The symmetric bis(iminophosphorano)methanes CH 2 [P{=NP(=O)(OR) 2 }Ph 2 ] 2 (R = Ph (2a), Et (2b)) have been obtained by treatment of bis(diphenylphosphino)methane with a 2-fold excess of phosphorylated azides (RO) 2 P(=O)N 3 . The asymmetric ligand CH 2 [P{=NP(=O)-(OPh) 2 }Ph 2 ][P{=NP(=O)(OEt) 2 }Ph 2 ] (2c) has been prepared by oxidation of Ph 2 PCH 2 P{=NP-(=O)(OEt) 2 }Ph 2 (1b) with (PhD) 2 P(=O)N 3 . Compounds 2a-c can be deprotonated with sodium hydride, affording the corresponding methanide anions NaCH[P{=NP(=O)(OR) 2 }-Ph 2 ] 2 (R = Ph (3a), Et (3b)) and NaCH[P{=NP(=O(OPh) 2 }Ph 2 ] [P{=NP(=O)(OEt) 2 }Ph 2 ] (3c). Treatment of [{Ru(η 6 -p-cymene)(μ-Cl)Cl} 2 ] with 3a-c results in the formation of the neutral complexes [RuCl(η 6 -p-cymene)(κ 2 (C,N)-CH[P{=NP(=O)(OR) 2 }Ph 2 ] 2 )] (R = Ph (4a), Et (4b)) and [RuCl(η 6 -p-cymene)(κ 2 (C,N)-CH[P{=NP(=O)(OPh) 2 }Ph 2 ][P{=NP(=O)(OEt) 2 }Ph 2 ])] (4c), via selective κ 2 (C,N) coordination of the bis(iminophosphorano)methanide anions to ruthenium. The cationic species [Ru(η 6 -p-cymene)(κ 3 (C,N,O)-CH[P{=NP(-O)(OR) 2 }Ph 2 ] 2 )][SbF 6 ] (R = Ph (5a), Et (5b)) and [Ru(η 6 -p-cymene)(κ 3 (C,N,O)-CH[P{=NP(=O)(OPh) 2 }Ph 2 ][P{=NP-(=O)(OEt) 2 }Ph 2 ])] [SbF6] (5c/5c') have been also prepared by reaction of 4a-c with AgSbF 6 . Deprotonation of complexes 4a-c or 5a-c' with NaH generates the unprecedented ruthenium carbenes [Ru(η 6 -p-cymene)(κ 2 (C,N)- [P{=NP(=O)(OR) 2 }Ph 2 ] 2 )] (R = Ph (6a), Et (6b)) and [Ru(η 6 -p-cymene)(κ 2 (C,N)-C[P{=NP(=O)(OPh) 2 }Ph 2 ][P{=NP(=O)(OEt) 2 }Ph 2 ])] (6c). The structures of compounds 2a, 5a, and 6a have been confirmed by X-ray crystallography. DFT calculations on a model for complexes 6a-c, [Ru(η 6 -C 6 H 6 )(κ 2 (C,N)-C[P{=NP(=O)-(OMe) 2 )Me 2 ] 2 )], suggest a nucleophilic character for the carbon atom in Ru=C. In agreement with this theoretical prediction, protonation of complexes 6a-c with HCl or HBF 4 takes place selectively on the carbenic carbon, regenerating 4a-c or 5a-c', respectively.