In the early 1980s the University Senatus was preoccupied with UGC reductions in funding. Faculties and Departments engaged in an unprecedented self-scrutiny, devised research schemes, projected early retirements. Together with a concern for student numbers, these menaced the academic status quo and undermined individual self respect. Conversely, they challenged the community to a positive course of action. The Principal and Senate drafted Institutional Plans and established the Development Trust. Innovation became a keyword for policy and interdisciplinarity promised a rich and increasing harvest of research. On 8 June 1988 the Senate was told that all the research councils were actively organising bids for 'Interdisciplinary Research Centres' and that 'it was essential that the University secure an award for at least one IRC in the near future'. Among those staff who were already committed to the possibilities of interdisciplinary cooperation was Dr Judith Hook who had aired the possibility of a degree in Intellectual History similar to that being taught in the University of Sussex. Judith died tragically and suddenly on 28 July 1984. In spring 1985 Dr Roy Porter of the Wellcome Institute lectured to the History Department and at a meeting afterwards discussed with staff from various departments the possibility of launching a new interdisciplinary degree course. From that came the suggestion that a Group be formed. I was asked to convene the first meeting on 1 May 1985. Judith's colleagues, Jennifer Carter, Paul Dukes and Bill Scott all had interdisciplinary interests. At that time the writings of the French annalistes and historians of mentalites were exploring different concepts of historical time. Theories of discourse enabling fresh analytical structures as well as a new historicism were developing in the literary theory taught in the English Department by Michael Spiller and myself. The contemporary influences of anthropological, structuralist and linguistic thought in the work of Saussure and Levi-Strauss, of Barthes, Elias, Foucault, Goldmann, and many more demonstrated the narrowness of existing categories which our thinking and research interests had already proved inadequate. Gramsci, Williams and Thompson had explored the hegemonies of culture and canon. Traditional teaching programmes had become too selective under pressure of term and degree or were bursting at the seams. Certain disciplines, Linguistics and Philosophy, for example, had a broader pedagogic depth and lent themselves flexibly to the exploration of different modes of feeling and perception, of describing problems and asking questions. These brought together David Cram from Linguistics, and Melvin Dalgarno, Eric Matthews, and later Nigel Dower from
Read full abstract