SEER, Vol. 87,No. 1,January 20og Reviews Berger, T., Raecke, J. and Reuther, T. (eds). SlavistischeLinguistik2004/2005. Referate desXXX. Konstanzer Slavistischen Arbeitstreffens Klagenfurt, 13. iy . September2004 und Referate desXXXI. Konstanzer Slavistischen Arbeitstreffens Freudenstadt, ig. 23 . September2005. Slavistische Beitrage, 453. Otto Sagner, Munich, 2006. 466 pp. Illustrations. Tables. Notes. Bibliogra phies. 46.00 (paperback). The sixteen articles published in thisvolume are based on papers given at the thirtiethand thirty-first sessions of the conference of Slavists fromGerman speaking countries, known as the Konstanzer Slavistisches Arbeitstreffen, which were held inKlagenfurt in 2004 and in Freudenstadt in 2005. The subjects dealt with come broadly under the heading of linguistics and a wide range of Slavonic languages are on view. Some of the authors gave papers at both conferences and are thus represented here by two articles. In one of his articlesWolfgang Girke examines the syntactic peculiarities ofRussian vdrug, vnezapnoand neozidanno; in the other he analyses Russian constructions with ibo,potomu cto, ved' and zacem. Aspect in Russian complements modified by numerals or measurements is the subject ofHans Robert Mehlig's contribu tion. Edgar Hoffmann raises the question of the transitional status, between the common noun and the proper noun, of the 'eventonym' (name of a political event) with examples fromRussian and Czech. Sebastian Kempgen considers the outstanding needs of Slavonic philologists for special sorts in computer fonts. The editors have not seen fitto reveal which papers were given at which session, but clues sometimes emerge from the text. Jochen Raecke, for example, in one of his articles, reveals that it originated at the meeting held 'inKlagenfurt among Slovenes' (p. 340). His thoughts there on the decline of Slovene inCarinthia led him to contemplate more generally the question of Slavonic languages in decline in the lightofDavid Crystal's book Language Death (Cambridge, 2000). That Carinthian Slovene is still living, however, is confirmed by Herta Maurer-Lausegger's account of a project at the Univer sity ofKlagenfurt to document on filmboth acoustic and visual aspects of dialects and folk culture from informantswho can remember the days before electrification. The impact of political independence on Ukrainian, leading to the growth of surzyk,a Ukrainian-Russian hybrid, is examined by Bernhard Brehmer, observing evidence from internet communications. The use of both verbal and graphic representations of animals in Soviet propaganda is demonstrated with illustrations and dissected by Daniel Weiss. The language of the smallest Slavonic nation is represented in an article byWalter Breu and Lenka Scholze, who analyse theposition of the verb in indicative sentences in modern colloquial Upper Sorbian, observing certain similarities toGerman but concluding thatUpper Sorbian word-order preserves itsautonomy despite total bilingualism. The levels of clarity, originality and rigour in thisvolume vary, as is almost inevitable in collective enterprises of this kind. Hardly REVIEWS IO5 anyone is likely to read it from cover to cover, but for some readers some itemswill be useful. HertfordCollege,Oxford Gerald Stone Tosi, Alessandra. Waiting for Pushkin: Russian Fiction in theReign ofAlexander I (i801-1823). Studies in Slavic Literature and Poetics, 44. Rodopi, Amsterdam and New York, 2006. 429 pp. Notes. Bibliography. Index. 85.00: $106.00 (paperback). As Alessandra Tosi states in the introduction toWaitingfor Pushkin, 'Russian prose fiction of the age of Alexander I (1801-25) has been left largely unexplored in recent scholarship, both inRussia and in theWest' (p. 11). Whereas the poets of the era (Tosi mentioned Batiushkov, Zhukovskii and Gnedich) have enjoyed both scholarly prominence and relative popular appeal, the prose of the firstquarter of the nineteenth century has often been marginalized, a result of 'the teleological view of literaryhistory as an evolu tion toward the great achievements in the 1830s and 1840s' (p. 11).Accord ingly,Tosi sets herself the task of recuperating this lost legacy, providing 'an overview of the intense literaryactivity' (p. 11) that occurred during the reign ofAlexander I, and stimulating 'itsreintegration intoRussia's literaryhistory' (p. 12).To do this,Tosi combines a broad historical and cultural overview of the period with a number of close readings of texts that are held to be both representative of contemporary trends and aesthetically rewarding in their own right. Many of these are not the works normally associated with specific authors: thediscussion...
Read full abstract