Concurrent Urinary Incontinence Research Articles

Fecal incontinence is not associated with UTI: A contemporary case-control study.

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a leading cause of infection in adults. The most common cause is gastrointestinal bacteria ascending the urethra into the bladder. Studies showing fecal incontinence (FI) is a risk factor for UTI have been limited to nursing home populations. Healthy patients with recurrent UTI, especially women, often receive counseling, suggesting improper personal hygiene contributes to UTIs. This advice can be stigmatizing. Given UTI prevalence, it is important to elucidate risk factors for improved diagnosis, treatment, and patient education. Our objective was to perform a hospital-centered, retrospective case-control analysis to assess the effect of FI on UTI development in ambulatory patients. Patients (n = 3035) with a diagnosis of FI were identified from a single institution and propensity score-matched with screening colonoscopy patients (n = 3035) from 2018 to 2021. Patients were matched on age, sex, race, ethnicity, body mass index, and comorbidities, for example, diabetes, vesicoureteral reflux, and urinary incontinence. The association between FI and UTI was tested using Pearson's χ2 test. Median age was 64 years with more females than males (73.81% vs. 71.20% female for case/control, p = 0.02). Patients with FI were more often to have concurrent urinary incontinence (18.62% vs. 10.25% for case/control, p < 0.001), as well as specifically urgency incontinence (13.28% vs. 11.57% for case/control, p = 0.04). There was no significant difference in the incidence of UTI between patients with FI and those presenting for screening colonoscopy (p = 0.44). FI was not associated with an increased number of UTIs. Based on our results, current stigmatizing beliefs regarding the association between FI and UTI should be reevaluated.

Treatment of Urinary Incontinence in Patients With Erectile Dysfunction.

Concurrent urinary incontinence (UI) and erectile dysfunction (ED) can greatly damage a patient's quality of life. Owing to the intertwined anatomy, treatment options for one most certainly have implications on the other. The aim of this review is to characterize and elucidate the treatment patients with postprostatectomy UI undergoing concurrent or subsequent treatment of ED. These principles can be extrapolated to all patients with UI and ED. The literature on postprostatectomy UI treatment in the context of concurrent ED was reviewed through a Medline search. Original research using quantitative and qualitative methodologies was considered. The epidemiology, workup, and management of postprostatectomy UI being mindful of ongoing or future ED treatments are the main outcome measures. Owing to the intertwined anatomy, treatment options for UI and ED have implications on the other. It is essential for the surgeon to obtain an understanding of the patient's degree of bother for each process, personal preference on treatment options, and management of expectations. Surgical treatment options include a combination of the artificial urinary sphincter, sling, inflatable penile prosthesis, semi-rigid penile prosthesis, and new techniques such as the Mini-Jupette. The appropriate combinations will be determined by patient factors of dexterity, preference, degree of leakage, history of radiation, and so on. The decision of staged vs dual implant will be largely driven by the surgeons' preference, payor limitations, and comfort level. This issue is particularly challenging in redo cases where we advocate for cuff downsizing or tandem cuff before the transcorporal approach is used with the goal of preserving sexual function. The concurrent treatment of ED and UI requires thoughtful workup, meticulous attention to detail, and an armamentarium of surgical skills. It is crucial for the surgeon to understand and manage patient expectations in treating these delicate and difficult pathologies. Ajay D, Mendez MH, Wang R, etal. Treatment of Urinary Incontinence in Patients With Erectile Dysfunction. Sex Med Rev 2021;9:593-604.

Fecal Incontinence After High-Risk Delivery

In Brief OBJECTIVE To investigate the prevalence of and factors associated with fecal incontinence and its precursors among high-risk women at 12 months postpartum. METHODS A survey of women in the immediate and later postpartum was conducted. Participants were 568 women at higher risk of anal sphincter damage, namely those who had an instrumental delivery and/or delivered a high birth weight infant (4000 g or more) at tertiary teaching hospitals in Australia. Women participated in a baseline hospital-based interview and a 12-month follow-up telephone interview. The main outcome measures were frank fecal incontinence (solid and/or liquid stool) and precursor symptoms (flatal incontinence, soiling, and/or fecal urgency) at 12 months postpartum. RESULTS Prevalence rates were 2.6% for solid stool incontinence and 4.9% for liquid stool incontinence. Overall, 6.9% women had either one or both of these symptoms of frank fecal incontinence. Prevalence rates were 24.4% for flatal incontinence, 10.9% for soiling, and 14.8% for fecal urgency. Overall, 32.4% women had at least one of these precurser symptoms. Concurrent urinary incontinence and postpartum constipation were significantly associated with both frank fecal incontinence and precursor symptoms. In addition, joint hypermobility and older maternal age were associated with frank fecal incontinence, whereas inability to stop the urine flow and multiparity was associated with precursor symptoms. CONCLUSION The present findings suggest that older and multiparous women, and women with joint hypermobility are at increased risk of postpartum anal incontinence symptoms after a high-risk delivery. Concurrent urinary incontinence, flow-stopping inability, and constipation are also associated with postpartum anal incontinence symptoms after high-risk deliveries. Older and multiparous women, and women with joint hypermobility, constipation, or urinary incontinence are at increased risk of postpartum anal incontinence symptoms after high-risk delivery.

Fecal incontinence after high-risk delivery

Objective To investigate the prevalence of and factors associated with fecal incontinence and its precursors among high-risk women at 12 months postpartum. Methods A survey of women in the immediate and later postpartum was conducted. Participants were 568 women at higher risk of anal sphincter damage, namely those who had an instrumental delivery and/or delivered a high birth weight infant (4000 g or more) at tertiary teaching hospitals in Australia. Women participated in a baseline hospital-based interview and a 12-month follow-up telephone interview. The main outcome measures were frank fecal incontinence (solid and/or liquid stool) and precursor symptoms (flatal incontinence, soiling, and/or fecal urgency) at 12 months postpartum. Results Prevalence rates were 2.6% for solid stool incontinence and 4.9% for liquid stool incontinence. Overall, 6.9% women had either one or both of these symptoms of frank fecal incontinence. Prevalence rates were 24.4% for flatal incontinence, 10.9% for soiling, and 14.8% for fecal urgency. Overall, 32.4% women had at least one of these precurser symptoms. Concurrent urinary incontinence and postpartum constipation were significantly associated with both frank fecal incontinence and precursor symptoms. In addition, joint hypermobility and older maternal age were associated with frank fecal incontinence, whereas inability to stop the urine flow and multiparity was associated with precursor symptoms. Conclusion The present findings suggest that older and multiparous women, and women with joint hypermobility are at increased risk of postpartum anal incontinence symptoms after a high-risk delivery. Concurrent urinary incontinence, flow-stopping inability, and constipation are also associated with postpartum anal incontinence symptoms after high-risk deliveries.

Prevalence of combined fecal and urinary incontinence: a community-based study.

To assess the prevalence of combined fecal and urinary incontinence. A cross-sectional, community-based study. Olmsted County, Minnesota. Men (n = 778) and women (n = 762), aged 50 years or older, selected randomly from the population. Participants completed a previously validated self-administered questionnaire that assessed the occurrence of fecal and urinary incontinence in the previous year. The age-adjusted prevalence of incontinence was 11.1% (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 8.8-13.5) in men and 15.2% (95% CI, 12.5-17.9) in women for fecal incontinence; 25.6% (95% CI, 22.5-28.8) in men and 48.4% (95% CI, 44.7-52.2) in women for urinary incontinence; and 5.9% (95% CI, 4.1-7.6) in men and 9.4% (95% CI, 7.1-11.6) in women for combined urinary and fecal incontinence. The prevalence of fecal incontinence increased with age in men but not in women, from 8.4% among men in their fifties to 18.2% among men in their eighties (P for trend = .001). For women, the prevalence increased from 13.1% among 50-year-old women to 20.7% among women 80 years or older (P for trend = .5). Among persons with fecal incontinence, the prevalence of concurrent urinary incontinence was 51.1% among men and 59.6% among women (P = .001 and P = .003, respectively). Cross-sectionally, the age-adjusted, relative odds of fecal incontinence among persons with urinary incontinence was greater in men than in women (Odds Ratio (OR) = 3.0; 95% CI, 1.9-4.8 in men and OR = 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.7 in women, P = .04). These findings suggest that persons with one form of incontinence are likely to have the other form as well. Despite the higher prevalence of urinary and fecal incontinence among women, the association between fecal incontinence and urinary incontinence was stronger among men than women. This finding, and the significant association between fecal incontinence and age observed in men but not in women, suggest that the etiologies may be more closely linked in men than in women.