The low atomic number and low density of beryllium give it the lowest absorption coefficient of any material which might, by virtue of other suitable physical characteristics, be employed for windows in x-ray tubes. The first use of beryllium plates for such a purpose appears to have been in Germany, and shortly thereafter in this country, in the early 1930's, when they were used, not as windows in the external envelope of the tube, but in an internal hood surrounding the target, the purpose of which was to prevent the bombardment of the tube walls by secondary electrons. Beryllium windows permit such hoods to shield completely against electrons while absorbing the x-ray beam to a negligible extent. There is, of course, no requirement that such windows be vacuum-tight, as is the case in the external envelope. The development of malleable beryllium (1) and the production therefrom of thin vacuum-tight sheets led to the first commercially produced tubes with vacuum-tight beryllium windows in the external envelope, as reported by Machlett (2) in 1942. These tubes were designed primarily for x-ray diffraction work, having targets of special materials, such as molybdenum, cobalt, copper, iron, or chromium. The beryllium window was sought for such tubes in order to reduce to a minimum the loss of intensity due to absorption in the window of the characteristic radiation of the target material, which is of relatively long wave length, particularly in the case of the lower atomic number materials like cobalt, iron, and chromium. In these and other tubes (3) designed primarily for diffraction studies, the window may be quite small, since only a narrow pencil of rays is employed. The advantages of this low-absorption window for other applications were soon recognized, and these so-called “diffraction tubes” were used advantageously in such special radiographic procedures as microradiography (4, 5) and the checking of spot-welds of thin aluminum sheets. In some of these applications, a wider beam had to be employed to cover larger areas than was possible with the diffraction tubes, and a larger window was therefore required. As the size is increased, the difficulties involved in the fabrication of vacuum-tight beryllium windows increase many-fold, particularly in the operation of brazing the windows in a permanently vacuum-tight manner to a suitable base for incorporation into the tube envelope. Nevertheless, the necessary technics have been perfected, and tubes with beryllium windows admitting a 40-degree solid angle cone of rays (Fig. 1) have now been available for some time (6). As indicated above, such tubes were first developed to meet the needs of certain special radiographic applications, arising principally in connection with the war effort. It is natural to inquire whether they offer possibilities for advantageous use in the medical field, as well as in other industrial applications.