Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections Research Articles

Comparison of efficacy and safety between elacycline and polymyxin for complicated intra-abdominal infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of eravacycline and polymyxin drugs in the treatment of multidrug-resistant complicated intra-abdominal infections(cIAI). Methods: The cIAI patients diagnosed or highly suspected of multidrug resistant bacterial infection who received eravacycline treatment at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital and Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital from June to August 2023 were prospectively included as the elacycline group. The cIAI patients with cIAI caused by multidrug resistant bacteria who received treatment with polymyxin (B or E) from January 2021 to August 2023 were retrospectively collected. The acute physiology and chronic health scores and age were matched with those of the elacrinid group, and they were included in the polymyxin group. The study mainly analyzed the clinical efficacy, microbial clearance rate, comprehensive efficacy, and safety of the two groups at the end of treatment and discharge. Results: A total of 72 patients with cIAI were included in the study, including 53 males and 19 females, aged (56.0±15.4) years. Among them, there were 28 cases in the eravacycline group and 44 cases in the polymyxin group. There was no statistically significant differences in the baseline, the proportion of patients who used combined drugs, the strains, the infection sites and infection conditions of patients between the two groups(all P>0.05).The clinical efficacy rate at the end of treatment [89.3% (25/28) vs 56.8%(25/44), P=0.004] and discharge [(88.5%(23/26) vs 63.6%,(28/44), P=0.024], microbial clearance rate at the end of treatment [(88.9% (24/27) vs 47.6%(20/42), P=0.001] and discharge [(91.3%(21/23) vs 59.5%(25/42), P=0.007], and overall recovery rate at the end of treatment [(89.3%(25/28) vs 52.3%(23/44), P=0.001] and discharge [(88.5%(23/26) vs 63.6%(28/44), P=0.024] in the erythromycin group were higher than those in the polymyxin drug group. In terms of safety, only 2 cases of mild vasculitis were observed in the eravacycline group. Conclusions: Combined regimens based on eravacycline showed better clinical effect in the treatment of cIAI caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. The clinical effective rate, microbial clearance rate and comprehensive efficacy were significantly higher than those of polymyxin drugs at the end of treatment and discharge with good safety.

Aztreonam-avibactam versus meropenem for the treatment of serious infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria (REVISIT): a descriptive, multinational, open-label, phase 3, randomised trial.

There is a need for additional therapeutic options for serious infections caused by Gram-negative pathogens. In the phase 3, descriptive REVISIT study, we investigated the safety and efficacy of aztreonam-avibactam in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections or hospital-acquired pneumonia or ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP-VAP) caused, or suspected to be caused, by Gram-negative bacteria. This prospective, multinational, open-label, central assessor-masked study enrolled adults who were hospitalised with a complicated intra-abdominal infection or HAP-VAP. Patients were randomly allocated via block randomisation using interactive response technology stratified by infection type in a 2:1 ratio to aztreonam-avibactam (with metronidazole for complicated intra-abdominal infection) or meropenem with or without colistin for 5-14 days for complicated intra-abdominal infection or 7-14 days for HAP-VAP. The primary endpoint was clinical cure at the test-of-cure visit (within 3 days before or after day 28) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Secondary endpoints included 28-day mortality in the ITT population and safety in patients in the ITT population who received study drug (safety analysis set). No formal hypothesis testing was planned. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03329092) and EudraCT (2017-002742-68) and is complete. Between April 5, 2018, and Feb 23, 2023, we screened 461 patients. 422 patients were enrolled and randomly allocated (282 in the aztreonam-avibactam group and 140 in the meropenem group, forming the ITT analysis set), of whom ten patients (seven in the aztreonam-avibactam group and three in the meropenem group) were randomly allocated but did not receive study treatment. 271 (64%) of 422 patients had at least one Gram-negative pathogen from an adequate specimen identified at baseline. The most frequent baseline pathogens were Enterobacterales (252 [93%] of 271). Overall, 19 (24%) of 80 isolates tested for carbapenemases were carbapenemase-positive (serine, metallo-β-lactamase, or both). 193 (68·4%) of 282 patients in the aztreonam-avibactam group and 92 (65·7%) of 140 in the meropenem group had clinical cure at the test-of-cure visit (treatment difference 2·7% [95% CI -6·6 to 12·4]). For patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection, the adjudicated clinical cure rate was 76·4% (159 of 208) for the aztreonam-avibactam group and 74·0% (77 of 104) for the meropenem group. Cure rates in patients with HAP-VAP were 45·9% (34 of 74) for aztreonam-avibactam and 41·7% (15 of 36) for meropenem. 28-day all-cause mortality rates were 4% (12 of 282) for aztreonam-avibactam and 7% (ten of 140) for meropenem; in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection, mortality was 2% (four of 208) and 3% (three of 104) for aztreonam-avibactam and meropenem, respectively, and in patients with HAP-VAP, mortality was 11% (eight of 74) and 19% (seven of 36), respectively. Aztreonam-avibactam was generally well tolerated, and safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile of aztreonam monotherapy. There were no treatment-related serious adverse events in the aztreonam-avibactam group. These phase 3 efficacy and safety data provide support for aztreonam-avibactam as a potential therapeutic option for complicated intra-abdominal infection or HAP-VAP caused by Gram-negative bacteria. Pfizer.

Early Oral Step-Down Versus Continued Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment of Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection.

Background: Complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) require a combined tactic, of source control and antimicrobial therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral step-down antimicrobial therapy in cIAIs after initial intravenous (IV) antimicrobial therapy. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included hospitalized adult patients diagnosed with a cIAI who received more than seven days of IV therapy from March 2017 to October 2021. Exclusion criteria included primary/peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis, necrotizing pancreatitis, fistulizing inflammatory bowel disease, or upper gastrointestinal tract infection. Patients were assigned into two groups: IV-only or oral step-down therapy. The primary outcome was infection recurrence, defined as re-initiation of antimicrobial agents after a treatment-free period of more than or equal to three days. Secondary outcomes included treatment escalation, repeat source control procedure, treatment-related complications, and all-cause mortality. Results: The cohort consisted of 248 patients (199 IV-only and 49 oral step-down). Patients receiving IV-only therapy had a shorter median antimicrobial duration than the oral step-down group (13 vs. 23 d; p <0.0001). Infection recurrence occurred in 26 (13.1%) and 6 (12.2%) patients in the IV-only and oral step-down groups, respectively (p = 0.88). Treatment escalation, repeat source control, and 28-day mortality were similar between groups. Oral step-down therapy resulted in more adverse drug events (10.2% vs. 3.0%; p = 0.04). Discussion: Transition to oral step-down after initial IV therapy had a similar rate of infection recurrence as IV-only therapy but was associated with a longer duration of antimicrobial therapy and an increased rate of adverse drug reactions. Larger randomized non-inferiority studies are needed to confirm this approach.

Association of CRP, Procalcitonin, Lactate, and Albumin Levels with In-Hospital Mortality Post-Definitive Laparotomy in Patients with Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections

Association of CRP, Procalcitonin, Lactate, and Albumin Levels with In-Hospital Mortality Post-Definitive Laparotomy in Patients with Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections

Estimating the value of new antibiotic treatment strategies in Zhejiang province, China: cost-effectiveness analysis based on a validated dynamic model

ObjectivesThis analysis aims to better reflect the value of new antibiotic treatment strategies, thereby informing clinical antibiotic use, antimicrobial reimbursement and/or hospital formulary decision-making in China.DesignWe adapted a published and...

Clinical and Microbiological Study of Intra-Abdominal Infections in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) are one of the important contributors to sepsis in intensive care units. The emergence of antibiotic resistance and the diversification of etiological agents make it challenging to determine the optimal empirical therapy. This study attempts to know the etiological agents, their antibiotic susceptibility patterns, and the risk factors associated with IAIs in different settings. This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care facility from January 2023 to June 2023. Adult and paediatric patients having primary IAI or developed infections during their hospital stay were included in this study. Specimen like peritoneal swabs or fluid from intra-abdominal drains placed for more than 24 hours were excluded. Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-Of-Flight was used to identify the etiological agents. Vitek®2 system was used to perform the antimicrobial susceptibility. Associated risk factors were documented. A total of 86 cases were analysed. The majority of the patients had complicated IAIs (95.3%), and 65.12 % acquired the infection in the community (CA-IAI). The vast number of cases presented with intra-abdominal abscesses (46.5%). Diabetes and hepatic disorders were the frequent underlying comorbid conditions associated with CA-IAIs. Prolonged hospital stay and the presence of concomitant conditions like malignancy and chronic renal failure significantly influenced the occurrence of hospital-acquired infections (HA-IAIs). E. coli was the frequently isolated Gram-negative pathogen both in the community and hospital settings. Whereas among Gram-positives, Enterococcus predominated and was commonly isolated from HA-IAIs. Enterobacterales were highly susceptible to meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam. E. coli and Klebsiella were the frequent extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producers and showed the least susceptibility towards cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones. Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) (p=.013), including carbapenem-resistant strains (p=.048), were significantly isolated from hospital-acquired IAIs. The high prevalence of IAIs with MDROs in hospital settings emphasizes the importance of developing hospital-based antibiotic policy, infection control measures, and judicious use of antibiotics.

Distribution and Antimicrobial Resistance of Complicated Intraabdominal Infection Pathogens in Two Tertiary Hospitals in Egypt.

Background: Management of complicated intraabdominal infections (cIAIs) requires containment of the source and appropriate initial antimicrobial therapy. Identifying the local data is important to guide the empirical selection of antimicrobial therapy. In this study, we aimed to describe the pathogen distribution and antimicrobial resistance of cIAI. Methods: In two major tertiary care hospitals in Egypt, we enrolled patients who met the case definition of cIAI from October 2022 to September 2023. Blood cultures were performed using the BACTAlert system (BioMerieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France). A culture of aspirated fluid, resected material, or debridement of the infection site was performed. Identification of pathogens and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were conducted by the VITEK-2 system (BioMerieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France). Gram-negative resistance genes were identified by PCR and confirmed by whole bacterial genome sequencing using the Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation Kit and sequencing with the MiSeq Reagent Kit 600 v3 (Illumina, USA) on the Illumina MiSeq. Results: We enrolled 423 patients, 275 (65.01%) males. The median age was 61.35 (range 25-72 years). We studied 452 recovered bacterial isolates. Gram-negative bacteria were the vast majority, dominated by E. coli, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Proteus mirabilis (33.6%, 30.5%, 13.7%, 13%, and 5.4%, respectively). High rates of resistance were detected to third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones. No resistance was detected to colistin. Resistance to amikacin and tigecycline was low among all isolates. Resistance to meropenem and ceftazidime/avibactam was moderate. ESBL genes were common in E. coli and K. pneumoniae. CTX-M15 gene was the most frequent. Among Enterobacterales, blaOXA-48 and blaNDM were the most prevalent carbapenemase genes. Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates harbored a wide variety of carbapenemase genes (OXA, NDM, VIM, SIM, GIM, SPM, IMP, AIM), dominated by metallo-beta-lactamases. In 20.6% of isolates, we identified two or more resistance genes. Conclusion: High resistance rates were detected to third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones. Amikacin and tigecyclines were the most active antimicrobials. Our data call for urgent implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs and reinforcement of infection control.

On the assessment of the role of new antibiotics in pharmacotherapy algorithms for complicated intra-abdominal infections (literature review)

The goal: To analyze the topical problems in the use of the newest antibiotics in abdominal surgical interventions and approaches to their solution. Material and methods: The large-scale (as a rule) publications mostly of 2019–2023 on the issue were analyzed. The searching had been executed according to keywords in Pubmed (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). Findings: Modern protected cephalosporins and carbapenems, as well as eravacycline, appear to be valuable tools in the treatment of surgical intra-abdominal infection, caused in particular by resistant microflora, especially when taking into account local data. The value of tigecycline in this nosology seems less obvious.

The Therapeutic Effect of Contezolid in Complex Intra-Abdominal Infections.

In this paper, we observed the use of contezolid in patients with complex intra-abdominal infections in the intensive care unit of the Hepatobiliary Surgery department at the Chinese PLA General Hospital. The study collected data on complex intra-abdominal infections patients who received the antibiotic contezolid between January 2022 and April 2023. Contezolid was administered to 12 patients, including 8 with severe acute pancreatitis, 3 with intra-abdominal infections following abdominal surgery, and 1 with complicated intra-abdominal infection after trauma. Gram-positive bacteria, such as Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus casseliflavus, Staphylococcus capitis, and Staphylococcus haemo-lytica, were detected in 11 patients. All patients who received contezolid had previously been treated with other anti-Gram-positive agents, including linezolid for 9 patients, teicoplanin for 6 patients, and vancomycin for 3 patients. The treatment with contezolid began 20.0 (15.0, 34.5) days after admission and lasted for 8.0 (6.0, 10.0) days. At the end of the treatment, the patients' body temperature showed a significant decrease. After concomitant therapy, IL-6 levels decreased, and platelet count increased. Contezolid has shown potential in treating complex intra-abdominal infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria by reducing fever and inflammatory response.

Case of Tigecycline Induced Liver Injury: A Cautionary Tale

Tigecycline, the inaugural glycylcycline antibiotic in clinical use, is experiencing rising global utilization owing to its effectiveness against multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. Although gastrointestinal side effects like nausea and vomiting are more prevalent, it is important to recognize that tigecycline can also lead to liver injury. The manufacturer has issued a warning regarding tigecycline's potential to elevate total bilirubin (TB) and transaminase levels. [1] We present the case of a 74-year-old female with a history of multiple comorbidities who developed severe hepatotoxicity following tigecycline therapy for a complicated intra-abdominal infection. The patient shows an abnormal liver function test with hyperbilirubinemia. Later on she developed jaundice. This case underscores the importance of considering TILI in patients receiving tigecycline, particularly those with preexisting liver disease or receiving other potentially hepatotoxic medications.

2024 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: Risk Assessment, Diagnostic Imaging, and Microbiological Evaluation in Adults, Children, and Pregnant People.

As the first part of an update to the clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis and management of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the panel presents 21 updated recommendations. These recommendations span risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation. The panel's recommendations are based on evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.

2024 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: Diagnostic Imaging of Suspected Acute Appendicitis in Adults, Children, and Pregnant People.

This paper is part of a clinical practice guideline update on the risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). In this paper, the panel provides recommendations for diagnostic imaging of suspected acute appendicitis. The panel's recommendations are based on evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.

2024 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: Diagnostic Imaging of Suspected Acute Intra-abdominal Abscess in Adults, Children, and Pregnant People.

This article is part of a clinical practice guideline update on the risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this article, the panel provides recommendations for diagnostic imaging of suspected acute intra-abdominal abscess. The panel's recommendations are based on evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.

2024 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: Utility of Intra-abdominal Fluid Cultures in Adults, Children, and Pregnant People.

This paper is part of a clinical practice guideline update on the risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this paper, the panel provides recommendations for obtaining cultures of intra-abdominal fluid in patients with known or suspected intra-abdominal infection. The panel's recommendations are based on evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

2024 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on Complicated Intraabdominal Infections: Diagnostic Imaging of Suspected Acute Cholecystitis and Acute Cholangitis in Adults, Children, and Pregnant People.

This article is part of a clinical practice guideline update on the risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation of complicated intraabdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this article, the panel provides recommendations for diagnostic imaging of suspected acute cholecystitis and acute cholangitis. The panel's recommendations are based on evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

2024 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: Risk Assessment in Adults and Children.

This paper is part of a clinical practice guideline update on the risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this paper, the panel provides a recommendation for risk stratification according to severity of illness score. The panel's recommendation is based on evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adheres to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.

2024 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: Utility of Blood Cultures in Adults, Children, and Pregnant People.

This article is part of a clinical practice guideline update on the risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this guideline, the panel provides recommendations for obtaining blood cultures in patients with known or suspected intra-abdominal infection. The panel's recommendations are based on evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.

2024 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: Diagnostic Imaging of Suspected Acute Diverticulitis in Adults and Pregnant People.

This paper is part of a clinical practice guideline update on the risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this paper, the panel provides recommendations for diagnostic imaging of suspected acute diverticulitis. The panel's recommendations are based on evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adhere to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.

Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam for Complicated Infections: A Real-World Evidence.

(1) Background: Infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria represent one of the major global public health problems of the 21st century. Beta-lactam antibacterial agents are commonly used to treat infections due to Gram-negative pathogens. New β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations are urgently needed. Combining relebactam (REL) with imipenem (IMI) and cilastatin (CS) can restore its activity against many imipenem-nonsusceptible Gram-negative pathogens. (2) Methods: we performed a systematic review of the studies reporting on the use of in vivo REAL/IPM/CS. (3) Results: A total of eight studies were included in this review. The primary diagnosis was as follows: complicated urinary tract infection (n = 234), complicated intra-abdominal infections (n = 220), hospital-acquired pneumonia (n = 276), and ventilator-associated pneumonia (n = 157). Patients with normal renal function received REL/IPM/CS (250 mg/500 mg/500 mg). The most frequently reported AEs occurring in patients treated with imipenem/cilastatin plus REL/IPM/CS were nausea (11.5%), diarrhea (9.8%), vomiting (9.8%), and infusion site disorders (4.0%). Treatment outcomes in these high-risk patients receiving REL/IPM/CS were generally favorable. A total of 70.6% of patients treated with REL/IPM/CS reported a favorable clinical response at follow-up. (4) Conclusions: this review indicates that REL/IPM/CS is active against important MDR Gram-negative organisms.

Risk Factors for Invasive Candidiasis in Critically Ill Patients Who Underwent Emergency Gastrointestinal Surgery for Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection.

Background: Candida species account for approximately 15% of hospital-associated infections, causing fatal consequences, especially in critically ill patients. This study aimed to evaluate invasive candidiasis (IC) risk factors in critically ill patients undergoing surgery. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 583 patients who underwent emergency surgery for complicated intra-abdominal infections between January 2016 and December 2021. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of IC during their hospital stay. IC was defined as culture-proven candidemia and intra-abdominal candidiasis. Results: This study included 373 patients for the final analysis, of whom 320 were discharged without IC (IC absent group) and 53 presented with IC (IC present group) during their hospital stay. The IC present group showed a higher in-hospital mortality rate (35.8 vs. 8.8%; p < 0.001), with 66.0% of the patients diagnosed within 10 days, whereas only 6.5% were diagnosed beyond 20 days after admission. Stomach (odds ratio [OR], 4.188; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.204-14.561; p = 0.024) and duodenum (OR, 7.595; 95% CI, 1.934-29.832; p = 0.004) as infection origin, higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score (OR, 1.097; 95% CI, 1.044-1.152; p < 0.001), and lower initial systolic blood pressure (OR, 0.983; 95% CI, 0.968-0.997; p = 0.018) were risk factors of IC after emergency gastrointestinal surgery. Conclusions: Patients who had stomach and duodenum as infection origin, higher APACHE II scores, and lower initial systolic blood pressure had a higher risk of developing IC during their hospital stay after emergency gastrointestinal surgery. Prophylactic antifungal agents can be carefully considered for critically ill patients with these features.