In this paper, we reconsider the issue of the relative magnitude of the optimal capacity of a congestible facility, under optimal congestion tolling, as compared to the second-best capacity with less than optimal tolling, when such tolling is the result of distributional objectives. We show that the previous literature does not address this issue, because it is always based on formulations of the problem that, at least implicitly, assume that the high cost of tolling is the reason for less than optimal tolls. We present a formulation of the problem adequate to distributional objectives. In this formulation, second-best tolls and capacities are chosen together, and characteristic outcomes show that the extant analyses do not apply to cases with distributional objectives.