Mitral annuloplasty ring dehiscence may occur in 1% to 10% of all mitral surgeries, but can have severe and potentially fatal consequences when it does. In this issue of The Annals, Pierce and colleagues [1Pierce E.L. Siefert A.W. Paul D.M. et al.How local annular force and collagen density govern mitral annuloplasty ring dehiscence risk.Ann Thorac Surg. 2016; 102: 518-526Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (25) Google Scholar] examine the mechanisms underlying mitral annuloplasty ring dehiscence. In this manuscript, “How Local Annular Force and Collagen Density Govern Mitral Annuloplasty Ring Dehiscence Risk,” Pierce and colleagues examine causative factors governing mitral annular ring suture dehiscence in a sheep model. Possible mechanisms contributing to dehiscence such as cyclic force, loading, annular flexion, and left ventricular pressures, among others, were quantified and correlated with relative collagen density differences at multiple points around the mitral ovine annulus. From this data, a propensity for mitral annular suture pull out and force margins of safety was developed. The results showed that the anterior annular holding strength exceeded posterior annular holding strength and that the overall pullout force required exhibited a strong correlation to local collagen density. Surprisingly, trigonal sutures were less secure (less resistant to pullout) than would have been predicted or thought by the authors, due to a combination of reduced collagen in the trigonal area and higher overall annular rigidity. This goes against popular belief that the trigones are the most secure area. This finding reinforces their finding that the inter-trigonal anterior annular tissue may be a superior anchor for a mitral annular ring. This fact may help guide clinicians in selection of type of ring (complete versus partial) and for future rings and mitral prostheses. Furthermore, this manuscript is also important as it brings up more questions to be considered. For example, ring dehiscence appears to be more common in the tricuspid annular position than mitral. What are the corresponding pullout forces in the tricuspid position? Are there significant differences between the ovine and the human annulus? What happens to pullout force when the annulus is overdistended and dilated, as is often seen in human congestive heart failure. All of these questions should be examined carefully as our field moves forward to possible percutaneous therapy for mitral and tricuspid disease. Data such as in the present manuscript will help with the technology of percutaneous implantations of mitral and tricuspid rings when annular ring implantation technique no longer includes direct visualization. The scientific quantitation of long-held popular beliefs in cardiac surgery is well warranted. The questioning and validation or abandonment of our standard practice should be a continual quality process. It is in this manner that we will best serve our future mitral patients. How Local Annular Force and Collagen Density Govern Mitral Annuloplasty Ring Dehiscence RiskThe Annals of Thoracic SurgeryVol. 102Issue 2PreviewAnnuloplasty ring dehiscence is a well described mode of mitral valve repair failure. Defining the mechanisms underlying dehiscence may facilitate its prevention. Full-Text PDF