Only Muslim: Embodying in Twentieth-Century by Naomi Davidson. Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 2012. xi, 299 pp. $25.95 US (paper). For more than two decades, French public discourse has cast a challenge to French secularism. Journalists and politicians have taken headscarves and halal meat, prayers in public streets and requests for women's-only swimming pool hours, evidence that recent immigrants to France, especially from North Africa, pose a new and visible threat to norms and laws that govern a religiously neutral public sphere. In these accounts, are seen to repeatedly physically transgress republic's cherished laicite. These corporeal transgressions are imagined to represent Muslims' inability to properly privatize their faith. Naomi Davidson's important book offers crucial historical insight into why body is focus of public debate about Islam. In doing so, it offers compelling correctives to standard narratives about problem in modern France. First, book suggests that these state concerns are not just a recent phenomenon. It shows that managing has a much longer colonial well postcolonial history. Secondly, by focusing on Muslims and Davidson questions the usefulness of laicite a category for understanding history of in France (p. 12). Standard accounts of laicite, in her view, fail to account for why bodies and embodied practices gamer so much state attention. In order to understand pervasive corporealization of Islam, she argues, one needs to attend to questions not just of religion, but also of race. Indeed, writes Davidson, Muslim must be understood as a category of racial rather than one of religious difference (p. 11). Muslim in state discourses and practices of what she terms Islam francais is simultaneously homogenizing and particularizing. It presumes that possess a unified culture that expresses itself in distinct material forms such architecture and food. In its materialized particularity, Muslimness of North African migrants resists assimilation into universal and presumptively disembodied abstraction of French citizenship. The racialization of religion that Davidson describes recalls fate of Jews and Judaism in post-revolutionary and colonial North Africa. Throughout book, Davidson productively draws out such parallels and divergences in order to clarify specific ways in which North Africans have been racialized. How did Islam francais produce Muslimness an embodied condition? In order to illustrate how state officials were concerned with bodies they were with souls, Davidson adopts a highly original phenomenological approach to state and colonial archive. Studying architectural plans of Mosques alongside official correspondence, Davidson reconstructs how officials conceived a built environment. She details how Islam francais assigned embodied practices (praying, eating; healing) to specific places and spaces. In process, she shows how state produced ideas about North African colonial migrants' prayer habits and hygiene, culinary and vestimentary practices. Since First World War, institutions that were created to at once serve and surveil Muslim migrants in metropole conceived their faith in material terms--as matters of architectural and aesthetic detail, bodily conditions, and embodied traditions. Rather than approaching Islam francais a coherent set of discourses and practices, Davidson's book explores constitutive contradictions that marked it from start. The first chapter lays out these founding contradictions by exploring how orientalist discourse, colonial Algerian law, and eventually anticolonial nationalism shaped conceptions of Islam: its connection to body and its presumptive confusion between public and private. …
Read full abstract