The myosin superfamily of mechanoenzymes, more commonly referred to as molecular motors, converts chemical energy from the hydrolysis of ATP into mechanical work through its cyclic interactions with actin, which serves as a cytoskeletal track for myosin. Various classes of myosin perform such basic cellular processes that range from muscle contraction to intracellular cargo transport and exocytosis. Class V myosins (myoV) are one of the most highly studied processive molecular motors, which have the ability to travel long distances (>1 µm) by taking multiple, 36-nm hand-over-hand steps without falling off their actin tracks (Forkey et al., 2003; Warshaw et al., 2005). This ability makes the motor well suited for directed intracellular cargo transport along the actin cytoskeleton, traveling from the cell center toward the cell periphery. However, the intracellular actin highway is extremely complex, consisting of a 3-D meshwork of intersecting actin filaments and cross-linked filaments (i.e., bundles) that present a physical challenge to efficient myoV transport. How myoV copes with these cytoskeletal challenges requires an understanding of how this molecular motor’s structure allows it to be adept at maneuvering through the cell’s actin meshwork. In this issue, Lewis et al. paint an elegant 3-D picture of how myoV motors engage their actin track using state-of-the-art single-molecule fluorescence microscopy, providing molecular structure and function in real time as the myoV molecule walks step by step in vitro along a single actin filament adhered to a glass microscope slide (Figs. 1 and and2).2). By placing rigidly coupled fluorescent probes at specific locations on the myoV motor (Fig. 1), fluorescence polarization (pol) measurements in a total internal reflectance fluorescence (TIRF) microscope provided high temporal (80 ms) and angular (10°) resolution, polTIRF readouts of the myoV’s conformational orientation relative to its actin track for each step taken by the motor. Knowing the limits of myoV’s structural flexibility and how it contributes to its processive motion in vitro are critical pieces of information that must be defined before appreciating how in vivo myoV deals with the complexity of the actin cytoskeleton.