Concomitant Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Research Articles

Incidence and predictors of heart failure events following cardiac surgery in patients with atrial fibrillation - insights from the LAAOS-III trial

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common comorbidity in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and further increases the risk of incident heart failure (HF). However, only limited data exist on HF events following surgery in patients with AF. Methods The Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Study (LAAOS) III was a randomized trial evaluating concomitant left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with AF undergoing cardiac surgery. In this secondary analysis, we aimed to identify independent predictors of the composite outcome of HF hospitalization or HF-related death following discharge, using a multivariable Cox model – incorporating sex, age (≥65 vs <65 years), systolic blood pressure (≤140 vs >140 mmHg), body mass index (BMI; <25 vs 25-29.9 vs ≥30 kg/m2), diabetes mellitus (DM), prior HF diagnosis, prior stroke, ischemic heart disease (IHD), heart valve surgery, AF history duration, rhythm on discharge electrocardiogram, and trial allocation. Supplementary analyses were undertaken to further assess the continuous variables using cubic spline regression. Results Of 4770 patients enrolled, in-hospital death occurred in 201 (4.2%) and complete discharge data were available for 4564 (95.7%). During a median follow up of 3.9 years, 533 (11.7%) of 4564 patients were hospitalized for HF. In total, 873 (19.1%) died after discharge, including 95 HF-related deaths. The composite outcome of HF hospitalization or HF-related death occurred at an annualized event rate of 3.31%/year [95% confidence interval: 3.04-3.60]. The independent risk factors included age (event rate of 3.64%/year vs 2.03%/year for ≥65 vs <65 years; hazard ratio (HR) 1.71 [1.32-2.21]), DM (4.71%/year vs 2.71%/year for with vs without DM; HR 1.59 [1.34-1.90]), prior HF diagnosis (4.27%/year vs 2.17%/year for with vs without HF; HR 2.00 [1.66-2.41]), IHD (3.63%/year vs 2.85%/year for with vs without IHD; HR 1.26 [1.03-1.54]), AF history duration (3.81%/year vs 2.89%/year for >2 vs <0.5 years; HR 1.23 [1.01-1.50]), and AF rhythm at discharge (3.87%/year vs 2.68%/year for AF vs non-AF rhythm; HR 1.31 [1.09-1.58]). The supplementary spline analyses further revealed a positive correlation between BMI and the risk of the composite outcome (p-value 0.042). Conclusions In patients with AF undergoing cardiac surgery, post-discharge HF hospitalization and HF-related death occurred at a rate of 3.31% per year. Our study identified several significant risk factors including advanced age, higher BMI, DM, prior HF diagnosis, IHD, AF history >2 years, and AF rhythm at discharge.The associations of HF with age and BMI

E-4 | Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Concomitant Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Versus Isolated Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-Analysis

E-4 | Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Concomitant Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Versus Isolated Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-Analysis

Left atrial appendage occlusion: Percutaneous and surgical approaches in everyday practice.

Prophylactic left atrial appendage occlusion has been suggested as a means of reducing cardioembolism risk in patients with atrial fibrillation. Its clinical benefits have been discussed together with potential endocrine or hemodynamic adverse effects, with conflicting conclusions. We aimed to provide a thorough overview of the current literature and a recommendation for daily clinical decision-making. A comprehensive Medline search through PubMed was conducted to search for relevant articles, which were further filtered using the title and abstract. Sixty-five articles were selected as relevant to the topic. Concomitant left atrial appendage occlusion during cardiac surgery for other reasons is effective in terms of thromboembolism risk reduction in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation and higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores. Surgical occlusion is safe, and epicardial closure techniques are preferred. Thoracoscopic and transcatheter techniques are also feasible, and the individual treatment choice must be tailored to the patient. The concerns about endocrine imbalance or risk of heart failure after occlusion are not supported by evidence. Current evidence is conflicting with regard to hemodynamic consequences of appendage occlusion.

Sociodemographic disparities in concomitant left atrial appendage occlusion during cardiac valve operations.

Sociodemographic disparities in atrial fibrillation (AF) management and thromboembolic prophylaxis have previously been reported, which may involve inequitable access to left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) during cardiac surgery. The present study aimed to evaluate the association of LAAO utilization with sex, race, and hospital region among patients with AF undergoing heart valve operations. Adults with AF undergoing valve replacement/repair in the 2012-2019 National Inpatient Sample were identified and stratified based on concurrent LAAO. Multivariable linear and logistic regressions were developed to identify factors associated with LAAO utilization. Mortality, complications including stroke and thromboembolism, hospitalization costs and length of stay (LOS) were secondarily assessed. Of 382,580 patients undergoing valve operations, 18.7% underwent concomitant LAAO. Over the study period, the proportion of female patients receiving LAAO significantly decreased from 44.8% to 38.9% (p<0.001). Upon risk adjustment, female (AOR 0.93 [95% CI 0.89-0.97]) and Black patients (0.91 [0.83-0.99]) had significantly reduced odds of undergoing LAAO compared to males and Whites, respectively. Additionally, hospitals in the Midwest (1.38 [1.24-1.51]) and West (1.26 [1.15-1.36]) had increased likelihood of LAAO whereas Northeast hospitals (0.85 [0.77-0.94)] had decreased odds relative to the South. Furthermore, LAAO was associated with decreased stroke (0.71 [0.60-0.84]) and thromboembolism (0.68 [0.54-0.86]), $4,200 reduction in costs and 1-day decrement in LOS. Female and Black patients had significantly lower odds while Midwest and Western hospitals had greater odds of LAAO utilization. Enhancing access to LAAO during valvular surgery is warranted to improve clinical and financial outcomes for patients with AF.

Novel technique of left atrial appendage occlusion-a pilot study.

A clot in the left atrial appendage (LAA) is an important cause of cardio-embolic stroke. Concomitant occlusion of the LAA during cardiac surgery is found to have reduced postoperative stroke. A study was designed to observe the results of LAA occlusion in 17 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and aortic valve replacement (AVR). The LAA was occluded epicardially with a SIRONIX 60-mm linear noncutting stapler (Healthium Medtech Pvt limited, Peenya, Bengaluru). The effectiveness of occlusion was confirmed by trans-esophageal echocardiography and at 2years of follow-up with trans-thoracic echocardiography. There was no re-canalization of the LAA, and the patients remained in sinus rhythm. Concomitant LAA occlusion with a linear stapler during cardiac surgery is a safe, feasible, and reproducible option.

Concomitant Surgical Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: a Review.

In this review, we discuss some of the observational studies that examined the impact of left atrial appendage occlusion on stroke, the Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Study (LAAOS) III research program that provided definitive evidence for the benefit of surgical left atrial appendage occlusion on ischemic stroke, and high priority studies in the field that should be pursued by the surgical community. Atrial fibrillation is common in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Oral anticoagulants are effective at preventing strokes related to atrial fibrillation; they have been the standard of care for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation for decades. Most strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation originate from the left atrial appendage. LAAOS III, a large randomized controlled trial, has recently demonstrated that concomitant left atrial appendage occlusion in patients undergoing cardiac surgery for another indication reduces the risk of stroke or systemic embolism on top of oral anticoagulation. Surgical left atrial appendage occlusion reduces the risk of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation and a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2 undergoing cardiac surgery for another indication. The role of surgical left atrial appendage occlusion with patients without atrial fibrillation, as a substitute to anticoagulation and as a standalone procedure, remains unclear.

Concomitant left atrial appendage occlusion in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

The Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Study (LAAOS III) was a multicenter, randomized controlled trial that included patients undergoing cardiac surgery who also had atrial fibrillation. The trial recruited 4811 participants, of which 2400 patients were randomized to undergo left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion surgery, while 2411 participants had isolated cardiac surgery. The aim of the study was to determine whether concomitant occlusion of the LAA prevents ischemic stroke or systemic embolism. The study also evaluated the efficacy and safety of concomitant LAA occlusion in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The number of ischemic strokes or systemic embolisms was significantly lower in the LAA occlusion group [114 (4.8%) vs. 68 (7.0%)] compared to the no-occlusion surgery group. There was also no increase in hospital length of stay or hospitalization for heart failure. It is expected that based on the findings of the LAAOS III study, the recommendations for concomitant LAA occlusion will be upgraded from the current class IIB to class I.

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion during Cardiac Surgery to Prevent Stroke

BackgroundSurgical occlusion of the left atrial appendage has been hypothesized to prevent ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation, but this has not been proved. The procedure can be performed during cardiac surgery undertaken for other reasons.MethodsWe conducted a multicenter, randomized trial involving participants with atrial fibrillation and a CHA2DS2-VASc score of at least 2 (on a scale from 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating greater risk of stroke) who were scheduled to undergo cardiac surgery for another indication. The participants were randomly assigned to undergo or not undergo occlusion of the left atrial appendage during surgery; all the participants were expected to receive usual care, including oral anticoagulation, during follow-up. The primary outcome was the occurrence of ischemic stroke (including transient ischemic attack with positive neuroimaging) or systemic embolism. The participants, research personnel, and primary care physicians (other than the surgeons) were unaware of the trial-group assignments.ResultsThe primary analysis population included 2379 participants in the occlusion group and 2391 in the no-occlusion group, with a mean age of 71 years and a mean CHA2DS2-VASc score of 4.2. The participants were followed for a mean of 3.8 years. A total of 92.1% of the participants received the assigned procedure, and at 3 years, 76.8% of the participants continued to receive oral anticoagulation. Stroke or systemic embolism occurred in 114 participants (4.8%) in the occlusion group and in 168 (7.0%) in the no-occlusion group (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.53 to 0.85; P=0.001). The incidence of perioperative bleeding, heart failure, or death did not differ significantly between the trial groups.ConclusionsAmong participants with atrial fibrillation who had undergone cardiac surgery, most of whom continued to receive ongoing antithrombotic therapy, the risk of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism was lower with concomitant left atrial appendage occlusion performed during the surgery than without it. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; LAAOS III ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01561651.)

Concurrent Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion and Sternal-Sparing LVAD Implantation

Thromboembolic events (TEs) remain common adverse events for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients. There is early evidence that left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) at the time of LVAD implantation may reduce the incidence of TEs, but the feasibility of LAAO during less invasive LVAD implantation is unknown. Patients who underwent LAAO during LVAD implantation via the complete sternal-sparing (CSS) approach were retrospectively reviewed. LAAO was performed through the left thoracotomy incision using a commercially available left atrial appendage exclusive device. Preoperative patient characteristics, intraoperative data, and postoperative complications were collected. The primary outcome was incidence of intraoperative complications. Secondary outcomes included operative time, successful placement of exclusion device, and incidence of postoperative TEs. A total of 8 patients underwent concurrent LAAO at the time of CSS LVAD implantation. Average age was 62 ±12 years and five (63%) patients were male. Two patients (25%) were INTERMACS Profile 1, five (63%) Profile 3, and one (12%) was Profile 4. Four patients (50%) had evidence of preoperative left ventricular thrombus, and six (75%) had a history of arrhythmia. All patients received a fully magnetically levitated LVAD. There were no intraoperative complications and all patients had evidence of complete atrial appendage occlusion on intraoperative transesophageal echocardiogram. Performing LAAO did not significantly increase operative time compared to CSS implantation without concomitant LAAO. Median postoperative length of stay was 12 [10-13] days. During a total of 587 patient-days of follow-up, one patient suffered a non-disabling thrombotic stroke with no residual defects and one patient died from unrelated causes. LAAO is feasible via the left thoracotomy incision during CSS LVAD implantation. Early evidence suggests the procedure is safe and effective at occluding the left atrial appendage. Further research is needed to determine potential long-term benefits.

Incidence and characteristics of left atrial appendage stumps after device-enabled epicardial closure.

High success rates for left atrial appendage (LAA) exclusion with the AtriClip (Atricure, USA) device have been reported in the literature. This study evaluated the presence and characteristics of residual LAA stumps after AtriClip LAA exclusion using postoperative short- and long-term computed tomography angiography (CTA). In this retrospective analysis, 43 of 291 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery with concomitant LAA occlusion using the AtriClip device were identified with available postoperative short- and long-term follow-up by CTA. LAA patency and the absence or the size of a present residual LAA stump were assessed on 2-dimensional multiplanar reconstructions, on maximum intensity projection images and on volume-rendered 3-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions. Based on current recommendations, the threshold for a significant LAA stump length was defined <10 mm. The LAA was successfully occluded in all 43 patients (100%) as confirmed by intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography and CTA imaging with a mean follow-up duration of 7.1 ± 0.8 years post-implant. The absence of blood flow in the excluded LAA was confirmed in all cases. In 31 of 43 patients (72%), no residual stump (0 mm) was observed creating a smooth endocardial surface, CTA revealed residual LAA stumps in 11/43 patients (26%) with a length <10 mm and a significant residual stump with a depth of >10 mm (12 mm) in 1 patient (2%). The mean length, width and depth of the residual stumps were 5.8 ± 2.1, 4.4 ± 1.2 and 7.3 ± 2.3 mm, respectively. This study investigated the incidence of residual stump formation (>10 mm) after LAA closure with the AtriClip device based on CTA imaging data obtained during short- and long-term follow-up. While no LAA stump was detectable in the majority of patients, a non-significant LAA stump (<10 mm) was present in 26% of cases, indicating a favourable LAA occlusion profile for the AtriClip device. However, although a LAA stump length <10 mm is currently considered clinically safe, this definition needs further attention in future studies with regards to its potential clinical implications.

Feasibility of concomitant MitraClip and left atrial appendage occlusion.

The aim of our study is to report our single-centre experience with concomitant MitraClip (MC) and left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) and further to assess the feasibility, safety and short-term outcome of such an approach. Twenty-five consecutive patients underwent MC with concomitant LAAO at our hospital (combined group). As a control group, 25 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing standalone MC were selected. Baseline parameters were equal between the two groups. Patients in the combined group had longer procedural time (90.0 min vs. 66.0 min, p=0.02) and radiation time (32.0 min vs. 18.0 min, p=0.01). There were no procedural deaths. At 30 days, one patient died due to cerebral haemorrhage (combined vs. 4% vs. 0%, p=0.32) and two had acute kidney injury (combined vs. 4% vs. 4%, p=1.00). In multivariate analysis, the association of LAAO with device or procedural success was not significant. LAAO along with MC in a single stage procedure is feasible. These preliminary results have to be validated in a large randomised study, in order to assess the efficacy of combined LAAO that can be expected to become evident only after longer follow-up.

Outcome after simultaneous PCI and left atrial appendage occlusion

PCI with concomitant left atrial appendage occlusion is a feasible alternative to combined anti-platelet and anti-thrombotic management in patients with CAD and atrial fibrillation. Longer-term follow-up will be needed to demonstrate efficacy.

Surgical left atrial appendage occlusion during cardiac surgery for patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis.

Concomitant left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) during surgical ablation has emerged as a potential treatment strategy to reduce stroke and perioperative mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The present meta-analysis aims to assess current evidence on the efficacy and safety between LAAO and LAA preservation cohorts for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Electronic searches were performed using six electronic databases from their inception to November 2013, identifying all relevant comparative randomized and observational studies comparing LAAO with non-LAAO in AF patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Data were extracted and analysed according to predefined endpoints including mortality, stroke, postoperative AF and reoperation for bleeding. Seven relevant studies identified for qualitative and quantitative analyses, including 3653 patients undergoing LAAO (n = 1716) versus non-LAAO (n = 1937). Stroke incidence was significantly reduced in the LAAO occlusion group at the 30-day follow-up [0.95 vs 1.9%; odds ratio (OR) 0.46; P = 0.005] and the latest follow-up (1.4 vs 4.1%; OR 0.48; P = 0.01), compared with the non-LAAO group. Incidence of all-cause mortality was significantly decreased with LAAO (1.9 vs 5%; OR 0.38; P = 0.0003), while postoperative AF and reoperation for bleeding was comparable. While acknowledging the limitations and inadequate statistical power of the available evidence, this study suggests LAAO as a promising strategy for stroke reduction perioperatively and at the short-term follow-up without a significant increase in complications. Larger randomized studies in the future are required, with clearer surgical and anticoagulation protocols and adequate long-term follow-up, to validate the clinical efficacy of LAAO versus non-LAAO groups.