Confirmation Of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Research Articles

Cutaneous expression of growth-associated protein 43 is not a compelling marker for human nerve regeneration in carpal tunnel syndrome.

Growth-associated protein 43 (GAP-43) has long been used as a marker for nerve regeneration following nerve injury, with numerous in vitro and animal studies showing its upregulation in regenerating neurons. In humans, expression of GAP-43 has predominantly been examined in skin biopsies from patients with peripheral neuropathies; with several studies showing a reduction in GAP-43 immunoreactive cutaneous nerve fibres. However, it remains elusive whether cutaneous GAP-43 is a valid marker for human nerve regeneration. Here, we present a cohort of 22 patients with electrodiagnostically confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), used as a model system for focal nerve injury and neural regeneration after decompression surgery. We evaluate GAP-43 immunoreactivity and RNA expression levels in finger skin biopsies taken before and 6 months after surgery, relative to healthy controls. We further classify patients as 'regenerators' or 'non-regenerators' based on post-surgical epidermal re-innervation. We demonstrate that patients with CTS have lower GAP-43 positive intra-epidermal nerve fibre density (IENFD) before surgery than healthy controls. However, this difference disappears when normalising for total IENFD. Of note, we found surgery did not change GAP-43 expression in IENF, with no differences both in patients who were classified as regenerators and non-regenerators. We also did not identify pre-post surgical differences in cutaneous GAP-43 gene expression or associations with regeneration. These findings suggest cutaneous GAP-43 may not be a compelling marker for nerve regeneration in humans.

Ultrasonography for carpal tunnel syndrome in pregnancy: a prospective cross-sectional study

Confirmation of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) diagnosis with sonographic measurement of the median nerve cross sectional area (MN-CSA) is increasing in popularity. We aimed to analyse the ultrasonography (USG) values of MN-CSA in pregnant women with and without CTS symptoms. MN-CSAs of third trimester pregnant women were measured with USG and they were asked about the presence of CTS symptoms. Symptomatic participants were assigned to the CTS group and remaining participants were assigned to the Control group. The groups were compared according to MN-CSA. Twenty-five participants were grouped in CTS group and the remaining 64 participants were grouped in Control group. The MN-CSA was higher in the CTS group (9.44 ± 2.68) than in the Control group (7.20 ± 1.99), p = .00004. Obstetricians can use USG measurement of MN-CSA to confirm CTS diagnosis and consequently can offer conservative management, which is the widely accepted treatment modality in this cohort. Impact statement What is already known on this subject? CTS is the most common mononeuropathy of pregnancy, with up to 62% prevalence rates. The American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine practice guideline for the diagnosis of CTS recommends sonographic measurement of median nerve swelling at the carpal tunnel inlet as an accurate diagnostic test (Level A). What do the results of this study add? We found that a simple sonographic measurement of median nerve cross sectional area (MN-CSA) at the wrist appears to be a convenient method to confirm clinical CTS diagnosis in pregnant women. This study offers to use USG to confirm clinical CTS diagnosis in third trimester pregnant women before delivery. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? This study will help to raise awareness of obstetricians about CTS during pregnancy. USG can be an effective first-line confirmatory test for CTS diagnosis in the pregnant population, but further research is necessary to determine a clear cut-off value for MN-CSA. We advise obstetricians to use sonographic measurement of MN-CSA in pregnant women with typical CTS symptoms, which will increase uniformity for consensus development. Obstetricians can offer advice for conservative management of CTS during pregnancy, which is the widely accepted treatment in this cohort.

Measurement properties of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire in subjects with neurophysiological confirmation of carpal tunnel syndrome: a Rasch analysis perspective

Measurement properties of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire in subjects with neurophysiological confirmation of carpal tunnel syndrome: a Rasch analysis perspective

Role of ultrasound and electro-diagnostic studies in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: A comparative study

BACKGROUND: The current gold standard for the diagnosis of Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a topic of debate. Nerve conduction studies (NCS) traditionally have been used as the confirmatory test; however, ultrasound (USG) has garnered interest as an alternative diagnostic test for CTS. Ultrasound measurement of the cross sectional area of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel has been proposed as an alternative for confirmation of CTS.
 AIM: The aim of the study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity between Ultrasound and Electro-diagnostic Studies in the diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome with reference to a validated clinical diagnostic tool i.e. CTS- 6; that combines findings from the history and physical examination.
 MATERIALS AND METHODS: 40 (20 Cases and 20 controls) adult patients and adolescents of both sexes with complain of pain and paraesthesia in upper limb were included in this cross sectional study. All patients were evaluated using CTS-6 clinical diagnostic tool. Those patients with CTS score12 were considered as positive diagnosis for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (cases) (Main group). Those patients with CTS Score12 were taken as Controls. Ultrasound and Electro-diagnostic Studies were performed by individuals blinded to the results of the CTS-6 and ultrasound examination.
 RESULTS: We found that USG have sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 85%, and positive predictive value of 85.71% and negative predictive value of 89.47%. Whereas NCS have sensitivity of 85%, specificity of 80%, positive predictive value of 80.95% and negative predictive value of 84.21%.
 CONCLUSION: Using CTS-6 clinical tool as a standard reference, the sensitivity and specificity of USG is more than that of NCS.

Use of Multiple Ultrasonographic Parameters in Confirmation of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Ultrasonography (US) of the median nerve has been increasingly studied and used for confirmation of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). However, a consensus on the choice of parameters to be evaluated is still not established. The aim of this diagnostic accuracy study was to assess the diagnostic value of multiple parameters individually, as well as in different combinations of variable complexity, and to find an optimal approach for US-based confirmation of a CTS diagnosis. All participants completed clinical and electrophysiologic evaluations, and their hands were scanned with a 5-13-MHz linear US transducer. Eighty-six patients with CTS (135 symptomatic hands) and 50 control participants (93 asymptomatic hands) were analyzed. The median nerve was recorded transversely at the forearm, at the carpal tunnel inlet, in the mid tunnel, and at the carpal tunnel outlet. For determining the parameters' diagnostic value, sensitivities, specificities, and area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated. The inlet cross-sectional area, inlet circumference, and outlet cross-sectional area of the median nerve had the highest AUCs (0.962, 0.920, and 0.913, respectively), sensitivities (87.4%, 80.0%, and 74.1%), and specificities (94.6%, 91.4%, and 92.5%) among single-measurement parameters. An analysis of 2-level parameters (wrist-to-forearm-ratio, inlet-to-outlet-ratio, outlet-to-forearm-ratio, and inlet-outlet mean) yielded the highest AUC (0.974) for the mean cross-sectional area of the median nerve [(inlet + outlet cross-sectional area)/2], with high sensitivity (93.5%) and specificity (91.1%). A compound regression-based index yielded a marginally higher AUC (0.989) than the previously mentioned parameters. Results of the study show that the mean cross-sectional area and inlet cross-sectional area may be valid and easy-to-acquire parameters for routine clinical use in confirming CTS.

Negative Neurodynamic Tests Do Not Exclude Neural Dysfunction in Patients With Entrapment Neuropathies

ObjectiveTo examine differences in somatosensory phenotypes of patients with positive and negative neurodynamic tests and compare these with healthy participants. DesignCase-control study. SettingUniversity department. ParticipantsPatients with electrodiagnostically confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) (n=53) and people without CTS (n=26) participated in this study (N=79). Patients with CTS were subgrouped according to the results of the upper limb neurodynamic tests biasing the median nerve into patients with positive or negative neurodynamic tests. InterventionsNot applicable. Main Outcome MeasureAll participants underwent quantitative sensory testing in the median innervated territory of their hand. ResultsOnly 46% of patients with CTS had positive neurodynamic tests. No differences were identified between groups for pain thresholds (P>.247). However, patients with CTS had increased mechanical (P<.0001) and thermal detection thresholds (P<.0001) compared with people without CTS. Patients with negative neurodynamic tests had a more pronounced vibration detection deficit (mean, 7.43±0.59) than people without CTS (mean, 7.89±0.22; P=.001). Interestingly, warm detection was the only domain differentiating positive (mean, 4.03°C±2.18°C) and negative neurodynamic test groups (6.09°C±3.70°C, P=.032), with patients with negative neurodynamic tests demonstrating increased loss of function. ConclusionsPatients with negative neurodynamic tests seem to have a more severe dysfunction of the unmyelinated fiber population. Our findings suggest that neurodynamic tests should not be used in isolation to judge neural involvement. Rather, they should be interpreted in the context of loss of function tests of the small fiber domain.

Carpal tunnel syndrome assessment with ultrasonography: value of inlet-to-outlet median nerve area ratio in patients versus healthy volunteers.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic value of the Inlet-to-outlet median nerve area ratio (IOR) in patients with clinically and electrophysiologically confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).MethodsForty-six wrists in 46 consecutive patients with clinical and electrodiagnostic evidence of CTS and forty-four wrists in 44 healthy volunteers were examined with ultrasonography. The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve was measured at the carpal tunnel inlet (the level of scaphoid-pisiform) and outlet (the level of the hook of the hamate), and the IOR was calculated for each wrist. Ultrasonography and electrodiagnostic tests were performed under blinded conditions. Electrodiagnostic testing combined with clinical symptoms were considered to be the gold standard test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic value between the inlet CSA and IOR.ResultsThe study population included 16 men and 30 women (mean age, 45.3 years; range, 18–83 years). The control population included 18 men and 26 women (mean age, 50.4 years; range, 18–79 years). The mean inlet CSA was 8.7 mm2 in healthy controls and 14.6mm2 in CTS group (P<0.001). The mean IOR in healthy volunteers (1.0) was smaller than that in patients (1.6, P<0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed a diagnostic advantage to using the IOR rather than the inlet CSA (P<0.01). An IOR cutoff value of ≥ 1.3 would yield 93% specificity and 91% sensitivity in the diagnosis of CTS.ConclusionThe IOR of median nerve area promises to be an effective means in the diagnosis of CTS. A large-scale, randomized controlled trial is required to determine how and when this parameter will be used.

Median versus ulnar medial thenar motor recording in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome

Aim of the workThis study proposed to assess the role of the median versus ulnar medial thenar motor (MTM) recording in supporting the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Patients and methodsThe present study included 130 hands (70 CTS and 60 controls). Clinical examination was done for all patients. The following tests were done (using surface electrodes recording) for patients and control: (1) sensory nerve conduction studies: median nerve, ulnar nerve and median versus ulnar digit four sensory study; (2) motor nerve conduction studies: median nerve, ulnar nerve, median (second lumbrical) versus ulnar (interosseous) (2-LINT) motor study and median versus ulnar (MTM) study. ResultsThe tests with higher sensitivity in diagnosing CTS were median versus ulnar (2-LINT) motor latency difference (87.1%), median versus ulnar (MTM) motor latency difference (80%) and median versus ulnar digit four sensory latency difference (91.4%). There was no statistically significant difference between median versus ulnar (MTM) motor latency difference with both median versus ulnar (2-LINT) motor latency difference and median versus ulnar digit four sensory latency difference (P>0.05) as regards the confirmation of CTS. ConclusionsMedian versus ulnar (MTM) motor latency difference has high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of CTS as for both median versus ulnar (2-LINT) motor latency difference and median versus ulnar digit four sensory latency difference. It can be considered a useful neurophysiological test to be used in combination with other median versus ulnar comparative tests for confirming the diagnosis of CTS beside other well known electrophysiological tests.

334 Differences in risk factors for neurophysiologically confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome and illness with similar symptoms but normal median nerve function

ObjectivesTo explore whether neurophysiologically confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) has different risk factors from sensory symptoms in the hand that occur in the absence of impaired median nerve conduction.MethodsWe compared...

Differences in risk factors for neurophysiologically confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome and illness with similar symptoms but normal median nerve function: a case-control study.

BackgroundTo explore whether risk factors for neurophysiologically confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) differ from those for sensory symptoms with normal median nerve conduction, and to test the validity and practical utility of a proposed definition for impaired median nerve conduction, we carried out a case–control study of patients referred for investigation of suspected CTS.MethodsWe compared 475 patients with neurophysiological abnormality (NP+ve) according to the definition, 409 patients investigated for CTS but classed as negative on neurophysiological testing (NP-ve), and 799 controls. Exposures to risk factors were ascertained by self-administered questionnaire. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated by logistic regression.ResultsNP+ve disease was associated with obesity, use of vibratory tools, repetitive movement of the wrist or fingers, poor mental health and workplace psychosocial stressors. NP-ve illness was also related to poor mental health and occupational psychosocial stressors, but differed from NP+ve disease in showing associations also with prolonged use of computer keyboards and tendency to somatise, and no relation to obesity. In direct comparison of NP+ve and NP-ve patients (the latter being taken as the reference category), the most notable differences were for obesity (OR 2.7, 95 % CI 1.9-3.9), somatising tendency (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.9), diabetes (OR 1.6, 95% CI 0.9-3.1) and work with vibratory tools (OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.9-2.2).ConclusionsWhen viewed in the context of earlier research, our findings suggest that obesity, diabetes, use of hand-held vibratory tools, and repeated forceful movements of the wrist and hand are causes of impaired median nerve function. In addition, sensory symptoms in the hand, whether from identifiable pathology or non-specific in origin, may be rendered more prominent and distressing by hand activity, low mood, tendency to somatise, and psychosocial stressors at work. These differences in associations with risk factors support the validity of our definition of impaired median nerve conduction.

The segmental palmar test in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome reassessed

ObjectiveTo test our hypothesis that comparing the sensory nerve conduction velocity of the median nerve across the wrist with that of the forearm is more sensitive than comparing it with that of the palm in the electrodiagnostic confirmation of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). MethodsOne hundred and fifty seven consecutive patients with clinically defined CTS were prospectively included and electrophysiologically examined. Antidromic nerve conduction velocities were measured in 3 segments of the median nerve: forearm, wrist, and palm. Differences and ratios in nerve conduction velocities were computed between the forearm and wrist and between the palm and wrist segments. ResultsComparing the median nerve conduction velocities of the forearm with the wrist segment provides a greater sensitivity (79.6% and 82.8% for the second and third digit, respectively) than comparing the palm with the wrist segment (65.6% and 65.0%). Applying the ratio leads to slightly higher sensitivities for both comparisons. ConclusionsThe modified segmental palmar test is a sensitive, robust and easily applicable method in diagnosing CTS. SignificanceWe recommend to use the median nerve sensory conduction velocity in the forearm as a reference in the segmental palmar test instead of that in the palm.

The median palmar cutaneous nerve in normal subjects and CTS

Objective The neurophysiological confirmation of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) relies on detecting abnormal median nerve transcarpal conduction in the presence of unaffected comparator nerves. We compare the palmar cutaneous median branch (PCBm) with the ulnar sensory nerve conduction to digit 5 (US 5) as comparator nerves for diagnosing CTS. Methods In a prospective case control study of patients with clinically defined carpal tunnel syndrome and normal subjects, we determined and compared the PCBm and US 5 conduction velocity. Results We examined 57 hands with clinically defined CTS and 59 control hands. Comparison showed highly significantly slowed PCBm conduction ( p < 0.0001) but not for US 5 conduction ( p = 0.488). Using a 3 percentile cut-off for abnormality derived from controls, PCBm conduction velocity was abnormal in 46% of CTS hands. Conclusions The high frequency of PCBm nerve conduction abnormality in CTS suggests that this nerve should not be used as a comparator nerve for the neurophysiological diagnosis of CTS. This finding may help explain some of the extension of sensory symptoms outside the median nerve distribution in CTS. Significance In CTS frequent abnormality of PCBm conduction makes this a poor comparator nerve and may explain extension of sensory symptoms beyond the median nerve.

Evaluation of sympathetic vasomotor fibres in carpal tunnel syndrome using continuous wave doppler Ultrasonography

Sympathetic vasomotor fibres carried by the median nerve and ulnar nerve innervate their respective sensory territories. The sympathetic vasomotor fibres of the median nerve were evaluated in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome and in healthy volunteers using continuous wave Doppler ultrasonography. The pulsatility index of the radialis indicis artery and the radial palmar digital artery of the little finger were measured at baseline and after stimulation. The maximal increase in the pulsatility index of each artery was measured. This was significantly lower for the radialis indicis artery in the CTS group than in the healthy controls. However, there was no significant difference in the maximal increase in pulsatility index of the radial palmar digital artery of the little finger between both groups. Sympathetic vasomotor fibres of the median nerve are affected in carpal tunnel syndrome. Continuous wave Doppler ultrasonography is easy to use and should be investigated further as a possible diagnostic tool for the confirmation of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Transient forearm conduction block in the median nerve

We present two cases referred for electrophysiological confirmation of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Initial nerve conduction studies were normal. Approximately 20 min into the examination, both patients developed sensory symptoms and weakness in the distal median nerve territory while the elbow was extended and forearm supinated. Further studies demonstrated complete conduction block across the forearm in the median motor and sensory nerve fibers. When measurable, conduction velocities remained normal or were modestly slow. Complete clinical and electrophysiological recovery occurred within 2 min following forearm pronation, suggesting that dysfunction was probably due to focal transient ischemia. Patients describing increased sensory symptoms during routine electrophysiological assessments for CTS should be investigated to rule out the possibility of a more proximal abnormality.