Confusion Assessment Method For The Intensive Care Unit Research Articles

Comparing the Validity of CAM-ICU and CAM-ICU-7 for Delirium Assessment based on Simulation

Purpose : This study aimed to compare the validity and user evaluations of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) and its 7-item version (CAM-ICU-7) for delirium assessment. Methods : Thirty-six intensive care unit (ICU) nurses from four university hospitals participated in this simulation-based methodological study. Four standardized patients with normal cognition, subsyndromal delirium, hypoactive delirium, and hyperactive delirium were recruited. The participants assessed all four standardized patients using the CAM-ICU and CAM-ICU-7. We analyzed the validity, assessment time, and user evaluations of both tools. DeLong’s test and the paired t-test were used for comparisons. Results : The CAM-ICU showed sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 80.6%, 94.4%, and 84.0%, respectively, with an Area Under Curve (AUC) of 87.5%. CAM-ICU-7 demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 90.7%, 97.2%, and 92.4%, respectively, with an AUC of 94.0%. The CAM-ICU-7 showed a better AUC than the CAM-ICU for detecting subsyndromal delirium (<i>p</i> =.029). However, the CAM-ICU-7 required more time for assessment across all patient types (<i>p</i>＜ .001). ICU nurses reported that the CAM-ICU was faster to administer, whereas the CAM-ICU-7 was easier to use, better at detecting delirium, more effective at reflecting changes in delirium, and had a higher intention to use in clinical practice. Conclusion : The CAM-ICU-7 demonstrated superior validity compared to the CAM-ICU. Despite requiring more time, ICU nurses evaluated the CAM-ICU-7 as more useful. These findings support using the CAM-ICU-7 for delirium assessment in ICU settings.

Delirium and Weakness Acquired in the Intensive Care Unit: Individual and Combined Effects on 90-Day Mortality in Survivors of Critical Illness.

To compare the individual and combined effects on 90-day mortality among four critically ill survivor groups: normal (without ICU-acquired delirium or ICU-acquired weakness), delirium-only (with ICU-acquired delirium only), weakness-only (with ICU-acquired weakness only) and delirium-weakness (combined ICU-acquired delirium and weakness). A prospective cohort study consecutively recruited delirium-free critically ill patients admitted to six medical ICUs at a university hospital. Delirium was assessed once daily for 14 days (or until death or ICU discharge) using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU. Participants who were discharged from the ICUs were assessed for weakness using the Medical Research Council scale. A summed score below 48 defines ICU-acquired weakness. These survivors were evaluated again for 90-day mortality. The study is reported using the STROBE checklist. Delirium developed in 107 (43.2%) participants during their first 14 days of ICU stay; 55 (22.2%) met criteria for weakness by ICU discharge. Participants with delirium were at increased risk for also developing ICU-acquired weakness, and the 90-day mortality was 18.2%. Independent of age and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score at ICU admission, delirium-only and weakness-only were not associated with higher 90-day mortality, while participants in the delirium-weakness group had a 3.69-fold higher risk of death, compared to those who were normal during the ICU stay. A non-significant interaction was found, suggesting the joint effect of delirium and weakness on mortality is not higher than the sum of both effects individually. Mortality is substantially high among critically ill survivors who experience both delirium and weakness, although no additive effect on mortality was observed when these conditions occur together. Our findings highlight the urgent need to optimise ICU care by prioritising the prevention, early identification and management of these two common ICU-acquired conditions. Study participation and completion of all assessments. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04206306.

Perioperative Risk Factors for Postoperative Delirium in Non-Dementia Older Patients after Non-Cardiac Surgery and Anesthesia: A Prospective Study.

To investigate the incidence and perioperative risk factors for postoperative delirium (POD) in non-dementia older patients who underwent anesthesia for non-cardiac surgery. This prospective cohort study was conducted on 195 non-dementia older patients, aged 60 years or older, who were hospitalized after non-cardiac surgery and anesthesia. The Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) was used to evaluate the occurrence of POD. Incidence of POD was reported. We conducted univariate and multivariate logistic regression to identify the risk factors associated with POD. 195 patients were enrolled; 172 completed the study. POD occurred in seven patients within three days after anesthesia, which is a 4.1% incidence of POD. Multivariate logistic analysis showed arrhythmia, coagulopathy, urinary comorbidity, minimum intraoperative heart rate, and minimum post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) pain score as independent risk factors for POD. A minimum PACU pain score > 1 is the optimum cutoff pain score for developing POD, with a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 69.1%. The postoperative complication rate and in-hospital mortality were significantly higher for patients with POD compared to those without POD. The incidence of POD in the study population is 4.1%. Arrhythmia, coagulopathy, urinary comorbidity, minimum intraoperative heart rate, and minimum PACU pain score were independent risk factors for POD. The minimum PACU pain score is the strongest independent risk factor of POD. POD is associated with increased postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality rates in non-dementia older patients.

Usefulness of the 4A's test for detecting delirium in critically ill patients: a multicenter prospective observation study.

The Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) is a robust and reliable instrument for discerning delirium within the specific context of the intensive care unit (ICU). Nonetheless, the CAM-ICU is burdened by various limitations, including a protracted learning curve and the need for frequent daily administration. The 4 A's Test (4AT) was formulated to assess delirium in hospitalized patients and may have distinct advantages over the CAM-ICU, particularly regarding practical applicability within the ICU bundle. This study was performed to assess the utility of the 4AT in detecting delirium in critically ill patients. This multicenter prospective observational study involved critically ill patients at four academic tertiary care hospitals in South Korea from June 2021 to September 2022. In total, 274 patients (median age, 64years; 56.9% men) were included, and 75 (27.4%) developed delirium. The 4AT showed good performance in detecting ICU delirium (area under the curve, 0.879; P < 0.001). The 4AT showed a sensitivity of 74.0%, specificity of 95.4%, positive predictive value of 77.5%, negative predictive value of 94.6%, and accuracy of 91.7% for ICU detection of delirium. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the CAM-ICU for detecting ICU delirium were 71.3%, 97.1%, 83.8%, 94.1%, and 92.6%, respectively. The 4AT showed acceptable reliability and validity for detecting ICU delirium in critically ill patients. Because the 4AT is simpler and easier to learn, this scale could be a useful alternative to the CAM-ICU for detecting delirium in critically ill patients.

Delirium detection in the emergency department: A diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis of history, physical examination, laboratory tests, and screening instruments.

Geriatric emergency department (ED) guidelines emphasize timely identification of delirium. This article updates previous diagnostic accuracy systematic reviews of history, physical examination, laboratory testing, and ED screening instruments for the diagnosis of delirium as well as test-treatment thresholds for ED delirium screening. We conducted a systematic review to quantify the diagnostic accuracy of approaches to identify delirium. Studies were included if they described adults aged 60 or older evaluated in the ED setting with an index test for delirium compared with an acceptable criterion standard for delirium. Data were extracted and studies were reviewed for risk of bias. When appropriate, we conducted a meta-analysis and estimated delirium screening thresholds. Full-text review was performed on 55 studies and 27 were included in the current analysis. No studies were identified exploring the accuracy of findings on history or laboratory analysis. While two studies reported clinicians accurately rule in delirium, clinician gestalt is inadequate to rule out delirium. We report meta-analysis on three studies that quantified the accuracy of the 4 A's Test (4AT) to rule in (pooled positive likelihood ratio [LR+] 7.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.7-20.7) and rule out (pooled negative likelihood ratio [LR-] 0.18, 95% CI 0.09-0.34) delirium. We also conducted meta-analysis of two studies that quantified the accuracy of the Abbreviated Mental Test-4 (AMT-4) and found that the pooled LR+ (4.3, 95% CI 2.4-7.8) was lower than that observed for the 4AT, but the pooled LR- (0.22, 95% CI 0.05-1) was similar. Based on one study the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) is the superior instrument to rule in delirium. The calculated test threshold is 2% and the treatment threshold is 11%. The quantitative accuracy of history and physical examination to identify ED delirium is virtually unexplored. The 4AT has the largest quantity of ED-based research. Other screening instruments may more accurately rule in or rule out delirium. If the goal is to rule in delirium then the CAM-ICU or brief CAM or modified CAM for the ED are superior instruments, although the accuracy of these screening tools are based on single-center studies. To rule out delirium, the Delirium Triage Screen is superior based on one single-center study.

Translation, cultural debugging, and validation of the Chinese version of the Sour Seven Questionnaire: a cross-sectional study.

Intensive care unit delirium (ICUD) is an acute cerebral dysfunction accompanied by a change of level of consciousness, disorientation, and cognitive dysfunction, typically occurring over a short duration ranging from hours to days and resulting from underlying medical causes. Family members may sometimes detect changes in consciousness earlier than medical staff. The Sour Seven Questionnaire is a tool to assist family members in screening for delirium, but there is currently no Chinese version. This study aimed to translate and cross-culturally debug the Sour Seven Questionnaire and test the effectiveness of the Chinese version in screening for ICUD by family members. To create the Chinese version of the questionnaire, the questionnaire was first translated and then culturally debugged through expert consultation and cognitive interviews. Patients and their family members admitted to three ICUs in a Chinese hospital were selected to test the Chinese version of the Sour Seven Questionnaire and the results were compared with those of the validated and recommended Confusion Assessment Method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) assessment. A total of 190 ICU patients and their families were included in this study. Results of the CAM-ICU assessment showed that 73 (38.4%) patients developed ICUD compared to the 66 (34.7%) using the Chinese version of the Sour Seven Questionnaire, which had a Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.853, a sensitivity of 0.863, and a specificity of 0.974. The positive predictive value was 0.954 and the negative predictive value was 0.919. The Chinese version of the Sour Seven Questionnaire is a valid assessment tool for helping families screen for ICUD, and it is effective in identifying altered consciousness in patients even during online visits.

Delirium Mediated the Association Between a History of Falls and Short-Term Mortality Risk in Critically Ill Ischemic Stroke Patients.

Patients with ischemic stroke have an increased propensity to fall, resulting in significant physical and psychological distress. This study examined the association between falls in the 3 months prior to intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality within 28 days among 2950 adult ICU patients diagnosed with ischemic stroke from 2008 to 2019, focusing on the potential mediating role of delirium. The primary outcomes were short-term mortality (28, 60, and 90 days) and the risk of delirium. Each patient was followed for at least 1 year. Delirium was primarily assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU and by reviewing nursing notes. Group differences between patients with and without a history of falls were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test or the chi-squared test. Cox proportional risk or logistic regression models were used to explore the association between fall history and outcomes, and causal mediation analysis was performed. Results showed that patients with a recent fall history had a significantly increased risk of 28-day (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.35-1.94), 60-day (HR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.42-1.98), and 90-day mortality (HR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.41-1.95), as well as an increased risk of delirium (odds ratio: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.66-2.42). Delirium significantly mediated the association between fall history and 28-day mortality (total effect: HR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.45-2.16; natural indirect effect: HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05-1.21; proportion mediated: 24.6%). These findings suggest that ischemic stroke patients with a recent fall have an increased risk of short-term mortality, partly mediated by delirium. Strategies aimed at preventing delirium may potentially improve prognosis in this patient population.

Association between preoperative sarcopenia and postoperative delirium in older patients undergoing gastrointestinal cancer surgery.

Postoperative delirium (POD) is a usual neurological complication, often leading to poor prognoses. Early identification of high-risk patients is crucial for preventing POD. Sarcopenia is an age-related geriatric syndrome characterized by the loss of skeletal muscle mass and function, and previous studies indicated that preoperative low muscle mass might be a predictor for POD. However, the association between preoperative sarcopenia and POD remains to be fully elucidated. This study was to explore the correlation between preoperative sarcopenia and POD following gastrointestinal cancer surgery in older patients. Older patients (≥60 years) undergoing gastrointestinal cancer surgery were enrolled. Sarcopenia was defined based on the Special Interest Group on sarcopenia of the International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (ISarcoPRM), which combined the loss of muscle mass (evaluated by ultrasound) and function (assessed by chair stand test and handgrip strength) before surgery. POD assessment was performed using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) or CAM for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) during the first 7 days after surgery or before discharge. Multivariate logistic regression analysis examined the correlation between preoperative sarcopenia and POD. Moreover, the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was applied to analyze the predictive effect of the preoperative sarcopenia in POD. One hundred and thirty patients were finally included, of which 43 patients presented with sarcopenia before surgery. Twenty-four patients ultimately developed POD, and the incidence was 18.5%. The results of the multivariate analyses demonstrated that preoperative sarcopenia was still independently associated with POD after adjusting for age ≥70 years, preoperative Mini-Mental State Examination score, and intraoperative blood transfusion. The area under the ROC curve of preoperative sarcopenia in predicting POD was 0.680 (95% confidence interval 0.557-0.804). Preoperative sarcopenia defined by ISarcoPRM criteria was independently associated with POD in geriatric patients after gastrointestinal cancer surgery.

High-risk factors for delirium in severely ill patients and the application of emotional nursing combined with pain nursing.

Delirium is a neuropsychiatric syndrome characterized by acute disturbances of consciousness with rapid onset, rapid progression, obvious fluctuations, and preventable, reversible, and other characteristics. Patients with delirium in the intensive care unit (ICU) are often missed or misdiagnosed and do not receive adequate attention. To analyze the risk factors for delirium in ICU patients and explore the application of emotional nursing with pain nursing in the management of delirium. General data of 301 critically ill patients were retrospectively collected, including histories (cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, hypertension, smoking, alcoholism, and diabetes), age, sex, diagnosis, whether surgery was performed, and patient origin (emergency/clinic). Additionally, the duration of sedation, Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale score, combined emotional and pain care, ventilator use duration, vasoactive drug use, drainage tube retention, ICU stay duration, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, white blood cell count, body temperature, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score were recorded within 24 h after ICU admission. Patients were assessed for delirium according to confusion assessment method for the ICU, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for delirium in the patients. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed on the 24 potential risk factors associated with delirium in ICU patients. The results showed that 16 risk factors were closely related to delirium, including combined emotional and pain care, history of diabetes, and patient origin. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that no combined emotional and pain care, history of diabetes, emergency source, surgery, long stay in the ICU, smoking history, and high APACHE II score were independent risk factors for delirium in ICU patients. Patients with diabetes and/or smoking history, postoperative patients, patients with a high APACHE II score, and those with emergency ICU admission need emotional and pain care, flexible visiting modes, and early intervention to reduce delirium incidence.

Association of Hyperoxia During Cardiopulmonary Bypass and Postoperative Delirium in the Pediatric Cardiac ICU.

ICU delirium commonly complicates critical illness associated with factors such as cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time and the requirement of mechanical ventilation (MV). Recent reports associate hyperoxia with poorer outcomes in critically ill children. This study sought to determine whether hyperoxia on CPB in pediatric patients was associated with a higher prevalence of postoperative delirium. Secondary analysis of data obtained from a prospective cohort study. Twenty-two-bed pediatric cardiac ICU in a tertiary children's hospital. All patients (18 yr old or older) admitted post-CPB, with documented delirium assessment scores using the Preschool/Pediatric Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU and who were enrolled in the Precision Medicine in Pediatric Cardiology Cohort from February 2021 to November 2021. None. Of 148 patients, who underwent cardiac surgery, 35 had delirium within the first 72 hours (24%). There was no association between hyperoxia on CPB and postoperative delirium for all definitions of hyperoxia, including hyperoxic area under the curve above 5 predetermined Pao2 levels: 150 mm Hg (odds ratio [95% CI]: 1.176 [0.605-2.286], p = 0.633); 175 mm Hg (OR 1.177 [95% CI, 0.668-2.075], p = 0.572); 200 mm Hg (OR 1.235 [95% CI, 0.752-2.026], p = 0.405); 250 mm Hg (OR 1.204 [95% CI, 0.859-1.688], p = 0.281), 300 mm Hg (OR 1.178 [95% CI, 0.918-1.511], p = 0.199). In an additional exploratory analysis, comparing patients with delirium within 72 hours versus those without, only the z score for weight differed (mean [sd]: 0.09 [1.41] vs. -0.48 [1.82], p < 0.05). When comparing patients who developed delirium at any point during their ICU stay (n = 45, 30%), MV days, severity of illness (Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 Score) score, CPB time, and z score for weight were associated with delirium (p < 0.05). Postoperative delirium (72 hr from CPB) occurred in 24% of pediatric patients. Hyperoxia, defined in multiple ways, was not associated with delirium. On exploratory analysis, nutritional status (z score for weight) may be a significant factor in delirium risk. Further delineation of risk factors for postoperative delirium versus ICU delirium warrants additional study.

Incidences, Characteristics, Management and Outcomes of Different Subtypes of Postoperative Delirium in Elderly Patients Admitted to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit: A Secondary Analysis of a Prospective Cohort Study

Objective: Postoperative delirium (POD) has three subtypes: hyperactive, hypoactive, and mixed, with each having distinct features and implications. This study aimed to determine the incidence, management, and clinical outcomes of each POD subtype in elderly patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) after surgery. Materials and Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of POD in the SICU. Patients aged ≥65 years admitted to the SICU and expected to stay in the SICU for &gt;24 h were recruited. POD was screened using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU). Patients with positive CAM-ICU were defined as having POD and included in the analysis. The POD subtypes were categorized, pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments were identified, and clinical outcomes were reported. Results: Of the 300 included patients, 117 developed POD, with 20 (17.1%) having hypoactive, 45 (38.5%) hyperactive, and 52 (44.4%) mixed. Medications were prescribed in 1 (5.0%), 34 (75.6%), and 35 (67.3 %) in patients with hypoactive, hyperactive, and mixed POD, respectively (P &lt;0.001). Patients with hypoactive POD had the longest duration of delirium, longest length of stay in both the SICU and hospital, and highest hospital mortality. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that hypoactive POD was significantly associated with increased hospital mortality (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.15–13.11). Conclusion: Different POD subtypes resulted in different outcomes. Although hypoactive POD had the lowest incidence, it carried the highest mortality risk.

Tocilizumab is associated with reduced delirium and coma in critically ill patients with COVID-19

Recent preclinical studies demonstrate a direct pathological role for the interleukin-6 (IL-6) pathway in mediating structural and functional delirium-like phenotypes in animal models of acute lung injury. Tocilizumab, an IL-6 pathway inhibitor, has shown reduced duration of ventilator dependency and mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19. In this study, we test the hypothesis that tocilizumab is associated with reduced delirium/coma prevalence in critically ill patients with COVID-19. 253 patients were included in the study cohort, 69 in the tocilizumab group and 184 in the historical control group who did not receive tocilizumab. Delirium was assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) with a positive score indicating delirium. Coma was defined as a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score of − 4 or − 5. Tocilizumab was associated with significantly greater number of days alive without delirium/coma (tocilizumab [7 days (IQR: 3–9 days)] vs control [3 days (IQR: 1–8 days)]; p < 0.001). These results remained significant after adjusting for age, sex, sepsis, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, and median daily dose of analgesics/sedatives (β^\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\hat{\\upbeta }$$\\end{document} = 0.671, p = 0.010). There were no significant differences in mortality (β^\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\hat{\\upbeta }$$\\end{document} = − 0.204, p = 0.561), ventilator duration (β^\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\hat{\\upbeta }$$\\end{document} = 0.016, p = 0.956), and ICU or hospital length of stay (β^\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\hat{\\upbeta }$$\\end{document} = − 0.134, p = 0.603; β^\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\hat{\\upbeta }$$\\end{document} = 0.003, p = 0.991, respectively). Tocilizumab use was associated with significantly increased number of days without delirium/coma. Confirmation of these findings in randomized prospective studies may inform a novel paradigm of pharmacological amelioration of delirium/coma during critical illness.

Delirium management and current practice among Intensive Care Units Doctors, Khartoum

Delirium is a brain dysfunction characterized by attention and cognitive disturbances in a fluctuating manner. The international guidelines recommend daily screening for delirium. The Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) and Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) are the most commonly used methods for assessing delirium. This study aimed to identify barriers and gaps in knowledge and practice. This was a hospital-based Cross-Sectional study. Stratified random sampling was used in this study. 72 ICU doctors were randomly selected. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS version 23. Descriptive data were presented, and the chi-squared test was used to determine the associations among variables. Statistical significance was set at p &lt; 0.05. More than 70% of the doctors were ≤ 30 years of age and female. A total of 69.4% of the participants had &lt; 1year of experience. In total, 94.4% of the participants worked in medical ICUs. Less than 20% of the doctors used delirium assessment tools, with a statistically significant difference based on experience (p=0.012). Delirium was not regularly assessed in 13.9% of the patients. Non-pharmacological management was applied by 76.4% of doctors, and communication with patients was the most frequent (75%). Haloperidol was the most commonly used drug (83.3%). A total of 40.3% of doctors did not stop delirium medication on ICU discharge. A regular delirium assessment was performed. However, the use of validated assessment tools is uncommon. Nonpharmacological management of delirium is important and is mostly performed. Our doctors prescribed antipsychotics for the treatment of both forms of delirium, and almost half of them did not stop the medications on ICU discharge. Medication reconciliation and contact with the next in-charge of the patients are important.

Serum NPTX2 as a Potential Predictive Biomarker for Postoperative Delirium in Patients with Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.

Postoperative delirium (POD) significantly impacts patient outcomes after acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) surgeries. This study investigates the role of Neuronal Pentraxin 2 (NPTX2) as a potential biomarker for POD in ATAAD patients. This secondary analysis involved ATAAD patients from a prospective observational study. Serum NPTX2 levels were measured preoperatively and immediately postoperatively using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Delirium was assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) or CAM for the ICU (CAM-ICU). Statistical analyses included the Pearson Correlation Coefficient and multivariate logistic regression to evaluate the association between NPTX2 levels and POD. Among the 62 patients included, 46.77% developed POD. Patients with POD had significantly lower preoperative and postoperative serum NPTX2 levels. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that postoperative NPTX2 had a strong predictive capability for POD (AUC = 0.895). The optimal cutoff for postoperative NPTX2 in predicting POD was less than 421.4 pg/mL. Preoperative NPTX2 also demonstrated predictive value, albeit weaker (AUC = 0.683). Serum NPTX2 levels, both preoperatively and postoperatively, are promising biomarkers for predicting POD in ATAAD patients. These findings suggest that NPTX2 could be instrumental in early POD detection and intervention strategies.

Comparison of Propofol-Based Total Intravenous Anesthesia versus Volatile Anesthesia with Sevoflurane for Postoperative Delirium in Adult Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Single-Blinded Study

ObjectiveDelirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) are major causes of morbidity after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Anesthetic agents such as propofol and sevoflurane potentially have a role in pathogenesis of cognitive dysfunction. There is scarce literature comparing these two agents in CABG with CPB despite the relatively high incidence of cognitive dysfunction in this patient population. The authors compared the incidence of delirium and early POCD (at one week) between propofol-based TIVA and volatile anesthesia with sevoflurane in adult patients undergoing elective CABG with CPB. DesignA prospective randomized single blinded study. SettingThis study was conducted at a single institution (Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, a Tertiary care Institute and a university level teaching hospital) ParticipantsSeventy two patients undergoing elective CABG under CPB participated in this study. InterventionsThis study was conducted on 72 adult patients (> 18 years) undergoing elective CABG under CPB who were randomised to receive propofol or sevoflurane. Anesthetic depth was monitored to maintain bispectral index between 40-60. Delirium was assessed using the Confusion-Assessment Method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU). Early POCD was diagnosed when there was a reduction of > 2 points in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score compared to baseline. Cerebral oximetry changes using near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), atheroma grades and intraoperative variables were compared between the two groups. Measurements & Main ResultsSeventy-two patients were randomised to receive propofol (36) or sevoflurane (36). The mean age was 59.4 years (SD 8.6 years). The baseline and intraoperative variables including atheroma grades, NIRS values, hemoglobin, glycemic control, oxygenation were comparable between the two groups. Fifteen (21.7%) patients developed delirium and 31 (44.9%) had early POCD. The incidence of delirium was higher with sevoflurane (12, 34.2%) compared to propofol (3, 8.8%), OR 1.72 (95% CI: 1.13-2.62), p 0.027*. POCD was higher with sevoflurane (20, 57.1%) compared to propofol (11,32.3%), OR 1.63 (95% CI: 1.01-2.62), p value 0.038*. In patients age > 65 years, delirium was higher with sevoflurane (7/11,63.6%) compared to propofol (1/7, 14.2%), p 0.03*. ConclusionsPropofol based TIVA was associated with a lower incidence of delirium and POCD compared to sevoflurane in this cohort of patients undergoing CABG under CPB. Large scale, multi-centre, randomized trials with longer follow-up duration are needed to substantiate the clinical relevance of this observation.

Effects of short-term preoperative intranasal dexmedetomidine plus conventional treatment on delirium following cardiac surgery in patients with sleep disorders

Study objectivesTo assess whether preoperative dexmedetomidine (DEX) nasal drips combined with conventional treatment could mitigate the occurrence of postoperative delirium (POD).DesignA prospective randomised controlled study.SettingThe cardiac surgery intensive care unit (CSICU) and patient hospitalisation ward at a university hospital.ParticipantsA total of 100 patients (aged ≥60 years) undergoing cardiac surgery at a university hospital between 7 January 2022, and 30 November 2022 met the eligibility criteria and were included in the study.InterventionsPatients with sleep disorders (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index ≥8) were divided into two groups: Group A (the placebo group, n=50), receiving a short-term preoperative placebo combined with conventional treatment and Group B (the DEX group, n=50), receiving short-term preoperative DEX combined with conventional treatment.Measurements and resultsThe Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) was used for POD assessment in the CSICU, while the CAM was employed to assess delirium in the patient ward. Group B demonstrated a reduced incidence of POD compared to Group A (12% vs. 30%, odds ratio: 0.318, 95% confidence interval: 0.112–0.905, p=0.027).ConclusionThe combined treatment involving DEX demonstrated a decreased incidence of POD in elderly individuals with sleep disorders undergoing cardiac surgery compared to the placebo combination treatment.Trial registrationURL: www.chictr.org.cn with registration number ChiCTR 2100043968, registered on 06/03/2021.

Effect of Esketamine on Postoperative Delirium in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Valve Replacement with Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of esketamine on the risk of postoperative delirium (POD) in adults undergoing on-pump cardiac valve surgery. In this randomized, triple-blind, controlled trial, 116 adult patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade Ⅱ or Ⅲ and a New York Heart Association (NYHA) grade Ⅱ or Ⅲ who underwent cardiac valve surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass were included. Esketamine (0.25 mg/kg) or normal saline was administered intravenously before anesthesia induction. The primary outcome was POD, defined as a positive delirium assessment according to the 3-minute confusion assessment method (CAM) or the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) on a twice-daily basis for 7 days after surgery. Delirium duration and the delirium subtype were also recorded. The cognitive status of patients was measured according to the Mini-Mental State Examination at baseline, discharge, 30 days postoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. A total of 112 patients (mean age, 52 years; 53.6% female) were enrolled; 56 were assigned to receive esketamine, and 56 were assigned to receive placebo. POD occurred in 13 (23.2%) patients in the esketamine group and in 25 (44.6%) patients in the placebo group (relative risk [RR], 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.91; P = .018). Thirteen patients (23.2%) in the esketamine group and 24 (42.9%) patients in the placebo group had multiple episodes of delirium (RR, 0.54, 95% CI, 0.28-0.92), and 13 (23.2%) vs 22 (39.3%) patients exhibited the hyperactive subtype. A single dose of esketamine (0.25 mg/kg) injected intravenously before anesthesia induction reduced the incidence of delirium in relatively young patients with ASA grade Ⅱ or Ⅲ who underwent on-pump cardiac surgery.

Effectiveness of Dexmedetomidine vs Propofol in Post-Open Heart Surgery Patients: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study at the PLA Army Central Hospital in Beijing, China

Introduction: Dexmedetomidine and propofol are sedation drugs commonly used in patients after open heart surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine and propofol in patients after open heart surgery in terms of sleep quality, delirium, and hemodynamics.&#x0D; Methods: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study was conducted on 120 patients after open heart surgery at the PLA Army Central Hospital in Beijing, China. Patients were randomized to receive dexmedetomidine (n = 60) or propofol (n = 60). Sleep quality was measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Scale (PSQI), delirium was measured using the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU), and hemodynamics were monitored continuously.&#x0D; Results: Patients receiving dexmedetomidine had lower PSQI scores (p &lt; 0.05) and a lower incidence of delirium (p &lt; 0.05) compared with patients receiving propofol. There were no significant differences in hemodynamic parameters between the two groups.&#x0D; Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine is more effective than propofol in improving sleep quality and reducing delirium in patients after open heart surgery.

Bringing Delirium to Light: Impact of CAM-ICU Tool to Improve Care Coordination.

Delirium is a serious complication in patients in the critical care unit (CCU) that may lead to prolonged hospitalization if left undetected. The CCU at our hospital does not have a framework for determining delirium that could affect patient outcomes and discharge planning. CCU in a community hospital. A posttest-only design was used for this study. We established a framework for the early assessment of delirium, educated and trained nurses to detect delirium, collaborated with the informatics department, intensivist, nursing, respiratory therapy and worked with case management to deploy the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). We used a one-tailed independent t test to determine the impact of CAM-ICU on length of stay (LOS). Cross-tabulation and chi-square tests were used to examine the impact of CAM-ICU tool on home care utilization between the intervention and comparison groups. There was a 3.12% reduction in LOS after implementing the CAM-ICU tool. Also, a reduction in home care service utilization demonstrated statistical significance ( p = .001) between the intervention group (62.5%; n = 177) and the comparison group (37.5%; n = 106). Case managers are essential in improving care transitions. Case managers need to become competent in understanding the implications of the CAM-ICU tool because of their relevant role in the multidisciplinary rounds as advocates to improve care transitions across the continuum of care. Case managers need to have an understanding on how to escalate when changes in the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale scores occur during the multidisciplinary rounds because it can affect care coordination throughout the hospital. Implementing the CAM-ICU decreased LOS, and reduced health care utilization. The early identification of patients with delirium can affect the outcomes of critically ill patients and entails multidisciplinary collaboration.

Spanish Translation and Cultural Adaptation of the Intensive Care Unit Delirium Playbook.

A lack of high-quality provider education hinders the delivery of standard-of-care delirium detection and prevention practices in the intensive care unit (ICU). To fill this gap, we developed and validated an e-learning ICU Delirium Playbook consisting of eight videos and a 44-question knowledge assessment quiz. Given the increasing Spanish-speaking population worldwide, we translated and cross-culturally adapted the playbook from English into Spanish. To translate and culturally adapt the ICU Delirium Playbook into Spanish, the second most common native language worldwide. The translation and cross-cultural adaptation process included double forward and back translations and harmonization by a 14-person interdisciplinary team of ICU nurses and physicians, delirium experts, methodologists, medical interpreters, and bilingual professionals representing many Spanish-speaking global regions. After a preeducation quiz, a nurse focus group completed the playbook videos and posteducation quiz, followed by a semistructured interview. The ICU Delirium Playbook: Spanish Version maintained conceptual equivalence to the English version. Focus group participants posted mean (standard deviation) pre- and post-playbook scores of 63% (10%) and 78% (12%), with a 15% (11%) pre-post improvement (P = 0.01). Participants reported improved perceived competency in performing the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU and provided positive feedback regarding the playbook. After translation and cultural adaptation, the ICU Delirium Playbook: Spanish Version yielded significant knowledge assessment improvements and positive feedback. The Spanish playbook is now available for public dissemination.