<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> Recurrent or new primary breast cancer with an indication for comprehensive regional nodal irradiation (RNI) in the setting of prior radiotherapy (RT) to the supraclavicular area (SCV) and upper axilla presents a unique treatment challenge due to cumulative brachial plexus (BP) dose tolerance. Brachial plexopathy is a debilitating potential consequence of RT, and BP dose monitoring is needed for comprehensive reirradiation (reRT). We hypothesize that pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBS-PT) and photon volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) are conformal techniques that allow BP relative dose-sparing, while maintaining target volume (TV) dose. A comparative evaluation was performed to assess each approach. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> In this IRB-approved retrospective study, all patients with ipsilateral recurrent or new primary breast cancer previously treated with photon RT, then receiving PBS-PT reRT to TV with at least partial BP overlap, were identified. VMAT plans were developed by photon breast dosimetrists using matched individualized BP dose constraints (BP maximum 17.1-53.9 Gy) used in the PBS-PT course. BP and TV DVH parameters were assessed. Patient and tumor characteristics, treatment parameters, clinical outcomes, and toxicities were collected. The median follow-up from the start of reRT was 10.5 months. <h3>Results</h3> Ten consecutive patients were identified. Median patient age was 58 years (41-82), with median time between RT courses of 48 months (15-276). Median first, second, and cumulative RT doses were 50.4 Gy (42.6-60.0), 50.4 Gy(RBE) (45.0-64.4), and 102.4 Gy(RBE) (95.0-120.0), respectively. PBS-PT and VMAT plans matched BP doses, with the median maximum and mean BP cumulative doses 86.6 Gy (RBE) and 60.7 Gy (RBE) for PBS-PT and 87.5 Gy and 60.2 Gy for VMAT, respectively. TV coverage of V85% (volume receiving 85% of prescription dose), V90%, and V95% were generally lower for VMAT vs. IMPT plans: axilla level II were 84.8%, 91.8%, and 75.7% vs. 90.9% (p=0.17), 88.3% (p=0.04), and 84.5% (p<0.01); axilla level III were 89.8%, 75.1%, and 64.0% vs. 95.4% (p=0.39), 91.8% (p=0.12), and 86.5% (p=0.32); and SCV were 83.0%, 74.3%, and 67.2% vs. 90.9% (p=0.41), 82.1% (p=0.13), and 68.2% (p=0.76), respectively. One patient developed symptoms of brachial plexopathy with neuropathy in the ulnar nerve distribution without pain or weakness. This patient had the highest maximum cumulative BP dose of the entire cohort (106.1 Gy(RBE)). <h3>Conclusion</h3> VMAT and PBS-PT provide conformal RT plans that can provide BP dose sparing but some surrounding compromise of the adjacent TV at risk. In this cohort, PBS-PT improved BP sparing and TV coverage versus VMAT. Further study with uniform TV and prescription parameters will be useful for direct comparison of the two modalities as the approach to this clinical situation continues to be refined. Longer follow-up will be needed to characterize the implication of cumulative BP dose on risk of developing clinically-significant brachial plexopathy.
Read full abstract