Concussion Evaluation Research Articles

Comparative Study of Craniofacial Injuries in Skiing Versus Snowboarding: A NEISS Database Study

Introduction: Skiing and snowboarding are popular winter sports which are rising in popularity. There is a lack of detailed data in the literature regarding skiing and snowboarding head and neck injuries, especially the rate of concussions with helmet use. Methods: The authors queried the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) database to characterize patient demographics, injury types, subsite injured, and ED disposition associated with skiing and snowboarding-related head and neck injuries between 2009 and 2020 in the US. Results: An estimated 87,994 head and neck-related ski and snowboarding injuries were reported from 2011 to 2020 nationally. Ski-related and snowboard-related injuries comprised 51.9% and 48.1% of injuries, respectively. Ski-related injuries accounted for the majority of admissions (69.2%). Head injuries were the most common (68.3%), followed by injuries to the face (15.3%) and neck (12.2%). Concussions (57.7%) were the most common overall injury type and comprised 49.2% of admissions. Concussions were more common in snowboarding injuries (65.6% versus 50.3%, P<0.001), whereas lacerations (11.1% versus 14.4%), contusion/abrasions (6.7% versus 11.1%), and fractures (2.9% versus 7.0%) were more common in ski-related injuries. Cases with negative helmet status were associated with a greater proportion of concussion injuries (79.8% versus 70.9%, P<0.001). Conclusions: Patients presenting with skiing or snowboarding injuries require a thorough head and neck examination. A comprehensive history and physical should be performed with a focus on helmet use and evaluation for concussion, lacerations, and fractures. Helmet use is strongly recommended to prevent the risk of head injury. Level of Evidence: IV.

Utility of the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening in Military Medicine: A Systematic Review.

The Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) was created as a brief clinical screening tool for identifying vestibular and ocular motor symptoms and impairments post-concussion. It was found to have predictive validity in correctly identifying concussed athletes from healthy controls. In 2018, the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation 2 (MACE2) replaced the original Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE); the most prominent change between the MACE and MACE2 was the addition of the VOMS. Despite its adoption into military medicine, it is not known if the addition of the VOMS to the MACE2 is acutely helpful, and if it provides additional information for diagnosis, prognosis, and/or management. The purposes of this systematic review were: (1) to determine the utility of the VOMS in correctly identifying concussed individuals, particularly as it pertains to military medicine; (2) to explore the extent to which the VOMS can inform concussion prognosis; and (3) to establish the value of the VOMS as a measure for monitoring the evolution of symptoms throughout a service member's course of care. A comprehensive search of PubMed was performed from January 1, 2014 through August 16, 2023. Articles were included if they researched concussion or a related health condition or healthy controls and administered the VOMS. Articles were excluded if they discussed health conditions other than concussion; did not administer the VOMS; or were written in languages other than English. The tools used to assess methodological quality and risk of bias varied according to study design. Articles were classified into three primary domains: diagnosis, prognosis, and/or rehabilitation/recovery over time. A total of 231 articles were retrieved and 3 were duplicates, leaving 228 articles for review. Of the 228 articles screened, 100 relevant full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Fifty-nine articles met our inclusion and exclusion criteria while the other 41 articles were rejected. Thirty-two articles helped to inform diagnosis, 15 prognosis, and 16 rehabilitation/recovery over time. The VOMS had excellent internal consistency and moderate to good test-retest reliability; however, a false-positive rate of 21.9% was found. Most studies indicated that a positive VOMS was associated with a delayed recovery. Several studies indicated that VOMS scores improved with targeted, active interventions and/or a symptom-guided progressive return to activity. The greatest limitation was the paucity of published evidence in the military population. More research is needed on the use of the VOMS in service members.

Testing the Validity and Reliability of a Standardized Virtual Examination for Concussion.

We determined inter-modality (in-person vs telemedicine examination) and inter-rater agreement for telemedicine assessments (2 different examiners) using the Telemedicine Buffalo Concussion Physical Examination (Tele-BCPE), a standardized concussion examination designed for remote use. Patients referred for an initial evaluation for concussion were invited to participate. Participants had a brief initial assessment by the treating neurologist. After a patient granted informed consent to participate in the study, the treating neurologist obtained a concussion-related history before leaving the examination room. Using the Tele-BCPE, 2 virtual examinations in no specific sequence were then performed from nearby rooms by the treating neurologist and another neurologist. After the 2 telemedicine examinations, the treating physician returned to the examination room to perform the in-person examination. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) determined inter-modality validity (in-person vs remote examination by the same examiner) and inter-rater reliability (between remote examinations done by 2 examiners) of overall scores of the Tele-BCPE within the comparison datasets. Cohen's kappa, κ, measured levels of agreement of dichotomous ratings (abnormality present vs absent) on individual components of the Tele-BCPE to determine inter-modality and inter-rater agreement. For total scores of the Tele-BCPE, both inter-modality agreement (ICC = 0.95 [95% CI 0.86-0.98, p < 0.001]) and inter-rater agreement (ICC = 0.88 [95% CI 0.71-0.95, p < 0.001]) were reliable (ICC >0.70). There was at least substantial inter-modality agreement (κ ≥ 0.61) for 25 of 29 examination elements. For inter-rater agreement (2 telemedicine examinations), there was at least substantial agreement for 8 of 29 examination elements. Our study demonstrates that the Tele-BCPE yielded consistent clinical results, whether conducted in-person or virtually by the same examiner, or when performed virtually by 2 different examiners. The Tele-BCPE is a valid indicator of neurologic examination findings as determined by an in-person concussion assessment. The Tele-BCPE may also be performed with excellent levels of reliability by neurologists with different training and backgrounds in the virtual setting. These findings suggest that a combination of in-person and telemedicine modalities, or involvement of 2 telemedicine examiners for the same patient, can provide consistent concussion assessments across the continuum of care.

Comparative Performance of Three Eye-Tracking Devices in Detection of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Acute Versus Chronic Subject Populations.

Presently, traumatic brain injury (TBI) triage in field settings relies on symptom-based screening tools such as the updated Military Acute Concussion Evaluation. Objective eye-tracking may provide an alternative means of neurotrauma screening due to sensitivity to neurotrauma brain-health changes. Previously, the US Army Medical Research and Development Command Non-Invasive NeuroAssessment Devices (NINAD) Integrated Product Team identified 3 commercially available eye-tracking devices (SyncThink EYE-SYNC, Oculogica EyeBOX, NeuroKinetics IPAS) as meeting criteria toward being operationally effective in the detection of TBI in service members. We compared these devices to assess their relative performance in the classification of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) subjects versus normal healthy controls. Participants 18 to 45 years of age were assigned to Acute mTBI, Chronic mTBI, or Control group per study criteria. Each completed a TBI assessment protocol with all 3 devices counterbalanced across participants. Acute mTBI participants were tested within 72 hours following injury whereas time since last injury for the Chronic mTBI group ranged from months to years. Discriminant analysis was undertaken to determine device classification performance in separating TBI subjects from controls. Area Under the Curves (AUCs) were calculated and used to compare the accuracy of device performance. Device-related factors including data quality, the need to repeat tests, and technical issues experienced were aggregated for reporting. A total of 63 participants were recruited as Acute mTBI subjects, 34 as Chronic mTBI subjects, and 119 participants without history of TBI as controls. To maximize outcomes, poorer quality data were excluded from analysis using specific criteria where possible. Final analysis utilized 49 (43 male/6 female, mean [x̅] age = 24.3 years, SD [s] = 5.1) Acute mTBI subjects, and 34 (33 male/1 female, x̅ age = 38.8 years, s = 3.9) Chronic mTBI subjects were age- and gender-matched as closely as possible with Control subjects. AUCs obtained with 80% of total dataset ranged from 0.690 to 0.950 for the Acute Group and from 0.753 to 0.811 for the Chronic mTBI group. Validation with the remaining 20% of dataset produced AUCs ranging from 0.600 to 0.750 for Acute mTBI group and 0.490 to 0.571 for the Chronic mTBI group. Potential eye-tracking detection of mTBI, per training model outcomes, ranged from acceptable to excellent for the Acute mTBI group; however, it was less consistent for the Chronic mTBI group. The self-imposed targeted performance (AUC of 0.850) appears achievable, but further device improvements and research are necessary. Discriminant analysis models differed for the Acute versus Chronic mTBI groups, suggesting performance differences in eye-tracking. Although eye-tracking demonstrated sensitivity in the Chronic group, a more rigorous and/or longitudinal study design is required to evaluate this observation. mTBI injuries were not controlled for this study, potentially reducing eye-tracking assessment sensitivity. Overall, these findings indicate that while eye-tracking remains a viable means of mTBI screening, device-specific variability in data quality, length of testing, and ease of use must be addressed to achieve NINAD objectives and DoD implementation.

Baseline Normative and Test-Retest Reliability Data for Sideline Concussion Assessment Measures in Youth.

Tools used for the identification, evaluation, and monitoring of concussion have not been sufficiently studied in youth or real-world settings. Normative and reliability data on sideline concussion assessment measures in the youth athlete population is needed. Pre-season normative data for 515 athletes (93.5% male) aged 5 to 16 on the Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC/SAC-Child), modified Balance Errors Scoring System (mBESS), Timed Tandem Gait (TTG), and the King-Devick Test (KDT) are provided. A total of 212 non-injured athletes repeated the measures post-season to assess test-retest reliability. Mean performance on the SAC-C, mBESS, TTG, and KDT tended to improve with age. KDT was the only measure that demonstrated good to excellent stability across age ranges (ICC = 0.758 to 0.941). Concentration was the only SAC/SAC-C subtest to demonstrate moderate test-retest stability (ICC = 0.503 to 0.706). TTG demonstrated moderate to good (ICC = 0.666 to 0.811) reliability. mBESS demonstrated poor to moderate reliability (ICC = -0.309 to 0.651). Commonly used measures of concussion vary regarding test-retest reliability in youth. The data support the use of at least annual sport concussion baseline assessments in the pediatric population to account for the evolution in performance as the child ages. Understanding the variation in the stability and the evolution of baseline performance will enable improved identification of possible injury.

Maintaining Cognitive Performance at the Expense of Gait Speed for Asymptomatic Concussed Athletes: A Novel Dual-Task and Post-Exercise Assessment.

Our goal was to evaluate persisting deficits in gait and executive functioning in asymptomatic athletes with a history of concussion using a novel approach combining a dual-task paradigm and post-exercise exertion. Thirty-eight athletes aged 17 to 25 years old participated in the study, including 18 with a history of concussion. The dual-task paradigm required walking continuously at a predetermined self-paced target speed of 6.5 km/h while executing a complex switch task. Athletes completed two conditions, each on separate days: (1) dual task alone and (2) dual task following 20 min of running on a non-motorized treadmill. The statistical analyses revealed a significant reduction in gait speed exclusively for athletes with a history of concussion and only following the post-exercise condition (p = 0.008). These findings suggest that although asymptomatic concussed athletes maintain a cognitive performance comparable to non-concussed athletes, this appears to be achieved at the expense of gait speed. Our results underscore the importance of incorporating gait assessments and post-exercise exertion into concussion evaluation protocols in both research and clinical settings.

A - 37 Baseline Mental Health Functioning in University Student Athletes.

Abstract Purpose Examine the prevalence of mental health difficulties in university student-athletes during baseline concussion assessment. Method Two hundred and forty-three university athletes (male = 163, female = 80) completed the. Sideline Concussion Assessment Tool, 3rd Edition (SCAT3) Symptom Evaluation scale and the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18) self-report questionnaire at baseline evaluation across two consecutive seasons. The BSI-18 measured psychological distress using 5-point rating scales to calculate three emotional scales (Somatization, Depression, Anxiety) and one total scale (Global Severity Index). The four psychological symptoms from the SCAT3 Symptom Evaluation scale (more emotional, irritability, sadness, and nervous or anxious) were selected to calculate a total psychological symptom score out of 24. Existing normative data informed the SCAT3 symptom severity, including classifications of mild (1–2), moderate (3–4), and severe (5–6). Results Descriptive statistics indicated that 7.5% of athletes reported depressive symptoms and. 9.5% reported anxious symptoms on the BSI-18. The SCAT3 psychological symptoms score showed that 6.5% of athletes were within the mild range. Significant correlations existed between the SCAT3 total psychological symptom score and the BSI’s Anxiety, Depression, Somatization, and Global Severity Index scales (p &amp;lt; 0.01). Conclusions A small but significant number of collegiate athletes reported experiencing psychological symptoms during baseline concussion evaluation. These results indicate that the psychological symptoms of the SCAT’s Symptom Evaluation scale may help identify players with more significant mental health concerns who will likely benefit from mental health support.

A - 34 Differences in Symptom and Well-Being Report at Initial Post-Injury Concussion Medical Evaluations

Abstract Purpose To investigate differences in subjective symptom report and percentage ratings of subjective well-being (SWB) at initial post-injury concussion medical evaluations in professional football players. Method A retrospective, quasi-experimental design was used for the study. Participants included Canadian Football League players who underwent initial locker room post-injury medical evaluations. CFL concussion protocol requires any player suspected of a concussion to undergo a full evaluation including SCAT5. There were 2 groups including 43 players subsequently diagnosed with concussions who were compared with 22 players not diagnosed with concussion. Data included total symptom score from the SCAT5 and SWB (ratings out of 100%). T-tests and descriptive statistics evaluated differences between groups. Results At baseline, there were no significant differences on ratings of SWB between groups. In contrast, there was a significant difference in ratings of subjective well being between concussed players (M = 75.5%, SD = 19.5) and non concussed players (M = 92.7, SD = 7.7); t(63) = [3.8], p = [0.1]. Furthermore, significant differences on total symptom report from the SCAT5 were identified between concussed players (M = 16.9, SD = 15.4) and non concussed players (M = 3.5, SD = 5.7); t(63) - [3.9], p = [&amp;lt;0.01]. The sensitivity was 85% with a specificity of 63% using a post-injury SWB score of 75%. Conclusions Results indicated that at initial post-injury concussion evaluations, players subsequently diagnosed with concussion have lower SWB. Further research is needed to determine whether this metric would be helpful in the diagnosis of concussion.

Diagnosis of Sports-Related Concussion Using Symptom Report or Standardized Assessment of Concussion

The Sports Concussion Assessment Tool-5 (SCAT5) has been recommended for concussion evaluation and utilizes both a subjective reported symptom grading scale and objective measures of concussion including a cognitive evaluation: the Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC). The SAC includes testing for orientation, immediate memory, concentration, and delayed recall; a 10-word list is used to assess immediate memory and delayed recall. To determine the diagnostic accuracy of components of the SCAT5 and to provide a framework for clinical interpretation. This prospective case-control study of National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I athletes from any sport was conducted from July 2020 to December 2022 at 4 universities. Athletes completed baseline SCAT5 testing using the 10-word list. When an athlete presented acutely with suspected concussion (sideline or within 2 days), the tests were repeated. If a concussion was diagnosed, a control athlete underwent the same tests. Controls were identified and matched on comorbid conditions, sex and gender, sport, season, and baseline scores. Data analysis was conducted from August to October 2023. The primary outcomes were area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and test-retest reliability of the symptom score; symptom severity score; the total SAC score; and the orientation, immediate memory, concentration, and delayed memory subcomponent scores on the SCAT5 compared with clinical diagnosis of concussion. Baseline and postinjury data were collected on 92 athletes with concussion and 92 matched control athletes (96 men [52%] and 88 women [48%]; 110 who played a sport other than football [59%]). Diagnostic utility was considered excellent for symptom score (AUC, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.89-0.96) and symptom severity score (AUC, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90-0.97). An increase of 2 points on the symptom score was associated with a sensitivity of 86% (95% CI, 78%-92%), specificity of 80% (95% CI, 70%-87I%), and positive predictive value of 81% (95% CI, 72%-88%). The total SAC score had poor to fair diagnostic utility (AUC, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.63-0.77); however, 41 athletes with concussion (45%) had a total SAC score at or above their baseline score (ie, within normal limits). The diagnostic utility was poor to fair for immediate memory (AUC, 0.68, 95%CI, 0.61-0.75) and delayed recall (AUC, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.62-0.77) and not useful for orientation (AUC, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.43-0.56) and concentration (AUC, 0.52 95% CI, 0.44-0.61). Test-retest reliability was fair for total SAC and poor for immediate memory and delayed recall, orientation, and concentration. In this case-control study of the diagnostic accuracy of reported symptoms and the SAC, reported symptoms were the most accurate indicator of concussion while the 10-word SAC had limited sensitivity. These findings suggest that understanding the properties of the SAC is important when making the diagnosis of concussion.

Head injuries: What the team physician needs to know

Aconcussion is the mildest form of amild traumatic brain injury (tbi) and resembles the most prevalent type of sports associated tbi. Diffuse axonal injuries, the main pathophysiological mechanism of concussion, leads to disruption of communication between different brain areas. The resulting clinical symptoms may relate to several clinical domains (cognition, fatigue, anxiety disorders, headaches/migraines or vestibulo-ocular problems), all of which need to be assessed in aclinical screening during an evaluation for possible concussion. Appropriate and consensus-based protocols to conduct clinical exams are provided by the Concussion in Sport Group (Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT), Sport Concussion Office Assessment Tool (SCOAT)) and should be used in the most up-to-date version. Therapeutically, slowly and incrementally increasing sub symptomatic activation consisting of daily routine activities, aerobic and cognitive exercises should be introduced early after the trauma. Education about concussion should be geared towards target audiences and will then greatly contribute to adherence and acceptance of medical management.

Language Matters: Comparisons of Concussion Assessments Among English- and Spanish-Speaking Middle School Athletes.

The Child Sport Concussion Assessment Tool, fifth edition (Child SCAT5), is among the most widely used international pediatric concussion evaluation tools. However, the tool's English-only aspect may limit its use for patients who speak different languages. Prior researchers have suggested one's preferred language (ie, home language) could be associated with concussion assessments in adults, yet how this might affect pediatric athletes is not well understood. To compare baseline Child SCAT5 assessment outcomes between middle school athletes whose home language was Spanish and matched control athletes whose home language was English. Case-control study. Middle school athletics. Athletes self-reported their home language (ie, language spoken at home). Those indicating their home language was Spanish were individually matched to athletes who spoke English at home on age, sex, sport, school, and pertinent comorbidities (eg, concussion history). The final sample consisted of 144 athletes (Spanish home language = 72, English home language = 72). We used Mann-Whitney U tests to compare the Child SCAT5 component scores of the home language groups (ie, Spanish versus English). Athletes in the Spanish home language group scored lower on the Standardized Assessment of Concussion-Child version (P < .01, r = -0.25), Immediate Memory (P < .01, r = -0.45), and total modified Balance Error Scoring System scores (P < .01, r = -0.25) than the English home language group. Matched athletes whose home language was Spanish versus English scored differently on baseline Child SCAT5 assessment components. Those with the home language of Spanish scored lower on cognitive and balance tasks than those whose home language was English. These findings may serve as a rationale for the development of future concussion assessment tools to properly capture clinically relevant data regarding language differences among pediatric athletes.

Mechanical and Contractile Properties of Knee Joint Muscles after Sports-Related Concussions in Women Footballers.

The purpose of this study was to determine if women footballers have an increased lack of neuromuscular control of the knee joint after a concussion compared to a healthy cohort tested with tensiomyography (TMG). Forty-one female collegiate footballers were enrolled in this study from which there were 20 with a history of sports-related concussions (SRCs) and 21 control subjects. Results from the SRC group had significantly higher Tc (ms) (z = -5.478, p = 0.000) and significantly lower Dm (mm) (z = -3.835, p = 0.000) than the control group in the case of the rectus femoris muscle. The SRC group had significantly higher Tc (ms) (z = -2.348, p = 0.016) and significantly lower Dm (mm) (z = -4.776, p = 0.000) than the control group in the case of the vastus medialis muscle. The SRC group had significantly higher Tc (ms) (z = -5.400, p = 0.000) and significantly lower Dm (mm) (z = -4.971, p = 0.000) than the control group in the case of the vastus lateralis muscle. The SRC group had significantly higher Tc (ms) (z = -5.349, p = 0.000) than the control group in the case of the biceps femoris muscle response, whereas no significant difference was found in Dm (mm) (z = -0.198, p = 0.853) between the groups. The results of the current study may have implications for current practice standards regarding the evaluation and management of concussions and can add valuable information for knee prevention programs as well.

Comparison of Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) and Computerized Eye-tracking to Identify Exposure to Repetitive Head Impacts.

Military service members (SMs) are exposed to repetitive head impacts (RHIs) in combat and training that are purported to adversely affect brain health, including cognition, behavior, and function. Researchers have reported that RHI from blast-related exposure may affect both vestibular and ocular function, which in turn may be related to symptomology. As such, an examination of the effects of RHI on exposed military SMs should incorporate these domains. To date, researchers have not compared groups of exposed special operations forces (SOF) operators on combined clinical vestibular/ocular and eye-tracker-based outcomes. Therefore, the primary purpose of this study was to compare participant-reported symptoms and performance on the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) tool with performance on the computerized RightEye tracking system between SOF operators exposed to blast-related RHI and healthy controls without blast-related exposure. In addition, the study aimed to compare subgroups of snipers and breachers exposed to RHI to controls on the preceding metrics, as well as identify a subset of individual (demographic) factors, participant-reported symptoms, and performance metrics on VOMS and RightEye that best identify SOF operators exposed to RHI from unexposed controls. The study involved a cross-sectional design including 25 Canadian SOF SMs comprised of breachers (n = 9), snipers (n = 9), and healthy, unexposed controls (n = 7). The former 2 groups were combined into an RHI group (n = 18) and compared to controls (n = 7). Participants provided demographics and completed a self-reported concussion-related symptom report via the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation 2, the VOMS, and RightEye computerized eye-tracking assessments. Independent samples t-tests and ANOVAs were used to compare the groups on the outcomes, with receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC) analyses to identify predictors of blast exposure. This study was approved by the Defence Research Development Canada Human Research Ethics Committee and the Canadian Forces Surgeon General/Special Forces Command. The results from t-tests supported group differences for age (P = .012), participant-reported symptoms (P = .006), and all VOMS items (P range = <.001-.02), with the RHI group being higher than healthy controls on all variables. ANOVA results supported group differences among snipers, breachers, and controls for age (P = .01), RightEye saccades (P = .04), participant-reported total symptom severity (P = .03), and VOMS total scores (P = .003). The results of the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses supported age (AUC = 0.81), Military Acute Concussion Evaluation 2 participant-reported total symptom severity (AUC = 0.87), and VOMS total scores (AUC = 0.92) as significant predictors of prior blast exposure. Participant-reported concussion symptoms, VOMS scores, and age were useful in identifying SOF operators exposed to RHI from controls. RightEye metrics were not useful in differentiating RHI groups from controls. Differences between snipers and breachers warrant further research. Overall, the findings suggest that VOMS may be a useful tool for screening for the effects of exposure to RHI in SOF operators. Future investigations should be conducted on a larger sample of military SMs, consider additional factors (e.g., RHI exposure levels, medical history, and sex), and include additional assessment domains (e.g., balance, cognitive, and psychological).

Association of concussion/brain injury symptoms and diagnosis with mental and social well-being in 2020 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) children

ABSTRACT Background Population-based data regarding the associations between prior concussion or brain injury symptoms/diagnosis and mental/social well-being is lacking for U.S. children. Methods Associations between prior concussion or brain injury symptoms/diagnosis (reported by parents of children ages 5–17 from the 2020 National Health Interview Survey) and current mental/social well-being were determined in multivariable models. Results Amongst 2020 US children, 8.7% and 5.3% had previous symptoms and diagnosis of concussion/brain injury, respectively. 23% of children with symptoms were never checked for a concussion/brain injury, with younger children at higher risk of not getting checked after symptomatic head trauma. Prior concussion or brain injury symptoms/diagnosis was associated with a higher likelihood of current depressive symptoms (odds ratio [OR] = 1.60; 95% CI = 1.21–2.14; p < 0.001), anxiety (OR = 2.07; 95% CI = 1.52–2.82; p < 0.001), difficulty making friends (OR = 1.57; 95% = 1.06–2.33; p = 0.03), use of medications for mental/social/behavioral issues (OR = 1.69; CI = 1.21–2.36; p = 0.002), and mental health therapy/counseling (OR = 1.52; 95% CI = 1.13–2.04; p = 0.006). Conclusion U.S. children with prior concussion or brain injury symptoms/diagnosis have a higher rate of mental and social disturbances and a more frequent need for mental health services. Nearly one-quarter of children with significant symptoms after head trauma are never checked for a concussion/brain injury; routine concussion evaluation after head trauma should be emphasized especially in younger children.

Level of Agreement Between Child and Parent Reporting on the Child Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT5).

The Child Sport Concussion Assessment Tool, fifth edition (SCAT5), remains the consensus instrument for concussion evaluation in youth athletes. Both child and parent are recommended to complete the athlete background and symptom reporting. To determine the level of agreement between child and parent medical history and symptom reporting and quantify their performance on the Child SCAT5 in male football athletes. Cross-sectional study. National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I college football facility. A total of 157 youth male football athletes (age = 10.7 ± 1.3 years) participating in a university-sanctioned youth football camp and their parent or legal guardian. Youth athletes and their parent completed the athlete background (demographics, diagnosed medical history) and symptom evaluation (symptom items, total number of symptoms, and symptom severity score) of the Child SCAT5 and were instructed not to discuss reporting with each other during testing. Cronbach α tests were conducted to determine the internal consistency, and descriptive statistics determined the level of agreement between medical history, symptom reporting, and baseline performance. The internal consistency of the symptom items was high for both child (Cronbach α = 0.91) and parent (α = 0.92). Agreement on medical history ranged from 67% (learning disability or dyslexia) to 85% (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder), with 82% agreement on sustaining a previous concussion. Fourteen youth athletes reported having been hospitalized for a head injury, with zero matched parent confirmations. Individual symptom agreement ranged from 70.7% (gets distracted easily) to 94.9% (going to faint). Agreement was 35% on total number of symptoms and severity. Abnormal scoring ranged from 2% (going to faint) to 25% (headache) for child and 2% (double vision) to 28% (gets distracted easily) for parent reporting. Fair agreement was shown between children and their parent on medical history and self-reported symptoms on the Child SCAT5 at baseline. When available, child and parent reporting should be used for concussion assessment and clinical decision-making.

Use of Reactive Balance Assessments With Clinical Baseline Concussion Assessments in Collegiate Athletes.

Current clinical concussion evaluations assess balance deficits using static or dynamic balance tasks while largely ignoring reactive balance. Including a reactive balance assessment might provide a more comprehensive concussion evaluation. To identify redundancy in current clinical baseline assessments of concussion and determine whether reactive balance adds unique information to these evaluations. Cross-sectional study. Clinical assessment. A total of 279 healthy National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I athletes. Two cohorts of data were collected at the beginning of the athletic season. For cohort 1 (n = 191), the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Tool, instrumented modified push and release (I-mP&R), and Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) were administered. For cohort 2 (n = 88), the I-mP&R, BESS, timed tandem gait, walking with eyes closed, and clinical reaction time were administered. The strengths of the relationships between the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Tool cognitive indices, mP&R clinical score, instrumented measures (BESS sway; I-mP&R time to stability, latency, and step length), BESS score, timed tandem gait, walking time to completion, and clinical reaction time were characterized. The strongest interinstrument correlation value was between single-task time to stability from the I-mP&R and clinical reaction time but was considered weak (r = 0.35, P = .001). The mP&R and I-mP&R clinical scores were weakly associated with the other assessments. Weak correlations between interassessment variables indicated that little redundancy was present in the current clinical evaluations. Furthermore, reactive balance represents a unique domain of function that may improve the comprehensiveness of clinical assessments.

70 Neuropsychological Consulting in Concussion Management: Remote Models Increase Access to Care

Objective:Neuropsychological assessment is the cornerstone of concussion management, and the nature of its delivery can vary widely. While literature concerning post-concussion care typically revolves around in-person evaluation, the proliferation of computerized neuropsychological tests (CNTs) has allowed for some distance between concussion patients and the neuropsychologist. In the wake of a global pandemic, several papers describing the use of telehealth for concussion care have emerged; however, the small samples found in these studies may suggest that access to care remains an issue. Additionally, telehealth may not be a sustainable fee-for-service approach as CMS aims to curtail telehealth reimbursement for behavioral health clinicians. The objective of the present study is to describe a remote neuropsychological consultation model of concussion management and evaluate its productivity and impact in a rural setting.Participants and Methods:In this model, a neuropsychologist based at an academic medical center in the northeastern United States consulted to middle school, high school, and collegiate concussion management programs. Students typically were administered baseline ImPACT tests prior to participation in sports, and all students in the current sample completed post-injury ImPACT tests as part of return to play protocols. The neuropsychologist read test results through the test’s online portal, then communicated interpretation and recommendations via email or phone to the school’s representative (e.g., athletic trainer, athletic director, or school nurse). 837 unique concussions were recorded between 2019 and 2022. After removing abnormal cases (e.g., COVID-19 school closures, extended college breaks, non-concussions, and non-return to play decisions), 790 unique concussions (51.4% male) were included for analysis, with a mean age of 16.84 years (SD=2.17). Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the sample.Results:Across 790 unique concussions, 7 were middle school, 571 were high school, and 212 were college students. 1,750 total postinjury ImPACT tests were administered over the three-year period. Per concussion, an average of 2.22 (SD=0.90) tests were used. Average time to the last ImPACT given was 18.47 days (SD=16.59), with a median of 15 days. Ten concussions (1.27% of total concussions) occurred within 3 months of a previous injury. The distance between schools and the medical center ranged from 2.4 to 102 miles (M=60.29; SD=34.34).Conclusions:The current study suggests that there is value in a remote model of neuropsychological consultation for concussion management. While telehealth offers a promising method of evaluation for concussion, it may be inaccessible and present reimbursement challenges. The remote consultation model described here increases access to care by eliminating in-person visits, which decreases demand for physical space at medical centers and increases access to rural populations with seemingly no negative effect on care. This consultation model also allows neuropsychologists working in concussion management more flexibility, potentially increasing the volume of cases they can assess. This program evaluation suggests remote models have merit, but replication studies in different regions of the country are needed.

12 Measuring effort on a continuum provides improved insight into concussion baseline cognitive assessments

Objective:Baseline assessment of cognitive performance is common practice under many concussion management protocols and is required for collegiate athletes by the NCAA. The purpose of baseline cognitive assessment is to understand an athlete’s individual uninjured cognitive performance, as opposed to using population normative data. This baseline can then serve as a reference point for recovery after concussion and can inform return-to-play decisions. However, multiple factors, including lack of effort, can contribute to misrepresentation of baseline results which raises concern for reliability during return-to-play decision-making. Measuring effort across a continuum, rather than as a dichotomous variable (good versus poor effort) may provide informative insight related to cognitive performance at baseline.Participants and Methods:Collegiate athletes (n = 231) completed the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Test (ImPACT) as part of their baseline pre-participation concussion evaluation. ImPACT creates composite scores of Verbal Memory, Visual Memory, Visual-Motor Speed, and Reaction Time. Baseline self-reported symptoms and total hours of sleep the night prior to testing are also collected through ImPACT. ImPACT has one embedded indicator within the program to assess effort, and research has identified an additional three embedded indicators. Athletes were also administered one stand-alone performance validity test, either the Medical Symptom Validity Test (n = 130) or the Rey Dot Counting Test (n = 101), to independently measure effort. Effort was estimated across a continuum (zero, one, two, or three or more failed effort indicators) with both stand-alone and embedded effort indicators. We evaluated the relationship between effort, symptoms, self-reported sleep, Reaction Time composite score and Visual-Motor Speed composite score using a linear regression model.Results:We found that 121 athletes passed all effort indicators, while 39 athletes failed only one effort indicator, 40 athletes failed two effort indicators, and 31 athletes failed three or four (three+) effort indicators. Self-reported symptoms and total hours of sleep were not related to effort, but Reaction Time and VisualMotor Speed composites were. Specifically, performance on the Visual-Motor Speed composite was significantly worse for athletes who failed two or three+ effort indicators compared to athletes who did not fail any, and performance on the Reaction Time composite was significantly worse only for athletes who failed three+ effort indicators. Additionally, athletes who failed one or more effort indicators and reported less sleep performed worse on both the Visual-Motor Speed and Reaction Time composites, compared to those who reported less sleep and did not fail any effort indicators.Conclusions:Athletes who failed one effort indicator did not perform significantly worse on Reaction Time and Visual-Motor Speed composites compared to those who passed all effort indicators. However, 31% of athletes failed two or more effort indicators and these athletes performed worse on cognitive tests, likely due to factors impacting their ability to put forth good effort. These results suggest that effort is more complex than a previously used dichotomous variable and highlights the importance of using several indicators of effort throughout baseline assessments. In addition, the importance of sleep should be emphasized during baseline assessments, especially when effort is questionable.

Reconsidering Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening Cutoff Scores forConcussion.

Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) is often part of a comprehensive evaluation to identify acute mild traumatic brain injury. Most of the reports describe the use of the VOMS in adolescents/young adults and not in older adults or military service members. The purpose of this study was to describe VOMS findings in healthy civilians and active duty military service members up to the age of 50 years. Seventy-seven healthy civilians between 18 and 50 years of age (22 males, age 31.8 [9.0] years) participated across three sites in addition to 40 healthy active duty service members (25 males, age 27.5 [4.9] years) from one site. Demographics, Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory scores, mean near point convergence (NPC) distance, and Total Symptom Change (TSS) scores from the VOMS were evaluated. For civilians, the group mean NPC distance was 4.98 (3.8) cm. For military service members, the group mean NPC distance was 6.17 (4.57) cm. For civilians, the mean TSS was 1.2 (2.3) with 53.2% reporting 0 TSS, 27.3% reporting one TSS, and 19.5% reporting two or more TSS. For military service members, the mean TSS was 0.20 (0.72) with 92.5% reporting 0 TSS, 0% reporting one TSS, and 7.5% reporting two or more TSS. Age did not correlate with the mean NPC distance and TSS in healthy civilians and active duty military service members. Reconsideration of the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation, Version 2 cutoff value for abnormal mean NPC distance may be warranted to improve diagnostic accuracy in both civilian and military adult populations. Similarly, re-evaluating criteria for interpreting the TSS results of the VOMS, specifically in civilians, may be warranted.

Optimizing baseline and post-concussion assessments through identification, confirmation, and equivalence of latent factor structures: Findings from the NCAA-DoD CARE Consortium

Objective: Concussion evaluations use a multidimensional assessment to evaluate unique patient function dimensions (e.g., subjective symptoms differ from balance assessments), but the overarching latent factor structure has not been empirically substantiated. Our objective was to determine the cumulative latent factor structure of pre-injury baseline and acute (<48-h) post-concussion assessment battery outcomes, and determine measurement equivalence among common factors in collegiate student-athletes. Methods: Collegiate student-athletes at baseline (n = 21,865) and post-concussion (n = 1,537) across 25-institutions completed standardized assessments. Individual items were used from the baseline and post-concussion assessments and consisted of: Sport Concussion Assessment Tool, Brief Symptom Inventory-18, Standardized Assessment of Concussion, Balance Error Scoring System, Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Test, and vestibular-ocular motor screening. Exploratory factor analysis was used on half the baseline data, and confirmatory factor analysis on the remaining baseline data and post-concussion data separately. Measurement equivalence was assessed between sex, sport contact classification, concussion history, and time. Results: A 10-factor exploratory model was established and comprised of: depression, somatic, vestibulo-ocular, headache, postural stability, neurocognition, emotional, fatigue, cognitive, consciousness clouding. The 10-factor model was confirmed at baseline and post-concussion with strong measurement equivalence between timepoints. Strong to strict measurement equivalence was observed for sex, sport contact classification, and concussion history at both timepoints separately. Conclusion: Our findings established a robust 10-factor latent factor model equivalent across timepoints and common factors among healthy and concussed collegiate athletes. Clinicians can use these findings to target specific factors while reducing redundant elements to provide efficient, comprehensive post-concussion assessments.