Contemporary Chronic Total Occlusion Research Articles

Use of antegrade dissection re-entry in coronary chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention in a contemporary multicenter registry.

We assessed efficacy and safety of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using antegrade dissection re-entry (ADR). We examined outcomes of ADR among 1313 CTO PCIs performed at 11 US centers between 2012-2015. 84.1% of patients were men. Prevalence of prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery was 34.3%. Overall technical and procedural success were 90.1% and 88.7%, respectively. In-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) occurred in 31 patients (2.4%). ADR was used in 458 cases (34.9%), and was the first strategy in 169 cases (12.9%). ADR cases were angiographically more complex than non-ADR cases (mean J-CTO score: 2.8±1.2 vs. 2.4±1.2, p<0.001). ADR was performed using the CrossBoss catheter in 246 of 458 (53.7%) and the Stingray system in 251 ADR cases (54.8%). Compared with non-ADR cases, ADR cases had lower technical (86.9% vs. 91.8%, p=0.005) and procedural success (85.0% vs. 90.7%, p=0.002), but similar risk for MACE (2.9% vs. 2.2%, p=0.42). ADR was associated with longer procedure and fluoroscopy time, and higher patient air kerma dose and contrast volume (all p<0.001). After excluding retrograde cases, ADR and antegrade wire escalation (AWE) had similar technical success (92.7% vs. 94.2%, p=0.43), procedural success (91.8% vs. 94.1%, p=0.23), and MACE (2.1% vs. 0.6%, p=0.12). ADR is used relatively frequently in contemporary CTO PCI, especially for challenging lesions and after failure of other strategies. ADR is associated with similar success rates and risk for complications as compared with AWE, and is important for achieving high procedural success.

Procedural failure of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from a multicenter US registry.

The hybrid approach to chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has significantly increased procedural success rates, yet some cases still fail. We sought to evaluate the causes of failure in a contemporary CTO PCI registry. We examined 380 consecutive patients who underwent CTO-PCI at 4 high volume CTO PCI centers in the United States using the "hybrid" approach. Clinical, angiographic, complication, and efficiency outcomes were compared between successful and failed cases. Failed cases were individually reviewed by an independent reviewer to determine the cause of failure. Procedural success was 91.3%. Compared with patients in whom CTO PCI was successful, those in whom CTO PCI failed had similar baseline clinical characteristics, but were more likely to have longer occlusion length, more tortuosity, more proximal cap ambiguity and blunt stump, and higher mean J-CTO scores (2.8 ± 1.1 vs. 3.5 ± 1.0, P < 0.001), and less likely to have collaterals suitable for the retrograde approach (66% vs. 45%, P = 0.021). Failure was due to a complication in 10 cases (30%). In the remaining 23 cases (70%) failure was due to inability to wire the lesion (n = 21, 4 of which were CTOs due to in-stent restenosis), or poor antegrade flow after PCI (n = 5). Compared with successful cases, failed CTO-PCI cases are more likely to have higher J-CTO scores, longer occlusion length, ambiguous proximal cap and no appropriate collaterals for retrograde crossing. Development of novel CTO crossing techniques is needed to further increase CTO PCI success rates.

Validation and incremental value of the hybrid algorithm for CTO PCI

To evaluate the outcomes and benefits of using the hybrid algorithm for chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The hybrid algorithm harmonizes antegrade and retrograde techniques for performing CTO PCI. It has the potential to increase success rates and improve efficiency for CTO PCI. No previous data have analyzed the impact of this algorithm on CTO PCI success rates and procedural efficiency. Retrospective analysis of contemporary CTO PCI performed at two high-volume centers with adoption of the hybrid technique was compared to previously published CTO outcomes in a well matched group of patients and lesion subsets. After adoption of the hybrid algorithm, technical success was significantly higher in the post hybrid algorithm group 189/198 (95.4%) vs the pre-algorithm group 367/462 (79.4%) (P < 0.001). Procedural success in the post hybrid algorithm group 175/198 (88.3%) when compared to the pre-algorithm group 360/462 (77.9%) (P < 0.001) was also significantly improved. Failure rates were significantly lower. Efficiency parameters including procedure time, contrast volume, fluoroscopy time, and radiation doses all favored the post hybrid group but did not reach statistical significance. The validation of the hybrid algorithm has the potential to disseminate adoption of CTO PCI.