734 SEER, 8o, 4, 2002 with the dramaof destruction and thevictoryof chaotic forces'.Unlike idealized and heroic events portrayedin socialistrealism,those portrayedin 7heGarden are 'violentand unpleasantlycorporealepisodes'(p. 174). In addition to its narrativecomplexities, TheGarden also presentsproblems of absence:chronology may be determinedonly throughcarefulsearchingon the part of the reader,while 'the Kremlin, the point aroundwhich the novel's space is organised, does not receive any direct narrativetreatment' (p. I86). Similarly,issuesof contemporarysocial and political import are missingfrom the novel'spages. In the analytical chapters, the concepts of time, space, gender, narrative perspective, and symbol in The Gardenare analysed, though not in a conventional sense. As Sarsenov explains, the presence of poetic discourse encourages a reading of the text using techniques often associated with analysis of poetry. Instead of the presence of 'time, space and narrative perspective', 'the repetition of leitmotifs and phonetic consonance constitute the novel's new structuralbeams' (p. I68). A comparisonto Belyi'sworks(particularlyPetersburg) and the notion of The Garden as a possible misprision of Gogol"s work situate Sadur in a larger Russian literarycontext. Sarsenovidentifiessome featuresof Sadur'swork as typical of modernism; M. Galina has identified certain texts of the I990S as 'destructive'literature. Characteristicsof such texts include 'a "merging of time", a preoccupation with madness, and a "deformed reality"' (p. I69). The presence of these elements in The Garden contributes to the reader's difficult task of comprehension. Complexity, however, does not preclude universality:Sadurlinksbroadthemes such as death and desire,and Sarsenov notes 'passion and death are so closely intertwined that the two concepts become inseparable'(p. I66). In an extension of WolfgangIser'snotion of the implied readerwhose task is to complete textual gaps, Sarsenov notes that TheGarden may be said to consist 'almostexclusivelyof gaps' (p. 200). Passion Embracing Deathis essential for any readerseekingto fillthese holes in TheGarden. School ofSlavonic andEastEuropean Studies ELIZABETH SKOMP University College London Sargeant, Amy. Vsevolod Pudovkin. ClassicFilmsof theSoviet Avant-Garde. I. B. Tauris, London and New York, 2000. XXXVii + 207 PP. Notes. Bibliography .Index. ?3995 THEpoint is well made by Dr Sargeant at the beginning of Vsevolod Pudovkin. ClassicFilms of theSovietAvant-Garde that of all the directors of the Soviet cinematic avant-garde of the I920S, Pudovkin has lately been the least fashionable. Eizenshtein, Vertov, Kuleshov, Dovzhenko, Kozintsev and Trauberg all have their advocates, and recent years have seen the republication of theirtheoreticalwritingsand studiesof theiroeuvres.The films of Eizenshtein and Vertov have been made widely available on video and, recently, in exemplary DVD versions with challenging interpretativecommentary .Amidstallthisintensecelebration,Pudovkinhasbeen the Cinderella REVIEWS 735 not invitedto the ball scholarshave been notablyneglectfuland the existing video editions of his 1920S revolutionary trilogy are murky and far from complete. Now, at last, the case for Pudovkin is being (re-)made. The British Film Institute has issued a video version of the charming 1925 short film he codirected with Nikolai Shpikovskii,Shakhmatnaia goriachka (ChessFever). Splendidly restored and digitallyremasteredversions of Konets Sankt Peterburga (T7he EndofStPetersburg, 1927) and Potomok Chingis-Khana (Storm over Asia, I 928) have been issued on DVD in Britain and America; they are twenty and forty minutes longer respectivelythan the existingvideo versionswhich were taken from later Soviet 'restorations'.ProfessorRichard Taylor is currentlypreparing a new edition of Pudovkin'stheoreticalwritings,and a season of his early filmswas organizedby Amy Sargeantat the National FilmTheatre in London in September 200I. In thiscontext of renewed interest Vsevolod Pudovkin. Classic Filmsof theSoviet Avant-Garde, the first monograph on the director for many years, offersa new guide to his earlycareer. Dr Sargeant's approach is to place Pudovkin'sfilms in the context of his writings,and her extensive introductionaddressesboth the curve of his career as writer-about-cinemaand the vexed question of whetherhis writings,taken together,constitutea 'theory'of cinema in the way that the workof Kuleshov, Vertovand, above all, Eizenshtein, obviouslydoes. This is followed by six chaptersin which Pudovkin'sfilms, from Chess Fever to Detertir(TheDeserter,I933) are placed in the context of his intellectual development and his engagement with the theories not only of other film makers and artists but also of philosophers, political thinkers and natural scientists for it is of no small significancethat Pudovkininitiallytrained as a chemist, turningto cinema only afterbeing poleaxed by Griffith'sIntolerance. Thus chaptertwo, forexample...