Concomitant Ketoconazole Research Articles

Effects of Ketoconazole on the Pharmacokinetics of Mifepristone, a Competitive Glucocorticoid Receptor Antagonist, in Healthy Men.

IntroductionMifepristone, a competitive glucocorticoid receptor antagonist approved for Cushing syndrome, and ketoconazole, an antifungal and steroidogenesis inhibitor, are both inhibitors of and substrates for cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4). This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic effects of concomitant ketoconazole, a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, on mifepristone.MethodsIn an open-label, two-period, single-center study, healthy adult men received mifepristone 600 mg orally daily for 12 days (period 1) followed by mifepristone 600 mg daily plus ketoconazole 200 mg orally twice daily for 5 days (period 2). Serial pharmacokinetic blood samples were collected predose and over 24 h postdose on days 12 (period 1) and 17 (period 2). A cross-study comparison (using data on file) further examined whether systemic exposure to mifepristone plus ketoconazole exceeded the exposure following mifepristone 1200 mg orally administered for 7 days.ResultsSixteen subjects were enrolled and 14 completed the study. Concomitant administration with ketoconazole increased the systemic exposure to mifepristone, based on geometric least squares mean ratios, by 28% for C max and 38% for AUC0–24. This increase was 85% and 87% of the exposure observed following mifepristone’s highest label dose of 1200 mg/day for C max and AUC0–24, respectively. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 56.3% (9/16) of subjects during administration of mifepristone alone and in 57.1% (8/14) during combination with ketoconazole. No serious AEs were reported.ConclusionSystemic exposure to mifepristone increased following multiple doses of mifepristone 600 mg daily plus ketoconazole 200 mg twice daily. Little to no increase in AEs occurred. Dose adjustment of mifepristone may be needed when given with ketoconazole.FundingCorcept Therapeutics.

Effect of enzyme inhibition on perampanel pharmacokinetics: Why study design matters

ObjectivesPerampanel, a selective, noncompetitive AMPA receptor antagonist, is indicated as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of partial seizures with or without secondarily generalized seizures and primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures in patients with epilepsy aged 12years and older. In vitro studies and Phase I trials indicate that perampanel is metabolized almost exclusively by CYP3A, with an elimination half-life (t1/2) averaging approximately 105h. Understanding of pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions—enzyme inhibition or induction—and anticipating their occurrence are important for management of patients with epilepsy. Here we report PK results from a Phase I drug-drug interaction (DDI) study (Study 005) combining perampanel with the CYP3A inhibitor ketoconazole, as well as supplementary in silico predictions further exploring this interaction. MethodsA Phase I, randomized, open-label, two-period, two-treatment, two-way crossover study was conducted in 26 healthy adult male volunteers. Subjects were randomized to 1 of 2 treatment sequences. In one period, subjects received a single 1-mg fasting dose of perampanel (Day1); in the other period, subjects received ketoconazole 400mg once daily for 10days with a single 1-mg perampanel dose while fasting (Day3). Blood samples were drawn at multiple time points up to 288h after the perampanel dose. Pharmacokinetic parameters of perampanel were calculated by noncompartmental analysis, and safety was recorded. An integrated, physiologically based PK model built in Simcyp® provided additional insight into this interaction. Drug-drug interaction intensity was measured by the ratio of systemic exposure (area under plasma concentration-time curve [AUC]) of perampanel in the presence or absence of concomitant ketoconazole. ResultsSingle oral doses of 1mg perampanel and once-daily oral doses of ketoconazole 400mg were safe and well tolerated. Maximum perampanel plasma concentration (Cmax) and time to Cmax showed no apparent differences when perampanel was administered alone versus with ketoconazole. Ketoconazole co-administration resulted in an approximate 20% increase in perampanel AUC (P<0.001). This increase, although statistically significant, was a<2.0-fold AUC change and alone would suggest a modest effect of ketoconazole. To further explore these results, DDI simulations were performed to query the findings and test additional study conditions. Using the actual trial conditions of Study 005, the simulations also predicted an AUC ratio increase <2-fold, providing verification of the simulation assumptions and the modest effect of ketoconazole for 10days. Simulations further suggested that an interaction effect of ketoconazole on perampanel exposure (>2-fold) of potential clinical significance could be predicted when using larger doses of ketoconazole (e.g., 200mg every 6h) coadministered for a greater time period (e.g., 30days), with AUC ratio as high as 3.36. Additionally, simulations suggested that a significant interaction with co-administration of perampanel and an inhibitor more potent than ketoconazole (such as itraconazole) could not be ruled out. ConclusionsSelecting an appropriate study design is critical to fully characterize the PK interaction for drugs such as perampanel that have a long t1/2. Although a negligible effect on perampanel PK was observed following co-administration of ketoconazole 400mg/day for 10days, this is likely due in part to the relatively brief co-administration period of ketoconazole and perampanel (<3 times the t1/2 of perampanel). While short-term administration of a CYP3A inhibitor may not significantly increase perampanel exposure, such increases may be expected following chronic and larger dosing or with a more potent inhibitor.

Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between the Orexin Receptor Antagonist Almorexant and the CYP3A4 Inhibitors Ketoconazole and Diltiazem

Almorexant, a tetrahydroisoquinoline orexin receptor antagonist and first representative of a new class of compounds for the treatment of insomnia, is a substrate of the cytochrome P450 3A4 isoenzyme (CYP3A4). Two randomized two-way crossover studies were performed in healthy subjects investigating the pharmacokinetic interaction between almorexant and the CYP3A4 inhibitors ketoconazole and diltiazem. When administered as a single dose of 100 mg almorexant during steady state of ketoconazole (400 mg once daily for 14 days) or diltiazem treatment (300 mg once daily for 11 days), the exposure to almorexant was 10.5- and 3.5-fold, respectively, greater when compared with almorexant alone. Exposure to the phenol metabolites M3 and M8 increased in the presence of the CYP3A4 inhibitors, whereas that to M6 (dealkylated metabolite) decreased. Concomitant ketoconazole decreased formation of the dehydrogenated metabolite M5 and diltiazem increased concentrations of this metabolite. Higher almorexant exposure was associated with an increased incidence of typical almorexant-related adverse events such as fatigue (both studies) and somnolence (ketoconazole study only). The present results indicate that dose adaptation must be considered when almorexant would be coadministered with inhibitors of CYP3A4.

Evaluation of the effects of rifampicin, ketoconazole and erythromycin on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of the components of a novel oral contraceptive containing estradiol valerate and dienogest in healthy postmenopausal women

BackgroundWe evaluated the effects of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) induction and inhibition on steady-state pharmacokinetics of the components of a novel oral contraceptive (OC) containing estradiol valerate (E2V) and dienogest (DNG). Study DesignCYP3A4 induction was assessed in an open-label, one-arm study. Sixteen healthy postmenopausal women received E2V 2 mg/DNG 3 mg (days 1–17) and concomitant rifampicin (600 mg, days 12–16). Ratios of the area under the serum concentration–time curve between 0 and 24 h [AUC(0–24 h)] and maximum serum concentration (Cmax) of E2 and DNG on days 17 and 11 (after and before rifampicin intervention) are presented. CYP3A4 inhibition was investigated in an open-label, parallel-group study in 24 healthy postmenopausal women receiving E2V 2 mg/DNG 3 mg (days 1–14) and concomitant ketoconazole (400 mg, n=12) or erythromycin (500 mg three times daily, n=12) on days 8–14. Mean ratios of AUC(0–24 h) and Cmax of E2 and DNG on days 7 and 14 are presented. ResultsConcomitant administration of rifampicin decreased systemic drug exposure and yielded geometric mean ratios for E2Cmax and AUC(0–24 h) of 75% and 56%, respectively. Corresponding mean ratios for DNG were 48% and 17%, respectively. Ketoconazole coadministration increased systemic drug exposure and yielded ratios of E2 of 165% and 157%, respectively, and ratios of DNG of 194% and 286%, respectively. Erythromycin coadministration also resulted in increased mean Cmax and AUC(0–24 h) of both E2 and DNG. Geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUC(0–24 h) for E2 were 151% and 133%, respectively. Corresponding ratios for DNG were 133% and 162%, respectively. ConclusionsSignificant drug–drug interactions are apparent when CYP3A4 modulators are coadministered with the components of a novel OC containing E2V/DNG. Coadministration of CYP3A4 modulators should be avoided where possible, and another type of contraception should be used when coadministration of CYP3A4 inducers like rifampicin is unavoidable.

A Phase I Clinical Study of High Dose Ketoconazole Plus Weekly Docetaxel for Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer

This phase I study of high dose ketoconazole and docetaxel was designed against castration resistant prostate cancer to determine the maximum tolerated doses, side effects, and pharmacokinetic interaction of co-administered docetaxel and ketoconazole. Patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer received weekly docetaxel for 3 of every 4 weeks plus daily ketoconazole. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on day 1 (docetaxel alone) and day 16 (after ketoconazole). The study enrolled 42 patients at 9 different dose levels. The combination regimens investigated included docetaxel weekly, increasing from 5 to 43 mg/m(2), with starting doses of 600, 800 or 1,200 mg ketoconazole daily. Decreases in prostate specific antigen of 50% or greater were seen in 62% of patients. Of 25 patients with soft tissue disease 7 (28%) had a partial response. Median overall survival was 22.8 months and was significantly greater in docetaxel naïve patients than in patients pretreated with docetaxel (36.8 vs 10.3 months, p = 0.0001). The most frequently observed adverse events were anemia, edema, fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, sensory neuropathy and elevated liver function tests. The fractional change in docetaxel clearance correlated significantly with ketoconazole exposure (p <0.01). Concomitant ketoconazole increased docetaxel exposure 2.6-fold with 1,200 mg daily, 1.6-fold with 800 mg daily and approximately 1.3 to 1.5-fold with 600 mg daily. Combination regimens using 600 mg ketoconazole daily were fairly well tolerated and the maximum tolerated dose of docetaxel was 32 mg/m(2). Results suggest that the combination has significant antitumor activity in castration resistant prostate cancer. The long survival in the docetaxel naïve cohort warrants additional, larger trials of docetaxel with ketoconazole or possibly CYP17A1 inhibitors such as abiraterone.

Effect of the CYP3A inhibitor ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of bortezomib in patients with advanced solid tumors: A prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, two-way crossover drug—drug interaction study

Background: The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib undergoes oxidative biotransformation via multiple cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, with CYP3A4 identified as a partial, yet potentially important, contributor based on in vitro drug metabolism studies. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of concomitant administration of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of bortezomib. Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter, openlabel, randomized, multiple-dose, 2-way crossover study in patients with advanced solid tumors. All patients received bortezomib 1.0 mg/m 2 IV (on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of two 21-day cycles) and were randomized to receive concomitant ketoconazole 400 mg on days 6, 7, 8, and 9 of cycle 1 or 2. Serial blood samples were collected over the day-8 dosing interval (immediately prior to bortezomib administration, and from 5 minutes to 72 hours after administration) in cycles 1 and 2 for measurement of plasma bortezomib concentrations for noncompartmental PK analysis and blood 20S proteasome inhibition for PD analysis. All adverse events (AEs) were recorded during each cycle including serious AEs and all neurotoxicity events for up to 30 days after the last dose of bortezomib. Results: Twenty-one patients (median age, 57 years; sex, 67% male; race, 86% white; median body surface area, 2.01 m 2) were randomized to treatment. Twelve pa- tients completed the protocol-specified dosing and PK sampling in both cycles 1 and 2. Assessment of the effect of ketoconazole on bortezomib PK and PD was based on data in these 12 PK-evaluable patients. The ratio of geometric mean bortezomib AUC 0-tlast(AUC from time 0 to last quantifiable concentration) for bortezomib plus ketoconazole versus bortezomib alone was 1.352 (90% CI, 1.032–1.772). Consistent with this observed mean increase in bortezomib exposure, concomitant administration of ketoconazole was associated with a corresponding increase (24%–46%) in the blood proteasome inhibitory effect. Conclusion: Concomitant administration of the CYP3A inhibitor ketoconazole with bortezomib resulted in a mean increase of 35% in bortezomib exposure. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00129207.

Bioavailability of two oral formulations of loratadine 20 mg with concomitant ketoconazole: An open-label, randomized, two-period crossover comparison in healthy Mexican adult volunteers

Background: Loratadine is a long-acting antihistaminewith selective peripheral histamine H 1-receptor antagonistic activity and fewer sedative effects compared with conventional antihistamines, and is widely used in Mexico. Although several generic formulations of loratadine are available in Mexico, based on a literature search, information concerning the bioavailability of each formulation in the Mexican population is not available. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare thebioavailability and tolerability of 2 oral formulations of loratadine 20 mg (two 10-mg tablets) used in Mexico: Sensibit® (test formulation; Laboratorios Liomont S.A. de C.V., Mexico City, Mexico) and Clarityne® (reference formulation; Schering-Plough S.A. de C.V., Mexico City, Mexico) in healthy volunteers. Methods: This open-label, randomized, 2-period crossover study was conducted at Universidad Autônoma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico. Eligible subjects were healthy male Mexican volunteers aged ⩾ 18 years. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive a single 20-mg dose (two 10-mg tablets) of the test or reference formulation, followed by a 2-week washout period, followed by the same dose of the alternate formulation. A 400-mg dose of ketoconazole (2 doses in 24 hours) was administered to each subject before the administration of each formulation, and a 200-mg dose of ketoconazole was given together with each formulation (ie, a total of 600 mg of ketoconazole was administered). Doses were administered after a 12-hour overnight fast. For analysis of pharmacokinetic properties, including C maX, AUC 0−t, and AUC 0−∞, blood samples were drawn at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 5, 8, 12, 16, and 22 hours after dosing. The formulations were considered bioequivalent if the geometric mean ratios of C maX and AUC were within the predetermined equivalence range of 80% to 125%. Tolerability was assessed by monitoring vital signs and subject interview regarding the potential presence of adverse events (AEs). Results: Thirty-two subjects were enrolled in thestudy (mean age, 22 years [range, 18–28 years]; mean weight, 68.9 kg [range, 58–79 kg]; mean height, 170.8 cm [range, 158–183 cm]). Sixteen subjects received the test formulation first. No period or sequence effect was observed. The 90% CIs for the corresponding ratios of CmaX, AUC 0−t, and AUC 0−∞ were 81.43% to 106.01%, 83.12% to 100.23%, and 84.06% to 101.10% (all, P < 0.05), meeting the predetermined criteria for bioequivalence. Similar results were found for data without a logarithmic transformation. No AEs were reported throughout the study. Conclusions: In this small study in healthy Mexicanvolunteers, a single, 20-mg dose of the test formulation of loratadine was found to be bioequivalent to that of the reference formulation based on the rate and extent of absorption when concomitantly administered with ketoconazole. Both formulations were well tolerated.

Enhancement of Nifedipine-Induced Gingival Overgrowth by Concomitant Ketoconazole in Rats

Nifedipine (NIF), a calcium channel blocker, is well known to induce gingival overgrowth (GO) as an adverse effect, and ketoconazole (KTZ), an azole antifungal agent, has been implicated in various drug interactions. We here examined the effects of concomitant KTZ on NIF-induced GO in a rat model. Fifteen-day-old male Fischer rats were fed chow with NIF, KTZ, or both. After 41 days, gingival conditions were evaluated and the concentration of NIF in serum was measured. Rats fed with NIF alone had induced GO and suppressed growth, while those given KTZ alone did not. Compared to the administration of NIF alone, concomitant KTZ significantly increased the severity of GO and the concentration of NIF in serum. These results suggest that concomitant KTZ increases the serum concentration of NIF and enhances the severity of GO.

Hepatotoxicity Associated With Cyclosporine Monitoring Using C 2 Recommendations in Adults Renal Recipients Receiving Ketoconazole

Following the change, in the way we monitored cyclosporine (CsA) levels in January 2000 namely from C 0 to C 2 concentrations, in renal “de novo” allograft recipients, some patients treated with concomitant ketoconazole experienced liver toxicity, a complication that had not been previously seen with CsA monitoring using C 0. Therefore, we decided to compare the outcomes of patients transplanted using CsA levels monitored by C 0 (1998 to 1999) who also had simultaneous C 2 determinations (group A) with those of recipients transplanted after 2000 (group B). All received steroids, azathioprine, and CsA plus ketoconazole. Recipients were followed for at least a year after transplantation. Patients in group B showed higher CsA C 2 levels, AUC concentrations, and drug doses during the immediate postsurgical period, and at 2 weeks as well as 4 and 6 months posttransplantation. Six group B patients (26%) but no group A recipients displayed, severe liver toxicity characterized by jaundice, elevated liver enzymes, with negative serological tests for CMV, HVC, and HVB. There was a correlation between the GOT and the C 2 CsA levels; both normalized 15 to 55 days after CsA dose reduction. High C 2 CsA levels, which have been recommended when the drug is used alone in renal transplantation, cannot be used in patients taking ketoconazole, because C 2 neither represents nor correlates with AUC drug exposure. Thus high C 2 levels may produce liver toxicity.

Co‐administration of ketoconazole with H1‐antagonists ebastine and loratadine in healthy subjects: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects

Two studies were conducted to evaluate the effects of coadministration of ketoconazole with two nonsedating antihistamines, ebastine and loratadine, on the QTc interval and on the pharmacokinetics of the antihistamines. In both studies healthy male subjects (55 in one study and 62 in the other) were assigned to receive 5 days of antihistamine (ebastine 20 mg qd in one study, and loratadine 10 mg qd in the other) or placebo alone using a predetermined randomization schedule, followed by 8 days of concomitant ketoconazole 450 mg qd/antihistamine or ketoconazole 400 mg qd/placebo. Serial ECGs and blood sampling for drug analysis were performed at baseline and on study days 5 (at the end of monotherapy) and 13 (at the end of combination therapy). QT intervals were corrected for heart rate using the formula QTc = QT/RR(alpha) with special emphasis on individualized alpha values derived from each subject's own QT/RR relationship at baseline. No significant changes in QTc interval from baseline were observed after 5 days administration of ebastine, loratadine or placebo. Ketoconazole/placebo increased the mean QTc (95% CI) by 6.96 (3.31-10.62) ms in the ebastine study and by 7.52 (4.15-10.89) ms in the loratadine study. Mean QTc was statistically significantly increased during both ebastine/ketoconazole administration (12.21 ms; 7.39-17.03 ms) and loratadine/ketoconazole administration (10.68 ms; 6.15-15.21 ms) but these changes were not statistically significantly different from the increases seen with placebo/ketoconazole (6.96 ms; 3.31-10.62 ms), P = 0.08 ebastine study, (7.52 ms; 4.15-10.89 ms), P = 0.26 loratadine study). After the addition of ketoconazole, the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) for ebastine increased by 42.5 fold, and that of its metabolite carebastine by 1.4 fold. The mean AUC for loratadine increased by 4.5 fold and that of its metabolite desloratadine by 1.9 fold following administration of ketoconazole. No subjects were withdrawn because of ECG changes or drug-related adverse events. Ketoconazole altered the pharmacokinetic profiles of both ebastine and loratadine although the effect was greater for the former drug. The coadministration of ebastine with ketoconazole resulted in a non significant mean increase of 5.25 ms (-0.65 to 11.15 ms) over ketoconazole with placebo (6.96 ms) while ketoconazole plus loratadine resulted in a nonsignificant mean increase of 3.16 ms (-2.73 to 8.68 ms) over ketoconazole plus placebo (7.52 ms). Changes in uncorrected QT intervals for both antihistamines were not statistically different from those observed with ketoconazole alone. The greater effect of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of ebastine was not accompanied by a correspondingly greater pharmacodynamic effect on cardiac repolarization.

Influence of Drugs Interacting with CYP3A4 on the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of the Prandial Glucose Regulator Repaglinide

The object of this study was to analyze drug interactions between repaglinide, a short‐acting insulin secretagogue, and five other drugs interacting with CYP3A4: ketoconazole, rifampicin, ethinyloestradiol/levonorgestrel (in an oral contraceptive), simvastatin, and nifedipine. In two open‐label, two‐period, randomized crossover studies, healthy subjects received repaglinide alone, repaglinide on day 5 of ketoconazole treatment, or repaglinide on day 7 of rifampicin treatment. In three open‐label, three‐period, randomized crossover studies, healthy subjects received 5 days of repaglinide alone; 5 days of ethinyloestradiol/levonorgestrel, simvastatin, or nifedipine alone; or 5 days of repaglinide concomitant with ethinyloestradiol/levonorgestrel, simvastatin, or nifedipine. Compared to administration of repaglinide alone, concomitant ketoconazole increased mean AUC0‐∞ for repaglinide by 15% and mean Cmax by 7%. Concomitant rifampicin decreased mean AUC0‐∞ for repaglinide by 31% and mean Cmax by 26%. Concomitant treatment with CYP3A4 substrates altered mean AUC0–5h and mean Cmax for repaglinide by 1% and 17% (ethinyloestradiol/levonorgestrel), 2% and 27% (simvastatin), or 11% and 3% (nifedipine). Profiles of blood glucose concentration following repaglinide dosing were altered by less than 8% by both ketoconazole and rifampicin. In all five studies, most adverse events were related to hypoglycemia, as expected in a normal population given a blood glucose regulator. The safety profile of repaglinide was not altered by pretreatment with ketoconazole or rifampicin or by coadministration with ethinyloestradiol/levonorgestrel. The incidence of adverse events increased with coadministration of simvastatin or nifedipine compared to either repaglinide or simvastatin/nifedipine treatment alone. No clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions occurred between repaglinide and the CYP3A4 substrates ethinyloestradiol/levonorgestrel, simvastatin, or nifedipine. The pharmacokinetic profile of repaglinide was altered by administration of potent inhibitors or inducers, such as ketoconazole or rifampicin, but to a lesser degree than expected. These results are probably explained by the metabolic pathway of repaglinide that involves other enzymes than CYP3A4, reflected to some extent by a small change in repaglinide pharmacodynamics. Thus, careful monitoring of blood glucose in repaglinide‐treated patients receiving strong inhibitors or inducers of CYP3A4 is recommended, and an increase in repaglinide dose may be necessary. No safety concerns were observed, except a higher incidence in adverse events in patients receiving repaglinide and simvastatin or nifedipine.

Influence of Drugs Interacting with CYP3A4 on the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of the Prandial Glucose Regulator Repaglinide

The object of this study was to analyze drug interactions between repaglinide, a short-acting insulin secretagogue, and five other drugs interacting with CYP3A4: ketoconazole, rifampicin, ethinyloestradiol/levonorgestrel (in an oral contraceptive), simvastatin, and nifedipine. In two open-label, two-period, randomized crossover studies, healthy subjects received repaglinide alone, repaglinide on day 5 of ketoconazole treatment, or repaglinide on day 7 of rifampicin treatment. In three open-label, three-period, randomized crossover studies, healthy subjects received 5 days of repaglinide alone; 5 days of ethinyloestradiol/levonorgestrel, simvastatin, or nifedipine alone; or 5 days of repaglinide concomitant with ethinyloestradiol/levonorgestrel, simvastatin, or nifedipine. Compared to administration of repaglinide alone, concomitant ketoconazole increased mean AUC0-infinity for repaglinide by 15% and mean Cmax by 7%. Concomitant rifampicin decreased mean AUC0-infinity for repaglinide by 31% and mean Cmax by 26%. Concomitant treatment with CYP3A4 substrates altered mean AUC0-5 h and mean Cmax for repaglinide by 1% and 17% (ethinyloestradiol/levonorgestrel), 2% and 27% (simvastatin), or 11% and 3% (nifedipine). Profiles of blood glucose concentration following repaglinide dosing were altered by less than 8% by both ketoconazole and rifampicin. In all five studies, most adverse events were related to hypoglycemia, as expected in a normal population given a blood glucose regulator. The safety profile of repaglinide was not altered by pretreatment with ketoconazole or rifampicin or by coadministration with ethinyloestradiol/levonorgestrel. The incidence of adverse events increased with coadministration of simvastatin or nifedipine compared to either repaglinide or simvastatin/nifedipine treatment alone. No clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions occurred between repaglinide and the CYP3A4 substrates ethinyloestradiol/levonorgestrel, simvastatin, or nifedipine. The pharmacokinetic profile of repaglinide was altered by administration of potent inhibitors or inducers, such as ketoconazole or rifampicin, but to a lesser degree than expected. These results are probably explained by the metabolic pathway of repaglinide that involves other enzymes than CYP3A4, reflected to some extent by a small change in repaglinide pharmacodynamics. Thus, careful monitoring of blood glucose in repaglinide-treated patients receiving strong inhibitors or inducers of CYP3A4 is recommended, and an increase in repaglinide dose may be necessary. No safety concerns were observed, except a higher incidence in adverse events in patients receiving repaglinide and simvastatin or nifedipine.

Effect of metabolic inhibitors on cyclosporine pharmacokinetics using a population approach.

Drugs known to inhibit the metabolism of cyclosporine are administered concomitantly to those who undergo cardiothoracic transplantation. The aim of this study was to examine in quantitative terms the relationship between cyclosporine oral dose rate and the trough concentration (Css(trough)) at steady state in patients who undergo cardiothoracic transplantation and are administered cyclosporine alone or in combination with drugs known to inhibit its metabolism. Dose and whole blood cyclosporine Css(trough) observations measured using the enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT) (396 observations) or the TDx assay (435 observations) were collected as part of routine blood concentration monitoring from 182 patients who underwent cardiothoracic transplantation. Data were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects modeling approach to examine the effect of metabolic inhibitors on dose-rate-Css(trough) ratio. The mean (and 95% confidence interval) dose-rate-Css(trough) ratio for cyclosporine generated from concentrations measured using EMIT was 94 (82.5-105.5) Lh(-1) for patients administered cyclosporine alone, 66.7 (58.1-75.3) Lh(-1) for patients administered concomitant diltiazem, 47.9 (15.4 -80.4) Lh(-1) for patients administered concomitant itraconazole, 21.7 (14.8-28.5) Lh(-1) for patients administered concomitant ketoconazole, and 14.9 (11.8-18.1) Lh(-1) for patients concomitantly administered diltiazem and ketoconazole. For patients administered concomitant cyclosporine, ketoconazole, and diltiazem, the dosage of cyclosporine, if it is administered alone, should be 20% to achieve the same blood concentrations. This will allow safer drug concentration targeting of cyclosporine after cardiothoracic transplantation.

Effects of Ketoconazole on Digoxin Absorption and Disposition in Rat

Digoxin, a cardiac glycoside, is a substrate of the multidrug transporter P-glycoprotein (Pgp), and in rats has also been identified as a substrate for cytochrome P₄₅₀ 3A (CYP3A). Ketoconazole, an antifungal agent, was shown to inhibit Pgp in a multidrug-resistant cell line, and is known to be a potent inhibitor of CYP3A. Here, we determined the effects of ketoconazole on digoxin absorption and disposition in rats. Digoxin was administered intravenously or orally with or without a concomitant oral dose of ketoconazole. When given intravenously, digoxin AUC increased from 93 ± 22 to 486 ± 26 µg·h/l with ketoconazole administration. Similarly, ketoconazole raised the AUC of orally administered digoxin from 63 ± 17 to 411 ± 50 µg·h/l. Concomitant ketoconazole administration prolonged digoxin elimination, yielding a nonlinear pharmacokinetic profile. Using time-averaged values, digoxin bioavailability increased from 0.68 ± 0.18 to 0.84 ± 0.10, while mean absorption time was reduced from 1.1 ± 0.4 to 0.3 ± 0.1 h. Thus, in rats, ketoconazole increases digoxin plasma concentrations, rate of absorption and bioavailability. Although the effects of ketoconazole on AUC could be explained by inhibition of both CYP3A and Pgp, which cannot be differentiated in this study, the decreased mean absorption time can only be explained by inhibition of Pgp in the intestine.

Plasma carbamazepine concentrations were significantly increased by concomitant ketoconazole,

Plasma carbamazepine concentrations were significantly increased by concomitant ketoconazole,

Cyclosporine a immunosuppression in sheep with response enhancement by concomitant ketoconazole.

1. The pharmacokinetics of a single dose of Cyclosporine A (CsA) administered to sheep by intravenous (i.v.) route were examined. 2. Concomitant administration of ketoconazole was found to increase the area under the blood CsA concentration-time curve (AUC) and was effective when administered by the oral or intraperitoneal route. 3. The effects of CsA and ketoconazole on the immune system of sheep were also assessed. 4. A single dose of CsA 5 mg/kg resulted in abrogation of in vitro lymphocyte function manifest at 24 h after injection of CsA. Normal responsiveness recovered in 48-72 h. Numbers of T lymphocytes in peripheral blood were elevated transiently at 48 h although no other significant alteration in lymphocyte subsets was observed with this treatment. 5. Concomitant ketoconazole administration enhanced the CsA-induced suppression of in vitro lymphocyte responses. Blood levels of CsA (AUC values to 24 h) were significantly elevated with concomitant ketoconazole administration and depression of lymphocyte responses to mitogens were also significantly enhanced. An increase in the proportion of T4 positive cells in the blood was observed at 48 h and at 7 days after administration of CsA with ketoconazole. 6. These findings indicate that CsA effectively abrogates immunocompetence in the sheep and this immunosuppressive effect is enhanced by concomitant administration of ketoconazole.

Concomitant ketoconazole reduces the cost of cyclosporin therapy in heart transplant recipients

Concomitant ketoconazole reduces the cost of cyclosporin therapy in heart transplant recipients