Approximately 40 percent of the work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are low back injuries. Recent advances in human-robotic cooperation, across the spectrum of passive assistance to powered augmentation, have shown strong potential to reduce MSD risks by reducing or transferring biomechanical loadings from targeted joints. However, exoskeletons could negatively impact users’ gaits and postures, and significantly increase users’ metabolic costs (Gregorczyk et al., 2010; Jin, Prado, & Agrawal, 2018). It has been shown that some industrial exoskeletons reduce loads on targeted parts of the body, such as shoulders, but increase loadings on other regions, such as spine (Picchiotti, Weston, Knapik, Dufour, & Marras, 2019; Weston, Alizadeh, Knapik, Wang, & Marras, 2018). Thus, the rapid application of exoskeletons and robotic interventions to the industry without proper ergonomic evaluations is likely to exacerbate current MSDs or introduce new risks to the workplaces such as cognitive overloads (NIOSH, 2018). In this study, the neuroergonomic fit of an industrial passive low-back exoskeleton (Laevo, Delft, The Netherlands) will be evaluated during simulated manual handling tasks with varying levels of physical and cognitive demands of twelve healthy adults (gender-balanced). Neuroergonomic fit is defined as a human-robotic fitness that minimizes the physical load while maximizes the neural (cognitive) availability of a user. An exoskeleton that demands minimum biomechanical loads and mental efforts is considered to be a neuroergonomic fit product. We hypothesized that using low-back exoskeleton will reduce the biomechanical loads on users’ low backs but increase users’ cognitive efforts while performing manual handling task. The objective of this study is to examine the neuroergonomic fit of exoskeletons during the manual handling tasks. During each 30-minute session, a subject will be instructed to perform a manual handling task of lifting a 16-pound medicine ball from the knees to the waist level asymmetrically (45o) at a frequency of 6 lifts per minute. The whole experiment consists of four sessions which is a combination of two experimental conditions (with/without an exoskeleton and with or without cognitive demands). The cognitively demanding task will be an arithmetic task of a serial 13 subtraction from a random number between 500 and 1000 in each cognitive intervention session. Each subject will participant in two random sessions per day for two separate days with at least one resting day in between. There will be a 30-minute resting period between two sessions to reduce any fatigue effect. The neural efforts of each subject will be calculated by measuring the brain activation patterns using a 21-channel portable continuous wave functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) system NIRSport2TM (NIRx Medical Technologies, NY, USA). Multiple physical and cognitive task-related brain regions are measured. The regions include dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) which is correlated with working memory, supplementary motor area (SMA) and premotor cortex (PM) which are both in charge of motor planning. A 2 exoskeletons (1 control and 1 exoskeleton) x 2 tasks (physical and physical-cognitive condition) x 2 phases (early and late phases) analysis of variance (ANOVA), with a significance level of alpha at 0.05, will be used to assess their main and interaction effects on physical and cognitive task performance. The brain activation data will be used to identify functional and effective connectivity patterns among the regions which are related to different cognitive and motor functions under four conditions. Neural efficiency metric that integrates neural effort and task performance data will be used to monitor human-robotic cooperation at different phases of each session. The ultimate goal of this study is to improve exoskeleton-workplace safety and productivity by understanding, assessing, and augmenting the neuroergonomic fit exoskeletons during occupational manual handling tasks.
Read full abstract