Reviewed by: A Literate South: Reading before Emancipation by Beth Barton Schweiger Christopher N. Phillips (bio) A Literate South: Reading before Emancipation beth barton schweiger Yale University Press, 2019 258 pp. Does reading lead to liberalization? If so, what reading, or kinds of reading? As Beth Barton Schweiger argues, what she calls "the ideology of literacy," which insists on a connection between literacy and liberalization, [End Page 283] has been firmly entrenched in American culture since the middle of the nineteenth century. While it can seem obvious that a literacy-liberty correlation does not always hold historically, studies of the nineteenth-century US have long operated under the assumption that the North's higher rate of literacy was a contributing factor in the turn away from slavery, and that the South's relative lack of print publishing infrastructure enabled public opinion to support slavery. Schweiger's careful, engaging study of female readers in two families, drawing on journals and other writings at the Virginia Historical Society and in continued family possession, shows that literacy practices were a lively, continual element in the lives of rural southerners, even those whose lifestyle and infrastructure prevented them from devoting long hours to print-based activity. A Literate South might seem late for a review in EAL, focusing as it does on reading and writing practices of the 1830s through the 1850s, but as book historians such as James Raven have pointed out, the circulation of texts originating in multiple eras is a fact of reading life, and some of the reading material and much of the literacy pedagogy that the Cooley and Speer sisters experienced belonged to an earlier era. This book is very much a history of reading, following in the tradition of the micro-history exemplified by Carlo Ginzburg's The Cheese and the Worms (Johns Hopkins UP, 1992) and more recently by Allan Westphall's Books and Religious Devotion (Pennsylvania State UP, 2014). Schweiger's study does what the best of these micro-histories do, examining and contextualizing the documented experiences of a few, seemingly marginal historical figures in order to illuminate where expected patterns of reading and writing held, and especially where we may need to rethink our assumptions about literacy, culture, and the place of print in everyday life. As in the case of the ideology of literacy, Schweiger moves from fine-grained analysis to big ideas and assumptions, showing that the two scales do not always easily match and that the details of women's and girls' literacy at a given time and place may tell us much about what and how literacy was. Schweiger begins with a long introductory chapter explaining the diverse ways that print suffused the South, even at significant geographical remove from printing presses, booksellers, and newspaper offices. The Cooleys were Virginia farmers who engaged in part-time smithing and clothes-making; the Speers were North Carolina tanners whose Whig politics and middle-class values shared a similar rural space, which included [End Page 284] a print world made up primarily of periodicals, schoolbooks, hymnbooks, Bibles, and more ephemeral texts. This was not a world of many books, but Schweiger demonstrates that it was one of wide and voracious print and reading. Her canny use of Shirley Brice Heath's notion of "ways of words" allows her to detect the Cooleys' and Speers' reading not just by the titles they name but also by the phrases, cadences, and diction they use. Part I demonstrates the importance of this method by highlighting the literacy practices of the two households through writings left by Amanda and Betsy Cooley, Jennie and Ann Speer, and a few of their relatives. The chapters in this section follow the sequence of literacy textbooks that was well-established by the early nineteenth century: spellers, grammars, and rhetorics. The chapter on spellers foregrounds the experience of Jincy, an enslaved teenaged girl on the Cooley farm who Amanda recorded as studying a speller while other members of the household read, wrote, or otherwise used their leisure time. Schweiger traces a history of enslaved people's use of spellers that includes both the more familiar dimensions of prohibition and clandestine learning, and an...
Read full abstract