Engineering of crystals and solids is an active area of research that intertwines the concepts of supramolecular chemistry and materials science. The supramolecular construction of nanoporous solids with ample, open voids that can be freely accessed by other molecular species is quite a difficult task and pursued by a vast number of research groups. One common approach is the spontaneous aggregation of dissolved small-molecular building blocks. However, its success is rather limited because for the selfaggregation to render useful architectures, one should posses a profound predictive knowledge of the involved intermolecular forces, which implies the proposition and preparation of molecules (“aggregons”) with suitable geometries and functionalities. Yet, worse, once the crystal or solid is formed, there are few opportunities, if any, to further manipulate its structure. Layered g-zirconium phosphate (g-ZP) is a versatile and well-known structure in which the phosphates that reside in the surfaces of the lamellae are topotactically replaceable by phosphonates and diphosphonates, the latter leading to pillared, porous solids. Layered g-ZP can be thus used as a carving board in which appropriate organic molecules could be orderly grafted at a controlled, low density. Therefore, size and shape of interpillar spaces may be tuned by simply choosing organic moieties of appropriate length and flexibility and by controlling the degree of pillaring. Moreover, one may select a suitable chemical response of interpillar spaces by including sophisticated functionalities in the organic chain. These facts, together with the possibility of replacing all remaining superficial phosphates by other phosphorous functions of different polarity, make the prospects of this building-block combination to be limited only by the imagination of the researcher. We report herein that the chemical response to a simple acid–base reaction induces fast, sharp porosity changes in the microcrystals of the inorganic–organic material created by stepwise, double topotactic exchange of g-ZP by pentaethylenglycol derived diphosphonic acid and hypophosphite (see Scheme 1). Treatment of exfoliated g-ZP in 1:1 water/acetone at 80 8C with the diphosphonic acid in the appropriate molar ratio (step A) led to the pillared material I of empirical formula ZrPO4[O2P(OH)2]0.74[O2P(OH)-R-(OH)PO2]0.13·nH2O, R= CH2CH2(OCH2CH2)5OCH2CH2. Careful neutralization of I with methylamine followed by treatment with hypophosporous acid (Scheme 1 step B; see Experimental Section) yielded a new material II. Elemental and thermogravimetric analyses for II gave the empirical formula Zr(PO4)(O2PH2)0.74(C14H30P2O12)0.13·0.8H2O, thus showing that all exchangeable phosphates of I were replaced by hypophosphite without appreciable loss of diphosphonate. A sample of material II, dissolved in HF/D2O, gave a P NMR spectrum with signals at 0.0, 8.9, and 25.3 ppm attributable to phosphoric, hypophosphorous, and phosphonic acids, respectively. Their relative intensity (3.97:2.91:1) was in excellent agreement with the calculated ratios (3.84:2.85:1) for the empirical formula obtained from the other techniques. FTIR of II showed the expected stretching P H band at 2403 cm 1 while solid-state MAS P NMR revealed the presence of the nonexchangeable phosphates at 27.9 and the complete disappearance of the signal at 13.6 ppm arising from exchangeable phosphates of the starting material I. Both hypophosphite and phosphonate groups gave a broad signal at about 10 ppm, whose intensity heavily increased under cross-polarization conditions (contact time 2 ms). X-ray powder diffraction of II showed a reasonable degree of crystallinity and an interlayer distance of 1.28 nm, which was independent of the degree of humidity of the sample. The unexpectedly fast swelling of material II occurred when it reacted with a very small amount of methylamine. A comparative study of the titration of I and II with methylamine is depicted in Figure 1a. While I gradually increases its interlayer distance with increasing pH (see powder XRD patterns in Figure 1b), II shows a remarkable, sharp swelling from 1.28 nm to 2.14 nm in a very narrow pH range (ca. 4.2 to 5.0) corresponding to the addition of solely 0.2 equivalents of amine. It should be noted that II suffers extensive oxidation at pH> 7. Solid-state P NMR and elemental analysis indicate that phase II completely transforms into phase I at pH 9. The forces governing the piling of g-ZP and g-ZP/ hypophosphite (g-ZPH) layers are very different. In g-ZP the outer layer of exchangeable phosphates form a network of Scheme 1. Synthesis of I and II.
Read full abstract