We like Critchfield’s (2011) article,which is scholarly, clear, and insight-ful. In it, Critchfield provides anexcellent overview of translationalresearch in behavior analysis andsuggests several general strategiesfor increasing the likelihood that suchresearch, which has been scarce inpast years, will become more com-mon and benefit the discipline as wellas humanity at large. As he pointsout, a small number of people havebeen responsible for most of thetranslational research that has ap-peared, and relatively few behavioranalysts are well trained in both thebasic science and applied areas of ourdiscipline. In an attempt to provide acrude index of how many contempo-rary behavior analysts are produc-tive, and hence at least somewhatskilled, in the basic science andapplied areas of our discipline, weused PsycINFO to determine thenumber of people who authored atleast one article in both the Journal ofthe Experimental Analysis of Behavior(JEAB) and the Journal of AppliedBehavior Analysis (JABA)from2006through 2010 (i.e., in the last 5 years).Thirty-eight people did so. This is asubstantial number, but it is impor-tant to note that during this period381 people were listed as JEABauthors and 718 people were listedas JABA authors. Thus, only 3.6% ofthe total number of authors (38 of1,061) published in both journals.Their names and the number ofarticles they published in each journalduring this period are shown inTable 1.Although publishing in a givenarea is not strong evidence of exper-tise in that area (an author could,e.g., contribute just by collectingdata), it is likely that most, andprobably all, of these people knowquite a bit about both the basicscience and applied areas of ourdiscipline and hence could play lead-ership roles in increasing the amountand quality of translational researchproduced. Some of them, such asTom Critchfield and Bud Mace,obviously do so (e.g., Mace & Critch-field, 2010).Both Critchfield (2011) and Poling(2010) suggested that current gradu-ate training programs might be inad-equate for producing competenttranslational researchers, but neitheroffered specific strategies for im-provement. Examining the formaland informal training received bythe researchers listed in Table 1 couldprovide clues regarding the experienc-es that develop the repertoire neededto bridge the basic-to-applied chasm.Critchfield pointed out that he wasinfluenced by Bill Redmon in a coursethat combined basic and appliedreadings, and our hunch is that manyof those listed in Table 1 studied withmentors who had broad interests. Forwhat it’s worth, one of us (Poling) wasmentored by Andy Lattal and TravisThompson, both of whom have pub-lished applied, basic, and translation-al studies, and Poling has donelikewise. Many of his students, in-cluding the coauthor of this article(Edwards), are also generalists.As generalists, they use a variety ofresearch methods while they retain acommitment to the tactics and strat-egies characteristic of behavior anal-ysis (e.g., Poling, Methot, & LeSage,1995; Sidman, 1960) and to use them
Read full abstract