Today, the of political science is shaped by the transition from classical colonialism to contemporary colonialism in a world founded on colonialism. In this process, the of political science has been perceived as a task that is generally focused on administration and bureaucracy. Because, in particular, between 1945 and 1980, political science was seen as the only means of social development, the means of execution of state and state. For this reason, the need for an examination of policy has emerged in order to get to know the state formation in the best way, to work effectively and to achieve social development. The joint efforts made for political science have led to the emergence of universal laws. In a more general sense, such universal laws are used to formulate policy science. All of the efforts made to compare political science to natural sciences raise the impairment of default or actual laws from irreversible individual reasoning and the effects of irrelevant cultural circles over the normative values. The emphasis on the political science has forced the state administration system to change within the scope of the new colonialism and a proposal has been made to suggest that putting the integrity of the state and bureaucracy on an edge, seeing everything belonging to them as a business. As a result of this proposal, the new and alternative name in political science is discipline of public administration. Considering political science as a one-dimensional phenomenon may lead to the conceptual misrepresentation. Political science is closely related to political science, law and business administration are social sciences. Therefore, it seems very difficult to introduce a new mold by separating policy science from the different elements it contains. The distinction between politics and management has brought with it a limit which limits the thought of political science. Because politics takes decisions and management takes decisions. The problem of seeing the science of politics as a tool rather than a would be an appropriate approach to abolish the separation of politics and administration so that the situation or the situation can be removed. In this study, a conceptual evaluation of the future of political science has been put into place. While examining the future of political science, it has been addressed the application of the New Policy, which can be called a new initiative in this field to emphasize the practicing identity of policy science. Nevertheless, a brief evaluation was made because of the importance of the bureaucracy that has become an inseparable part of the administration and, in some respects, the future of policy science. While discussing the scientific future of political science, scientific support has been sought from the concepts of civil policy and governance, which are practical applications. It has been tried to draw attention to the necessity of a transition from the understanding of classical policy consciousness to the understanding of civilized administration in the process of scientific evaluation of political science. This study examined the scientific history of policy science, cameralism, the understanding of New Political Science, bureaucracy and politics in the axis of public governance, and emphasized the necessity of shaping policy science with civilian policy understanding. In this context, the case of public governance is considered both a target and a tool.