IN A recent communication under the above title 1 Prof. A. S. Eve has given an account of a problem which arose in the production of directional hydrophones during the war. As the writer had the privilege of serving as a member of Professor Eve’s staff engaged on the problem, the following remarks may not be inappropriate: Attention is drawn to a paper by Wood and Young 2 dealing with this problem, in which the disturbances produced by small bodies in plane waves in water are discussed and a satisfactory approximate theory of the single plate direction finder is formulated. Briefly, the directional hydrophone depends for its action on phase difference. In the symmetrical ‘I edge-on ” position of the unbaffled instrument, the sound waves reach the opposite faces of the hydrophone in the same phase and the diaphragm is therefore not excited. If, however, the hydrophone is “ broadside-on,” the waves at the opposite faces are not in phase, a lag occurring at the back face due to the longer path travelled by the waves reaching it, and the diaphragm is excited. The function of the baffle is to introduce a constant phase lag near the adjacent face of the diaphragm equal to the lag normally occurring at the back face in the “ broadside-on ” position of the unbaffled instrument. Thus when the baffled side is facing the source of sound the lags at the two faces are equal, the pulses are once more in phase, and the diaphragm is not excited. In the opposite position the two lags add, and a reinforced maximum is produced. This elementary theory is admittedly an approximate attempt to account for a complex phenomenon, and though no simple theory covers all of the facts, some further light may be thrown on the problem from practical experience. 1 JOUR. FRANK. ISST., 202, 627, 1926. ’ PI-oc. Roy. Sot., A IOO, 1921.
Read full abstract