Continuous Low Dose Rate Brachytherapy Research Articles

Establishing implantation uncertainties for focal brachytherapy with I-125 seeds for the treatment of localized prostate cancer

Background. The efficacy of focal continuous low dose-rate brachytherapy (CLDR-BT) for prostate cancer requires that appropriate margins are applied to ensure robust target coverage. In this study we propose a method to establish such margins by emulating a focal treatment in patients treated with CLDR-BT to the entire gland.Material and methods. In 15 patients with localized prostate cancer, prostate volumes and dominant intra-prostatic lesions were delineated on pre-treatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Delineations and MRI were registered to trans-rectal ultrasound images in the operating theater. The patients received CLDR-BT treatment to the total prostate volume. The implantation consisted of two parts: an experimental focal plan covering the dominant intra-prostatic lesion (F-GTV), followed by a plan containing additional seeds to achieve entire prostate coverage. Isodose surfaces were reconstructed using follow-up computed tomography (CT). The focal dose was emulated by reconstructing seeds from the focal plan only. The distance to agreement between planned and delivered isodose surfaces and F-GTV coverage was determined to calculate the margin required for robust treatment.Results. If patients had been treated only focally, the target volume would have been reduced from an average of 40.9 cm3 for the entire prostate to 5.8 cm3 for the focal plan. The D90 for the F-GTV in the focal plan was 195 ± 60 Gy, the V100 was 94% [range 71–100%]. The maximum distance (cd95) between the planned and delivered isodose contours was 0.48 cm.Conclusions. This study provides an estimate of 0.5 cm for the margin required for robust coverage of a focal target volume prior to actually implementing a focal treatment protocol.

In vitro radiosensitization by gold nanoparticles during continuous low-dose-rate gamma irradiation with I-125 brachytherapy seeds

This communication reports the first experimental evidence of gold nanoparticle (AuNP) radiosensitization during continuous low-dose-rate (LDR) gamma irradiation with low-energy brachytherapy sources. HeLa cell cultures incubated with and without AuNP were irradiated with an I-125 seed plaque designed to produce a relatively homogeneous dose distribution in the plane of the cell culture slide. Four sets of irradiation experiments were conducted at low-dose rates ranging from 2.1 to 4.5cGy/h. Residual γH2AX was measured 24h after irradiation and used to compare radiation damage to the cells with and without AuNP. The data demonstrate that the biological effect when irradiating in the presence of 0.2mg/ml concentration of AuNP is about 70%–130% greater than without AuNP. Meanwhile, without radiation, the AuNP showed minimal effect on the cancer cells. These findings provide in vitro evidence that AuNP may be employed as radiosensitizers during continuous LDR brachytherapy. From the Clinical EditorIn this basic science paper, the application of gold nanoparticles as radiosensitizing agents for low dose rate gamma radiation therapy is discussed, demonstrating efficacy in cell culture models.

Differential effects of CLDR and PDR brachytherapy on cell cycle progression in a syngeneic rat prostate tumour model

Purpose: The study consisted of two treatment arms comparing the effects of CLDR (continuous low dose rate) and PDR (pulsed dose rate) brachytherapy on cell cycle progression in a radioresistant rat prostate tumour model.Materials and methods: Interstitial PDR and CLDR brachytherapy (both 192-Ir, 0.75 Gy/h) were administered to Dunning prostate R3327-AT1 carcinomas transplanted subcutaneously into the thigh of Copenhagen rats. Increasing doses of up to 20 as well as up to 40 Gy were applied. Cell cycle distributions of the aneuploid tumour cell subpopulations were determined at 4 h (3 Gy), 24 h (18 Gy), 48 h (20 and 36 Gy), as well as during the subsequent redistribution period (20 and 40 Gy) at 72, 96, and 120 h. Tumours either implemented with an empty tubing system (n = 5) or under undisturbed growth (n = 5) served as controls. Three animals were irradiated per time point and exposure condition. At least two flow cytometrical analyses were carried out per animal.Results: The aneuploid cells possessed a constant DNA-Index of 1.9 ± 0.06. In contrast to sham-treated controls, the aneuploid cell fraction with G2/M DNA content was significantly increased (p < 0.05) after initiation of both, CLDR and PDR brachytherapy. However, CLDR resulted in an earlier accumulation of tumour cells in G2/M (24 h: 28% CLDR vs. 19% PDR, p < 0.05) with a concomitant reduction of cells in G1, whereas PDR yielded delayed, but then more pronounced cell cycle changes, particularly expressed during the redistribution period after both 20 and 40 Gy.Conclusion: CLDR and PDR brachytherapy showed differential effects on cell cycle progression. The induction of a significantly earlier but also less persistent G2/M cell cycle arrest after CLDR compared to PDR brachytherapy implies that a substantially higher fraction of tumour cells are irradiated in G2/M after CLDR.

Differential effects of interstitial PDR and CLDR brachytherapy on cell cycle progression in a syngeneic rat prostate tumor model

Purpose/Objective: Radiobiological models based on incomplete repair calculations (linear quadratic formalism) suggest that PDR (pulsed dose rate) should have under certain conditions the same radiobiological effectiveness as CLDR (continuous low dose rate) brachytherapy. Possible differential effects of these two fractionation schedules on cell cycle progression are not considered in these models, but may play an important role. The aim of this study was therefore: 1) to establish reproducible flow cytometrical measurements in solid tumors, 2) to evaluate the effects of interstitial CLDR and PDR brachytherapy on cell cycle distribution in a syngeneic rat prostate tumor model. Materials/Methods: Interstitial PDR and CLDR brachytherapy were administered to Dunning prostate R3327-AT1 carcinomas transplanted subcutaneously into the right thigh of Copenhagen rats. Doses of 20 and 40 Gy were administered in each study arm (CLDR versus PDR). Interstitial PDR was carried out using a 37 GBq 192-Ir source with 0.75 Gy/pulse and hour. CLDR was administered with a centrally implanted seed with a dose rate of 0.75 Gy/h. The dose was prescribed to the tumor surface (5 mm source distance, tumor diameter 10 mm). Endpoint of this study was the cell cycle distribution of the diploid and aneuploid cells at 4, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 h after the initiation of brachytherapy. Tumors either implemented with an empty tubing system (n=5) or under undisturbed growth (n=5) served as controls. Three animals were irradiated per time point and exposure condition. At least two flow cytometrical analyses were carried out per animal. Flow cytometry was performed after 6-diamidino-2-phenyl-indole (DAPI) staining of disintegrated tumor tissue fragments using a PAS II flow cytometer (Partec, Germany). For cell cycle analysis and ploidy status the resultant histograms covering 30000–90000 cells were evaluated by the Multicycle program (Phoenix Flow Systems, USA). Results: By flow cytometric analysis this tumor consisted of a mixture of diploid and aneuploid cells, with the latter cohort possessing a constant DNA-Index of 1.9±0.06. Only the aneuploid cell fraction, which mainly represented the tumor population, was used for further analysis. Comparison of sham treated (empty tube) and untreated controls did not show a differential effect of tube insertion on cell cycle regulation. Under both treatment modalities (dose 20 Gy), the fraction of aneuploid cells in G2M-phase increased significantly within 48 h (PDR, Mann-Whitney Test p<0.05) and 24 h (CLDR, Mann-Whitney Test p<0.05) after initiation of therapy (see Table, G2M values are given as mean percentages of the aneuploid fraction, dose 20 Gy). To avoid multiple statistical testing at the different time points the Kolmogorov-Smirnov was used as a non-parametric statistical test to compare the corresponding cell cycle phases of the two treatment arms (e.g. G1 CLDR vs G1 PDR). After irradiation with 20 Gy of cell cycle progression was significantly different for PDR and CLDR with regard to all cell cycle phases (G1: p<0.05; S: p<0.05; G2M: p<0.05). These differences diminished after irradiation with 40 Gy where only the G1 phase showed a borderline significance (p=0.0474). Conclusions: PDR and CLDR brachytherapy displayed a statistically significant effect on cell cycle progression. Cell cycle progression represents another important factor beneath incomplete repair when comparing the radiobiological effects of different fractionation schedules. These data further expand our mechanistical understanding of PDR and CLDR brachytherapy.

Dose-dependent differential effects of low and pulsed dose-rate brachytherapy in a radioresistant syngenic rat prostate tumour model

Purpose : To study the response of the Dunning prostate carcinoma (R3327-AT1 subline) to continuous low dose-rate (CLDR) and pulsed dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy. Materials and methods : After subcutaneous tumour transplantation into the thigh of the Copenhagen rat, doses of 0, 20, 30, 40 and 50 Gy were applied to the tumour surface (tumour diameter 9 ±1mm). Eight animals were irradiated per dose group and exposure condition. Interstitial PDR (192 Ir source, 37 GBq) and CLDR (192 Ir seed, 150 MBq) brachytherapy were carried out with 0.75 Gy/pulse h -1 and a dose-rate of 0.75Gyh -1, respectively. Treatment response was assessed in terms of growth delay expressed as the time (T 5) required for each tumour to reach five times the initial tumour volume. Results : The median T 5 times for the CLDR groups (in the order: control, 20, 30, 40, 50 Gy) were 12 (12), 54.5 (21), 64.5 (31), 85.5 (51), and 65 (47.5) days. Values after PDR brachytherapy are given in parentheses and resulted in a significantly impaired tumour growth delay (log-rank test) in the 20Gy (p =0.006) and 30 Gy (p =0.036) groups. No significant difference was found in the 40-50 Gy dose range. Conclusions : In contrast to previous results and predictions of biological models we observed dose-dependent differential effects of PDR and CLDR brachytherapy with reduced efficacy of PDR in the lower dose range.

Clinical implications of incomplete repair parameters for rat spinal cord: the feasibility of large doses per fraction in PDR and HDR brachytherapy

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical implications of the repair parameters determined experimentally in rat spinal cord and to test the feasibility of large doses per fraction or pulses in daytime high-dose-rate (HDR) or pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy treatment schedules as an alternative to continuous low-dose-rate (CLDR) brachytherapy. Methods and Materials: BED calculations with the incomplete repair LQ-model were performed for a primary CLDR-brachytherapy treatment of 70 Gy in 140 h or a typical boost protocol of 25 Gy in 50 h after 46-Gy conventional external beam irradiation (ERT) at 2 Gy per fraction each day. Assuming biphasic repair kinetics and a variable dose rate for the iridium-192- ( 192Ir) stepping source, the LQ-model parameters for rat spinal cord as derived in three different experimental studies were used: (a) two repair processes with an α/β ratio = 2.47 Gy and repair half-times of 0.2 h (12 min) and 2.2 h (Pop et. al.); (b) two repair processes with an α/β ratio = 2.0 Gy and repair half-times of 0.7 h (42 min) and 3.8 h (Ang et al.); and (c) two repair processes with an α/β ratio = 2.0 Gy and repair half-times of 0.25 h (15 min) and 6.4 h (Landuyt et al.). For tumor tissue, an α/β ratio of 10 Gy and a monoexponential repair half time of 0.5 h was assumed. The calculated BED values were compared with the biologic effect of a clinical reference dose of conventional ERT with 2 Gy/day and complete repair between the fractions. Subsequently, assuming a two-catheter implant similar to that used in our experimental study and with the repair parameters derived in our rat model, BED calculations were performed for alternative PDR- and HDR-brachytherapy treatment schedules, in which the irradiation was delivered only during daytime. Results: If the repair parameters of the study of Pop et al., Ang et al., or Landuyt et al. are used, for a CLDR-treatment of 70 Gy in 140 h, the calculated BED values were 117, 193, or 216 Gy sc (Gy sc was used to express the BED value for the spinal cord), respectively. These BED values correspond with total doses of conventional ERT of 65, 96, or 104 Gy. The latter two are unrealistic high values and illustrate the danger of a straightforward comparison of BED values if repair parameters are used in situations quite different from those in which they were derived. For a brachytherapy boost protocol, the impact of the different repair parameters is less, due to the fact that the percentage increase in total BED value by the brachytherapy boost is less than 50%. If a primary treatment with CLDR brachytherapy delivering 70 Gy in 140 h has to be replaced, high doses per fraction or pulses (> 1 Gy) during daytime can only be used if the overall treatment time is prolonged with 3–4 days. The dose rate during the fraction or pulse should not exceed 6 Gy/h. For a typical brachytherapy boost protocol after 46 Gy ERT, it seems to be safe to replace CLDR delivering a total dose of 25 Gy in 50 h by a total dose of 24 Gy in 4 days with HDR or PDR brachytherapy during daytime only. Total dose per day should be limited to 6 Gy, and the largest time interval as possible between each fraction or pulse should be used. Conclusion: Extrapolations based on longer repair half-times in a CLDR reference scheme may lead to the calculation of unrealistically high BED values and dangerously high doses for alternative HDR and PDR treatment schedules. Based on theoretical calculations with the IR model and using the repair parameters derived in our rat spinal cord model, it is estimated that with certain restrictions, large doses per fraction or pulses can be used during daytime schedules of HDR or PDR brachytherapy as an alternative to CLDR brachytherapy, especially for those treatment conditions in which brachytherapy is used after ERT for only less than 50% of the total dose.

Office hours pulsed brachytherapy boost in breast cancer

Background and purpose: Radiobiological studies suggest equivalent biological effects between continuous low dose rate brachytherapy (CLDR) and pulsed brachytherapy (PB) when pulses are applied without interruption every hour. However, radiation protection and institute-specific demands requested the design of a practical PB protocol substituting the CLDR boost in breast cancer patients. An office hours scheme was designed, considering the CLDR dose rate, the overall treatment time, pulse frequency and tissue repair characteristics. Radiobiological details are presented as well as the logistics and technical feasibility of the scheme after treatment of the first 100 patients.Materials and methods: Biologically effective doses (BEDs) were calculated according to the linear quadratic model for incomplete repair. Radiobiological parameters included an α/β value of 3 Gy for normal tissue late effects and 10 Gy for early normal tissue or tumour effects. Tissue repair half-time ranged from 0.1 to 6 h. The reference CLDR dose rate of 0.80 Gy/h was obtained retrospectively from analysis of patients' data. The treatment procedure was evaluated with regard to variations in implant characteristics after treatment of 100 patients.Results: A PB protocol was designed consisting of two treatment blocks separated by a night break. Dose delivery in PB was 20 Gy in two 10 Gy blocks and, for application of the 15 Gy boost, one 10 Gy block plus one 5 Gy block. The dose per pulse was 1.67 Gy, applied with a period time of approximately 1.5 h. An inter-patient variation of 30% (1 SD) was observed in the instantaneous source strength. Taking also the spread in implant size into account, the net variation in pulse duration amounted to 38%.Conclusion: An office hours PB boost regimen was designed for substitution of the CLDR boost in breast-conserving therapy on the basis of the BED. First treatment experience shows the office hour regimen to be convenient to the patients and no technical perturbations were encountered.

Pulsed low dose rate brachytherapy in a rat model: Dependence of late rectal injury on radiation pulse size

Clinical protocols utilizing pulsed low dose rate brachytherapy (PDR) to replace traditional continuous low dose rate brachytherapy (CLDR) employ irradiation in individual pulses given at intervals of a few hours. A critical factor in determining whether PDR will produce equivalent or greater late-occurring normal tissue toxicity is the dose per pulse. A rat rectal model was used to determine the role of pulse size in modifying dose effectiveness in producing late-occurring toxicity. A rat model in which the rectum is irradiated with 192Ir sources was used in conjunction with an intracavitary applicator. A section of rectum 1.3 cm in length was irradiated with either 0.75 Gy/h CLDR or one of five schemes of PDR. The schemes applied 0.375, 0.75, 1.5, 3.0, or 6.0 Gy pulses at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, or 8.0 h intervals, respectively. Rats were observed for up to 300 days after completion of irradiation for rectal obstruction. Rectal specimens were taken at the time of sacrifice for obstruction or at the end of follow-up and analyzed histologically for injury. Effectiveness of irradiation was analyzed by calculating the ED50 for incidence of obstruction and severe histological injury. The ED50 for obstruction after treatment with CLDR and pulse sizes of 0.375, 0.75, and 1.5 Gy were 70.5, 68.0, 68.6, and 68.8 Gy, respectively. These values were not significantly different. Compared to CLDR, the ED50 for obstruction after pulse sizes of 3.0 and 6.0 Gy were significantly different at 60.9 and 46.3 Gy, respectively. The relative changes in ED50 for the different radiation schemes in producing ulceration, fibrosis, and vascular sclerosis injury were similar to that observed for obstruction. The endpoints of colitis cystica profunda and atypical epithelial regeneration varied less with increasing pulse size. We have demonstrated that for late rat rectal injury, dose responses to PDR pulse sizes up to 1.5 Gy at 2-h intervals are not distinguishable from that seen with CLDR at a dose rate of 0.75 Gy/h.

Pulsed low dose rate brachytherapy for pelvic malignancies

The pulsed low dose rate remote afterloading unit was designed to combine the radiation safety and isodose optimization advantages of high dose rate technology with the radiobiologic advantages of continuous low dose rate brachytherapy. This is the first report of a prospective clinical trial evaluating the relative incidence of acute toxicity and local control in patients with pelvic malignancies who underwent interstitial or intracavitary brachytherapy with the pulsed low dose rate remote afterloader. From 5/11/92-6/21/95, 65 patients underwent 77 brachytherapy procedures as part of their treatment regimen for pelvic malignancies. Using the pulsed low dose rate Selectron, equipped with a single cable-driven 0.3-1.0 Ci Ir192 source, target volume doses of 0.40-0.85 Gy per pulse were prescribed to deliver the clinically determined dose. Forty-five intracavitary and 32 interstitial procedures were performed. Fifty-four patients had primary and 11 recurrent disease. Patients were followed closely to assess incidence of Grade 3-5 acute and delayed toxicity, local control, and survival. With a median follow-up of 16.1 months (range 1-29), 33 patients are NED, 10 alive with disease, 13 dead with disease, 4 dead of intercurrent disease, and 5 lost to follow-up. Local control was maintained until last follow-up or death in 48 cases, local failure occurred in 11, unknown in 5. Grade 3-5 acute toxicities (requiring medical or surgical intervention) occurred in 5 out of 77 procedures (6.5%), delayed complications in 10 patients (15% actuarial incidence at 2 years). In the 52 procedures performed for 42 patients with cervix cancer, the acute toxicity incidence was 5.8%, with a 14% 2-year actuarial incidence of delayed complications. Of 32 interstitial templates performed on 30 patients for pelvic malignancies, there were three incidences of acute toxicity and five delayed toxicities. Using the parameters described for this initial clinical study in patients treated for pelvic malignancies, pulsed low dose rate brachytherapy shows no significant increase in acute toxicity above that seen with the standard continuous low dose rate approach. Using the isodose optimization possible with pulsed brachytherapy, local control is excellent in patients treated at initial presentation, although longer follow-up is required for full assessment of local control and late toxicity. Further trials will need to be carried out to determine if larger doses per pulse and shorter total treatment times have comparable therapeutic ratios.

Optimizing the time course of brachytherapy and other accelerated radiotherapeutic protocols

Purpose : It is likely that early-responding tissues, such as tumors, repair sublethal damage more rapidly than do late-responding tissues. This difference can be exploited to design protocols with a significantly improved therapeutic advantage for accelerated radiotherapeutic regimens, including brachytherapy. Methods and Materials : The time course of potential protocols is computer optimized, maximizing the therapeutic difference between tumor-control probability ( TCP), and normal-tissue complication probability ( NTCP). These quantities are evaluated with the linear-quadratic model, using clinically derived parameters. The optimization is performed by individually adjusting doses in different parts of the treatment, maximizing the therapeutic advantage. In the main calculations, half times for damage repair were T 1 2 (late) = 4 h, T 1 2 (early) = 0.5 h. Two component (fast/slow) repair processes were also investigated. Results : Protocols determined by optimization have significantly greater therapeutic advantage than continuous low-dose rate ( CLDR) protocols of the same overall dose and time. The optimized protocols are either (a) acute-dose/gap/ CLDR/gap/acute-dose; or (b) a series of acute doses separated by 3–4 h. As a typical example, results are given for 60 Gy/120 h CLDR brachytherapy, which is assumed to give NTCP = 0.2 and TCP = 0.8. Under our assumptions, optimized regimes, with the same overall time and dose, produce an NTCP of ∼ 0.11 and TCP of ∼ 0.83, a significant therapeutic gain over CLDR. Conclusion : Difference in repair rates between early- and late-responding tissues can be exploited to produce clinically practical protocols that are significantly superior to current regimens. Such optimized protocols produce slightly better tumor control than CLDR with the same overall dose and time, significantly less late damage, and similar early normal-tissue sequellae. Temporal optimization, thus, promises to be a powerful tool in designing better treatment protocols.

Continuous low dose rate brachytherapy with high activity iodine-125 seeds in the management of meningiomas

The purpose of this study was to evaluate if meningiomas can be effectively treated with brachytherapy using permanent implantation of high activity 1–125 seeds. Thirteen patients with intracranial meningiomas were treated by means of permanent stereotactic implantation of one or more high-activity 1–125 seeds. The physical characteristics of I-25 enabled us to deliver a minimum tumor dose ranging from 100 Gy to 500 Gy at a low dose rate of 5 cGy to 25 cGy per hr. Indications for this procedure included recurrence after initial surgery or as primary modality of treatment in patients who were not candidates for surgery. All 13 patients are alive at a median follow-up of 25 months. Nine of 13 patients achieved complete resolution of the tumor and in the remaining four, more than 50 reduction in tumor volume was noted at the last follow-up. No late complications were observed. We conclude from this initial data that localized high dose irradiation delivered at a low dose rate using 1–125 permanent implantation is an effective, safe, and simple method in the treatment of both recurrent and primary intracranial meningiomas.

Pulsed & continuous low-dose rate brachytherapy: Biological equivalence in vivo

Pulsed & continuous low-dose rate brachytherapy: Biological equivalence in vivo