Renewed interest in neural vector fields as the generators of visual organization is indicated by recent publications, such as Dodwell and Caelli's Figural Synthesis. Perceptual and physiological approaches are beginning to converge. Studies of induced movement and pattern integration revive problems first raised by gestalt psychologists, and a new theory of the constancy mechanisms implies a parallel to the author's own work involving visual composition in the arts. Recently, several extensive publications have reported ongoing research in shape perception with a renewed appreciation of structural organization in the total visual pattern. It is an approach appealing to the interest of those of us who are involved in the visual arts. I therefore propose to describe briefly the present state of affairs in this field in occasion of the publication of a valuable new collection of papers edited by Peter C. Dodwell and Terry Caelli entitled Figural Synthesis [1]. Concerned with psychophysical research, the book is too specialized for the needs of many Leonardo readers. It teems with mathematical formulae and experimental technicalities. Therefore, instead of reviewing the book on its own terms, I will use it to sketch an up-to-date image of some of the major problems now facing the scientific discipline in this area and the directions in which solutions are sought. The principal dilemma pervading the field is the discrepancy between what is observed in consciousness when humans or animals look at visual patterns and what can be ascertained through a study of the anatomy and physiology of the nervous system. On the one side, there is the world of visual experience organized by more or less integrated patterns according to principles that derive from the structure of the whole. Using these psychological facts as their point of departure, investigators explore the brain in search of physiological equivalents by which to explain what is being observed in perception. This approach was initiated by the gestalt psychologists and their followers. They had to struggle with neurological situations in which sums of elements rather than organized wholes seemed to be in charge. Millions of Rudolf Arnheim (psychologist), 1133 South Seventh Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48103, U.S.A. Received 3 March 1986. ? 1987 ISAST Pergamon Journals Ltd. Printed in Great Britain. 0024-094X/87 $3.00+0.00 receptor organs in the eye were found to connect with complex networks of fibers, which in turn ended up at the innumerable nerve cells of the cerebral cortex. To derive from these agglomerations of elements the kind of field process that alone seemed to do justice to what happens in perception offered technical difficulties. On the other side, the intricate anatomy of the brain was the base for the opposite approach to the problem. Here, too, the need to account for wholedetermined functioning began to be felt keenly. Some 25 years ago, evidence began to accumulate that, in the brains of higher animals, dealing with visual stimuli did not work simply as a summation of the point-sized recordings of isolated receptor cells. Rather, groups of such cells were shown to be programmed to respond together to simple shapes, directions and movements of visible objects. These inbuilt mechanisms,
Read full abstract