BACKGROUND CONTEXTSince the start of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, telemedicine has increased in popularity to deliver health care via a remote setting. Preoperative spine surgery clearance visits are imperative for assessing and stratifying patients based on cardiac risk factors for potential invasive testing prior to surgery. However, it is unclear if moving these visits to a remote setting delivers the same quality of care as in person visits.PURPOSETo compare the rates of complications, readmissions, mortality, and cancellations for all patients who underwent spine procedures based on the setting of the preoperative cardiac clearance.STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGRetrospective cohort.PATIENT SAMPLEPatients >18 years-old who underwent any spine procedure performed by one of our fellowship-trained spine surgeons at a single tertiary academic center from January 1st, 2019 to June 30th, 2021.OUTCOME MEASURESComplications, readmissions, inpatient and 90-day mortality and cancellations.METHODSPatients were split into in-person or telemedicine cohorts based on their preoperative cardiac clearance visit. Patients were also split into cohorts based on their medical cardiac history. Cancellations, inpatient complications, 90-day readmission and inpatient and 90-day mortality were compared between the cohorts. Secondary analysis included multiple logistic regression to determine independent predictors of cancellations, 90-day readmission and 90-day mortality and multiple linear regression for inpatient complications.RESULTSA total of 1,963 patients were included with 1,407 patients having an in-person preoperative cardiac clearance visit and 556 having telemedicine clearance. The two cohorts had similar inpatient complications (0.6 vs 0.6, p=0.812), 90-day readmission (5.2% vs 4.9%, p=0.763), inpatient mortality (0.1% vs 0.2%, p=0.486), and 90-day mortality (0.6% vs 0.9%, p=0.370). The telemedicine cohort had more cancelled surgeries (4.5% vs 6.7%, p=0.048). Patients with a medical cardiac history had more inpatient complications (mean, 0.6 vs 0.8, p=0.011), and higher inpatient (0.0% vs 0.3%, p=0.039) and 90-day mortality (0.4% vs 1.3%, p=0.023). A subgroup analysis of patients with a medical cardiac history showed that patients who had a telemedicine visit had more cancellations (3.9% vs 10.3%, p=0.005) and higher 90-day mortality (0.8% vs 3.4%, p=0.024) than in-person visits. On regression, having a telemedicine visit was an independent predictor of preoperative cancellation (OR 1.57, p=0.039). Similarly, age (OR 1.02, p=0.042) and Elixhauser (OR 1.18, p=0.012) were associated with cancellation. A medical cardiac history (0.16, p=0.005), age (0.005, p=0.002), female sex (0.18, p <0.001), CCI (0.06, p=0.005), surgery in the thoracolumbar region (0.84, p <0.001), anterior approach (ref: posterior, 0.20, p=0.047), and combined approach (ref: posterior, 0.37, p <0.001) were independent predictors of increased inpatient complications while surgery in the cervical region was associated with decreased inpatient complications (ref: lumbar, -0.38, p <0.001). CCI was an independent predictor of 90-day mortality (OR 2.02, p <0.001).CONCLUSIONSPatients with a cardiac history who undergo telemedicine visits have increased cancellations and 90-day mortality. Telemedicine for preoperative cardiac clearance is safe for appropriately selected patients but carries increased risk of case cancellation and in-person visits should be strongly considered for patients with a history of heart disease.FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUSThis abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Read full abstract