Objective: We reviewed our experience and evaluated the results of helical tomotherapy (HT) compared the disease outcome with that of high-dose rate brachytherapy in patients with cervical cancer. Methods: Total 114 patients who have been treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy(CCRT) for newly diagnosed cervical cancer from 2008 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Radiotherapy was given as a combination of whole pelvic external beam RT (EBRT) followed by high-dose rate brachytherapy(BT) or helical tomotherapy(HT). Results: We extracted selected population using propensity score matching with 1:1 ratio. After adjustment for age, BMI, radiation dose, prior surgery, clinical stage and histologic type, there was no significantly different parameter between two groups. The overall survival was poorer in BT group compared to HT group (median survival 17.5 months after BT vs 30 months after HT, log rank p=0. 034). 4-year survival rates were 74.2% in brachytherapy group and 100% in tomotherapy group. But the progression free survival was not different between two groups(p=0.270). 1-year and 2-year progression-free rates were 85.3% and 76.3% in BT group, but those were 87.0% and 58.9% in HT group. In univariate analysis, there was no significant risk factor for overall survival. But in PFS, stage was the only significant risk factor for recurrence. In multivariate analysis, clinical stage was still significant risk factor after adjusting for the other clinical parameters. Conclusion: HT could be a feasible option for CCRT in patients with cervical cancer with appropriate indications. Further studies with delicate design and larger number from multicenter with long follow up period are warranted to confirm the significance of benefit of HT in concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the field of cervical cancer.
Read full abstract