The contamination of Canadian Arctic marine wild-life by persistent organic pollutants (POPs) has beenknown since the early 1970s (reviewed in Muir et al.,1992, 1999; Jensen et al., 1997; AMAP, 1998). Thesecompounds typically arrive via long range transportfrom source areas in tropical or temperate regions,and are deposited in the Arctic by condensing, cool,polar air (Bright et al., 1995; Jensen et al., 1997). Onceassimilated into the lower parts of marine food chains,these lipophilic compounds biomagnify with increasingtrophic level, and can reach concentrations in top pred-ators that can be deleterious to reproduction or survival(Jensen et al., 1997; Dietz et al., 2000; Borga˚ et al., 2001;Bustnes et al., 2003).After the initial discovery of POPs in Arctic wildlife(once thought to be too distant from sources to be pol-luted), monitoring programs were established to trackcontaminant levels in various wildlife groups. Becausethey are long-lived, forage over large areas, and areoften colonial and thus easy to sample, marine birdsintegrate many aspects of local marine ecosystem condi-tions and have proven to be particularly effective bio-indicators of marine pollution (e.g. Braune et al., 2002).In the Canadian Arctic, concentrations of many POPsin marine birds decreased from the 1970s through the1980s, and then levelled off by the 1990s (Muir et al.,1999; Braune et al., 2001). Despite a general pattern ofdecline, however, there remain clear regional differences,with some sites continuing to support wildlife with con-siderably higher contaminant concentrations than otherlocales (Muir et al., 1999; Braune et al., 2002). Manygaps remain in our geographic knowledge of contami-nant levels in Arctic wildlife tissues.Contamination of Arctic wildlife has been a key con-cern to Inuit (the aboriginal residents of the CanadianArctic), because harvest of wild animals is the principalsource of meat and an important cultural activity (Jen-sen et al., 1997). During our seabird research near twolarge colonies southeast of Qikiqtarjuaq (formerlyBroughton Island), Nunavut (Fig. 1) on eastern BaffinIsland, the community expressed concern over possiblecontamination of wildlife near the colonies, which werelocated close to two former military sites (Durban andPadloping islands). To address community concerns,evaluate the possibility of point-source contaminationin the local marine food chain, and fill in a large geo-graphic gap for contaminant data in Nunavut, weEdited by Bruce J. RichardsonThe objective of BASELINE is to publish short communications on different aspects of pollution of the marineenvironment. Only those papers which clearly identify the quality of the data will be considered for publication.ContributorstoBaselineshouldreferto‘Baseline—TheNewFormatandContent’(Mar.Pollut.Bull.42,703–704).
Read full abstract