Computerized Physician Order Entry Research Articles

Workflow, Time Requirement, and Quality of Medication Documentation with or without a Computerized Physician Order Entry System-A Simulation-Based Lab Study.

The introduction of a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system is changing workflows and redistributing tasks among health care professionals. The aim of this study is to describe exemplary changes in workflow, to objectify the time required for medication documentation, and to evaluate documentation quality with and without a CPOE system (Cerner® i.s.h.med). Workflows were assessed either through direct observation and in-person interviews or through semistructured online interviews with clinical staff involved in medication documentation. Two case scenarios were developed consisting of exemplary medications (case 1 = 6 drugs and case 2 = 11 drugs). Physicians and nurses/documentation assistants were observed documenting the case scenarios according to workflows established prior to CPOE implementation and those newly established with CPOE implementation, measuring the time spent on each step in the documentation process. Subsequently, the documentation quality of the documented medication was assessed according to a previously established and published methodology. CPOE implementation simplified medication documentation. The overall time needed for medication documentation increased from a median of 12:12 min (range: 07:29-21:10 min) without to 14:40 min (09:18-25:18) with the CPOE system (p = 0.002). With CPOE, less time was spent documenting peroral prescriptions and more time documenting intravenous/subcutaneous prescriptions. For physicians, documentation time approximately doubled, while nurses achieved time savings. Overall, the documentation quality increased from a median fulfillment score of 66.7% without to 100.0% with the CPOE system (p < 0.001). This study revealed that CPOE implementation simplified the medication documentation process but increased the time spent on medication documentation by 20% in two fictitious cases. This increased time resulted in higher documentation quality, occurred at the expense of physicians, and was primarily due to intravenous/subcutaneous prescriptions. Therefore, measures to support physicians with complex prescriptions in the CPOE system should be established.

Efecto de la inactivación de las órdenes múltiples para solicitud de estudios complementarios en una central de emergencias

Introducción. La plantilla de órdenes múltiples es una herramienta informática que podría producir consecuencias inadvertidas pese a sus innumerables beneficios. Nos propusimos explorar el efecto de su inactivación sobre las solicitudes de estudios complementarios y los costos asociados. Métodos. Corte transversal en la Central de Emergencias de Adultos del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, que incluyó muestra consecutiva de consultas pre-intervención (Enero-Febrero 2020) y post-intervención (2021). Mediante el uso de bases secundarias, las variables incluidas fueron los débitos administrativos y sus respectivos precios de facturación. Resultados. Hubo 27.671 consultas en 2020 con una mediana de valor total de 474$, y 20.819 con 1.639$ en 2021. Tras el análisis restringido al área de consultorios de moderada complejidad (excluyendo consultas por COVID-19), se encontró: una disminución en la mediana del número de prácticas por consulta (mediana de 11 vs 10, p=0,001), una disminución en la solicitud de al menos una práctica de laboratorio (45% versus 39%, p=0,001), sin encontrar cambios significativos en costos globales (mediana 1.419$ vs 1.081$; p=0,122) ni en costos específicos de laboratorio (mediana 1.071$ vs 1.089$, p=0,710). Conclusión. Pese a la inflación interanual, se logró una reducción significativa en el número de prácticas y se mantuvieron los costos globales por consulta. Estos hallazgos demuestran la efectividad de la intervención, pero serán necesarias medidas educativas que apunten al recordatorio de los potenciales daños en la sobreutilización, y los costos sanitarios de los estudios innecesarios.

Prescribing errors in children: what is the impact of a computerized physician order entry?

Prescribing errors represent a safety risk for hospitalized patients, especially in pediatrics. Computerized physician order entry (CPOE) might reduce prescribing errors, although its effect has not yet been thoroughly studied on pediatric general wards. This study investigated the impact of a CPOE on prescribing errors in children on general wards at the University Children’s Hospital Zurich. We performed medication reviews on a total of 1000 patients before and after the implementation of a CPOE. The CPOE included limited clinical decision support (CDS) such as drug-drug interaction check and checks for duplicates. Prescribing errors, their type according to the PCNE classification, their severity (adapted NCC MERP index), as well as the interrater reliability (Cohen’s kappa), were analyzed. Potentially harmful errors were significantly reduced from 18 errors/100 prescriptions (95% CI: 17–20) to 11 errors/100 prescriptions (95% CI: 9–12) after CPOE implementation. A large number of errors with low potential for harm (e.g., “missing information”) was reduced after the introduction of the CPOE, and consequently, the overall severity of potential harm increased post-CPOE. Despite general error rate reduction, medication reconciliation problems (PCNE error 8), such as drugs prescribed on paper as well as electronically, significantly increased after the introduction of the CPOE. The most common pediatric prescribing errors, the dosing errors (PCNE errors 3), were not altered on a statistically significant level after the introduction of the CPOE. Interrater reliability showed moderate agreement (Κ = 0.48). Conclusion: Patient safety increased by reducing the rate of prescribing errors after CPOE implementation. The reason for the observed increase in medication reconciliation problems might be the hybrid system with remaining paper prescriptions for special medication. The lacking effect on dosing errors could be explained by the fact that a web application CDS covering dosing recommendations (PEDeDose) was already in use before the implementation of the CPOE. Further investigations should focus on eliminating hybrid systems, interventions to increase the usability of the CPOE, and full integration of CDS tools such as automated dose checks into the CPOE.What is Known:• Prescribing errors, especially dosing errors, are a common safety threat for pediatric inpatients.•The introduction of a CPOE may reduce prescribing errors, though pediatric general wards are poorly studied.What is New:•To our knowledge, this is the first study on prescribing errors in pediatric general wards in Switzerland investigating the impact of a CPOE.•We found that the overall error rate was significantly reduced after the implementation of the CPOE. The severity of potential harm was higher in the post-CPOE period, which implies that low-severity errors were substantially reduced after CPOE implementation. Dosing errors were not reduced, but missing information errors and drug selection errors were reduced. On the other hand, medication reconciliation problems increased.

Comparison of computerized provider order entry specific transfusion indications versus the use of "Other".

Computerized physician order entry (CPOE) systems are one way to reinforce evidence-based transfusion indications for blood products. The new CPOE system that was implemented at our institution allowed healthcare providers to select "Other" as an indication and provide reasons for transfusion outside of accepted guidelines. Transfusion order records for packed red blood cells (RBCs), platelets, and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) from high product-ordering areas of Long Island Jewish Medical Center and Cohen's Children's Medical Center from April 2021, when the new CPOE system was implemented, to November 2021 were reviewed. The percentage of "Other" orders was determined and the reason for each "Other" order was reviewed to identify possible areas for education or valid indications not included in the institutionally recognized indications. 9.7% of RBC orders, 1.9% of platelet orders, and 18.2% of FFP orders were placed with "Other" as the indication for transfusion (χ2 2 =88.5; p < .001). Reasons for "Other" orders were varied, but notable reasons included indications already institutionally accepted such as, bleeding (15.7% of pediatric "Other" RBC orders), hold for OR (14.3% of pediatric and 15.8% of adult "Other" RBC orders), and novel reasons such as FFP for ACE-inhibitor associated angioedema (84.6% of adult "Other" FFP orders). The findings from our study provide examples of potential difficulties hospitals may encounter when they implement a new computerized physician order entry system. Provider education may play an important role to reduce the number of "Other" orders placed for already recognized indications.

Improving medication safety in a paediatric hospital: a mixed-methods evaluation of a newly implemented computerised provider order entry system

ObjectivesComputerised provider order entry (CPOE) systems have been implemented around the world as a solution to reduce ordering and transcription errors. However, previous literature documented many challenges to attain this...

Reducing Medication Errors in Children's Hospitals.

Knowledge of the prevalence and characteristics of medication errors in pediatric and neonatal patients is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and medication error characteristics in a pediatric hospital over 5 years and to determine whether serial error prevention programs to optimize a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system reduce error incidence. We retrospectively reviewed medication errors documented between January 2015 and December 2019. A total of 2,591,596 prescriptions were checked, and 255 errors were identified. Wrong dose prescriptions constituted the most common errors (56.9%). Medications with the highest rate of errors were antibiotics/antiviral drugs (36.9%). Oral route medications comprised the highest portion (60.8%), followed by intravenous ones (28.6%). The most common stage for medication errors was physician ordering (93.3%). Junior residents were responsible for most errors (45.9%). Most errors occurred in the pediatric ward (53.7%). In total, 221 (86.7%) errors were near misses. Only 4 errors (1.6%) were considered significant and required active monitoring or intervention. Type of error, stage of error, staff composition, and severity level of errors were significantly related to the number of errors in different years. There was a statistically significant decrease in errors per 100,000 prescriptions across different years after optimizing the CPOE system. The incidence of medication errors decreased with extensive use of the CPOE system. Continuous application of the CPOE optimization program can effectively reduce medication errors. Further incorporation of pediatric-specific decision-making and support tools and error prevention measures into CPOE systems is needed.

Design, implementation, and evaluation of a CPOE system in a cancer care setting: A case study on the gastric cancer patients.

Chemotherapy is a complex, multi-disciplinary, and error-prone process. Information technology is being increasingly used in different health care settings with complex work procedures such as cancer care to enhance the quality and safety of care. In this study, we aimed to develop a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) for chemotherapy prescribing in patients with gastric cancer and to evaluate the impact of CPOE on medication errors and order problems. A multi-disciplinary team consisting of a chemotherapy council group and system design and implementation team was formed for chemotherapy process evaluation, requirement analysis, developing computer-based protocols, and implementation of CPOE. A before and after study was conducted to evaluate the impact of CPOE on the chemotherapy process and medication errors and problem orders. To evaluate the level of end-user satisfaction, an ISO Norm 9241/110 usability questionnaire was chosen for the evaluation. Before the implementation of the CPOE system, 37 medication errors (46.25%) and 53 problem orders (66.25%) were recorded for 80 paper-based chemotherapy prescriptions. After implementation of the CPOE system, 7 (8.7%) medication errors and 6 (7.5%) problem orders were recorded for 80 CPOE prescriptions. The implementation of CPOE reduced the medication error by 37.55% and the problematic order by 58.75%. The results for usability evaluation indicate that the CPOE was within the first class of the ISONORM level rating; this shows that a CPOE is with very high satisfaction and a very high functionality rate. Developing a CPOE system significantly improved safety and quality of the chemotherapy process in cancer care settings by reducing the medication error, deleting unnecessary steps, improving communication and coordination between providers, and use of updated evidence-based medicine in direct chemotherapy orders. However, the CPOE system does not prevent all medication errors and may cause new errors. These errors can be human-related factors or associated with the design and implementation of the systems.

Impact of computerised provider order entry on the quality and quantity of clinical information included with investigation requests: an interrupted time series analysis

IntroductionRelevant clinical information is vital to inform the analytical and interpretative phases of most investigations. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of implementation of computerised provider...

Diagnostic stewardship for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing using computerized physician order entry.

Altering the appearance of a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) interface reduces misuse of an HIV diagnostic test by 87%, demonstrating that CPOE design is a key component of diagnostic stewardship. Collaboration between infectious disease providers, clinical laboratorians, and information technology (IT) professionals can result in improved quality and decreased costs.

Implementation of a care pathway based computerized order entry system streamlines test ordering and offers tools for benchmarking clinical practice

Background and aimsThis is a narrative report on the development of specifications and of the stepwise implementation of a computerized physician order entry system (CPOE) in the University Hospitals Leuven, based on order sets integrated in care pathways. Integration of the CPOE into the electronic health record optimally supports those care pathways. Materials and methodsWe investigated adherence to consensus-based use of laboratory tests. We analysed data post- versus pre-implementation test requests for departments selected to cover various patient populations, using the Mann-Whitney U test corrected for the False Discovery Rate. ResultsWe investigated the effect on the number of tests post- versus pre-implementation. In the emergency and inpatient wards, the CPOE implementation resulted in decreases in requests for uric acid, total protein, direct bilirubin, reticulocyte count, and increases in requests for albumin, glucose and calcium. In the outpatient clinics, where the medical specialties already used non-computerized consensus-based test requesting strategies, effects on the number of requested tests were marginal. In all settings, operational improvements could be inferred: the centrally managed CPOE system resulted in fast and well-controlled management of test strategies, digital traceability of the laboratory test requesting process, automatic archiving of requests, assurance of availability of obligatory information. ConclusionsOverall, test requesting strategies improved towards more consensus-based and operational benefits resulted in time gains and improved efficiency of time spend.

Reduced prevalence of drug – related problems in psychiatric inpatients after implementation of a computerized physician order entry system

Reduced prevalence of drug – related problems in psychiatric inpatients after implementation of a computerized physician order entry system

2240. Implementation of a Clinical Decision Support Panel for Urine Culture Ordering

Abstract Background Standard urine culture collection techniques have a high risk of false positive results in catheterized patients. IDSA guidelines recommend replacing long-term catheters before specimen collection for cultures. Our goal was to evaluate the impact of clinical decision support (CDS) during the urine culture computerized provider order entry (CPOE) on test use and patient-level outcomes. Methods In March 2021, CDS was added to the urine culture CPOE in the electronic health record (EHR). The order panel includes education regarding appropriate clinical indications for urine culturing, and protocolizes urine collection to determine (A) if a urinalysis was ordered, (B) if special patient population (i.e., PICU), (C) the presence and duration of an indwelling urinary catheter, and (D) whether the catheter had difficulty with placement. Depending on the criteria identified in A, B, C, and D, the panel recommends catheter removal prior to urine culture (Figure 1). We retrospectively evaluated the impact of panel implementation in our pre- (7/2020- 3/2021) and post-intervention periods (4/2021- 3/2022) using an interrupted time series analysis with Poisson regression. Outcomes included urine cultures/1000 patient days (pd), number of catheter removal orders, catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI)/1000 catheter days, and days of antibiotic therapy with urinary tract infection (UTI) indication/1000pd Order Panel Framework Results Clinicians selected catheter removal in 183 of 2133 (8.5%) instances of ordering a urine culture when a catheter was detected by the panel (Figure 2). Analysis revealed a significant decrease in urine culture orders (1.1% decrease/month, p&amp;lt; 0.05), a decreasing trend of antibiotic use with UTI indications (Figure 3, 2.8% decrease/month, p&amp;lt; 0.05), but no significant change in CAUTI rates (Figure 4). Evaluation of the safety reporting system revealed no identifiable increase in safety events related to catheter removal or reinsertion. Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections Black boxes indicate Poisson regression model estimates Black boxes indicate Poisson regression model estimates Conclusion CDS can aid in improving urine culture practice habits, including removal of long-standing catheters before urine culture. The decreasing trend in total urine culture orders (Figure 5) may reflect a ”culture change” over time to avoid urine cultures in inappropriate instances. Total Urine Cultures Ordered Black boxes indicate Poisson regression model estimates. Red circles indicate predicted outcome without ‘intervention’. Disclosures Sonali D. Advani, MBBS, MPH, FIDSA, Locus Biosciences: Advisor/Consultant|Locus Biosciences: Honoraria|Sysmex America: Advisor/Consultant.

Effects of a Computerized Prescriber Order Entry System on Pharmacist Prescribing.

In Alberta, pharmacists are eligible to obtain additional prescribing authority (APA). At the University of Alberta Hospital, a transition was made from a paper-based prescriber order entry system to a computerized prescriber order entry (CPOE) system. The primary objective was to quantify any change in pharmacist prescribing after CPOE implementation. The secondary objective was to compare the paper-based and CPOE systems in terms of drug schedule, order type, medication class, and the pharmacist's area of clinical practice. A retrospective comparative review of pharmacist orders was completed using 2-week periods of data from each of the paper-based order entry system and the CPOE system, spaced 1 year apart (in January 2019 and January 2020). Pharmacists prescribed a mean of 3.76 (95% confidence interval 1.97-5.96) more orders per day within the CPOE system than in the paper-based system (p < 0.001). Schedule I medications accounted for a higher proportion of pharmacists' prescriptions in the CPOE system than in the paper-based system (77.7% versus 70.5%, p < 0.001). In terms of order type, discontinuation orders accounted for a much higher proportion of pharmacists' orders in the CPOE system than in the paper-based order entry system (58.0% versus 19.8%, p < 0.001). This study showed that a CPOE system resulted in more use of APA by pharmacists, with schedule I medications accounting for a higher proportion of pharmacists' prescriptions. With the CPOE system, pharmacists used their prescribing privileges to discontinue a higher proportion of orders than was the case with the paper-based system. Therefore, the CPOE system is a potential facilitator of pharmacist prescribing.

RWD11 Effectiveness Analysis of CPOE Implementation in Preventing Duplicate Medication: An Evidence From a Single Medical Center in Taiwan

Medication reconciliation (MR) is an important sector of medication safety use to prevent medication errors. In recent years, National Health Insurance Administration has been concerned about duplicate medication in Taiwan. As the elderly population grows in Taiwan, the demand for MR has increased. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) implementation in avoiding duplicate medication.

Drug-related problems in patients admitted for SARS-CoV-2 infection during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Introduction: Drug-related problems (DRP) are events or circumstances in which drug therapy does or could interfere with desired health outcomes. In December 2019, a new coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, appeared. Little knowledge about this type of infection resulted in the administration of various drugs with limited use in other pathologies. Evidence about DRP in patients with COVID-19 is lacking. Objective: The aim of the present study is to describe identified cases of DRP and those drugs involved in the first wave of patients with COVID-19, and evaluate associated risk factors. Material and methods: Observational, retrospective study performed in a tertiary university hospital between 14th March 2020 and 31 May 2020 (corresponding to the first COVID-19 wave). We recruited patients admitted during the study period. Exclusion criteria included age < 18years; admission to critically ill units; and care received either in the emergency room, at-home hospitalization or a healthcare center. Results: A total of 817 patients were included. The mean age was 62.5years (SD 16.4) (range 18-97), and 453 (55.4%) were male. A total of 516 DRP were detected. Among the patients, 271 (33.2%) presented at least one DRP. The mean DRP per patient with an identified case was 1.9. The prevailing DRPs among those observed were: incorrect dosage (over or underdosage) in 145 patients (28.2%); wrong drug combination in 131 (25.5%); prescriptions not in adherence to the then COVID-19 treatment protocol in 73 (14.1%); prescription errors due to the wrong use of the computerized physician order entry in 47 (9.2%); and incorrect dosage due to renal function in 36 (7%). The logistic regression analysis showed that patients who received only prescriptions of antibacterials for systemic use (J01 ATC group) faced a higher likelihood of experiencing a DRP (OR 2.408 (1.071-5.411), p = 0.033). Conclusion: We identified several factors associated with an increased risk of DRPs, similar to those reported in other pre-pandemic studies, including a prolonged length of stay, higher number of prescribed drugs and antimicrobial administration. The relevance of pharmacists and tools like pharmacy warning systems can help prevent, identify and resolve DRP efficiently.

The Overriding of Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) Drug Safety Alerts Fired by the Clinical Decision Support (CDS) Tool: Evaluation of Appropriate Responses and Alert Fatigue Solutions.

Introduction Most computerized physician order entry (CPOE) software come with clinical decision-support components (CDS) that provide prescribers assistance and notify them about adverse drug reactions. An excessive number of alerts in a repeated and non-relevant manner leads to alert fatigue and enforces physicians and pharmacists to alert overrides. King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC) in Jeddah still reports a higher percentage of drug alerts overridden by clinicians and pharmacists. Thus, this study was conducted to evaluate CDS alerts overriding and to determine which alerts are clinically irrelevant and need modifications. Methods The study was carried out in the inpatient setting at KAMC in Jeddah, from September 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020. It was designed as a retrospective chart review study that included all red alerts that required comments and were overridden by a physician and pharmacist. Results Among 11350 red alerts, potential drug-drug interaction (pDDI), dose, and allergy alerts represent 57%, 41%, and 2%, respectively, of the total alerts. The most common drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in category X were proton pump inhibitors and clopidogrel (9.9%). The appropriate response by prescribers and pharmacists toward allergy alerts was associated with the highest odds compared with the other alerts (p < 0.05) while there is a significant decrease in the odds of appropriate action being taken by both prescribers and pharmacists in the dose screen alerts (p < 0.05).Among all clinical specialties, there is an increased odds of appropriate action being taken by residents and fellows for allergy and dose alerts, respectively, compared to other groups (p < 0.05). For diminishing the unnecessary alerts, we provided 14 alert refinements strategies andadvised turning off four alerts. Applying this will terminate 32% of irrelevant alerts. Conclusion Our study's findings indicated that a substantial number of alerts are ignored, and the rate of appropriateness varies significantly by alert type and prescriber level.

Quality Improvement at the Laboratory’s Specimen Reception Station

Abstract Introduction/Objective In our 1000-bed acute care tertiary hospital, physicians order laboratory tests via the computerized-provider-order-entry (CPOE) system and print barcode labels (patient demographics/tests ordered) at the computer-on-wheel printer. When tubes with unsuitable barcodes (misaligned, poor quality) are received at the laboratory specimen reception area a fresh barcode is re-printed by our laboratory staff. An incident involving a re- printed barcode label pasted on the wrong blood tube prompted an investigation into the quality of barcodes. Methods/Case Report We initiated ‘an opportunity for improvement (OFI) project’ at the laboratory specimen reception station. The OFI team involved Nursing, Information Technology (IT) and Pathology departments aimed to eliminate re-printing of barcode labels by 75% within 6 months. We collated and analyzed reasons for re-printing of barcodes on 3 separate 48-hour periods (27-28 April 2020, 24-25 June 2020, and 13-14 June 2022). A series of interventions and initiatives were implemented. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) Re-printed barcodes were from the Emergency Department (56%), Out-patient clinics (7%) and Wards (57%). Root cause analysis(RCA) using the “5 whys” technique categorized re-print causes into staff-related (misaligned barcodes) and printer-related (faint barcodes lines/truncated un-verifiable patient demographics). The team mass-emailed clinicians an educational “Do-You-Know” guide on proper pasting of barcodes on blood tubes and instructions on how to obtain help for printer rectification. These guide documents were placed in the hospital-wide document-sharing portal - Docupedia. Immediate close follow-up with sites that had poor barcodes was done in real-time. Barcode reprints decreased 83% within 2 months - from 174 (27-28 Apr 2020) to 30 (24-25 Jun 2020). A recent audit showed sustained elimination of barcode re-printing: 25 cases (13-14 Jun 2022). Conclusion The OFI project has successfully raised the quality of CPOE labels on specimen tubes contributing to process efficiency and safer patient care. Close communication with all care sites and their representatives on the OFI team are critical success factors.

Evaluation of a Multilevel Laboratory Stewardship Intervention Targeted to Cardiac and Thoracic Surgical Services at an Academic Medical Center.

Unnecessary laboratory tests are ordered because of factors such as preselected orders on order sets, clinician habits, and trainee concerns. Excessive use of laboratory testing increases patient discomfort via unnecessary phlebotomy, contributes to iatrogenic anemia, increases risk of bloodstream infections, and increases the cost of care. To address these concerns, we implemented a multilevel laboratory stewardship intervention to decrease unnecessary laboratory testing, measured by laboratory tests per day attributed to service, across 2 surgical divisions with high laboratory use. The multilevel intervention included 5 components: stakeholder engagement, provider education, computerized provider order entry modification, performance feedback, and culture change supported by leadership. The primary outcome of the study was laboratory tests ordered per patient-day. Secondary outcomes included the number of blood draws per patient-day, total lab-associated costs, length of stay, discharge to a nursing facility, 30-day readmissions, and deaths. A difference-in-differences analytic approach assessed the outcome measures in the intervention period, with other surgical services as controls. The primary outcome of laboratory tests per patient-day showed a significant decrease across both thoracic and cardiac surgery services, with between 1.5 and 2 fewer tests ordered per patient-day for both services and an estimated 20 000 fewer tests performed during the intervention period. Blood draws per patient-day were also significantly decreased on the thoracic surgery service but not for cardiac surgery. A multilevel laboratory stewardship intervention targeted to 2 surgical services resulted in a significant decrease in laboratory test use without negatively impacting length of stay, readmissions, or mortality.

OntoPharma: ontology based clinical decision support system to reduce medication prescribing errors

BackgroundClinical decision support systems (CDSS) have been shown to reduce medication errors. However, they are underused because of different challenges. One approach to improve CDSS is to use ontologies instead of relational databases. The primary aim was to design and develop OntoPharma, an ontology based CDSS to reduce medication prescribing errors. Secondary aim was to implement OntoPharma in a hospital setting.MethodsA four-step process was proposed. (1) Defining the ontology domain. The ontology scope was the medication domain. An advisory board selected four use cases: maximum dosage alert, drug-drug interaction checker, renal failure adjustment, and drug allergy checker. (2) Implementing the ontology in a formal representation. The implementation was conducted by Medical Informatics specialists and Clinical Pharmacists using Protégé-OWL. (3) Developing an ontology-driven alert module. Computerised Physician Order Entry (CPOE) integration was performed through a REST API. SPARQL was used to query ontologies. (4) Implementing OntoPharma in a hospital setting. Alerts generated between July 2020/ November 2021 were analysed.ResultsThe three ontologies developed included 34,938 classes, 16,672 individuals and 82 properties. The domains addressed by ontologies were identification data of medicinal products, appropriateness drug data, and local concepts from CPOE. When a medication prescribing error is identified an alert is shown. OntoPharma generated 823 alerts in 1046 patients. 401 (48.7%) of them were accepted.ConclusionsOntoPharma is an ontology based CDSS implemented in clinical practice which generates alerts when a prescribing medication error is identified. To gain user acceptance OntoPharma has been designed and developed by a multidisciplinary team. Compared to CDSS based on relational databases, OntoPharma represents medication knowledge in a more intuitive, extensible and maintainable manner.

Electronic prescribing systems in hospitals to improve medication safety: a multimethods research programme

Electronic prescribing systems in hospitals to improve medication safety: a multimethods research programme