Composite Complete Response Research Articles

Venetoclax Combined with Daunorubicin and Cytarabine (2 + 6) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Updated Results of a Phase II Trial

INTRODUCTION Venetoclax (Ven) combined with intensive chemotherapy had been proven effectively in the management of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Our previous study showed that Ven combined with DA (2 + 6) is a highly effective and safe induction therapy for adults with newly diagnosed AML. To further validate the efficacy and safety of this induction regimen, the study continued to enroll young patients with newly diagnosed AML. Now, we have updated the results of this phase 2, multicenter, single-arm trial. METHODS Details of the Study design, participants, inclusion and exclusion criteria, procedures, efficacy and safety evaluation were provided in our previous article “Venetoclax combined with daunorubicin and cytarabine (2 + 6) as induction treatment in adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: a phase 2, multicenter, single-arm trial” which published in the Journal of “Experimental Hematology & Oncology”. RESULTS Until June 30, 2023, seventy patients were enrolled and treated with Ven combined with DA (2 + 6) as induction therapy. The median age was 44 (range, 16-60) years, and 37 (52.9%) patients were male. According to the European Leukemia Network prognostic group (2022), 32 (45.7%), 9 (12.9%), and 29 (41.4%) patients were considered to belong to the favorable, intermediate, and adverse groups, respectively. The ORR after one cycle of induction was 92.9% (65/70)with a composite complete response rate (CR + CRi) of 90.0% (CR 61/70, CRi 2/70). Moreover, 89.5% (51/57) of the patients reached CR with undetectable MRD. Grade 3 or worse adverse effects included neutropenia (100%), thrombocytopenia (100%), febrile neutropenia, and one mortality. The median neutrophil and platelet recovery times were 13 (5-36) and 13 (8-48) days, respectively. (Table 1) Until Jan 30, 2023, with with a median follow-up of 9 (1-18) months, 6 patients proceed Allo-HSCT, the estimated 12-month OS, EFS, and DFS rates were 84.9%、81.0%、81.6%, respectively. (Figure 1) Conclusion: Ven with DA (2 + 6) is a highly effective and safe induction therapy for adults with newly diagnosed AML. Keywords Venetoclax, DA(2+6), induction treatment, acute myeloid leukemia

CPX-351 Versus FLAG-IDA with or without Venetoclax in Previously Untreated and Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

1. Introduction A recent randomized comparison of liposomal daunorubicin and cytarabine (CPX-351) did not improve response rates or overall survival compared with FLAG-IDA in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) - although subgroup analyses appeared to show some benefit with CPX-351. The real-world outcomes of these cohorts are unknown. Additionally, there is little data on the relative outcomes of these cohorts in the relapsed or refractory (RR) setting. We aimed to explore the efficacy of CPX-351 and FLAG-IDA with or without venetoclax in newly diagnosed and RR AML outside of clinical trials. 2. Methods We analyzed 142 patients from the Project ERIS database with newly diagnosed or relapsed or refractory (RR) AML treated with CPX-351 or FLAG-IDA from January 1, 2013 to April 18, 2023 at VCU Massey Comprehensive Cancer Center. We recorded baseline patient-related and disease characteristics, including age, ECOG, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) scores, molecular profiling and ELN 2022 cytogenetic risk, dates of regimen initiation, and survival. We used the D'Agostino & Pearson method for normality testing and the t-test or Mann-Whitney (as applicable) tests for between-group comparisons. Categorical comparisons used Fischer's exact test. We applied the Bonferroni correction if multiple comparisons were made. The Wilson-Brown method was used for 95% confidence intervals. We analyzed survival by the Kaplan-Meier method with significance determined by the log-rank test. The event for calculating the overall survival (OS) was the date of death. Patients were otherwise censored at the date of last contact. 3. Results First, we analyzed 43 (30.3%) patients with newly diagnosed AML fit for intensive chemotherapy: 33 (76.7%) received CPX-351 and 10 (23.3%) received FLAG-IDA. In the FLAG-IDA cohort, three (30.0%) patients received concurrent venetoclax. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, including age, sex, race, or CCI scores, shown in Table A. However, patients in the CPX-351 cohort had significantly worse ECOG performance status compared with the FLAG-IDA cohort (median, 1 vs 0, p = 0.007). There were no significant differences in the proportion of patients that had ELN 2022 adverse risk cytogenetics between the CPX-351 and FLAG-IDA cohorts (65.6% vs 55.6%, p = 0.701). The composite complete response rate (CRc; CR + CRi + CRh) was 53.6% (95% CI: 35.8-70.5) in the CPX-351 cohort and 62.5% (95% CI: 30.6-86.3) for FLAG-IDA (p = 0.709). The rate of MRD negativity was 33.3% for CPX-351 (95% CI: 5.9-70.0) and 50.0% (95% CI: 2.6-97.4) for FLAG-IDA. A similar proportion of patients proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT; 39.4% vs 40.0%, p > 0.999). There was no significant difference in the median overall survival in patients treated with CPX-351 or FLAG-IDA (16.1 m. vs 11.4 m., p = 0.129, Figure B). Next, we analyzed 96 (90.7%) patients that received FLAG-IDA and ten (9.3%) that received CPX-351 for RR AML in any subsequent line; three (2.1%) patients in the overall cohort received either CPX-351 or FLAG-IDA in the first-line setting, then crossed over to the other arm at disease progression. Sixteen (16.7%) patients received venetoclax with FLAG-IDA. There were no significant baseline differences between cohorts, as shown in Table A. The CRc for CPX-351 was 33.3% (95% CI, 5.9-70.0) compared with 47.7% (95% CI, 37.6-58.0, p = 0.681) for FLAG-IDA. The rate of MRD negativity was 50.0% (95% CI, 2.6-97.4) for CPX-351 and 66.7% for FLAG-IDA (95% CI, 39.1-86.2, p > 0.999). There was no significant difference in the median overall survival in patients treated with CPX-351 or FLAG-IDA (12.7 m. vs 14.5 m., p = 0.561). 4. Discussion There was no significant difference in the rates of CRc, MRD negativity, or overall survival in patients that received CPX-351 or FLAG-IDA with or without venetoclax in the first-line setting or at the time of disease progression. Both approaches appear to be viable in carefully selected cohorts of patients. A comprehensive toxicity analysis and exploratory molecular subgroup analysis are ongoing.

A study to assess the efficacy of enasidenib and risk-adapted addition of azacitidine in newly diagnosed IDH2-mutant AML

AbstractEnasidenib (ENA) is an inhibitor of isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) approved for the treatment of patients with IDH2-mutant relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this phase 2/1b Beat AML substudy, we applied a risk-adapted approach to assess the efficacy of ENA monotherapy for patients aged ≥60 years with newly diagnosed IDH2-mutant AML in whom genomic profiling demonstrated that mutant IDH2 was in the dominant leukemic clone. Patients for whom ENA monotherapy did not induce a complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) enrolled in a phase 1b cohort with the addition of azacitidine. The phase 2 portion assessing the overall response to ENA alone demonstrated efficacy, with a composite complete response (cCR) rate (CR/CRi) of 46% in 60 evaluable patients. Seventeen patients subsequently transitioned to phase 1b combination therapy, with a cCR rate of 41% and 1 dose-limiting toxicity. Correlative studies highlight mechanisms of clonal elimination with differentiation therapy as well as therapeutic resistance. This study demonstrates both efficacy of ENA monotherapy in the upfront setting and feasibility and applicability of a risk-adapted approach to the upfront treatment of IDH2-mutant AML. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03013998.

Impact of previous anthracycline therapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving venetoclax.

Venetoclax (VEN) combination regimens are now recognized as effective against acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the prognosis of patients who do not attain a composite complete response (cCR) is extremely poor, and clinical determinants of response remain unknown. Medical records of 57 patients with AML treated with VEN combination regimens from April 2021 to March 2022 at six institutions were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was cCR, complete remission, or complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery after one cycle of VEN combination regimen. Five patients had previously relapsed after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). The treatment regimen was azacitidine-VEN in 48 patients (84%) and low-dose cytarabine-VEN in 9 patients (16%). Thirty patients (53%) achieved cCR after one cycle of a VEN regimen. In univariate analysis, the number of prior chemotherapy regimens, post-allo-SCT relapse, and cytogenetic risk category were associated with a decreased likelihood of achieving cCR. In multivariate analysis, second-line chemotherapy remained a significant predictor of response. Patients who received anthracycline immediately before the VEN regimen had a higher cCR rate than patients who did not receive anthracycline. In this study, prior chemotherapy/allo-SCT and cytogenetic risk were associated with VEN treatment outcomes.

A Metabolically Optimized, Noncytotoxic Low-Dose Weekly Decitabine/Venetoclax in MDS and AML

Abstract Purpose: Venetoclax (VEN) added to the hypomethylating agents (HMA) decitabine or azacitidine is the new standard of care for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and is being evaluated in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Current dosing of HMA/VEN relies on leukemia suppression through cytotoxicity which also impacts normal hematopoiesis. A regimen using once-weekly low-dose decitabine (LDDec) has demonstrated activity in myeloid malignancies. To overcome the severe myelosuppression often seen with HMA/VEN, we evaluated a once-weekly dosing regimen of VEN and LDDec in elderly and/or frail patients who were felt less likely to tolerate severe myelosuppression. Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective, single-center analysis of patients with AML, MDS, or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia treated with a once-weekly LDDec/VEN regimen. We also compare this regimen with a cohort treated with standard dosing HMA/VEN. Results: In a retrospective cohort of 39 patients, the overall response rate for patients receiving LDDec/VEN for first-line AML and MDS was 88% and 64%, respectively. In patients with TP53 mutations, the composite complete response rate was 71% and the median overall survival was 10.7 months. When compared with 36 patients receiving standard dose HMA/VEN, the LDDec/VEN patients had a longer time on therapy (175 vs. 78 days; P = 0.014) and a trend toward a higher rate of transfusion independence (47% vs. 26%; P = 0.33). Neutropenic fever occurred in 31% of patients, with a median of one hospitalization at any point during treatment. Conclusions: This preliminary clinical experience, although retrospective, provides proof-of-activity of noncytotoxic DNA methyltransferase 1–targeting by allowing frequent, sustained drug exposure often not possible with standard HMA/VEN regimens.

Responses in patients with AML and treated with entospletinib monotherapy.

e19010 Background: AML is a disease defined by the acquisition of genetic lesions in normal hematopoietic stem cells and progenitors resulting in poorly differentiated and highly proliferative leukemic blasts. Spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) is a nonreceptor tyrosine kinase that maintains de-differentiation and leukemogenesis. MLL rearrangements (MLL-r) occur in up to 10% of adult AML and are associated with upregulated expression of the transcription factors HOXA9 and MEIS1 and worse clinical outcomes. Entospletinib (ENTO), an oral, selective inhibitor of SYK, has been studied in clinical trials for unselected AML patients as well as MLL-r patients. ENTO plus standard induction chemotherapy in front line had a 76% (13/17) composite complete response (CR) in AML patients with high HOXA9 and MEIS1. We have 3 patients that achieved CRs with ENTO monotherapy; one patient achieved CR to 14 days of ENTO monotherapy prior to initiation of chemotherapy; 2 patients with relapsed/refractory AML with MLL-r treated with ENTO monotherapy achieved CRs. Methods: This was part of an international multicenter phase Ib/II study (NCT02343939) which evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ENTO in subjects with AML. During dose escalation, ENTO was administered in combination with induction chemotherapy (Group A) or with a hypomethylating agent (Group B). ENTO was administered as monotherapy for R/R AML in Group C. This report includes one patient from group A (newly diagnosed AML, MLL-r, 14-day monotherapy lead-in with ENTO) and two patients from group C monotherapy (relapsed/refractory AML, MLL-r). Results: Three patients receiving ENTO monotherapy had CRs. 18-year-old male from group A, that was MLL-r, NPM1-mutant (-). Patient treated at 400 mg PO, BID, achieved a cytogenetic CR with incomplete count recovery after cycle 0 (before chemotherapy); the patient continued study with induction chemotherapy and ultimately received ASCT in CR. Two additional patients in group C (with multiple therapies), both at 400 mg bid: (i) 37-year-old male, MLL-r, NPM1(-), was on study for 28 days, achieved CR; (ii) 28-year-old female, MLL-r, NPM1(-) on study for 60 days, achieved CR, both proceeded to SCT. Conclusions: Based on the results from these three patients, the clinical activity of SYK inhibition should be explored further in AML. We are testing Lanraplenib, a next-generation SYK inhibitor with enhanced selectivity, and more favorable pharmacologic properties in combination in genetically defined subsets of AML (NCT05028751). Clinical trial information: NCT02343939 .

Gilteritinib plus azacitidine and venetoclax for FLT3-ITD mutated relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

e19024 Background: Gilteritinib is a second-generation FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has been shown significantly increase the survival of relapsed/refractory (r/r) FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. We investigated the clinical benefit of gilteritinib plus azacitidine and venetoclax in the treatment of r/r FLT3-ITD mutated AML in the real word. Methods: Gilteritinib was given by oral administration at a dose of 80 or 120mg/d for each cycle. Azacitidine was intravenously administrated at a dose of 75 mg/m2/day d1-7. Venetoclax was given by oral administration at a dose of 100mg/d then ramp-up at 400mg/d, some patients were administrated at a dose of 400mg/d due to prior exposure. The composite complete response (CRc) rate (complete response [CR] and CR with incomplete blood count recovery [CRi]) were assessed, and then the overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), relapse-free survival (RFS) was evaluated. Results: We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of gilteritinib plus azacitidine and venetoclax in 14 r/r FLT3-ITD mutated AML patients. The CRc rate of the triple therapy was 57.1% (CR, n = 5, 35.7%; CRi, n = 3, 21.4%), in which, all patients achieved minimal residual disease (MRD) negative measured by multi-color flow cytometry. At a median follow-up of 136.5 days, the median OS was 216.0 days, the median EFS was 97.0 days, and the median RFS were 184 days. The common grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events included neutropenia (n = 14, 100.0%), anemia (n = 12, 85.7%), and thrombocytopenia (n = 11, 78.6%). The common grade 3/4 non-hematologic adverse events were pulmonary infection (n = 5, 35.7%), other adverse events were relatively less and milder. Conclusions: In conclusion, the current data demonstrated promising response of the triple therapy in r/r FLT3-ITD mutated AML patients, and the regimen represented a potential option as a bridge to transplant. Prospective studies are warranted to further define the risk or benefit for more patients.

Venetoclax combined with daunorubicin and cytarabine (2 + 6) as induction treatment in adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: a phase 2, multicenter, single-arm trial

BackgroundVenetoclax (Ven) combined with intensive chemotherapy was proven effective in the management of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the severe and prolonged myelosuppression remains a concern to worry about. To explore more appropriate combination regimens, we designed Ven combining daunorubicin and cytarabine (DA 2 + 6) regimen as induction therapy, aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety in adults de novo AML.MethodsA phase 2 clinical trial was performed in 10 Chinese hospitals to investigate Ven combined with daunorubicin and cytarabine (DA 2 + 6) in patients with AML. The primary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), comprising of complete remission (CR), complete remission with incomplete blood cell count recovery (CRi), and partial response (PR). Secondary endpoints included measurable residual disease (MRD) of bone marrow assessed by flow cytometry, overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and the safety of regimens. This study is a currently ongoing trial listed on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry as ChiCTR2200061524.ResultsOverall, 42 patients were enrolled from January 2022 to November 2022; 54.8% (23/42) were male, and the median age was 40 (range, 16–60) years. The ORR after one cycle of induction was 92.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 91.6–94.1; 39/42) with a composite complete response rate (CR + CRi) 90.5% (95% CI, 89.3–91.6, CR 37/42, CRi 1/42). Moreover, 87.9% (29/33) of the CR patients with undetectable MRD (95% CI, 84.9–90.8). Grade 3 or worse adverse effects included neutropenia (100%), thrombocytopenia (100%), febrile neutropenia (90.5%), and one mortality. The median neutrophil and platelet recovery times were 13 (5–26) and 12 (8–26) days, respectively. Until Jan 30, 2023, the estimated 12-month OS, EFS, and DFS rates were 83.1% (95% CI, 78.8–87.4), 82.7% (95% CI, 79.4–86.1), and 92.0% (95% CI, 89.8–94.3), respectively.ConclusionVen with DA (2 + 6) is a highly effective and safe induction therapy for adults with newly diagnosed AML. To the best of our knowledge, this induction therapy has the shortest myelosuppressive period but has similar efficacy to previous studies.

Efficacy and Safety of Decitabine Combined with Modified EIAG Regimen in the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia and High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome

To investigate the efficacy, prognosis and safety of decitabine combined with modified EIAG regimen in the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). The clinical data of 44 patients with relapsed/refractory AML and high-risk MDS admitted to our hospital from January 2017 to December 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were equally divided into D-EIAG group (decitabine combined with EIAG regimen) and D-CAG group (decitabine combined with CAG regimen) according to clinical treatment regimen. The complete response (CR), CR with incomplete hematologic recover (CRi), morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS), partial response (PR), overall response rate (ORR), modified composite complete response (mCRc), overall survival (OS) time, 1-year OS rate, myelosuppression and adverse reactions between the two groups were compared. In D-EIAG group, 16 patients (72.7%) achieved mCRc (CR+CRi+MLFS), 3 patients (13.6%) achieved PR, and ORR (mCRc+PR) was 86.4%. In D-CAG group, 9 patients (40.9%) achieved mCRc, 6 patients (27.3%) achieved PR, and ORR was 68.2%. Difference was observed in mCRc rate between the two groups (P=0.035), but not in ORR (P>0.05). The median OS time of D-EIAG group and D-CAG group was 20 (2-38) months and 16 (3-32) months, and 1-year OS rate was 72.7% and 59.1%, respectively. There was no significant difference in 1-year OS rate between the two groups (P>0.05). After induction chemotherapy, the median time for absolute neutrophil count recovery to 0.5×109/L in D-EIAG group and D-CAG group was 14 (10-27) d and 12 (10-26) d, for platelet count recovery to 20×109/L was 15 (11-28) d and 14 (11-24)d, the median red blood cell suspension transfusion volume was 8 (6-12) U and 6 (6-12) U, and the median apheresis platelet transfusion volume was 4 (2-8) U and 3 (2-6) U, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in comparison of the above indicators between the two groups (P>0.05). The hematological adverse reactions of patients were mainly myelosuppression. Grade III-IV hematological adverse events occurred in both groups (100%), with no increase in the incidence of non-hematological toxicities such as gastrointestinal reactions or liver function damage. Decitabine combined with EIAG regimen in the treatment of relapsed/refractory AML and high-risk MDS can improve remission rate, provide an opportunity for subsequent therapies, and have no increase in adverse reactions compared with D-CAG regimen.

Outcomes of Newly Diagnosed Therapy-Related AML and AML with Myelodysplasia-Related Changes Treated with 7+3, Hypomethylating Agents with or without Venetoclax and CPX-351: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) and AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) are associated with poor outcomes due to older age at diagnosis and adverse-risk cytogenetics and molecular features and, therefore, treatment of these groups of patients remain a challenge. There is a paucity of real-world data on outcomes of t-AML and AML-MRC treated with 7+3, hypomethylating agents (HMA) with or without venetoclax (VEN) or CPX-351 (Vyxeos). Methods We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study to compare overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and composite complete response (CCR) of patients with t-AML or AML-MRC treated with first-line 7+3, HMA, HMA+VEN or Vyxeos. Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome were not included. OS was defined from day 1 of initial chemotherapy until death from any cause. Patients were not censored at the time of allogeneic transplant. Sixty and 90-day treatment-related mortality were estimated as surrogates for treatment toxicity. Propensity score modeling was used to adjust for baseline characteristics (age, AML subtype, comorbidities, performance status, cardiac ejection fraction, cytogenetics, and mutations). Results Of 488 consecutive AML patients treated at the University of Maryland between 2013-2021, 136 patients had t-AML or AML-MRC and received one of the above therapies. 40% were female. The median age of the cohort was 67.5 [IQR: 60.9-73.2]. The median age of patients who received 7+3 (n=34) was 63.4 years, HMA (n=61) 70.3 years, HMA+VEN (n=27) 72.6 years, and Vyxeos (n=14) 62.2 years (age P-value= 0.1). 42 and 17 patients received decitabine in the HMA and HMA+VEN arms, respectively. None of the patients treated with 7+3 or Vyxeos received HMA prior to AML diagnosis. However, 3 and 6 patients received HMA in the HMA and HMA+VEN arms prior to AML diagnosis, respectively. Both 7+3 and HMA were given mostly before 2019 (7+3: 88%; HMA: 81%) compared to HMA+VEN and Vyxeos, which were given mostly in years 2019 and after (HMA+VEN: 74%; Vyxeos: 71%) (P<0.01). The median follow-up was 73.5 months (mo). Table 1 demonstrates unadjusted outcomes. Figure 1 demonstrates the unadjusted OS of treated groups. Using propensity score for adjustment, there was no difference in median OS or CCR in patients treated with 7+3 vs. HMA (11.2 vs. 10.6 mo, P=0.63; 42% vs. 31%, P=0.38). However, patients treated with HMA+VEN had worse adjusted m-OS than patients treated with 7+3 (5.3 vs. 20.2 mo, P=0.02) or HMA alone (5.3 vs. 10.1 mo, P=0.02). Patients treated with Vyxeos had a statistically similar adjusted-median OS to those treated with 7+3 (5.1 vs. 15.4 mo, P=0.34) and a trend toward a worse outcome than those treated with HMA alone (5.3 vs. 10.1 mo, P=0.07). Conclusion The outcomes of t-AML and AML-MRC remains poor. In t-AML and AML-MRC, using 7+3 and HMA resulted in similar OS; however, improved outcomes compared to HMA+VEN. Almost 50% of patients treated with HMA+VEN died in the first 90 days, possibly related to treatment toxicity. Further studies are needed to determine the role of VEN combination with HMA in t-AML and AML-MRC. Moreover, further real-world, multi-institutional data are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of Vyxeos in t-AML and AML-MRC. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Venetoclax in Combination with Hypomethylating Agents or Low-Dose Cytarabine for Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Retrospective Single-Centre Experience

Background. Relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a largely unmet medical condition with an overall dismal outcome owing to the lack of standardized, effective treatment approaches. The only curative option for R/R AML patients (pts) is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), that can be exploited in a minority of otherwise eligible pts due to poor efficacy and high toxicity of salvage regimens used to induce leukemia remission as bridge-to-transplant. Recently, a number of targeted agents with relatively favorable toxicity profiles have been explored in clinical trials for R/R AML pts. Since its first accelerated approval by the Food and Drugs Administration in 2018, the Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN), in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMA) or low dose cytarabine (LDAC), has steadily become the standard therapeutic approach for newly diagnosed AML in elderly or unfit pts, while its role in R/R disease is not well defined yet. Aim. To gain insights into the potential effectiveness of VEN-based regimens in patients with R/R AML. Patients. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of 67 R/R AML pts treated at our Institution with venetoclax-based regimens on an off-label basis, between March 2018 and April 2022. Fifty-eight pts (87%) carried a de-novo AML diagnosis, 6 pts (9%) had AML secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome and 3 pts (4%) had therapy-related AML. Median age was 58y (33-74y); 30 pts (45%) were aged >60, while 7 pts (10%) were aged >70y at VEN initiation. Thirty-eight pts (56%) were treated for first (n=32) or second relapse (n=6); last complete remission (CR) duration was <6 mo in 18 pts, 6-12 mo in 16 pts and >12 m (12-56) o in 4 patients; 11 pts (16%) had relapsed after HSCT; remaining 18 pts (27%) were treated for primary refractory disease. All pts received conventional immunophenotypic and cytogenetic characterization and at least NPM1, FLT3, CBFB/MYH11 and RUNX1/RUNX1T1 mutation/rearrangement detection. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) data were available for 56 pts (83%); specifically, 40 pts (primary refractory, n=18; relapsed, n=22) had NGS analysis carried out on bone marrow samples shortly before VEN initiation, while in 16 pts NGS was carried out on baseline diagnostic specimens. VEN partner drug was azacitidine in 45 pts (68%), LDAC in 15 (22%) and decitabine in 7 (10%). Thirty-nine pts (58%) were treated with an intention-to-transplant (ITT). Median follow-up duration was 11.8 mts (1.1 - 44). Results. Overall, we report a composite complete response (CCR) rate of 55% (n=37); 10 of complete responders (27%) had incomplete peripheral counts recovery. Minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity was achieved in 21/37 pts (56%). All CR invariably occurred during the first 8 weeks of treatment. Although it did not reach significance level (p=0.065), there was considerable variation in CCR rate among treatment settings: relapsed pts, 66%; primary refractory, 50%; post-HSCT relapse, 27%. Conventional risk stratification parameters (age, leukocyte counts, ELN 2017 risk category, NPM1/FLT3 mutational status, secondary disease, last CR duration) were poorly predictive of CR probability. A positive trend towards higher CCR rate, although not statistically significant, was found for NPM1 (CCR rate: 57%) and IDH1/2 mutation (66%) while FLT3/Ras pathway mutations were detrimental (23%). Median overall survival (OS) but not event-free survival (EFS), differed significantly among settings: relapsed pts, 11.9 mo; refractory, 8.6 mo; post-HSCT, 6.7 mo. (p=0.030). Stratifying pts based on NPM1 and FLT3-ITD status resulted in markedly different EFS: NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDneg, not reached; NPM1wt/FLT3any, 6.2 mo; NPM1mut, FLT3-ITDpos, 3.4 mo (p=0.031); as well as different OS: NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDneg, not reached; NPM1wt/FLT3any, 10.5 mo; NPM1mut, FLT3-ITDpos, 5.6 mo (p=0.003). Among the ITT population, HSCT actualization rate was 66%. Four pts are currently long-term survivors with follow-up exceeding 24 mo without receiving HSCT; notably, they all carried a NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDneg/Ras pathwayneg genotype. Conclusions: Overall, these findings suggest a role for venetoclax-based regimens in R/R AML patients and support the design of prospective studies. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Long-Term Survival of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Responding Patients Who Stopped Azacytidine and/or Venetoclax Because of Poor Tolerance or Physician Choice: A Retrospective Multicenter Study from the French Innovative Leukemia Organization (FILO)

Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients treated upfront with venetoclax and azacitidine (VEN-AZA) achieved a 66.4% composite complete response (CRc) including 36.7% complete response (CR) and 29.7% CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) in the VIALE-A trial (DiNardo et al., 2020). Median event-free survival (EFS) and duration of response were 9.8 months (95% CI, 8.4 to 11.8) and 17.8 months, respectively. These good results are mitigated by an 82% rate of hematologic adverse events and a 42 to 54% risk of febrile neutropenia both in clinical trial and real-life studies. A recent report of a small cohort of 13 patients in CRc for ≥12 months who interrupted VEN-AZA showed that these patients maintained long treatment-free remission period (Chua et al., 2022) suggesting that treatment interruptions might be considered. To evaluate the impact and the safety of this strategy, we designed a retrospective multicentric study of responding patients who stopped VEN and/or AZA. Methods: Eligible patients had to 1) have been treated with VEN-AZA for previously untreated or pretreated AML, 2) have stopped VEN or AZA for more than 3 months because of poor tolerance and/or physician choice, 3) be in response (CR, CRi or Morphologic leukemia-free state, [MLFS]) at the time of treatment interruption, 4) be aged ≥18 years. Main endpoints were overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and treatment-free remission (TFR). We measured the impact of prognostic factors on long-term survival by calculating hazard ratios (HR) in univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: We included 51 patients from 12 centers of the FILO group treated with VEN-AZA upfront (n=35, 68.6%) or as salvage treatment (n=16, 31.4%), between 01/19 and 02/22. Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and minimal residual disease (MRD) data were available for 38 (74.5%) and 28 (55%) patients, respectively. Median age was 75 (ranges, 22-89). WHO classification AML was de novo, AML with myelodysplastic-related changes and therapy-related AML for 27 (52.9%), 21 (41.2%) and 3 (5.9%) patients, respectively. Median platelet count, total white blood cell count and median absolute neutrophile count were 52 G/L (ranges, 7-259), 1.9 (ranges, 0.5-95.5) and 0.7 (ranges, 0-31.6), respectively. Median bone marrow blasts involvement was 32% (range, 7-99). Fourteen patients (27.5%) had adverse cytogenetics. NPM1 and FLT3 mutations were found in 9 (17.6%) and 4 (7.8%) patients, respectively. Twenty (39.2%) patients had a IDH mutation (IDH1, n=5 [9.8%]; IDH2R140 n=9 [17.6%] and IDH2R172, n=6 [11.8%]). TP53 mutation was mutated in 5 (9.8%) cases. Patients received a median of 4 cycles of VEN-AZA (ranges, 1-15); response were CR, CRi and MLFS for 33 (64.7%), 14 (27.5%) and 11 (21.6%) before interrupting VEN-AZA. Complete response with negative MRD was found for 24 out of the 28 evaluable patient (85.7%). Discontinuation of VEN and/or AZA treatments was based on physician choice because of hematological and/or non-hematological toxicities in 36 (71.6%) and 9 (17.6%) cases. Treatment interrupted was VEN, AZA or both in 26 (51%), 1 (2%) and 24 cases (47.1%), respectively. Median follow-up was 17.8 (15.2-20.4) months. Median EFS and OS were 16.7 (12.8-20.6) and 26.8 (14.1-39.5) months, respectively (Figure). Median duration of treatment-free remission (TFR) was 10.1 (7.1-13.1) months (Figure). Twelve patients resumed VEN and/or AZA treatment. For these patients, CRc, MLFS and SD/PD was obtained in 6 (50%), 2 (16.6%) and 5 (41.6%) cases. Obtaining a CR/CRi following the first VEN-AZA cycle and number of prior VEN-AZA cycles >4 were the main prognostic factors associated with a longer EFS and OS in univariate and/or multivariate analyses (Table). None of these factors were predictive for a better TFR, except the achievement of CR/CRi after cycle 1 (HR=2.2, p=0.05). The type of interrupted treatment (VEN versus VEN-AZA) did not influence EFS, OS nor TFS. Conclusion: Our findings confirm the high efficacy of VEN-AZA treatment in AML. Discontinuation of VEN and/or AZA treatment in responders was associated with durable responses and survival. Strategies of de-escalation based on clinical response, MRD and/or molecular profiling may be envisaged but will require a prospective evaluation in clinical trials. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Venetoclax Added to Cladribine (CLAD) + Low Dose AraC (LDAC) Alternating with Azacitidine (AZA) Is Highly Active As Frontline Therapy in Older Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia in a Phase 2 Study

Background The combination of venetoclax with AZA for patients with newly diagnosed AML who are older or unfit for intensive chemotherapy significantly improves remission rates and survival compared to AZA alone. A low-intensity backbone combining venetoclax with cladribine (CLAD) plus low-dose araC (LDAC) alternating with HMA has demonstrated encouraging results in older patients with newly diagnosed AML (Kadia TM, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2022). Here we report an updated cohort of patients with longer-term follow up treated on the phase 2 clinical trial of venetoclax added to CLAD/LDAC alternating with AZA. Methods This is a phase 2 study (NCT03586609) investigating the combination of venetoclax with CLAD/LDAC alternating with AZA in older (age ≥ 60 years) or patients <60 years that are unfit for intensive chemotherapy with newly diagnosed AML (excluding APL, CBF). The primary objective was composite complete response rate (CRc; CR+CRi); secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), overall response rate (ORR), and toxicity. Induction was with cladribine 5 mg/m2 IV on D1-5 and araC 20mg SQ BID on D1-10. Consolidation/maintenance consisted of 2 courses of cladribine 5 mg/m2 IV on D1-3 and araC 20 mg SQ BID on D1-10 alternating with 2 cycles of AZA 75 mg/m2 on D1-7, for up to 18 courses. Venetoclax 400 mg was added for each course with dose adjustments for concomitant CYP3A inhibitors. Venetoclax was given for 21 days during induction and for 7-14 days for consolidation depending on measurable residual disease (MRD) and tolerability. One cycle was 4 weeks and up to 2 cycles of induction were allowed. Results A total of 93 patients were treated on study with a median age was 68 years (range: 57 - 84); 28 (30%) patients were ≥ 70 yrs and 1 patient <60, unfit for intensive chemotherapy was enrolled. 29 (31%) patients had secondary or therapy related AML. 52 (56%) had diploid cytogenetics with 11 (12%) having adverse cytogenetics at enrollment. By European Leukemia Network (ELN) risk, 24%, 24%, and 53% were favorable, intermediate, and adverse risk, respectively. The most commonly mutated genes were DNMT3A in 28 (30%), NPM1 in 26 (28%), RAS in 23 (25%), TET2 in 22 (24%), and IDH2 in 20 (22%). TP53 was mutated in 8 (9%) patients. Among 93 evaluable patients the CRc rate was 92%. Best response was CR in 72 (78%), CRi in 13 (14%), no response in 5 (5%), and death in 2 (2%) patients. In responding patients with a bone marrow sample evaluable for assessment of MRD by flow cytometry, 71/85 (84%) achieved MRD negativity while on study. Responses were preserved across ELN risk groups with the CRc (CR/CRi) rate of 95% (86%/9%), 95% (82%/14%), and 90% (73%/17%) for patients with ELN favorable, intermediate, and adverse risk, respectively. CRc rate for TP53 mutated disease was 88% (7/8, 86% MRD negative) and for NPM1 mutated disease was 96% (25/26, 100% MRD negative). 35 (41%) responders received a subsequent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). Early mortality was low with two patients (2%) dying within 4 weeks and five patients (5%) dying with in 8 weeks. The most frequent grade 3/4 non-heme adverse events were febrile neutropenia (n=12), infection (n=7), atrial fibrillation (n=2), and allergic reaction (n=2). One patient developed grade 4 tumor lysis syndrome. With a median follow up of 22.8 months, the median duration of response (DOR) is not reached (95% CI: NE - NE months). Estimated 12- and 24-month DOR are 88.4% (95% CI: 81.0 - 96.4%) and 81.0% (95% CI: 71.0 - 92.4%), respectively. Median disease-free survival (DFS) is not yet reached (95% CI: 24.5 - NE months). Estimated 12- and 24-month DFS are 76.0% (95% CI: 66.8 - 86.4%) and 63.4% (95% CI: 52.1 - 77.1%), respectively. Median overall survival (OS) is not yet reached (95% CI: 25.4 - NE months). Estimated 12- and 24-month OS are 75.7% (95% CI: 66.9 - 85.7%) and 68.3% (95% CI: 58.1 - 80.1%), respectively (Figure). Conclusion Venetoclax added to CLAD/LDAC alternating with AZA is a highly effective, lower-intensity regimen which is well tolerated among older patients with newly diagnosed AML, producing high CRc and MRD negative remission rates and is effective in transitioning older adults to alloSCT. The rates of DFS and OS are encouraging. Further study of this non-anthracycline containing regimen is warranted in older patients both fit and unfit for intensive chemotherapy as a safe and effective induction treatment strategy. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

P581: PHASE II STUDY OF LOWER-INTENSITY FRONTLINE THERAPY FOR NEWLY DIAGNOSED PATIENTS WITH AML WHO ARE UNFIT OR OTHERWISE NOT ELIGIBLE FOR FRONTLINE CLINICAL TRIALS

Background: Pts with newly diagnosed (ND) AML frequently present with abnormal organ function, poor performance status (PS), concurrent active malignancies, and active infections. These factors often preclude these pts from enrollment on frontline clinical trials, since standard eligibility routinely exclude them. Aims: Therefore, we designed a lower-intensity regimen of cladribine plus low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) alternating with decitabine (DAC) with less stringent inclusion criteria in ND pts unfit or otherwise ineligible for existing clinical trials. Methods: Pts >18 years with untreated AML and ineligible for other frontline AML clinical trials were enrolled (NCT01515527). Eligibility criteria included either creatinine ≥2mg/dL; or total bilirubin ≥2 mg/dL; or ECOG PS of 3 or 4; or ineligible for participation in a higher priority protocol. Pts with active concurrent malignancies and ongoing infection related to their AML could be enrolled. Induction was cladribine 5 mg/m2 IV on D1-5, Cytarabine 20 mg SQ twice daily on D 1-10, followed by consolidation with cladribine 5 mg/m2 IV on D1-3, Cytarabine 20 mg SQ twice daily on D 1-10 alternating with decitabine 20 mg/m2 IV, daily on D 1-5. The primary objective was 60-d survival rate. Results: A total of 25 pts have been enrolled. The median age was 73 years (range, 52-82) with 76% of the cohort older than 70 years. Six pts (24%) had concurrent active malignancy, 4 (16%) had baseline creatinine >2mg/dL, and 9 (36%) had PS ≥3. 76% of them were adverse risk per ELN 2017. Baseline characteristics are shown in figure. Among 25 evaluable pts, 17 (68%) achieved a composite complete response (CRc) including 10 (40%) CR and 7 (28%) CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi). Among responders, 6 pts (35%) achieved MRD neg by flow. Of 7 pts with no response, all were ELN adverse risk. Median cycles to response was 1 (range: 1 - 4). 30- and 60 d mortality was 8% and 16%, respectively, including 2 pts (8%) who died due to pseudomonal sepsis on D8, and the other due to pneumonia on D11. At a median follow up of 9.4 months (range, 0.4- 19.9 m),median OS (6-mo OS% - 61 %), and EFS was 8.3 mo each (6-mo RFS% - 56 %) with a 60-d OS and EFS rate of 83% each, with a median RFS of 5.8 mo (2-mo RFS%-66%; 6-mo RFS% - 49 %). In this challenging patient population, this lower-intensity regimen was well tolerated, with an acceptable toxicity profile. Image:Summary/Conclusion: In an unfit patient population with a high comorbidity burden, that were ineligible for other clinical trials, induction therapy with Cladribine plus LDAC was feasible and effective in newly diagnosed pts with AML. The regimen produced high rates of response, encouraging EFS, OS, and low early mortality in a cohort predicted to have a high risk of early death. Treating this pt population on a clinical trial is feasible and can allow pts to achieve remission and move on to effective post-remission therapy.

Phase II study of lower-intensity frontline therapy for newly diagnosed patients with AML who are unfit or otherwise not eligible for frontline clinical trials.

e19028 Background: Pts with newly diagnosed(ND) AML often present with abnormal organ function, poor performance status (PS), concurrent active malignancies, and active infections precluding them from enrolling on frontline clinical trials, since standard eligibility routinely exclude them. We designed a lower-intensity regimen of cladribine plus low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) alternating with decitabine with less stringent inclusion criteria in ND pts unfit or ineligible for existing clinical trials. Methods: Pts &gt;18 years with untreated AML and ineligible for other frontline AML clinical trials were enrolled (NCT01515527). Eligibility criteria included either creatinine ≥2mg/dL; or total bilirubin ≥2 mg/dL; active concurrent cancer, infection, or ECOG PS of 3 or 4; or ineligible for participation in a higher priority protocol. Induction was cladribine 5 mg/m2 IV on D1-5, Cytarabine 20 mg SQ twice daily on D 1-10, followed by consolidation with cladribine 5 mg/m2 IV on D1-3, Cytarabine 20 mg SQ twice daily on D 1-10 alternating with decitabine 20 mg/m2 IV, daily on D 1-5. Primary objective was 60-d survival rate. Results: 25 pts have been enrolled. The median age was 73 yrs (range, 52-82) with 76% aged ≥70 yo. 6 pts (24%) had concurrent active malignancy, 4 (16%) had baseline creatinine &gt;2mg/dL, and 9 (36%) had PS ≥3. 76% were adverse risk per ELN 2017 (Table). Among 25 evaluable pts, 17 (68%) achieved a composite complete response (CRc) including 10 (40%) CR and 7 (28%) CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi). Among responders, 6 pts (35%) achieved MRD neg by flow. Of 7 pts with no response, all were ELN adverse risk. Median cycles to response was 1 (range: 1 - 4). 30- and 60 d mortality was 8% and 16%, respectively, including 2 pts (8%) who died due to pseudomonal sepsis on D8, and the other due to pneumonia on D11. At a median follow up of 9.4 months (range, 0.4- 19.9 m),median OS (6-mo OS% - 61 %), and EFS was 8.3 mo each (6-mo RFS% - 56 %) with a 60-d OS and EFS rate of 83% each, with a median RFS of 5.8 mo (2-mo RFS%-66%; 6-mo RFS% - 49 %). In this challenging patient population, this lower-intensity regimen was well tolerated, with an acceptable toxicity profile. Conclusions: In an unfit patient population of ND AML with high comorbidity burden, that were ineligible for other clinical trials, induction therapy with Cladribine plus LDAC was feasible and effective and can allow pts to achieve remission and move on to effective post-remission therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT01515527. [Table: see text]

Venetoclax combined with induction chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia: a post-hoc, propensity score-matched, cohort study

Venetoclax combined with intensive chemotherapy has been shown to be safe with promising activity in fit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia. The aim of this study was to compare the activity of venetoclax plus intensive chemotherapy with intensive chemotherapy alone. This was a post-hoc propensity score matched analysis of prospective clinical trials (NCT03214562, NCT02115295, and NCT01289457) in patients at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas, USA between March 29, 2010, and June 15, 2021. Eligible patients were aged 18 years and older, and had newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome, and were treated within trials incorporating purine analogues with an anthracycline and cytarabine either with venetoclax plus intensive chemotherapy or with intensive chemotherapy alone. Patients in the venetoclax plus intensive chemotherapy cohort were matched with patients in the intensive chemotherapy cohort. Morphological response and measurable residual disease (MRD) was assessed using bone marrow aspiration and biopsy and eight-colour multiparameter flow cytometry. The primary objectives were rate of MRD negative composite complete response and cumulative incidence of transition to allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). All patients who had response within two treatment cycles (induction and re-induction) were included in the analyses. Secondary objectives included assessment of event-free and overall survival. The propensity matched cohort included 279 patients (median age 49 years [IQR 39-57]; 131 [47%] were men and 148 [53%] were women); 85 in the venetoclax plus intensive chemotherapy cohort and 194 in the intensive chemotherapy cohort. After a median follow up of 30 months (95% CI 26-36), 64 (86%) of 74 patients in the venetoclax plus intensive chemotherapy cohort had an MRD-negative composite complete response rate compared with 86 [61%] of 140 patients in the intensive chemotherapy cohort (odd ratio 3·2 [95% CI 1·5-6·7]; p=0·0028). The overall cumulative incidence of allogeneic HSCT in responding patients was higher with venetoclax plus intensive chemotherapy than intensive chemotherapy (79% [95% CI 67-88] vs 57% [49-65]; hazard ratio [HR] 1·52 [95% CI 1·11-2·08]; p=0·012). Venetoclax plus intensive chemotherapy improved event-free survival (median not reached [NR; 95% CI NR-NR] vs 14·3 months [10·7-33·5]; HR 0·57 [95% CI 0·34-0·95]; p=0·030), but overall survival did not significantly differ between the two cohorts (median NR [95% CI 24-NR] vs 32 months [19-NR]; HR 0·63 [95% CI 0·35-1·1], p=0·13). Venetoclax combined with intensive induction chemotherapy induced deep MRD-negative remissions, allowing transition to allogeneic HSCT in first remission, and improvement in event-free survival. These results highlight the incremental benefit of venetoclax added to intensive induction chemotherapy across European LeukemiaNet risk groups, and serve as a benchmark to inform enrolment on future confirmatory prospective clinical trials. None.

Venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents or low dose cytarabine for relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia

Limited treatment options exist for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Venetoclax (VEN) in combination with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) has been recently approved for treatment-naïve patients unfit for intensive induction. Limited data are available to characterize the efficacy of VEN combinations in R/R AML. We retrospectively analyzed 77 patients with a median of 1 prior therapy (range 0–5) treated with VEN combinations for R/R AML or AML secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) progressing after HMA monotherapy. The median overall survival (OS) was 13.1 months (95% CI 9.2–15.1). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12 months (95% CI 8.2–15.4) with a median duration of response of 8.9 months (95% CI 5.7–13.9). Overall response rate (ORR) was 68% with a composite complete response (CR) and CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rate of 53%. VEN combination therapy is efficacious in R/R AML and further prospective studies are warranted.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation donor-derived memory-like NK cells functionally persist after transfer into patients with leukemia.

Natural killer (NK) cells are innate lymphoid cells that eliminate cancer cells, produce cytokines, and are being investigated as a nascent cellular immunotherapy. Impaired NK cell function, expansion, and persistence remain key challenges for optimal clinical translation. One promising strategy to overcome these challenges is cytokine-induced memory-like (ML) differentiation, whereby NK cells acquire enhanced antitumor function after stimulation with interleukin-12 (IL-12), IL-15, and IL-18. Here, reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) for HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) was augmented with same-donor ML NK cells on day +7 and 3 weeks of N-803 (IL-15 superagonist) to treat patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in a clinical trial (NCT02782546). In 15 patients, donor ML NK cells were well tolerated, and 87% of patients achieved a composite complete response at day +28, which corresponded with clearing high-risk mutations, including TP53 variants. NK cells were the major blood lymphocytes for 2 months after HCT with 1104-fold expansion (over 1 to 2 weeks). Phenotypic and transcriptional analyses identified donor ML NK cells as distinct from conventional NK cells and showed that ML NK cells persisted for over 2 months. ML NK cells expressed CD16, CD57, and high granzyme B and perforin, along with a unique transcription factor profile. ML NK cells differentiated in patients had enhanced ex vivo function compared to conventional NK cells from both patients and healthy donors. Overall, same-donor ML NK cell therapy with 3 weeks of N-803 support safely augmented RIC haplo-HCT for AML.

Benefit of high-dose idarubicin as induction therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: a prospective phase 2 study

Idarubicin 12mg/m2 has been recommended as a standard induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). It is unknown whether a higher dose of idarubicin can improve the remission rate. This phase 2 prospective single-arm study enrolled 45 adults with newly diagnosed AML between September 2019 and May 2021 (NCT 04,069,208). Induction therapy included administration of idarubicin 14mg/m2 for 3days and cytarabine 100mg/m2 every 12h subcutaneously for 7days. The primary endpoint was the composite complete response rate (complete response (CR) plus complete response with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi)). The median age was 45years (range 14-60years). Forty (88.9%) patients had CR or CRi, including 39 patients with CR and 1 patient with CRi after one course of induction therapy. The median times to recovery of absolute neutrophil and platelet counts were 21days. Only 1 patient died of intracranial hemorrhage during induction therapy. After a median follow-up of 14months (range 3.5-24months), the estimated 18-month overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) were 66.9% and 57.5%, respectively. In conclusion, idarubicin 14mg/m2plus cytarabine was a safe and efficient intensive regimen for younger and fit patients with newly diagnosed AML.

Comparison of Liposomal Daunorubicin and Cytarabine Versus Cladribine and High-Dose Cytarabine-Based Induction Chemotherapy in Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients (sAML) or Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Myelodysplastic Related Changes (AML-MRC)

Comparison of Liposomal Daunorubicin and Cytarabine Versus Cladribine and High-Dose Cytarabine-Based Induction Chemotherapy in Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients (sAML) or Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Myelodysplastic Related Changes (AML-MRC)