Contaminant Concentrations In Soil Research Articles

Effect of Normalization Methods on Accuracy of Estimating Low- and High-Molecular Weight PAHs Distribution in the Soils of a Coking Plant

Mapping spatial distribution of soil contaminants at contaminated sites is the basis of risk assessment. Hotspots can cause strongly skewed distribution of the raw contaminant concentrations in soil, and consequently can require suitable normalization prior to interpolation. In this study, three normalization methods including normal score, Johnson, and Box-Cox transformation were performed on the concentrations of two low-molecular weight (LMW) PAHs (i.e., acenaphthene (Ace) and naphthalene (Nap)) and two high-molecular weight (HMW) PAHs (i.e., benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) and benzo(b)fluoranthene (BbF)) in soils of a typical coking plant in North China. The estimating accuracy of soil LMW and HMW PAHs distribution using ordinary kriging with different normalization methods was compared. The results showed that all transformed data passed the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, indicating that all three data transformation methods achieved normality of raw data. Compared to Box-Cox-ordinary kriging, normal score-, and Johnson-ordinary kriging had higher estimating accuracy of the four soil PAHs distribution. In cross-validation, smaller root-mean-square error (RMSE) and mean error (ME) values were observed for normal score-ordinary kriging for both LMW and HMW PAHs compared to Johnson- and Box-Cox-ordinary kriging. Thus, normal score transformation is suitable for alleviating the impact of hotspots on estimating accuracy of the four selected soil PAHs distribution at this coking plant. The findings can provide insights into reducing uncertainty in spatial interpolation at PAHs-contaminated sites.

Soil amendments for cadmium phytostabilization by five marigold cultivars.

In recent years, ornamental plants have come under investigation as phytoremediation agents. In addition to reducing contaminant concentrations in soil, such plants support local economies by serving social (e.g., religious) and decorative purposes. Greenhouse studies investigated the phytostabilization potential of soil cadmium (Cd) by five cultivars of marigold (Tagetes erecta), a common ornamental flower in Asia. The effects of organic (cattle manure and pig manure) and inorganic (leonardite and Osmocote®) amendments in supporting plant growth and enhancing Cd uptake were also examined. Marigold cultivars Babuda and Sunshine grown in soil supplemented with pig manure produced the greatest biomass and experienced greatest Cd accumulation and flower production. In all treatments, plant parts accumulated Cd in the following order: root > shoot ≈ flower. Furthermore, Babuda and Sunshine cultivars had a high phytostabilization potential as evidenced by translocation factors < 1 and bioconcentration factors > 1 for roots. It is proposed that Babuda and Sunshine marigold cultivars be applied toward Cd phytostabilization while enhancing local economies as an ornamental species.

Pilot scale aided-phytoremediation of a co-contaminated soil

A pilot scale experiment was conducted to investigate the aided-phytoextraction of metals and the aided-phytodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons (PHC) in a co-contaminated soil. First, this soil was amended with compost (10% w/w) and assembled into piles (Unp-10%C). Then, a phyto-cap of Medicago sativa L. either in monoculture (MS-10%C) or co-cropped with Helianthus annuus L. as companion planting (MSHA-10%C) was sown on the topsoil. Physico-chemical parameters and contaminants in the soil and its leachates were measured at the beginning and the end of the first growth season (after five months). In parallel, residual soil ecotoxicity was assessed using the plant species Lepidium sativum L. and the earthworm Eisenia fetida Savigny, 1826, while the leachate ecotoxicity was assessed using Lemna minor L. After 5months, PH C10-C40, PAH-L, PAH-M PAH-H, Pb and Cu concentrations in the MS-10%C soil were significantly reduced as compared to the Unp-10%C soil. Metal uptake by alfalfa was low but their translocation to shoots was high for Mn, Cr, Co and Zn (transfer factor (TF) >1), except for Cu and Pb. Alfalfa in monoculture reduced electrical conductivity, total organic C and Cu concentration in the leachate while pH and dissolved oxygen increased. Alfalfa co-planting with sunflower did not affect the extraction of inorganic contaminants from the soil, the PAH (M and H) degradation and was less efficient for PH C10-C40 and PAH-L as compared to alfalfa monoculture. The co-planting reduced shoot and root Pb concentrations. The residual soil ecotoxicity after 5months showed a positive effect of co-planting on L. sativum shoot dry weight (DW) yield. However, high contaminant concentrations in soil and leachate still inhibited the L. sativum root DW yield, earthworm development, and L. minor growth rate.

Widespread environmental contamination in agricultural soils and human health risk at the vicinity of an oil refinery site

ABSTRACTIn this research, carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic human health risks due to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were investigated via three exposure pathways: accidental ingestion of soil, dermal contact of soils, and contaminated vegetable ingestion. To determine the contaminant concentrations in soil, samples were collected from areas adjacent to the Tehran oil refinery, located in Shahr-e-Ray city, Iran. Analyses of the samples indicated that the average of PAHs concentration in the soil samples were greater than clean-up level guidelines. Cancer risk of contaminants due to ingestion of cultivated vegetables that are sold in Tehran markets was significant in comparison with other exposure pathways. Moreover, the total cancer risk for 5th percentile, 95 upper confidence limit, and 95th percentile concentration of contaminants were 5.69E-04, 8.78E-02, and 2.13E-01, classifying the site as having a significant cancer risk potential. Furthermore, non-carcinogenic health risk analyses for the contaminants demonstrated hazard index of less than 1. Remediation of the soils is highly recommended to eliminate the potential cancer risks and prevent the contamination of the food chain for approximately 10 million Tehran residents.

In Situ Assessment of Phytotechnologies for Multicontaminated Soil Management

Due to human activities, large volumes of soils are contaminated with organic pollutants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and very often by metallic pollutants as well. Multipolluted soils are therefore a key concern for remediation. This work presents a long-term evaluation of the fate and environmental impact of the organic and metallic contaminants of an industrially polluted soil under natural and plant-assisted conditions. A field trial was followed for four years according to six treatments in four replicates: unplanted, planted with alfalfa with or without mycorrhizal inoculation, planted with Noccaea caerulescens, naturally colonized by indigenous plants, and thermally treated soil planted with alfalfa. Leaching water volumes and composition, PAH concentrations in soil and solutions, soil fauna and microbial diversity, soil and solution toxicity using standardized bioassays, plant biomass, mycorrhizal colonization, were monitored. Results showed that plant cover alone did not affect total contaminant concentrations in soil. However, it was most efficient in improving the contamination impact on the environment and in increasing the biological diversity. Leaching water quality remained an issue because of its high toxicity shown by micro-algae testing. In this matter, prior treatment of the soil by thermal desorption proved to be the only effective treatment.

Performance Monitoring of Remediation Technologies for Soil and Groundwater Contamination: Review

Performance monitoring of applied remediation technologies is an important part of site remediation. It involves periodic measurement of site parameters to evaluate whether the remediation technologies perform as expected or to determine the termination date of remediation projects. Performance monitoring can be a difficult undertaking if there are no well-defined and measurable remediation objectives, such as a reduction in mass discharge rate from a contaminant source. Besides, the selection of the site parameters to be monitored is highly dependent on the remediation objectives established and the remediation technologies applied. For instance, contaminant concentration in soil, soil vapor, and groundwater within a contaminant zone should be monitored if reduction of the mass or volume of a contaminant zone is the prime remediation objective, while contaminant concentration in groundwater just outside a contaminant zone should be the main monitoring parameter if the objective is to mitigate the contami...

A Multilayered Box Model for Calculating Preliminary Remediation Goals in Soil Screening

In the process of screening a soil against a certain contaminant, we define the health-risk-based preliminary remediation goal (PRG) as the contaminant concentration above which some remedial action may be required. Thus, PRG is the first standard (or guidance) for judging a site. An overestimated PRG (a too-large value) may cause us to miss some contaminated sites that can threaten human health and the environment. An underestimated PRG (a too-small value), on the other hand, may lead to unnecessary cleanup and waste tremendous resources. The PRGs for soils are often calculated on the assumption that the contaminant concentration in soil does not change with time. However, that concentration usually decreases with time as a result of different chemical and transport mechanisms. The static assumption thus exaggerates the long-term exposure dose and results in a too-small PRG. We present a box model that considers all important transport processes and obeys the law of mass conservation. We can use the model as a tool to estimate the transient contaminant concentrations in air, soil, and ground water. Using these concentrations in conjunction with appropriate health-risk parameters, we may estimate the PRGs for different contaminants. As an example, we calculated the tritium PRG for residential soils. The result is quite different from, but within the range of, the two versions of the corresponding PRG previously recommended by the U.S. EPA.

Risk Variability Due to Uniform Soil Remediation Goals

If a single contaminant concentration in soil were to be used as the remediation goal at all potential remediation sites in a region, risk would be expected to vary across sites due to differences in site characteristics that affect transport and fate. A methodology is developed to evaluate such variability. It is applied to Ross County, Ohio, a region for which compiled, detailed hydrogeologic information is available. Four carcinogenic contaminants (benzene, trichloroethylene, chlordane, and benzo[a]pyrene) and exposure scenarios (on-site commercial, on-site recreational, and on-site and off-site residential) are evaluated. Results vary, but in general, indicate that for contaminants that are highly degradable such as benzene or immobile in the subsurface such as benzo[a]pyrene, specifying a uniform soil remediation goal would result in relatively small degree of regional risk variability. However, for highly mobile and persistent contaminants like trichloroethylene, a uniform goal would result in a large degree of regional risk variability. Application of the methodology to a larger, less well-characterized region is analyzed.

SoilRisk: Risk Assessment Model for Organic Contaminants in Soil

This paper describes in detail a new integrated risk model, SoilRisk, for low-levels of organic pollutants in soil. An analytical model of the fate and transport of organics in unsaturated soil is used where chemical losses from the unsaturated zone occur due to first-order degradation, volatilization at the soil surface, and leaching to the saturated zone. The unsaturated zone module is linked to air dilution/dispersion, saturated zone transport, and dust generation modules to allow estimation of long-term average air, groundwater, respirable dust, and soil contaminant concentrations. With SoilRisk, the carcinogenic risk resulting from a specified contaminant concentration in soil or the contaminant concentration in soil to meet a specified level of risk can be estimated. These model outputs can be evaluated as single values or as cumulative distribution functions, depending on whether the input parameters are specified deterministically or probabilistically. In a subsequent paper, the model is applied to evaluate the risk implications of establishing uniform, concentration-based soil remediation goals.

Influence of Soil Half-Life on Risk Assessment of Carcinogens

Risk estimates for contaminants in soil are currently calculated assuming that concentrations remain unchanged over time. In reality, biological and physicochemical processes can substantially diminish contaminant concentrations in soil. For exposure periods typically evaluated in USEPA risk assessments, failure to consider the decline in contaminant levels from environmental transport and degradation can result in a significant overestimation of the average daily dose of toxicant. This overestimation may be up to 2- to 3-fold for compounds with long half-lives (15-20 years) in soil and as much as 40-fold for compounds with short half-lives (0.5 years). Overestimation of dosages affects estimation of cancer risks because of the assumption that the probability of cancer increases directly with the cumulative dose of carcinogen. Thus, assuming static contaminant concentrations in soil adds unacknowledged conservatism to cancer risk estimates and target concentration limits. Furthermore, as significant time may elapse before future-use scenarios could possibly occur, soil half-life can affect the estimation of noncarcinogenic health hazards as well. Therefore, an increase in target concentration limits for some compounds could be allowed and corresponding remediation costs reduced by considering how soil half-life changes the dosage calculation. Specific examples of the influence of soil degradation rates on estimates of cancer risk are presented and the degree of added conservatism imparted to risk assessments through assumption of static site contaminant levels is discussed. Considering the potential importance of this parameter for risk assessment and risk management decisions, soil degradation of contaminants under site-specific conditions should be performed whenever possible and incorporated into the risk assessment exercise. When the soil degradation rate cannot be measured or reliably predicted, an estimate of the degree of conservatism should be made to provide risk managers with an appreciation of the degree of uncertainty in the calculation of risk.

A model with mass transport limitations for pump and treat remediation of soils polluted with NAPL

A model is presented for the description of the pump and treat (or flushing) remediation of the saturated zone with non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) present as droplets. Sensitivity analysis shows that the most important variables are the NAPL droplet size and the distance through which the dissolved organic compound must diffuse to reach the advecting aqueous phase. The time needed to achieve complete remediation for different initial contaminant concentrations in soil depends more on the NAPL droplet radius and the size of the stagnant boundary layer than on the initial contaminant mass itself. Location of wells and flux rates are of little significance over the time needed for completion as long as all the water that flows through the contaminated region is captured in the recovery well.

Determining target cleanup levels: A risk assessment‐based decision process for contaminated sites

Abstract This paper presents methodologies for estimating target cleanup levels at Superfund sites. The methodologies follow those in the EPA Super‐fund risk assessment guideline but are performed in reverse order. This is done to determine cleanup levels that correspond to reference doses for noncarcinogens or to a reference risk level for carcinogens as recommended by the U.S. EPA. The target cleanup levels thus derived should be considered adequate to protect public health when multiple pathways of exposure to contaminants in air, soil, food, and water are possible. The transient nature of contaminant concentrations in soil, subject to change over time due to volatilization, leaching, and other phenomena, is also addressed. An example is given which indicates that when the exposure is attributable predominantly to a single pathway, the calculation needed for estimating the target cleanup levels can be considerably simplified.