiation technique. The plans and accompanying questionnaire answers were analysed using descriptive statistics. These results, together with a harmonisation proposal, were sent to all centres. The proposal was discussed at a meeting of the Dutch Society of Radiation Oncology breast cancer platform. Distinct parameters were accepted if consensus on them was reached. 19 out of 20 Dutch departments participated in this study. PTV coverage varied considerably, with D98% between 63% and 99% for the breast and between 37% and 97% for the internal mammary nodes (IMN). Also substantial OAR dose differences were observed, with e.g. mean heart doses ranging between 1.85Gy and 5.42Gy in case the IMN were included in the PTV. For evaluation of the PTVs D98%, D2% and Dmean were chosen to report on, with target values of≥95% (90% for the PTV_IMN), ≤ 107%, and 99-101%, respectively. For OARs, consensus was reached on the parameters to be evaluated, without target values: Dmean of the heart, Dmean and V5% of the lungs, and in case of periclavicular radiotherapy V30Gy of the thyroid gland. For patients younger than 40years a contralateral mean breast dose of≤1Gy was agreed upon. A new Dutch consensus guideline for evaluation of breast cancer RT plans has been established.

Dosimetric Comparison of Whole Breast Radiotherapy Using Field-in-Field and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Techniques in Left-Sided Breast Cancer Patients.

IntroductionThe radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancers is challenging because of neighboring critical organs, posing an increased risk of complications. Various radiation delivery techniques have been used to deliver the desired dose of radiation to the target area while keeping the doses to nearby structures within constraints.The main aim of this study is to quantify doses delivered to the organs at risk (OARs) including heart, left lung, spinal cord, and contralateral breast, and to the planning target volume (PTV) using Field-in-Field (FIF) and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT).Patients and methodsA retrospective review of 15 left-sided breast cancer patients was done. All the patients underwent breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant radiation. For every patient, two different radiation treatment plans were formulated and compared for the PTV coverage and doses to OARs, including heart, ipsilateral lung, spinal cord, and contralateral breast.The radiation treatment techniques utilized for this purpose were FIF and VMAT. The homogeneity index (HI), and conformity index (CI) required for the treatment planning were also calculated. Data was analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM Corp., Armonk, USA). An Independent T-test was used for statistical analysis.ResultsThe mean age was 41 years and the majority of them were stage II. Total nine patients were given 4005centi Gray (cGy) in 15 fractions (fr) followed by 10Gy boost, hence receiving a total dose of 5005cGy in 20fr. While remaining six patients were given a total dose 4005cGy in 15fr without any boost.All patients were hypofractionated and the dose was delivered at a rate of 267cGy per fr. The FIF technique utilized in breast cancer radiation significantly reduced the mean doses to OARs: mean heart dose (3.81cGy), ipsilateral lung dose (V16- 15cGy), mean contralateral breast dose (0.03cGy), and maximum spinal cord dose (0.18cGy); as compared to VMAT technique which delivered comparatively higher doses: mean heart dose (8.85cGy), ipsilateral lung dose (V16- 19.82cGy), mean contralateral breast dose (4.59cGy), and maximum spinal cord dose (7.14cGy).There was a significant mean difference between doses of OARs and all p-values were statistically significant (p<0.005). Moreover, the FIF technique also improves the dose distribution of PTV in terms of dose homogeneity. However, the conformity index is more enhanced with VMAT as opposed to FIF.ConclusionThe FIF technique is more advantageous than the VMAT planning technique because it provides better dose distribution in terms of PTV coverage and significantly lower doses to OARs in radiotherapy to left-sided breast cancer.

Contralateral breast dose with electronic compensators and conventional tangential fields – A clinical dosimetric study

Dose to the contralateral breast (CLB) from radiotherapy treatment has the potential to induce secondary breast cancer. Electronic tissue compensation (eComp) for breast cancer patients is one of the alternative methods to conventional 3D-conformal radiotherapy that eliminates the use of wedges. Several studies have investigated dose to the CLB using tangential fields involving wedges, intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc radiation therapy and various other techniques via treatment planning system calculations, Monte Carlo methods and phantoms. However, there are limited data published in assessing the actual dose received by the CLB from treatment with eComp-based tangential fields.In this study, the CLB dose for patients undergoing tangential field radiotherapy with eComp and enhanced dynamic wedged (standard) tangential fields was measured and compared to assess the CLB dose between the two methods. Measurements were conducted on a randomised trial of 40 patients, 20 of them had undergone standard planning, and the remaining 20 were treated with eComp. The mean surface dose measured with TLDs at 3cm from the medial tangential border for eComp and standard techniques was 10.04±1.37% and 10.14±2.05%, respectively for a prescription dose of 2.65Gy/fraction. The estimated dose at 1cm depth in tissue, measured with the use of perspex domes placed over the TLD at the same location, was 5.12±0.87% and 6.29±2.01% for eComp and standard, respectively.The CLB dose is dependent on the proximity of the medial tangential field edge to the contralateral breast and is patient-specific. The results of this study show that at 1cm depth, eComp technique delivers significantly less dose (p<0.05) to the CLB as compared to standard tangential fields. Furthermore, the surface dose measured for both eComp and standard are comparable indicating that the eComp-based tangential field technique does not contribute any excess dose to CLB when compared to standard tangential fields. The excess relative risk (ERR) for radiation-induced cancers for eComp was found to be 0.08, compared to 0.11 for standard tangential fields.