Complex Aneurysms Research Articles

The Importance of Cell Saver Usage in Complex Endovascular Repair of Thoraco-Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

The use of the cell saver is well-established in open aneurysm repair; however, its role in endovascular repair is yet to be determined. The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of cell saver usage in patients undergoing complex endovascular procedures. Single-center retrospective cohort study, including consecutive patients undergoing fenestrated and/or branched repair for the treatment of thoracoabdominal and complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (CAAAs) between January 2019 and December 2022. The cell saver was a standard part of the intraoperative setup of these procedures, and its use was readily available. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients, in which autologous blood collected was transfused (cell saver blood transfusion [CSBT]), alongside the useable amount obtained. Secondary endpoints included mean blood loss, postoperative hemoglobin levels, and 30-day mortality. A total of 170 patients (77.1% male, mean age 71.2±9.2years) were included, with a median blood loss of 700mL (interquartile range [IQR] 400-1,200mL). A total of 96 patients received some kind of blood transfusion (BT) (56.5%): 35 patients were (20.6%) allogenic BT, 31 patients were (18.2%) CSBT only, and 30 patients were (17.6%) a combination of both. In total, 61 patients (35.9% or 63.5% of all patients requiring BTs) received CSBT, with a median useable blood volume of 282mL (IQR, 194.5-508 mL). Thirty-day mortality was similar in both groups. Although the CSBT group had lower intraoperative hemoglobin values (9.25±1.55 vs. 10.36±1.88mg/dL; P<0.001), both groups presented similar postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) levels. Blood loss during complex endovascular repair is not insignificant. In this cohort, over 50% of included patients required some kind of BT, 32.3% of which received exclusively CSBT, while 31.3% had supplementary CSBT alongside allogenic BT. This data showcases its potential role in these repairs, paving the way for its standardization in the intraoperative setup of these complex procedures.

A national census for the off-label treatment of complex aortic aneurysms

ObjectiveDespite regulatory challenges, device availability, and rapidly expanding techniques, off-label endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms (cAAs) has expanded in the past decade. Given the lack of United States Food and Drug Administration-approved endovascular technology to treat cAAs, we performed a national census to better understand volume and current practice patterns in the United States. MethodsTargeted sampling identified vascular surgeons with experience in off-label endovascular repair of cAAs. An electronic survey was distributed with institutional review board approval from the University of Rochester to 261 individuals with a response rate of 38% (n = 98). ResultsA total of 93 respondents (95%) reported off-label endovascular repair of cAAs. Mean age was 45.7 ± 8.3 years, and 84% were male. Most respondents (59%) were within the first 10 years of practice, and 69% trained at institutions with a high-volume of off-label endovascular procedures for complex aortic aneurysms with or without a physician-sponsored investigational device exemption (PS-IDE). Twelve respondents from 11 institutions reported institutional PS-IDEs for physician-modified endografts (PMEGs), in-situ laser fenestration (ISLF), or parallel grafting technique (PGT), including sites with PS-IDEs for custom-manufactured devices. Eighty-nine unique institutions reported elective off-label endovascular repair with a mean of 20.2 ± 16.5 cases/year and ∼1757 total cases/year nationally. Eighty reported urgent/emergent off-label endovascular repair with a mean of 5.7 ± 5.4 cases/year and ∼499 total cases/year nationally. There was no correlation between high-volume endovascular institutions (>15 cases/year) and institutions with high volumes of open surgical repair for cAAs (>15 cases/year; odds ratio, 0.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.3-1.5; P = .34). Elective techniques included PMEG (70%), ISLF (30%), hybrid PMEG/ISLF (18%), and PGT (14%), with PMEG being the preferred technique for 63% of respondents. Techniques for emergent endovascular treatment of complex aortic disease included PMEG (52%), ISLF (40%), PGT (20%), and hybrid-PMEG/ISLF (14%), with PMEG being the preferred technique for 41% of respondents. Thirty-nine percent of respondents always or frequently offer referrals to institutions with PS-IDEs for custom-manufactured devices. The most common barrier for referral to PS-IDE centers included geographic distance (48%), longitudinal relationship with patient (45%), and costs associated with travel (33%). Only 61% of respondents participate in the Vascular Quality Initiative for complex endovascular aneurysm repair, and only 57% maintain a prospective institutional database. Eighty-six percent reported interest in a national collaborative database for off-label endovascular repair of cAA. ConclusionsEstimates of off-label endovascular repair of cAAs are likely underrepresented in the literature based on this national census. PMEG was the most common technique for elective and emergent procedures. Under-reported off-label endovascular repair of cAA outcomes data appears to be limited by non-standardized PS-IDE reporting to the United States Food and Drug Administration, and the lack of Vascular Quality Initiative participation and prospective institutional data collection. Most participants are interested in a national collaborative database for endovascular repair of cAAs.

Flow Diverter

The flow diverter is a relatively new but revolutionary technology in the realm of Endo vascular management of complex cerebral aneurysms. The traditional approach in the past has been stent deployment assisted coil embolisation. However, this maybe associated with partial occlusion or late recanalisation of the aneurysm. While planning the procedure for any cerebral aneurysm, the neurosurgeon needs to consider the morphology of the intracranial aneurysm as well as its proximity to the vascular branches and perforators. Giant (&gt;25mm diameter), large (&gt;10mm diameter), wide necked and fusiform aneurysms are the most challenging ones to treat.(1) The flow diverter works on the following principles (a)the stent deployed disrupts the blood flow from the parent vessel into the aneurysm (b) the stent works like a scaffolding for the growth of endothelial cells and separates the aneurysm from the parent vessel and gradually blocks it.(2) It is inducing endoluminal reconstruction in contrast to endosaccular filling in the older procedures. Moreover, it spares the origin of perforators from getting occluded. The sac gradually shrinks and finally collapses. This has excellent outcomes in comparison to conventional procedures for large or wide-necked aneurysms. This fascinating, innovative technology is associated with lesser complications and higher success rates. It is backed by landmark trials including the ‘Pipeline Embolisation Device for the Intracranial treatment of Aneurysms (PITA)’ trial and the ‘Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms (PUFs) trial.(1) The device has thrombogenic potential and the patient needs to be on anti platelet therapy to prevent thromboembolism and late in-stent stenosis. A diversified complex case of multiple giant internal carotid artery aneurysms managed by latest phenomenal advanced technique of flow diversion in Neurointervention spectrum, that is, FLOW DIVERTER (FD). This young lady presented with sudden onset right sided complete opthalmoplegia and headache. Her investigations revealed bilateral ICA large to giant aneurysms. Considering all aspects of her case, she was counselled and planned for FD placement with some coils.

Effect of fenestration configuration on renal artery outcomes during fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of fenestration configuration and fenestration gap on renal artery outcomes during fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (F/BEVAR). MethodsA retrospective multicenter analysis was performed, including patients with complex aortic aneurysms treated with F/BEVAR that incorporated at least one small fenestration to a renal artery. The renal fenestrations were divided into groups 1 (8 × 6 mm) and 2 (6 × 6 mm). Primary patency, target vessel instability (TVI), freedom from secondary interventions (SIs), occurrence of type IIIc endoleak, all related to the renal arteries, were analyzed at 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year landmarks. The fenestration gap (FG) distance was analyzed as a modifier, and clustering was addressed at the patient level. ResultsA total of 796 patients were included in this study, 71.7% male, with a mean age of 73.3 ± 8.1 years. The mean follow-up was 30.0 ± 20.6 months. Of the 1474 small renal fenestrations analyzed, 47.6% were 8 × 6 mm, and 52.4% were 6 × 6 mm. At the 30-day landmark, primary patency (99.9% vs 98.0%; P value < .001 for groups 1 and 2, respectively), freedom from TVI (99.6% vs 97.1%; P value < .001 for groups 1 and 2, respectively), and freedom from SI (99.8% vs 98.4%; P value = .022 for groups 1 and 2, respectively) were higher in 8 × 6 compared with 6 × 6 fenestrations, and the incidence of acute kidney injury was similar across the groups (92.6% vs 92.7%; P value = .953 for groups 1 and 2 respectively). The primary patency at 1 and 5 years was higher in 8 × 6 fenestrations (1-year: 98.8% vs 96.9%; 5-year: 97.8% vs 95.7%, for groups 1 and 2, respectively, P values = .010 and .021 for 1 and 5 year comparisons, respectively). The freedom from SIs was significantly higher among 6 × 6 fenestrations at 5 years (93.1% vs 96.4%, for groups 1 and 2, respectively, P value = .007). The groups were equally as likely to experience a type Ic endoleak (1.3% and 1.6% for 8 × 6 and 6 × 6mm fenestrations, respectively, P = .689). The 6 × 6 fenestrations were associated with higher risk of kidney function deterioration (17.8%) when compared with 8 × 6 fenestrations (7.6%) at 5 years (P < .001). The risk of type IIIc endoleak was significantly higher among 8 × 6 fenestrations at 5 years (4.9% and 2% for 8 × 6 and 6 × 6 mm fenestrations, respectively; P = .005). A FG ≥5 mm negatively impacted the cumulative 5-year freedom from TVI (group 1: FG ≥5 mm = 0.714, FG <5 mm = 0.857; P < .001; group 2: FG ≥5 mm = 0.761, FG <5 mm = 0.929; P < .001) and the cumulative 5-year freedom from type IIIc endoleak (group 1: FG ≥5 mm = 0.759, FG <5 mm = 0.921; P = .034; group 2: FG ≥5 mm = 0.853, FG <5 mm = 0.979; P < .001) in both groups and the cumulative 5-year patency in group 2 (group 1: FG ≥5 mm = 0.963, FG <5 mm = 0.948; P = .572; group 2: FG ≥5 mm = 0.905, FG <5 mm = 0.938; P = .036). ConclusionsFenestration configuration for the renal arteries impacts outcomes. The 8 × 6 small fenestrations have better patency at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years, whereas 6 × 6 small fenestrations are associated with lower rates of SIs, primarily due to a lower incidence of type IIIc endoleaks. FG ≥5 mm at the level of the renal arteries significantly impacts the freedom from TVI, freedom from type IIIc endoleak, and 5-year patency independently of the fenestration size or vessel diameter.

Aneurysm sac shrinkage at 1 year after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair of complex aortic aneurysms offers mid-term survival advantage

ObjectivesTo investigate the impact of 1-year changes in aneurysm sac diameter on patient survival after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. MethodsWe reviewed the clinical data of patients enrolled in a prospective nonrandomized study investigating FB-EVAR (2013-2022). Patients with sequential follow up computed tomography scans at baseline and 6 to 18 months after FB-EVAR were included in the analysis. Aneurysm sac diameter change was defined as the difference in maximum aortic diameter from baseline measurements obtained in centerline of flow. Patients were classified as those with sac shrinkage (≥5 mm) or failure to regress (<5 mm or expansion) according to sac diameter change. The primary end point was all-cause mortality. Secondary end points were aortic-related mortality (ARM), aortic aneurysm rupture (AAR), and aorta-related secondary intervention. ResultsThere were 549 patients treated by FB-EVAR. Of these, 463 patients (71% male, mean age, 74 ± 8 years) with sequential computed tomography imaging were investigated. Aneurysm extent was thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in 328 patients (71%) and abdominal aortic aneurysms in 135 (29%). Sac shrinkage occurred in 270 patients (58%) and failure to regress in 193 patients (42%), including 19 patients (4%) with sac expansion at 1 year. Patients from both groups had similar cardiovascular risk factors, except for younger age among patients with sac shrinkage (73 ± 8 years vs 75 ± 8 years; P < .001). The median follow-up was 38 months (interquartile range, 18-51 months). The 5-year survival estimate was 69% ± 4.1% for the sac shrinkage group and 46% ± 6.2% for the failure to regress group. Survival estimates adjusted for confounders (age, chronic pulmonary obstructive disease, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, and aneurysm extent) revealed a higher hazard of late mortality in patients with failure to regress (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-2.52; P = .005). The 5-year cumulative incidences of ARM (1.1% vs 3.1%; P = .30), AAR (0.6% vs 2.6%; P = .20), and aorta-related secondary intervention (17.0% ± 2.8% vs 19.0% ± 3.8%) were both comparable between the groups. ConclusionsAneurysm sac shrinkage at 1 year is common after FB-EVAR and is associated with improved patient survival, whereas sac enlargement affects only a minority of patients. The low incidences of ARM and AAR indicate that failure to regress may serve as a surrogate marker for nonaortic-related death.

Intestinal Fatty Acid–Binding Protein as a Potential Biomarker for Gastrointestinal Complications after Complex Endovascular Aortic Surgery

This study aimed to investigate the association between intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP), acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) grade, and gastrointestinal (GI) complications after fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. A total of 17 patients undergoing endovascular aortic repair for thoracoabdominal, juxtarenal, suprarenal, or pararenal aneurysm between May 2017 and September 2018 were enrolled. Blood samples were collected preoperatively and during postoperative intensive care. The blood samples were analyzed for I-FABP with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Gastrointestinal function was assessed according to the AGI grade every day during postoperative intensive care. Higher concentrations of I-FABP at 24hr and 48 hr correlated to higher AGI grade on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3 (P=0.032 and P=0.048, P=0.040 and P=0.018, and P=0.012 and P=0.016, respectively). Patients who developed a GI complication within 90days postoperatively had a higher overall AGI grade than those who did not develop a GI complication (P<0.001), as well as higher concentrations of I-FABP at 48 hrs (P=0.019). Patients developing GI dysfunction (AGI grade ≥2) had a higher frequency of complications (P=0.009) and longer length of stay in the intensive care unit (P=0.008). In patients undergoing endovascular aortic repair for complex aneurysm increased postoperative plasma I-FABP concentrations and postoperative GI dysfunction, evaluated using the AGI grade, were associated with GI complications, indicating that these measures may be useful in the postoperative management of these patients.

Using Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes Following Thoracic and Complex Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Using Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes Following Thoracic and Complex Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Significant Radiation Reduction Using Cloud-Based AI Imaging in a Matched Cohort of Complex Aneurysm Repair

Significant Radiation Reduction Using Cloud-Based AI Imaging in a Matched Cohort of Complex Aneurysm Repair

Comparison of Open Surgery and Endovascular Techniques for Juxtarenal and Complex Neck Aortic Aneurysms: The UK COMPlex AneurySm Study (UK-COMPASS) – Peri-operative and Midterm Outcomes

Comparison of Open Surgery and Endovascular Techniques for Juxtarenal and Complex Neck Aortic Aneurysms: The UK COMPlex AneurySm Study (UK-COMPASS) – Peri-operative and Midterm Outcomes

Technical feasibility and device stability of the Gore Excluder iliac branch endoprosthesis as abdominal aortic bifurcated device

The aim is to describe the technical feasibility, early outcomes, and graft stability of the Excluder iliac branch endoprosthesis (W.L. Gore & Associates) used as an infrarenal abdominal bifurcated endograft in cases unsuitable for standard endovascular aortic repair. The technique was used in 13 cases with abdominal and/or iliac aneurysms (n = 6), occlusive disease (n = 3), or complex aneurysms in association with a proximal fenestrated/branched endograft (n = 4). Technical success was 100%, and there were no adverse events, with 100% graft stability at 3 months. This case series demonstrates, in extremely selected cases, the feasibility and safety of Excluder iliac branch endoprosthesis used as an infrarenal aortic bifurcated device.

Endovascular Treatment of Complex Aortic Aneurysms Using Inner Branch Device (IBEVAR): A Single Center Experience

Abstract Background Due to advances in devices and techniques, the endovascular approach using fenestrated or branched endografts has emerged as a valid and safe alternative for patients with complex aortic aneurysms, especially if considered at high risk for surgery. The use of inner branch devices (iBEVAR) combining benefits of fenestrations and outer branches could offer an ideal configuration in this context. Aims The aim of our study was to report our monocentric experience with iBEVAR in the treatment of complex aortic aneurysms. Methods A retrospective analysis of prospective data retrieved from 1 center between January 2020 and January 2024 was done. Endpoints were immediate technical success, postoperative morbidity, rate of re-intervention and mortality. Results During this period, 72 patients with a mean age of 68.5 years (range 41-88) were identified. The maximum preoperative mean aortic diameter was 56 mm (44-71 mm). The majority of patients was asymptomatic. For diffuse thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms, a 2-steps procedure was used. There were 34 off-the-shelf E-nside (47%) and the remaining 38 patients were treated with a custom-made Extra-Design graft (53%). Despite successful endograft deployment in all patients and branch catheterization in 69/72 cases (96%), the technical success was 94% due to an additional open conversion for ilio-mesenteric bypass. The 30-days mortality was 5.5%. During the post-operative period, 19% of patients presented complications with 1 case of mesenteric ischaemia requiring a visceral resection and 2 cases of paralytic ileus, treated conservatively. 5 cases (6.9) of spinal cord ischemia were observed. During the median follow-up, 22 patients (31%) had a re-intervention, for endoleaks, bridging-stent events or limbs problems. The overall target vessel patency was 94%. Conclusion The use of iBEVAR appears to be safe and effective for the treatment of complex aortic aneurysms with an acceptable rate of complications. Strict follow-up is mandatory and about one-third of patients required a re-intervention. Further patients and longer follow-up are needed.

Analysis of Target Vessel Instability in Fenestrated Endovascular Repair (f-EVAR) in Thoraco-Abdominal Aortic Pathologies.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of target vessel anatomy and post-stenting geometry on the outcome of fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (f-EVAR). Methods: A retrospective review of data from a single center was conducted, including all consecutive fenestrated endovascular aortic repairs (f-EVARs) performed between September 2018 and December 2023 for thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) and complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (cAAAs). The analysis focused on the correlation of target vessel instability to target vessel anatomy and geometry after stenting. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of target vessel instability. Secondary endpoints were the 30-day and follow-up re-interventions. Results: A total of 136 patients underwent f-EVAR with 481 stented target vessels. A total of ten target vessel instabilities occurred including three in visceral and seven instabilities in renal vessels. The cumulative incidence of target vessel instability with death as the competing risk was 1.4%, 1.8% and 3.4% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. In renal target vessels (260/481), a diameter ≤ 4 mm (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.035-1.274, p = 0.009) and an aortic protrusion ≥ 5.75 mm (OR 8.21, 95% CI 3.150-12-23, p = 0.027) was associated with an increased target vessel instability. In visceral target vessels (221/481), instability was significantly associated with a preoperative tortuosity index ≥ 1.25 (HR 15.19, CI 95% 2.50-17.47, p = 0.045) and an oversizing ratio of ≥1.25 (HR 7.739, CI % 4.756-12.878, p = 0.049). Conclusions: f-EVAR showed favorable mid-term results concerning target vessel instability in the current cohort. A diameter of ≤4 mm and an aortic protrusion of ≥5.75 mm in the renal target vessels as well as a preoperative tortuosity index and an oversizing of the bridging stent of ≥1.25 in the visceral target vessels should be avoided.

Surgical Treatment Strategies for Residual or Recurrent Intracranial Aneurysms Following Endovascular Embolization.

To explore how to effectively manage the residual or recurrent intracranial aneurysms after embolization. The authors retrospectively reviewed our experience of endovascular interventional therapy, surgical clipping, and cerebrovascular bypass surgery in the treatment of residual or recurrent aneurysms after embolization at the authors' institution from 2018 to 2022. The Glasgow Outcome Scale of 28 patients after the procedure and at discharge showed that 24 recovered well, 3 had severe disability, and 1 died. During the 24-month follow-up, 26 had a good recovery, 1 suffered from disability, and 1 died. Two cases of aneurysm recurrence were detected, and both were treated through endovascular therapy. Among them, 1 case underwent a repeat endovascular embolization, and 1 case was switched to surgical clipping. No residual aneurysms were observed in the remaining patients who underwent bypass surgery, and their bypass grafts were all patent. Based on the clinical status of patients, aneurysmal characteristics, surgical risk, and possibility of rerupture of aneurysms, an individualized strategy was proposed for residual or recurrent aneurysms after embolization. The use of endovascular interventional therapy or surgical clipping can be safely and effectively managed, and cerebrovascular bypass surgery can effectively manage complex aneurysms.

A Practical Guide to Train the Side-to-side Anastomosis: Tips, Tricks and Technical Nuances

Microanastomosis presents a challenge in neurosurgical procedures, requiring specialized skills. Regular practice outside the operating room is crucial. This study aims to provide a detailed description of the side-to-side anastomosis technique and analyze its advantages in preventing failures compared with other variations. We examined the technique, characteristics, and outcomes of side-to-side bypass procedures for complex aneurysms in the anterior cerebral artery territory at our institution over the past decade. We compared our technique with those described in the literature by other groups. The Far East Neurosurgical Institute (FENI) technique was used in 15 patients, with 17 side-to-side anastomoses performed. The average anastomosis time was 27.5 minutes, with 100% patency in follow-up. Our technique demonstrated safety and effectiveness in treating intracranial aneurysms, yielding satisfactory short- and long-term functionality outcomes. We highlight the importance of maintaining a curvilinear arteriotomy shape, at least 3 times the diameter of the artery, and utilizing an interrupted suturing technique on the anterior wall. This paper presents the first comprehensive description of the side-to-side anastomosis technique, supported with images and videos for training and replicability. Our technique enhances flow dynamics and reduces the risk of acute thrombus formation. Training in simulators and microsurgery practice centers outside the operating room is essential for acquiring and refining microsurgical skills.

Examining the impact of median arcuate ligament-induced celiac artery compression on target vessel patency, long-term survival and device integrity in fenestrated and branched endovascular repairs

ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of celiac artery (CA) compression by median arcuate ligament (MAL) on technical metrics and long-term CA patency in patients with complex aortic aneurysms undergoing fenestrated/branched endograft repairs (F/B-EVARs). MethodsSingle-center, retrospective review of patients undergoing fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repairs and requiring incorporation of the CA between 2013 and 2023. Patients were divided into two groups—those with (MAL+) and without (MAL−) CA compression—based on preoperative computed tomography angiography findings. MAL was classified in three grades (A, B, and C) based on the degree and length of stenosis. Patients with MAL grade A had ≤50% CA stenosis measuring ≤3 mm in length. Those with grade B had 50% to 80% CA stenosis measuring 3 to 8 mm long, whereas those with grade C had >80% stenosis measuring >8 mm in length. End points included device integrity, CA patency and technical success—defined as successful implantation of the fenestrated/branched device with perfusion of CA and no endoleak. ResultsOne hundred and eighty patients with complex aortic aneurysms (pararenal, 128; thoracoabdominal, 52) required incorporation of the CA during fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Majority (73%) were male, with a median age of 76 years (interquartile range [IQR], 69-81 years) and aneurysm size of 62 mm (IQR, 57-69 mm). Seventy-eight patients (43%) had MAL+ anatomy, including 33 patients with MAL grade A, 32 with grade B, and 13 with grade C compression. The median length of CA stenosis was 7.0 mm (IQR, 5.0-10.0 mm). CA was incorporated using fenestrations in 177 (98%) patients. Increased complexity led to failure in CA bridging stent placement in four MAL+ patients, but completion angiography showed CA perfusion and no endoleak, accounting for a technical success of 100%. MAL+ patients were more likely to require bare metal stenting in addition to covered stents (P = .004). Estimated blood loss, median operating room time, contrast volume, fluoroscopy dose and time were higher (P < .001) in MAL+ group. Thirty-day mortality was 3.3%, higher (5.1%) in MAL+ patients compared with MAL− patients (2.0 %). At a median follow-up of 770 days (IQR, 198-1525 days), endograft integrity was observed in all patients and CA events—kinking (n = 7), thrombosis (n = 1) and endoleak (n = 2) —occurred in 10 patients (5.6%). However, only two patients required reinterventions. MAL+ patients had overall lower long-term survival. ConclusionsCA compression by MAL is a predictor of increased procedural complexity during fenestrated/branched device implantation. However, technical success, long-term device integrity and CA patency are similar to that of patients with MAL− anatomy.

Effect of Family History of Aortic Disease on Outcomes of Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aneurysm Repair of Complex Aortic Aneurysms

The clinical significance of family history (FH) of aortic disease on the outcomes of fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair (FB-EVAR) has not been well described. This study aimed to assess how FH of aortic disease affects outcomes following FB-EVAR for complex aortic aneurysms (CAAs). This study retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of consecutive patients enrolled in 10 ongoing, prospective, non-randomised, physician sponsored, investigational device exemption studies to evaluate FB-EVAR (2005 - 2022) in the United States Aortic Research Consortium database. Patients were stratified by presence or absence of FH of any aortic disease in any relative. Patients with confirmed genetically triggered aortic diseases were excluded. Primary outcomes were 30 day major adverse events (MAEs) and late survival. Secondary outcomes included late secondary interventions and aneurysm sac enlargement. During the study period, 2 901 patients underwent FB-EVAR. A total of 2 355 patients (81.2%) were included in the final analysis: 427 (18.1%) with and 1 928 (81.9%) without FH of aortic disease. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and aneurysm extent were similar between the groups. Patients with FH of aortic disease more frequently had prior open abdominal aortic repair, but less frequently had prior endovascular aneurysm repair (p < .050). There were no statistically significant differences in 30 day mortality (4% vs. 2%; p = .12) and MAEs for patients with or without FH of aortic disease (12% vs. 12%; p = .89). Three year survival estimates were 71% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67 - 0.78%) and 71% (95% CI 0.68 - 0.74%), respectively (p = .74). Freedom from secondary intervention and aneurysm sac enlargement were also not statistically significantly different between groups. A family history of aortic disease had no impact on 30 day and midterm outcomes of FB-EVAR of CAAs. In the absence of an identified genetically triggered aortic disease, treatment selection for CAAs should be based on clinical risk and patient anatomy rather than FH of aortic disease.

Protagoras 3.0: feasibility of current fenestrated endografts and chimney technique for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the anatomical feasibility of current available fenestrated endografts (FEVAR) and on-label chimney technique (EnChEVAR) in patients with complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (C-AAA). Feasibility of EnChEVAR (Endurant II/IIS CE-marked [Medtronic]) and 4 types of FEVAR (Zenith Fenestrated CE-marked, Zenith Fenestrated Low-Profile [LP] custom-made device [CMD] [Cook Medical], Fenestrated Anaconda LoPro90 CMD, Fenestrated Treo CMD [Terumo Aortic]) was assessed according to the manufacturer's instructions for use. Computed tomography angiograms of patients with C-AAA previously included in the Protagoras 2.0 study were retrospectively reviewed. The aortic coverage was ideally planned to involve a maximum of two chimney grafts or fenestrations. Iliac access and aortic neck of 73 C-AAAs were analyzed. The overall feasibility was significantly different between EnChEVAR (33%) and FEVAR (Zenith Fenestrated 15%, Zenith Fenestrated LP 15%, Fenestrated Anaconda LoPro90 45%, Fenestrated Treo 48%). The iliac access feasibility was significantly lower for Zenith Fenestrated with standard profile compared to all other grafts. The aortic neck feasibility was significantly higher for EnChEVAR and both Terumo Aortic fenestrated stent grafts, compared to both Cook Medical grafts. The treatment using any of the three current available fenestrated grafts with lower profile (Zenith Fenestrated LP, Fenestrated Anaconda LoPro90, Fenestrated Treo) would have been feasible in 71% of the cases. Most of the patients treated by ChEVAR would have not been treated by first generation fenestrated stent graft. The current available fenestrated endografts, with lower profile and suitable also for angulated necks, increase the anatomical feasibility.

One-Stage Combined Open and Endovascular Treatment Using a Hybrid Operating Room is Safe and Effective for Distal Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms

BackgroundAneurysms located in the distal middle cerebral artery (MCA) are relatively rare and lack an established treatment strategy. For distal MCA (DMCA) aneurysms, we performed a one-stage combined procedure of endovascular parent artery occlusion (PAO) with coils and superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) bypass in a hybrid operating room (HOR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this procedure. MethodsCases of unruptured DMCA aneurysms treated with the one-stage combined PAO and STA-MCA bypass in HOR were retrospectively examined, and patients’ and aneurysmal backgrounds, surgical procedures, and treatment outcomes were analyzed. ResultsSix patients were included in the study. The average maximum diameter of the aneurysms was 14.4 mm. One aneurysm was located at M2 and five at M3. All aneurysms had a fusiform shape. No cases were associated with infection, trauma, or malignant tumors. In all six cases, the combined PAO and STA-MCA bypass was successfully completed. No postoperative hemorrhagic complications occurred. A symptomatic ischemic complication occurred in one case whose symptom disappeared in a week. Three months after surgery, complete obliteration of the aneurysm and patency of the bypass were confirmed in all cases. ConclusionsThe one-stage combined PAO and STA-MCA bypass in the HOR is safe and effective for DMCA aneurysms, potentially serving as a treatment option for this complex aneurysm.

Current State of Microsurgical Treatment of Aneurysms of the Ophthalmic Segment of the Internal Carotid Artery

Current State of Microsurgical Treatment of Aneurysms of the Ophthalmic Segment of the Internal Carotid Artery

The Impact of Target Vessel Anatomy and Bridging Stent Geometry on Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair Outcomes

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of target vessel anatomy and bridging stent geometry on target vessel instability in branched endovascular aortic repair (B-EVAR). This retrospective, single centre cohort study included all consecutive B-EVARs performed between September 2018 and December 2022 for thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) or complex abdominal aortic aneurysm (CAAA). The primary endpoints were target vessel instability and related re-interventions at 12 months. Secondary endpoints were 30 day results, including target vessel instability and re-interventions. Target vessel instability analysis consisted of assessment of target vessel anatomy, including diameter, aortic trunk to branch angle, and tortuosity. Post-operative parameters included change of clock position/horizontal misalignment, bridging length (gap), sealing length, tortuosity, post-stenting angle, and oversizing ratio. A total of 69 patients (TAAA: n= 56, 81%; CAAA: n= 13, 19%) and 271 (133 visceral and 138 renal) target vessels were included. The cumulative incidence of target vessel instability was 4.8%, 6.4%, and 7.9% at one, two, and three years, respectively. In the renal target vessel group, vessel diameter ≤ 4 mm (hazard ratio [HR] 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.116 - 2.54; p= .022) and a bridging length ≥ 25 mm (HR 1.320, 95% CI 1.066 - 1.636; p= .011) were associated with increased target vessel instability. In visceral vessels, a change in clock position/horizontal misalignment ≥ 70 minutes (HR 1.072, 95% CI 1.026 - 1.121; p= .002) showed a significant association with target vessel instability. Target vessel diameter, bridging length (gap), and horizontal misalignment seemed to be associated with adverse target vessel outcomes. This may be solved with more customised endograft solutions to reduce the negative impact of the latter parameter.