Several studies have shown that new borne infants can respond to paternal verbalization and this stimulation can serve as a reinforcer to increase behavior. To date no studies exist demonstrating operant behavior prenatally. This study looks at the possible reinforcing effects of parental stimulation and gentle pushing on a 35 week old in-utero fetus. Using an ABAB reversal design, the experimenters observed the rate of kicking behavior over a four successive three minute periods. The results indicate that verbal statements combined with gentle touch can serve as a reinforcer for in utero fetus to kick. Key words: Prenatal, operant conditioning, kicking response, continuous reinforcement ********** While some studies exist of operant conditioning in neonates, no studies could be found of operant conditioning of prenatal fetuses. Neonate studies do imply a role for prenatal learning (Krueger, Holditch-Davis, Quint & DeCasper, 2004). Using the orienting response, DeCasper offers evidence neonates can differentiate their mother's voices from other female voices and that maternal voice is a more effective reinforcer when compared to other female voices (DeCasper & Fifer, 1980; DeCasper & Spence, 1986; Spence & DeCasper, 1987). Infant's discrimination between passages with content read by mother in uterus were analyzed post natal. In addition, neonates prefer the familiar passage over the novel passage. This occurs regardless of whether the passage is recited by the infant's mother or an unfamiliar woman (DeCasper & Spence, 1986). Finally, while father's voice has not been shown to function as a reinforcer, neonates can differentiate their father's voice from other male voices (DeCasper & Prescott, 1984). Each of the previous examples of preference could be achieved through simple prenatal respondent conditioning. In new born infants extensive work has been conducted using operant conditioning procedures (Perez, & Gewirtz, 1999, May). One example, remembering in infants was studied using operant methods such as mobile conjugate reinforcement (Merriman, Rovee-Collier & Wilk, 1997). Another example and one that has some relevance to this study, the kicking behavior has shown to have operant characteristics (Galloway & Thelen, 2004). Researchers have developed improved methods of exploring the kicking response in neonates (Kraebel, Fable & Gerhardstein, 2004). The current study came about after several sessions of playing by parents informally, using similar procedures to the procedure reported in the method section of this study. This study would add to the literature by extending the operant conditioning process to prenatal infants. METHODS Participants Parents are Caucasian male and female both in late 30's. Both parents have advanced degrees in behavior analysis. The fetus is female and in her 35th week of development. The fetus is typically developing and at the time of the study was oriented into the upside down position for birthing. The infant has regular periods of activity in which it kicks/stretches. Design After several informal sessions of contingent touching of the fetus's foot and stating baby, boom-boom parents decided to formally try to explore the relationship between contingent touch, plus vocal sound, and kicking behavior. Mother sat in a reclining position. Father placed his hand lightly above the skin to be able to feel the kicking. Previous sessions had shown that touching more then lightly prevented mother from being able to identify infant kicking. Father's mouth was one inch from skin in the proximate position where the head would be. The sessions were continuous. Each session lasted for three minutes. In phase one, the fetus's kicking was observed and counted. Only kicks that stretched the skin and could be seen and felt by parents were counted. In phase two, fetus was on a continuous reinforcement schedule. …