two-volume text indicate in the preface that these texts are intended for a general professional audience. In this reviewer's opinion, the authors are incorrect in that statement. However, these texts are excellent reference books for selected professionals. This two-volume edited text consists almost entirely of previously published articles on the behavioral treatment of sexual dysfunction. The introductory sections are well written and the articles chosen are generally of extremely high quality. In fact, several of the reprinted articles are seminal articles within this relatively new field of sex therapy. For example, the first article in volume 1 is a reprint of a report by Lobitz and LoPiccolo, describing the sex-therapy treatment techniques developed at the University of Oregon. This article is the first documented report of successfully using masturbatory training to treat nonorgasmic women. At the time of publication, this treatment approach represented a radical departure from the approach recommended by W. Masters and V. Johnson, and subsequently it has become the mainstay of most current therapeutic approaches for psychogenic female anorgasmia. Similarly, chapter 5 in volume 1 is a reprint of an article by McCarthy describing the successful modification of the Masters and Johnson treatment technique to more typical clinical settings. The procedures described in that article have subsequently been adopted in most sex therapy clinics. These volumes are commendable in that they contain excellent articles on the treatment of the more esoteric sexual difficulties such as fetishes, cross-dressing, exhibitionism, pedophilia, sadomasochism, voyeurism, and homosexuality as well as good articles on the treatment of garden-variety sexual difficulties, such as impotence and frigidity. I feel that this is an excellent reference book for professionals in the area of sex therapy and for graduate students in behaviorally oriented psychology graduate schools. I doubt that this book would be a sensible purchase for most biologically oriented scientists. The texts are too specialized and have too many noteworthy omissions. There are no articles on how to differentiate organic from psychogenic complaints, on pharmacological effects on human sexuality, or on the effects of physical disease on human sexuality. In summary, the theoretical orientation of this test is too specialized for most biological scientists, with the possible exception of the intellectually curious individual who may wish to know ofrecent technical developments in the behavioral treatment of sexual difficulties. Human sexuality, in all of its ramifications, remains an intellectually and personally exciting area of inquiry for most professionals . R. Taylor Segraves Department of Psychiatry University of Chicago IQ, Heritability and Racism. By James M. Lawler. New York: International Publishers , 1979. Pp. 228. $12.00 (cloth); $3.95 (paper). This is a readable, elementary, yet authoritative Marxist review of the controversy over the inevitability of measured differences in intellectual performance . The author exposes most of the conceptual fallacies underlying IQ tests Perspectives in Biology and Medicine ¦ Spring 1980 | 493 (which have no power to discover biological traits, but merely reflect the discriminations built into them by item selection and standardization) and in the misinterpretation of heritability estimates (which have nothing to do with inevitability and nothing to do with differences between groups). He neglects a relevant, ultimately perhaps more important issue: whether intelligence is a single, general dimension along which individuals vary, or many different abilities . All of this, of course, is old ground. What distinguishes the book from many other vigorous arguments on both sides is that it pulls no ideological punches. Professor Lawler is not the first to attack the unsupportable arguments ofJensen and Eysenck as rationalizations for continued suppression of the working class by the controlling capitalist class. He manages, however, to go beyond the popular controversy started by Jensen or even the one started by Terman 60 years ago. He correctly identifies the real controversy as the one between Marxism and social Darwinism. That conflict (more evident, recently, in the "sociobiology" debate) troubles any attempt to connect the biological sciences with the nature of man. Recasting theories in terms of left-right politics helps us recognize that ideological assumptions distort all our inferences. The problem is that revolutionary philosophers of science seem willing to assume that their own ideology, being the correct one, never distorts but merely...