Purpose: Reflux-like dyspepsia (RLD), where predominant epigastric pain is associated with heartburn and/or regurgitation, is quite prevalent and has variable response to proton pump inhibition (PPI) therapy. Since symptom frequency and severity vary, there is frequent overlap among gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and RLD. We assessed the potential of an algorithm and a multi-factorial scoring system in discriminating patients presenting with RLD from those with true GERD or NERD. Methods: We prospectively evaluated an outpatient, community-based, cohort presenting with RLD using the following algorithm: After an initial symptom evaluation (epigastric pain, heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia), endoscopy and distal esophageal biopsies were performed to evaluate the structure of the esophagus, stomach and duodenum, followed by esophageal motility and 24-hr ambulatory pH monitoring to assess esophageal function and pathologic acid exposure. Results: 110 patients (35 men, 75 women) were evaluated. Endoscopy showed erosive or complicated GERD in 33 patients (30%) and it was normal in 77 patients (70%). Of this latter group, 62 (56%) had abnormal pH and motility studies and were classified as patients with NERD. The remaining 15 (14%) had normal functional studies and were classified as patients with RLD. A disease severity score was then applied (Table). The scoring system effectively distinguished patients with GERD (mean score 8.69, range 5–15), NERD (mean score 6.22, range 3–10) and RLD (mean score 3.27, range 2–4). A score higher than 4 excludes RLD; a score higher than 10 excludes NERD. Conclusion: An algorithmic evaluation and scoring of patients presenting with RLD effectively distinguishes patients with NERD and GERD from those with functional RLD, facilitates long-term management and defines the need for continuous PPI therapy.Table: Components of disease severity score.