Concomitant Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Research Articles

Defining clinically significant outcomes following high tibial osteotomy with or without concomitant procedures

IntroductionThe threshold values needed to achieve MCID and PASS following HTO with or without concomitant procedures are not well known. ObjectivesTo determine values and variables predictive for achieving the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) of patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores following high tibial osteotomy (HTO) with or without associated restoration procedures for the correction of varus deformity. MethodsA prospectively collected HTO outcomes registry was retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent HTO between 2001 and 2018. Collected PROs included International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Lysholm scores. A distribution-based approach was used to calculate MCID, and an anchor-based approach was used for the calculation of PASS. ResultsFifty-five patients were identified (n = 43 males; n = 12 females) with a mean age of 37.9 ± 9.0 years at surgery and average follow-up of 3.3 ± 3.1 years. The MCID and PASS for IKDC were calculated as 12.5 and 40.23, respectively. MCID and PASS values for each of the KOOS subscales were as follows: symptoms: 9.9 and 71.43; pain: 11.3 and 72.22; daily living: 12.0 and 77.94; sports: 16.0 and 40; quality of life: 15.1 and 56.25, respectively. ConclusionsBased on calculated values for MCID and PASS following HTO using IKDC and KOOS subscales, higher preoperative PROs, prior medial meniscectomy, higher BMI, concomitant ACL reconstruction and worker's compensation status were associated with failure to achieve clinically significant outcomes. Prior ACL reconstruction was found to be predictive of MCID for KOOS-symptoms.

The lateral meniscal extrusion after repair with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at a mean follow-up of 3.5 years

BackgroundA meniscal repair is often performed on radial/flap or longitudinal tears of the lateral meniscus (LM) combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, it is unknown if meniscal extrusion changes over time after repair. This study evaluated whether meniscal extrusion of the LM is maintained after repair or progresses with time using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MethodsAmong 574 patients who underwent primary anatomic ACLR, 123 patients followed up for more than 2 years were retrospectively analyzed. Forty patients with concomitant radial/flap tears of the LM (group R), 43 with longitudinal LM tears (group L), and 40 with intact LM (group C, matched-control group) were included. Clinical findings (pain, range of motion, swelling, and anterior laxity), lateral joint space on radiograph, and meniscal extrusion on MRI were assessed. Lateral/posterior meniscal extrusions were examined preoperatively, within 3 weeks after surgery, and at the final follow-up, and the absolute values and relative values (the preoperative values as baseline) were assessed respectively. ResultsThere were no significant differences in the clinical and roentgenographic findings among the groups. No difference was observed in the relative values within 3 weeks after surgery among three groups, although the absolute values were larger in the repaired groups than in group C. At the final follow-up, however, the lateral extrusion in group L had progressed significantly, compared with that in group C (P = 0.033), while no significant difference was detected in the lateral extrusion between groups R and C (P = 0.177). The posterior extrusion in groups R and L had progressed significantly compared with that in group C (P < 0.001). ConclusionsLM extrusion could not be improved even immediately after meniscal repair, and it progressed laterally and posteriorly for more than 2 years after surgery.

Current Concepts on Tissue Adhesive Use for Meniscal Repair—We Are Not There Yet: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Background: Tissue adhesives (TAs) represent a promising alternative or augmentation method to conventional tissue repair techniques. In sports medicine, TA use has been suggested and implemented in the treatment of meniscal tears. The aim of this review was to present and discuss the current evidence and base of knowledge regarding the clinical usage of TAs for meniscal repair. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for studies reporting on clinical outcomes of TA usage for meniscal repair in humans in the English language published before January 2020. Results: Ten studies were eligible for review and included 352 meniscal repairs: 94 (27%) were TA-based repairs and 258 (73%) were combined suture and TA repairs. Concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed in 224 repairs (64%). All included studies utilized fibrin-based TA. Of the 10 studies, 9 were evidence level 4 (case series), and 8 reported on a cohort of ≤40 meniscal repairs. Rates of meniscal healing were evaluated in 9 of 10 studies, with repair failure seen in 39 repairs (11%). Conclusion: The use of TAs, specifically fibrin-based TAs, for meniscal repair shows good results as either an augmentation or primary repair of various configurations of meniscal tears. However, this review reveals an absence of comparative high-quality evidence supporting the routine use of TAs for meniscal repair and emphasizes the lack of an ideal TA designed for that purpose. Further high-quality research, basic science and clinical, will facilitate the development of new materials and enable testing their suitability for use in meniscal repair.

Which factors are associated with the prevalence of meniscal repair?

Purpose To investigate the potential factors associated with the prevalence of meniscal repairMethods Patients who received partial meniscectomy or meniscal repair in our institution from Jan 2015 to Dec 2019 were included in current study. The inclusion criteria were (1) meniscus tear treated using meniscectomy or repair, (2) with or without concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, (3) not multiligamentous injury. Demographic data, including sex, age, body mass index (BMI), injury-to-surgery interval and intra-articular factors such as the location of injury, medial or lateral, ACL rupture or not and the option of procedure (partial meniscectomy or repair) were documented from medical records. Univariate analysis consisted of chi-square. Multivariate logistic regression was then performed to adjust for confounding factors.Results 592 patients including 399 males and 193 females with a mean age of 28.7 years (range from 10 to 75 years) were included in current study. In the univariate analysis, male (p = 0.002), patients aged 40 years or younger (p < 0.001), increased weight (p = 0.010), Posterior meniscus torn (0.011), concurrent ACL ruputure (p < 0.001), lateral meniscus (p = 0.039) and early surgery (p < 0.001) were all associated with the prevalence of meniscal repair. However, After adjusting for confounding factors, we found that age (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17 - 0.68, p = 0.002), ACL injury (OR, 3.76; 95% CI, 1.97 – 7.21, p < 0.001), side of menisci (OR, 3.29; 95% CI, 1.43 – 7.55, p = 0.005), site of tear (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.07 – 0.32, p < 0.001), and duration of injury (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.28 – 0.82, p = 0.008) were associated with the prevalence of meniscus repair.Conclusions Meniscal tear in aged patients especially those with concomitant ACL injury is likely to be repaired. Additionally, in order to increase the prevalence of repair and slow down progression of OA, the surgical procedure should be performed within two weeks after meniscus tear especially when the tear is located at lateral meniscal posterior.Study designCase-control study; level of evidence, 3.

The predictive factors that are associated with the number of sutures used during meniscal repair

PurposeTo investigate factors associated with the consumption of a large number of sutures during arthroscopic meniscus repair procedures.MethodsAll patients who received meniscal repair, with or without concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2019 were included in the current study. Demographic data (sex, age, body mass index (BMI), and injury-to-surgery interval) and surgical data (the site of the tear, side of the meniscus, presence of an ACL rupture or not and the number of sutures) were retrospectively collected from our medical records. The number of sutures was divided into two groups (1–2 sutures versus > 2 sutures). The stitching process was implemented through an all-inside technique using a meniscal repair device (Fast-Fix; Smith & Nephew). According to the length and stability of the meniscal tear, one to seven sutures were used. Univariate analysis consisted of chi-square tests. Multivariate logistic regression was then performed to adjust for confounding factors.ResultsA total of 242 patients, including 168 males and 57 females, was finally included. In the univariate analysis, we found that those patients who underwent meniscus repair within one month after meniscus tear were more likely to need fewer sutures than those who underwent surgery more than one month after injury (70/110 versus 59/115, p=0.062). In total, 75/109 (68.8%) lateral meniscal tears were repaired with fewer sutures than medial (34/72, 47.2%) and bilateral meniscus injuries (20/44, 45.4%; p=0.003). In the multivariate analysis, we found that the duration of injury (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.16–3.64, p=0.013), presence of an ACL injury (OR, 3.76; 95% CI, 1.97–7.21, p< 0.001) and the side of the meniscus (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.14–0.65, p=0.002) were associated with the number of sutures used during meniscal repair procedures.ConclusionsPatients who underwent meniscal repair within one month after meniscus tear, especially lateral menisci tears, were more likely to need fewer sutures.Study designCase-control study; level of evidence, 3.

Suture tape augmentation improves laxity of MCL repair in the ACL reconstructed knee.

Medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury is very common and surgical repair is sometimes necessary. Especially in the setting of simultaneous anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) as the ACL is the secondary restraint against valgus stress. The goal of this study was to evaluate knee biomechanics after suture repair of the MCL augmented with suture tape, as compared to MCL repair alone, in the setting of concomitant ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Fifteen fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were tested using a six-degrees-of-freedom robotic system under four loadings: (a) an 89.0N anterior tibial load, (b) a 5.0Nm internal and external rotation torque, (c) a 10.0Nm valgus load, (d) a 7.0Nm valgus load combined with 5.0Nm internal rotation torque as a static simulated pivot-shift. The tested conditions were ACLR with the following states: (1) MCL intact, (2) MCL deficient, (3) MCL Repair, and (4) MCL repair augmented with suture tape (MCL Repair + ST). Under the different knee loadings, the tibial displacement, and the force in either the intact MCL, suture repaired MCL or repaired MCL-suture tape complex was measured. While neither the MCL Repair nor the MCL Repair + ST restored valgus rotation to the MCL intact state, displacement was significantly smaller after MCL Repair + ST (p < 0.05). The knee rotation under external rotation torque in MCL Repair + ST did not differ MCL intact (n.s.), while with MCL Repair the rotation was significantly greater (p < 0.05). MCL Repair + ST did not cause an over-constraint of the knee in any of the tested loading conditions. In a combined ACL-reconstruction-MCL-repair model, MCL Repair augmented with suture tape improved valgus and external rotation laxity when compared to MCL suture repair alone. Suture tape augmentation may provide this additional means of stabilization and can be added at the time of surgical repair of the MCL. Clinically this may result in lower failure rates and less residual laxity after MCL repair, as well as shorter immobilization times and faster return to play.

Functional, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Second-Look Arthroscopic Outcomes After Pullout Repair for Avulsion Tears of the Posterior Lateral Meniscus Root

Background: Little data exist in the literature regarding second-look arthroscopic outcomes after pullout repair for avulsion tears of the posterior lateral meniscus root. Purpose: To (1) assess the functional, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and second-look arthroscopic outcomes after pullout repair for avulsion tears of the posterior lateral meniscus root; (2) determine which demographic and clinical factors influenced healing of the repaired posterior lateral meniscus root; and (3) compare outcomes between different meniscal healing status groups. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A total of 31 patients underwent pullout repair for avulsion tears of the posterior lateral meniscus root and had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Functional outcomes were assessed using patient-reported scores (Lysholm, Tegner, and International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] scores). Lateral meniscal extrusion, cartilage degeneration of the lateral compartment, and healing of the repaired posterior lateral meniscus root were assessed via MRI. The healing status was also assessed using second-look arthroscopic surgery, and the patients were divided into different healing status groups. Results: The postoperative patient-reported scores improved significantly compared with the preoperative values (P = .001). Lateral meniscal extrusion was reduced significantly from 3.37 ± 0.82 mm preoperatively to 0.63 ± 0.80 mm at final follow-up (P = .001). The grade of cartilage degeneration of the lateral compartment progressed from 0.69 ± 0.67 preoperatively to 0.95 ± 0.83 at final follow-up (P = .213). MRI scans showed complete healing in 28 patients (90.3%) and partial healing in 3 patients (9.7%). Second-look arthroscopic surgery showed stable healing in 18 of 23 patients (78.3%) and lax healing in 5 of 23 patients (21.7%). Patients with stable healing had significantly higher Lysholm and IKDC scores, more reduction of meniscal extrusion, and less progression of cartilage degeneration than did patients with lax healing (P < .05). Concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was found to significantly positively influence healing of the repaired posterior lateral meniscus root (P = .047). Conclusion: Pullout repair for avulsion tears of the posterior lateral meniscus root yielded significantly improved patient-reported scores, reduced meniscal extrusion, and a satisfactory healing rate at final follow-up. Patients with stable healing had significantly better functional and MRI outcomes than did patients with lax healing.

Functional outcome of osteochondral autograft is equivalent in stable knee and in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

IntroductionAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are associated in 10% to 20% of cases with extensive traumatic focal osteochondral damage. Ligament reconstruction may require osteochondral autograft for symptomatic osteochondral lesions. Combined ACL and chondral or osteochondral reconstruction is poorly evaluated in the literature; osteochondral reconstruction in stable knee better documented. The objective of this study was to compare functional results after osteochondral autograft transfer (OAT) for significant symptomatic femoral condyle defect, in stable or stabilised knees (concomitant ACL reconstruction). The hypothesis was that functional results are equivalent in both groups. Material & methodThis was a single-centre retrospective comparative observational study of patients consecutively operated on between 2000 and 2018. Fifty patients met the inclusion criteria and were divided into two groups: Group 1 (OAT+ACL, n=13) and group 2 (OAT on stable knee, n=37). The following criteria were recorded at follow-up: pain (VAS), KOOS, IKDC and Lysholm scores and Hughston radiologic score, and time to return to sport. Mean follow-up was 79.7±60 months in group 1 and 86.4±62 months in group 2. ResultsTen patients were included for analysis in group 1 and 30 in group 2. Cartilage lesion size was comparable between groups: 1.6±1.20 cm2 for group 1 and 2.3±1.3 cm2 for group 2 (ns). One complication (infection with favourable course) was observed in group 2. Sport was resumed at 8.7±2.7 vs. 8.4±3.3 months, respectively. Mean subjective scores were respectively 83.3±7.4 and 75.4±14 for Lysholm, 89.7±7.8 and 89.7±19.6 for KOOS, 78±13.7 and 72.2±12.9 for subjective IKDC, 0.5±0.5 and 0.8±0.9 for pain on VAS and 3 and 3 for radiological Hughston radiologic score, with no significant differences between groups. ConclusionSymptomatic focal osteochondral lesions treated by osteochondral autograft transfer gives the same outcome on stable or stabilised knee. Level of evidenceIV; retrospective study.

Return to Play After Isolated Meniscal Repairs in Athletes: A Systematic Review.

Background:Meniscal tears are a common knee injury. Isolated meniscal tears are less common; however, unaddressed tears can be troublesome, particularly for athletes. There is currently a lack of data in the literature on athletes returning to play after isolated meniscal repair.Purpose:To evaluate the return to play rate and time to return to play for athletes with isolated meniscal injuries.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:A search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane electronic databases was conducted to identify studies that reported the time and the rate of return to play in athletes after repair of isolated meniscal tears. Studies were excluded if there was a concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, if there was a meniscectomy instead of a meniscal repair, or if the study was a systematic review. Quality assessment and data extraction were performed by 2 examiners.Results:Overall, 21 studies were included in this review. There were 355 athletes (358 knees) with a mean age of 22.5 years (range, 9-68 years). A sex breakdown was noted in 16 of the 21 (76.2%) studies with 224 men and 71 women. The specific repair technique was described in 259 (72.3%) knees. Of the total knees, 109 (30.4%) had an open repair, 128 (35.8%) had an inside-out arthroscopic technique repair, and 22 (6.1%) had an all-inside arthroscopic technique repair. Complications were addressed in 11 studies, with 13 out of 155 (8.4%) patients across the 11 articles having a postoperative complication. Of the total 355 patients, 295 (83.1%) returned to play, and 17 of these 21 (81.0%) articles reported the time it took for athletes to return to play, with a mean return of 8.7 months.Conclusion:The study results indicate that return to play rates after isolated meniscal repair are high, with an overall return to play rate of 83.1% and a mean return to play time of 8.7 months. However, the limited number of studies, particularly ones with larger patient numbers, highlights the need for further investigation regarding isolated meniscal repair in athletes.

Fibular Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Graft Options: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Autograft Versus Allograft

PurposeTo compare varus knee stability and clinical outcomes between patients who underwent fibular collateral ligament reconstruction (FCLR) or lateral collateral ligament (LCL) reconstruction with autografts versus allografts when undergoing concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). MethodsAll patients who underwent primary ACLR and concomitant FCLR from 2010 to 2017 performed by a single surgeon (R.F.L.) were retrospectively identified. Clinical characteristics and graft choices for FCLR were collected. Patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up for clinical outcome scores and 6-month stress radiographs were included. Patients with any other ligamentous procedure or revision ACLR were excluded. ResultsWe identified 69 primary ACLR with concomitant FCLR patients who met the inclusion criteria. Fifty patients underwent FCLR with semitendinosus autografts, and 19 with allografts. There were no significant side-to-side differences (SSDs) in lateral compartment gapping on varus stress x-rays between the 2 cohorts (allograft, 0.49 mm; autograft, 0.15 mm, P = .22), and no FCLR failures. There were no significant differences between autograft and allograft groups at minimum 2-year outcomes for 12-Item Short Form mental or physical composite score (SF12 MCS, P = .134; SF12 PCS, P = .642), WOMAC total (P = .158), pain (P = .116), stiffness (P = .061), or activity (P = .252); International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) (P = .337), Tegner (P = .601), Lysholm (P = .622), or patient satisfaction (P = .218). There were no significant differences in clinical knee stability between groups at an average follow-up of 3.6 years (P = 1.0). ConclusionThere were no differences in varus stress laxity 6 months postoperatively or clinical outcome scores at ≥2 years postoperatively between patients having FCL reconstructions with either autograft or allograft. This study demonstrates that both hamstring autografts and allografts for FCL reconstructions offer reliable and similar radiographic and clinical results at short-term follow-up. Level of EvidenceIII, retrospective comparative trial.

Patient-reported outcomes of meniscal repair and meniscectomy in patients 40 years of age and older show similar good results.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients aged 40years and older who underwent meniscal repair or meniscectomy. All patients aged 40 and older who underwent a meniscal repair at a single institution from 2006 to 2017 were included. Meniscal repair cases were matched with a meniscectomy control group in a 1:3 ratio, selected for an equal proportion of concomitant ACL reconstruction in each group. PROMs, collected at a minimum follow-up of 24months, included International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form (IKDC), Marx activity scale, and a patient satisfaction scale. The primary outcome was IKDC score, which was compared between groups using a Mann-Whitney U test. Rate of failure, defined as repeat ipsilateral knee surgery or surgeon report of failure, was reported. Thirty-five meniscal repair patients and 131 meniscectomy patients were identified; 28 (80.0%) and 67 (51.1%) completed all PROMs with mean follow-up of 4.9 and 5.2years, respectively. The mean age was 48.5 ± 7.0years in the meniscal repair cohort and 52.8 ± 7.1years in the meniscectomy cohort (p = 0.009). Concomitant ACL reconstruction was present in 46.4% and 49.3% of the meniscal repair and meniscectomy cohorts, respectively (n.s.). The median IKDC score was 78 (IQR 66, 87) in the repair cohort and 77 (IQR 56, 86) in the meniscectomy cohort (n.s.). The median Marx activity scale was 3.5 (IQR 0, 8) in the repair cohort and 3.0 (IQR 0, 9) in the meniscectomy cohort (n.s.). Over 85% of both groups were satisfied or very satisfied with no between-group differences (n.s.). In patients aged 40years and older, patient-reported outcomes at an average of 5years postoperatively were satisfactory and similar in patients undergoing meniscal repair and meniscectomy, indicating that age alone should not be a contraindication to meniscal repair.Level of evidence: Level III.

Three-dimensional realignment and slope reducing osteotomy with anatomic ACL reconstruction in patients with revision anterior cruciate ligament deficiency

Introduction:Current incidence of recurrent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) instability is 5%, but revision surgery is challenging and requires a thorough analysis of potential risk factor. Moreover, recurrent and chronic ACL instability can result in medial tibio-femoral osteoarthritis (OA). Beside various soft tissue patterns, bony morphologies like a steep posterior tibial slope are associated with an increased anterior tibial translation (ATT) and rotatory instability in the ACL deficient knee. To address the instability and the osteoarthritis a combined procedure is necessary in these patients, however, little is known about the efficacy of such combined procedures. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the patient reported outcomes and knee stability following combined high tibial osteotomy (HTO) with ACL reconstruction in middle-aged patients with recurrent or chronic cruciate ligament deficiency and mild to moderate medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA). Hypotheses: Methods:Surgical reports and prospectively collected patient reported outcome scores (IKDC, Lysholm, WOMAC, VAS for pain, and Tegner activity score) as well as clinical examination were evaluated retrospectively with a mean follow up of 45.2 ± 14.7 months. Inclusion criteria were 1) high tibial osteotomy with concomitant anatomic ACL reconstruction. Data at final followup were compared to baseline values using the Wilcoxon signed rank test (p < 0.05).Results:44 patients met the inclusion criteria. 16/44 suffered a graft failure after primary ACL reconstruction, and 8/44 had chronic ACL instability, but had a previous subtotal medial meniscus resection. Mean patient age at surgery was 38.2 ± 10.5 years (range: 18 – 63) with a mean varus alignment of 4.5° ± 1.5°. All patient reported significantly improved outcome scores at final follow-up (VAS 4.3 to 1.5, Lysholm 52.4 to 73.5, IKDC 56.5 to 70.9). However, the change in Tegner score at final follow-up (3.4 to 4.5) was not significant. At final followup 25/44 patients had a removal of the fixation plate.Conclusion:The results of this study indicate, that high tibial osteotomy combined with anatomic single bundle ACL reconstruction is a good treatment option in active middle aged patients suffering from recurrent or chronic ACL deficiency with mild to moderate medial compartment OA. At a median follow-up of 24 months patient reported outcome scores were improved. Especially in patients with multiple ACL reconstruction failures realignment osteotomies should be considered.

The Clinical Outcome of Simultaneous Lateral Closed- Wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the ACL-deficient Knees with Symptomatic Femoral Varus Deformity.

Nowadays combined high tibial osteotomy and ACL reconstruction is accepted as a safe and effective surgery for patients with symptomatic varus osteoarthritis and anterior knee instability; however, the source of varus deformity is sometimes the femoral bone. No studies have reported concomitant ACL reconstruction and distal femoral osteotomy in ACL-deficient knees with femoral varus deformity and medial osteoarthritis till now. This prospective study presents the technique and clinical outcome of a consecutive series of simultaneous lateral closed-wedge distal femoral osteotomy and ACL reconstruction. Nineteen patients with confirmed ACL rupture and femoral varus deformity (mechanical lateral distal femoral angle ≥ 93°) associated with medial osteoarthritis (± lateral thrust) were included the study. The patients underwent simultaneous lateral closed-wedge distal femoral osteotomy and ACL reconstruction. At the end of one year follow up, the final range of motion and stability of the knees and the last alignment of extremities were recorded. Surgical outcomes were assessed on 2000 IKDS subjective scores and KOOS subscales. The mean preoperative varus knee was 10.6° (±2.2°) mostly from the femoral side. The mean union time was 3.2 (±0.4) months. Regarding the radiological evaluation, the alignment of extremity and mLDFA were corrected significantly compared to the pre-operative findings. At the end of one year follow up, all patients were free of knee instability. Subjective assessment based on questionnaires showed a significant improvement in all aspects of knee function after surgery, however there was no considerable change in the knees range of motion. Simultaneous lateral closed- wedge distal femoral osteotomy and ACL reconstruction is a valuable procedure in femoral varus knees with medial osteoarthritis and anterior knee instability. After one year follow up all aspects of knee function were improved without serious complications.

Second-look arthroscopic findings and clinical outcomes of meniscal repair with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of suture and meniscus fixation device

Second-look arthroscopic findings and clinical outcomes of meniscal repair with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of suture and meniscus fixation device

Tibial Slope and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Outcomes.

The tibial slope represents an important risk factor for both primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and subsequent reconstruction failure. A high tibial slope has been associated with increased anterior tibial translation, increased strain on the ACL, and increased posteromedial compartment contact pressure. Patients with ACL-deficient knees who also have coronal tibiofemoral malalignment may potentially benefit from concomitant high tibial osteotomy and ACL reconstruction. Understanding the impact of the tibial slope on ACL reconstruction outcomes and the treatment options with regard to coronal tibiofemoral alignment allows for the appropriate care of patients with both morbidities.

Anterolateral ligament reconstruction as an augmented procedure for double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction restores rotational stability: Quantitative evaluation of the pivot shift test using an inertial sensor

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to investigate the biomechanical function of the anterolateral structures (ALS) of the knee regarding rotational stability, and to attempt to verify the effectiveness of anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction concomitant with double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction by quantifying the pivot shift test (PST) using an inertial sensor. MethodsSix knees of the fresh-frozen cadavers were evaluated during the following phases: (1) [Intact]; (2) ACL-deficient [ACL-D]; (3) ACL-reconstructed [ACL-R]; (4) ACL-reconstructed + ALS-deficient [ACL-R + ALS-D]; and (5) combined ACL and ALL reconstructed [ACL-R + ALL-R]. We evaluated knee rotational instability during each phase using the PST. We used an inertial sensor to calculate tibial external rotational angular velocity (ERAV) and tibial acceleration. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance; statistical significance was accepted as P < 0.05. ResultsRelative to [Intact], [ACL-D] caused a significant increase in ERAV and acceleration. However, there was no difference in these parameters between [ACL-R] and [Intact]. [ACL-R + ALS-D] increased ERAV significantly compared with [ACL-R], and there was a significant difference between ERAV during [ACL-R + ALS-D] and [Intact]. However, ERAV was significantly reduced during [ACL-R + ALL-R] compared with [ACL-R + ALS-D], and there was no significant difference in ERAV or acceleration between [ACL-R + ALL-R] and [Intact]. ConclusionsALS controlled rotational instability in cooperation with the ACL in a cadaveric model. In cases of combined injury of ACL and ALS, concomitant ACL and ALL reconstruction may restore knee stability comparable with the intact state.

Early chondral damage following meniscus repairs with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BackgroundMeniscal tears are commonly observed in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Meniscal repair has become a common procedure for the injured meniscus, and good clinical outcomes have been reported in such cases when used concurrently with ACL reconstruction. However, it is unclear whether early chondral damage progression can be prevented following meniscal repair with ACL reconstruction, as meniscal damage is a potential risk factor for the development of osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the zone-specific chondral damage that occurs after arthroscopic meniscal repair with concomitant ACL reconstruction. Our hypothesis was that meniscal repair with ACL reconstruction would not decrease the rate of progression of chondral damage compared to that observed in isolated ACL reconstruction with intact menisci. MethodsThis study included 40 patients who underwent anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction. We divided the patients into the following two groups: Group A with an intact meniscus (20 knees) and Group M requiring meniscal repair (20 knees). Chondral damage was evaluated arthroscopically in six compartments and 40 sub-compartments, and these features were graded using the International Cartilage Repair Society lesion classification. The cartilage damage in each sub-compartment and compartment was compared between the two groups both at reconstruction and at second-look arthroscopy (average 16 months postoperatively). At the latest follow-up examination (average 37 months postoperatively), the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score was compared between the two groups. ResultsGroup M had a significantly worse cartilage status than Group A in five sub-compartments (mainly in the medial compartment) at reconstruction and in nine sub-compartments (mainly in the bilateral compartments) at second-look arthroscopy. The mean IKDC score was better in Group A than in Group M (Group A; 90 vs. Group M; 86). The overall success rate of meniscal repairs was 92% (23 of 25 menisci) at second-look arthroscopy. ConclusionThe progression of post-traumatic chondral damage may occur at a faster rate in patients who require ACL reconstruction and meniscal repair than in patients with intact menisci.

Inside-Out Repair of the Meniscus in Concomitant Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Absorbable Versus Nonabsorbable Sutures

To compare the clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes of meniscal repair using absorbable versus nonabsorbable sutures in patients undergoing concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Data of 142 patients who underwent meniscal repair with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using either absorbable or nonabsorbable sutures for longitudinal meniscal tear were retrospectively reviewed. Inside-out suture technique was used for all meniscal repairs. Weight bearing and flexion (>90°) were allowed after 6 weeks postoperatively. Clinical evaluations were assessed by the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity score preoperatively and at 2-year follow-up. MRI outcomes at 1-year follow-up were compared to identify the successful healing (complete or partial healing) rate and incidence of additional meniscal tears. Subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the results of medial or lateral meniscus. Eighty patients underwent meniscal repair using absorbable sutures (mean age, 26.3 ± 11.9 years) and 62 patients with nonabsorbable sutures (mean age, 27.2 ± 10.0 years). There were no differences in zone and length of meniscal tears and stability tests between the groups. At a 2-year follow-up, all clinical scores had improved in both groups but did not differ significantly between the groups. Successful healing rate based on 1-year postoperative MRI was not significantly different between the absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures (93.7% vs 96.8%, P = .469). However, the absorbable sutures showed a lower additional tear incidence than the nonabsorbable sutures (2.5% vs 9.6%, P= .031). Subgroup analysis showed that the successful healing rate was not significantly different between the suture materials in both the medial and lateral menisci. The use of absorbable sutures leads to comparable healing rates to and lower incidence of additional tears than nonabsorbable sutures in patients undergoing meniscal repair with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Level III, retrospective comparative therapeutic trial.

Subjective Knee Function and Risk of Failure Are Equivalent for Men and Women at 5 Years After Meniscus Repair

To determine whether subjective knee function or risk of repair failure differ between men and women at mean 5 years following meniscal repair with or without concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A total of 235 patients (97 women, 138 men; mean age, 29.1 years; standard deviation, 11.3) were assessed for meniscus repair failure and postoperative knee function at mean 5.8 years follow-up. Knee symptoms were assessed with International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective (IKDC-S) scores. Postoperative activity scores were assessed with Marx activity score. Independent effects of patient age and activity level on meniscus failure risk and patient-reported outcomes were determined by multivariate analysis with adjustment for age, body mass index, anterior cruciate ligament status, tear pattern, and number of implants used at the time of surgery. Failures occurred in 18.9% of men and 21.0% of women with no difference in mean time to failure (P= .75) or risk of failure for men vs women (P= .57) in the univariate analysis. Male sex was not an independent risk factor for failure after adjustment for patient age, body mass index, concomitant anterior cruciate ligament status, tear pattern, or number of implants used (P= .16). Marx activity scores at follow-up were higher among men in multivariate analysis (P= .009). Men and women had similar IKDC-S scores at follow-up in the unadjusted (P= .25) and multivariate analyses (P= .21). Following meniscus repair, both sexes report similar subjective knee function, though men have higher self-reported activity scores. Meniscus repair failure risk does not differ between men or women at mid-term follow up. Level III, retrospective case-control study.

Early Osteoarthritic Change in Meniscus Repair with Concomitant Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison with Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Early Osteoarthritic Change in Meniscus Repair with Concomitant Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison with Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction