Cancer Screening Completion Research Articles

Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion and Yield in Patients Aged 45 to 50 Years

Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion and Yield in Patients Aged 45 to 50 Years

Abstract A130: Examining breast cancer screening completion: Comparing patient self-report and electronic health record data at a Federally Qualified Health Center during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

Abstract Intro: There is evidence to suggest that preventive services, such as breast cancer screening, were impacted during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic with interruption in screening mammogram services during March-July 2020. Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) are a critical health system to help better understand pandemic sequelae among diverse patient populations so teams can better prepare for a future pandemic. US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends average-risk patients aged 50-74 screen for breast cancer biyearly. Based on USPSTF recommendations in 2021, 76% of non-Hispanic White women and 74 % of Latina women were up-to-date on mammography screening. Our study, RESTORE, focuses on understanding patient barriers and facilitators to completing breast cancer screening at one large urban FQHC during the pandemic. Here, we compare FQHC patient self-reported completion of breast cancer screening to documented breast cancer screening found in the electric health record (EHR). Methods: Patients (n=20) were interviewed between July 2023 and February 2024 about their healthcare utilization, breast cancer screening (including medical site), and health literacy throughout the COVID period (2018-2022). When a screening date was documented in the EHR, interviewers mentioned the screening date to participants during the interview. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. A preliminary review of these interviews was conducted to collect self-reported breast cancer screening date and compare it to the date in the EHR. Results: Interviewees’ average age was 65.1 years; 70 % were Spanish-speaking; 60% were Latino, and 95% were female. Of the Spanish-speakers, 8 out of 14 patients self-reported completing a mammogram between 2018-2022, with 2 of 8 reporting having completed it with an onsite vendor. Only 3 of these 8 mammograms were captured in the EHR. Of these three, 2 patients were prompted with the EHR date during the interview: one patient agreed with the date while the other rejected the date. Among the English-speaking patients, 4 out of 6 patients self-reported completing a mammogram between years 2018-2022, all of these 4 self-reported dates were captured in the EHR. Of these 4 patients, all were prompted with the EHR date, 3 agreed to the date and one rejected the date, with 3 of 4 reporting having completed it with an onsite vendor.Conclusion: Throughout COVID, FQHC patients sought mammogram screening; however, gaps in data systems limited completeness of the health system’s mammogram EHR data. Time delays between patient experience and interview dates, complicated our understanding of patients’ COVID experiences. The inconsistency between self-reported dates and EHR dates also creates challenges educating and convincing patients to stay up-to-date on screenings based on recommended intervals. Missing EHR data could have also impacted staff not accurately following-up for mammograms or referrals. Additional work is needed to understand the opportunities to better integrate FQHC EHR with mammogram vendor data systems. Citation Format: Anne Escaron, Crystal Gomez, Jennifer Schneider, Jennifer Rivelli, Fabian Hidalgo, Gloria Coronado. Examining breast cancer screening completion: Comparing patient self-report and electronic health record data at a Federally Qualified Health Center during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr A130.

Patient-Provider Communication and Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion Using Multi-target Stool DNA Testing.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening continues to be underutilized in the USA despite the availability of multiple effective, guideline-recommended screening options. Provider recommendation has been consistently shown to improve screening completion. Understanding how patient-provider communication influences CRC screening can inform interventions to improve screening completion. We developed a behavioral theory-informed survey to identify patient-provider communication factors associated with multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) screening completion. The survey was administered by RTI International between 03/2022 and 06/2022 to a sample of US adults ages 45-75 who received a valid order for mt-sDNA screening with a shipping date between 5/2021 and 9/2021. Respondents completed an electronic or paper survey. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify patient-provider communication factors associated with mt-sDNA test completion. A total of 2973 participants completed the survey (response rate, 21.7%) and 81.6% of them (n = 2427) reported having had a conversation with provider about mt-sDNA testing before the test was ordered. Having a conversation with the provider about the test, including discussions about costs, the need for follow-up testing and test instructions were associated with higher odds of test completion and being "very likely" to use the test in the future. Lack of discussion about advantages and disadvantages of available CRC screening options and lack of patient involvement in CRC screening decision-making were associated with reduced odds of test completion and likelihood of future use. Healthcare providers play a key role in patient adherence to CRC screening and must be appropriately prepared and resourced to educate and to engage patients in shared decision-making about CRC screening.

The Effect of Medicare Annual Wellness Visits on Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis.

The Medicare Annual Wellness Visit (AWV)-a prevention-focused annual check-up-has been available to beneficiaries with Part B coverage since 2011. The objective of this study was to estimate the effect of Medicare AWVs on breast cancer screening and diagnosis. The National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry data linked to Medicare claims (SEER-Medicare), HRSA's Area Health Resources Files, the FDA's Mammography Facilities database, and CMS "Mapping Medicare Disparities" utilization data from 2013 to 2015. Using an instrumental variables approach, we estimated the effect of AWV utilization on breast cancer screening and diagnosis, using county Welcome to Medicare Visit (WMV) rates as the instrument. 66,088 person-year observations from 49,769 unique female beneficiaries. For every 1-percentage point increase in county WMV rate, the probability of AWV increased by 1.7 percentage points. Having an AWV was associated with a 22.4-percentage point increase in the probability of receiving a screening mammogram within 6 months ( P <0.001). There was no statistically significant increase in the probability of breast cancer diagnosis (overall or early stage) within 6 months of an AWV. Findings were robust to multiple model specifications. Performing routine cancer screening is an evidence-based practice for diagnosing earlier-stage, more treatable cancers. The AWV effectively increases breast cancer screening and may lead to more timely screening. Continued investment in Annual Wellness Visits supports breast cancer screening completion by women who are most likely to benefit, thus reducing the risk of overscreening and overdiagnosis.

Lung cancer screening provider recommendation and completion in black and White patients with a smoking history in two healthcare systems: a survey study

BackgroundAnnual lung cancer screening (LCS) with low dose CT reduces lung cancer mortality. LCS is underutilized. Black people who smoke tobacco have high risk of lung cancer but are less likely to be screened than are White people. This study reports provider recommendation and patient completion of LCS and colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) among patients by race to assess for utilization of LCS.Methods3000 patients (oversampled for Black patients) across two healthcare systems (in Rhode Island and Minnesota) who had a chart documented age of 55 to 80 and a smoking history were invited to participate in a survey about cancer screening. Logistic regression analysis compared the rates of recommended and received cancer screenings.Results1177 participants responded (42% response rate; 45% White, 39% Black). 24% of respondents were eligible for LCS based on USPSTF2013 criteria. One-third of patients eligible for LCS reported that a doctor had recommended screening, compared to 90% of patients reporting a doctor recommended CRCS. Of those recommended screening, 88% reported completing LCS vs. 83% who reported completion of a sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy. Black patients were equally likely to receive LCS recommendations but less likely to complete LCS when referred compared to White patients. There was no difference in completion of CRCS between Black and White patients.ConclusionsPrimary care providers rarely recommend lung cancer screening to patients with a smoking history. Systemic changes are needed to improve provider referral for LCS and to facilitate eligible Black people to complete LCS.

Comparative efficacy of telehealth interventions on promoting cancer screening: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Cancer screening is a pivotal method for reducing mortality from disease, but the screening coverage is still lower than expected. Telehealth interventions demonstrated significant benefits in cancer care, yet there is currently no consensus on their impact on facilitating cancer screening or on the most effective remote technology. A network meta-analysis was conducted to detect the impact of telehealth interventions on cancer screening and to identify the most effective teletechnologies. Six English databases were searched from inception until July 2023 to yield relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two individual authors completed the literature selection, data extraction, and methodological evaluations using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Traditional pairwise analysis and network meta-analysis were performed to identify the overall effects and compare different teletechnologies. Thirty-four eligible RCTs involving 131,644 participants were enrolled. Overall, telehealth interventions showed statistically significant effects on the improvement of cancer screening. Subgroup analyses revealed that telehealth interventions were most effective for breast and cervical cancer screening, and rural populations also experienced benefits, but there was no improvement in screening for older adults. The network meta-analysis indicated that mobile applications, video plus telephone, and text message plus telephone were associated with more obvious improvements in screening than other teletechnologies. Our study identified that telehealth interventions were effective for the completion of cancer screening and clarified the exact impact of telehealth on different cancer types, ages, and rural populations. Mobile applications, video plus telephone, and text message plus telephone are the three forms of teletechnologies most likely to improve cancer screening. More well-designed RCTs involving direct comparisons of different teletechnologies are needed in the future. Telehealth interventions should be encouraged to facilitate cancer screening, and the selection of the optimal teletechnology based on the characteristics of the population is also necessary.

Geographic Accessibility and Completion of Initial Low-Dose CT-Based Lung Cancer Screening in an Urban Safety-Net Population.

Recent modifications to low-dose CT (LDCT)-based lung cancer screening guidelines increase the number of eligible individuals, particularly among racial and ethnic minorities. Because these populations disproportionately live in metropolitan areas, we analyzed the association between travel time and initial LDCT completion within an integrated, urban safety-net health care system. Using Esri's StreetMap Premium, OpenStreetMap, and the r5r package in R, we determined projected private vehicle and public transportation travel times between patient residence and the screening facility for LDCT ordered in March 2017 through December 2022 at Parkland Memorial Hospital in Dallas, Texas. We characterized associations between travel time and LDCT completion in univariable and multivariable analyses. We tested these associations in a simulation of 10,000 permutations of private vehicle and public transportation distribution. A total of 2,287 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 1,553 (68%) completed the initial ordered LDCT. Mean age was 63 years, and 73% were underrepresented minorities. Median travel time from patient residence to the LDCT screening facility was 17 minutes by private vehicle and 67 minutes by public transportation. There was a small difference in travel time to the LDCT screening facility by public transportation for patients who completed LDCT versus those who did not (67 vs 66 min, respectively; P=.04) but no difference in travel time by private vehicle for these patients (17 min for both; P=.67). In multivariable analysis, LDCT completion was not associated with projected travel time to the LDCT facility by private vehicle (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.82-1.25) or public transportation (odds ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.89-1.44). Similar results were noted across travel-type permutations. Black individuals were 29% less likely to complete LDCT screening compared with White individuals. In an urban population comprising predominantly underrepresented minorities, projected travel time is not associated with initial LDCT completion in an integrated health care system. Other reasons for differences in LDCT completion warrant investigation.

Abstract 4790: Hospitalization as an opportunity to improve lung cancer screening in high-risk patients

Abstract Background: Lung cancer screening with annual low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in high-risk patients with exposure to smoking reduces lung cancer-related mortality, yet the screening rate of eligible adults is low. As hospitalization is a critical moment to engage patients in their overall health, it may be an opportunity to improve rates of lung cancer screening. Prior to implementing a hospital-based lung cancer screening referral program, this study assesses the association between hospitalization and completion of lung cancer screening. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of evaluated completion of at least one LDCT from 2014-2021 using electronic health record data using hospitalization as the primary exposure. Patients aged 55-80 who received care from a university-based internal medicine clinic and reported cigarette use were included. Univariate analysis and logistic regression models evaluated the association of hospitalization and completion of LDCT. The secondary outcome was completion of any CT of the chest. Results: Of the 1,935 current smokers identified, 47% had at least one hospitalization, and 21% completed a LDCT during the study period. While a higher proportion of patients with a hospitalization had a LDCT (24%) compared to patients without a hospitalization (18%, p&amp;lt;0.001), there was no association between hospitalization and completion of a LDCT after adjusting for potentially confounding covariates (95%CI 0.680 - 1.149). Of cohort patients, 38% completed any CT of the chest and hospitalization was associated with increased odds of receiving chest CT imaging in the adjusted model (OR 1.72; 95%CI 1.37 - 2.17). Conclusions: In a cohort of patients at risk for lung cancer, only 1 in 5 completed lung cancer screening with LDCT and hospitalization events were not associated with LDCT completion. A hospitalist driven lung cancer screening program has the potential to increase the suboptimal rates of lung cancer screening in high-risk patients. Citation Format: Ellen M. Nielsen, Jingwen Zhang, Justin Marsden, Chloe Bays, William P. Moran, Patrick D. Mauldin, Leslie A. Lenert, Benjamin A. Toll, Andrew D. Schreiner, Marc Heincelman. Hospitalization as an opportunity to improve lung cancer screening in high-risk patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 4790.

Hospitalization as an opportunity to improve lung cancer screening in high-risk patients

BackgroundLung cancer screening with annual low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in high-risk patients with exposure to smoking reduces lung cancer-related mortality, yet the screening rate of eligible adults is low. As hospitalization is an opportune moment to engage patients in their overall health, it may be an opportunity to improve rates of lung cancer screening. Prior to implementing a hospital-based lung cancer screening referral program, this study assesses the association between hospitalization and completion of lung cancer screening. MethodsA retrospective cohort study of evaluated completion of at least one LDCT from 2014 to 2021 using electronic health record data using hospitalization as the primary exposure. Patients aged 55–80 who received care from a university-based internal medicine clinic and reported cigarette use were included. Univariate analysis and logistic regression evaluated the association of hospitalization and completion of LDCT. Cox proportional hazard model examined the time relationship between hospitalization and LDCT. ResultsOf the 1935 current smokers identified, 47% had at least one hospitalization, and 21% completed a LDCT during the study period. While a higher proportion of patients with a hospitalization had a LDCT (24%) compared to patients without a hospitalization (18%, p<0.001), there was no association between hospitalization and completion of a LDCT after adjusting for potentially confounding covariates (95%CI 0.680 – 1.149). There was an association between hospitalization time to event and LDCT completion, with hospitalized patients having a lower probability of competing LDCT compared to non-hospitalized patients (HR 0.747; 95% CI 0.611 – 0.914). ConclusionsIn a cohort of patients at risk for lung cancer and established within a primary care clinic, only 1 in 4 patients who had been hospitalized completed lung cancer screening with LDCT. Hospitalization events were associated with a lower probability of LDCT completion. Hospitalization is a missed opportunity to refer at-risk patients to lung cancer screening.

Strategies to Increase Cervical Cancer Screening With Mailed Human Papillomavirus Self-Sampling Kits: A Randomized Clinical Trial

ABSTRACT In the United States, adherence for cervical cancer screening decreased from 86% to 77% between 2005 and 2019. Over 50% of cervical cancers are diagnosed in individuals overdue for screening, and promoting access and adherence is essential. Unlike traditional Papanicolaou testing, human papillomavirus (HPV) screening can use self-collected samples, which have comparable sensitivity and specificity to clinician-collected samples. Self-collecting has been shown to increase screening adherence, possibly by circumventing important barriers such as scheduling clinic appointments and negativity about pelvic examinations. Despite this, most individuals in prior studies remained unscreened with low follow-up of HPV-positive results, and kit uptake among populations that are screening adherent or have unknown screening history is unknown. The STEP trial (self-testing options in the era for primary HPV screening for cervical cancer) was a parallel, single-blind, randomized clinical trial comparing cervical cancer screening completion across groups of individuals with due (screening-adherent), overdue, or unknown screening history. Participants were randomized to traditional care (patient reminders and clinician electronic health record [HER] alerts), education (usual care plus educational materials about screening), direct mail (traditional care plus educational materials plus a mailed HPV self-collection kit), or to opt in (traditional care plus educational materials plus the option to request a self-collection kit). Patients were identified using the Kaiser Permanente Washington HER and administrative claims. Eligible participants were females aged 30 to 64 years with current Kaiser Permanente Washington insurance and primary care, intact cervix, who were either due or overdue for screening. The primary study outcome was screening completion within 6 months after randomization, which could be done either in clinic or using the self-collection kit. Modified Poisson regression was used to estimate relative risk (RR) of screening completion for the direct-mail and opt-in groups, relative to the education group. A total of 32,771 participants were randomized between November 2020 and January 2022, of which 13,356 were due for screening, 8682 were overdue, and 10,733 had unknown screening history. Of those due for screening, the RR for screening completion was 1.30 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23–1.36; absolute difference, 14.1% [95% CI, 11.2%–16.9%]) for direct mail and 1.07 (95% CI, 1.02–1.12; absolute difference, 3.5% [95% CI, 1.2%–5.7%]) for the opt-in group compared with education. Of those overdue for screening, the RR for screening completion was 1.90 (95% CI, 1.68–2.16; absolute difference 16.9% [95% CI, 13.8%–20.0%]) for direct mail compared with education. Of those with unknown screening history, the RR for screening completion was 1.14 (95% CI, 1.03–1.25; absolute difference 2.2% [95% CI, 0.5%–3.9%]) for the opt-in group compared with education. The results of this randomized controlled trial showed that directly mailing HPV self-collection kits increased cervical cancer screening by over 14% compared with education alone. The effect was similar between participants that were due or overdue for screening, and an opt-in approach was found to minimally increase screening.

A randomized controlled trial of a tailored navigation intervention to promote breast and cervical cancer screening among intergenerational Southeast Asian women

BackgroundCancer is the leading cause of death for Southeast Asian women in the U.S. Southeast Asian women have significantly high rates of breast and cervical cancers, yet are least likely to obtain regular mammography and Pap testing of all racial/ethnic groups in the U.S. ObjectivesThe purpose of this study is to compare a tailored navigation intervention delivered by bilingual and bicultural Community Health Advisors to information and reminder only to increase age-appropriate breast and cervical cancer screening completion among Southeast Asian women. MethodsThe Southeast Asian Women's Health Project study will enroll 232 Cambodian, Filipino, Lao, and Vietnamese women who are not up to date with their breast and cervical cancer screenings. Women randomized to navigation will receive the intervention for 10 weeks. Women in the information group will be mailed information on mammography and Pap testing only. All participants will be contacted post-enrollment to assess screening completion. DiscussionWe will examine intervention efficacy, predictors of each intervention group, and the influence of intergenerational exchange of breast and cervical cancer screening information between mothers and daughters. We will disseminate study results locally to the community, nationally at conferences, and through peer-reviewed journals.

Breast Cancer Screening Among Females With and Without Schizophrenia

Breast cancer screening with mammography is recommended in Ontario, Canada, for females 50 years or older. Females with schizophrenia are at higher risk of breast cancer, but in Ontario it is currently unknown whether breast cancer screening completion differs between those with vs without schizophrenia and whether primary care payment models are a factor. To compare breast cancer screening completion within 2 years after the 50th birthday among females with and without schizophrenia, and to identify the association between breast cancer screening completion and different primary care payment models. This case-control study analyzed Ontario-wide administrative data on females with and without schizophrenia who turned 50 years of age between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019. Those with schizophrenia (cases) were matched 1:10 to those without schizophrenia (controls) on local health integration network, income quintile, rural residence, birth dates, and weighted Aggregated Diagnosis Group score. Data analysis was performed from November 2021 to February 2023. Exposures were schizophrenia and primary care payment models. Outcomes included breast cancer screening completion among cases and controls within 2 years after their 50th birthday and the association with receipt of care from primary care physicians enrolled in different primary care payment models, which were analyzed using logistic regression and reported as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. The study included 11 631 females with schizophrenia who turned 50 years of age during the study period and a matched cohort of 115 959 females without schizophrenia, for a total of 127 590 patients. Overall, 69.3% of cases and 77.1% of controls had a mammogram within 2 years after their 50th birthday. Cases had lower odds of breast cancer screening completion within 2 years after their 50th birthday (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.64-0.70). Cases who received care from a primary care physician in a fee-for-service (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.53-0.60) or enhanced fee-for-service (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.75-0.82) payment model had lower odds of having a mammogram than cases whose physicians were paid under a Family Health Team model. This case-control study found that, in Ontario, Canada, breast cancer screening completion was lower among females with schizophrenia, and differences from those without schizophrenia may partially be explained by differences in primary care payment models. Widening the availability of team-based primary care for females with schizophrenia may play a role in increased breast cancer screening rates.

Saturday Pap Smear Clinic: addressing barriers to cervical cancer screening

BackgroundThe incidence of cervical cancer has decreased by 70% since the 1950s. Preventative measures include vaccination against HPV strains and Papanicolaou tests. Early identification of cervical cancer through routine screening...

Colorectal cancer and digital/live screening navigation: Promoting prevention through personalized recommendations and access.

10566 Background: This project evaluates the effectiveness of an advocacy organization-led digital and live navigation framework aimed at colorectal cancer (CRC) screening completion. The Colorectal Cancer Alliance’s screening quiz guides patients to a clinically valid, personalized CRC screening recommendation with a handoff to live navigation for those at risk. The framework utilizes digital innovation, targeted awareness, and financial support to support populations experiencing the greatest disparities and increase screening intention, behavior, and further health equity in colorectal cancer. This simple intervention is critical due to existing research consistently indicating on-time screening for CRC leads to favorable outcomes. Methods: In July 2022, the Alliance launched an enhanced quiz to improve the CRC screening navigation experience and increase engagement. The new survey instrument was restructured to streamline time to completion while preserving clinically accurate risk stratification. The follow-up navigation protocol was reordered from digital-first to live-first to leverage high-touch strategies earlier in the screening journey and dynamic content was added to the recommendation page to create a more personalized resource. The Alliance also deployed social media and influencer campaigns to increase outreach to at-risk communities. Results: The enhanced quiz delivered over 8,300 CRC screening recommendations and improved the average monthly completion rate (33%) and contact capture rate (14.4%) compared to the previous quiz in 2022 (24%; 8%). The median age of respondents was 55, and 37.2% of the respondents were between the ages of 45 and 64. Of the respondents, 26.7% were male and 73.3% were female. The majority were White (77.1%), 7.3% identified as Black/African American, 5.5% were Hispanic or Latino, and 3% were Asian. Most respondents were symptomatic (67.8%) but 8.1% were asymptomatic high-risk. Respondents (1,078) were triaged to live Alliance patient navigation. Conclusions: This digital and live navigation framework may serve as a strong solution in driving colorectal cancer screening and supporting shared-decision making conversations compared to other available interventions. The framework provides users with robust access to live navigation, educational resources, and support services for CRC screening and diagnosis. The Alliance is uniquely positioned to utilize its communications channels, social media and influencer campaigns to reach at-risk communities with credibility. Data attributed to specific campaigns are still being analyzed, and the Alliance will continue to optimize its navigation protocol and awareness efforts as quality improvement processes allow for a deeper understanding of more inclusive and impactful navigation experiences to close screening gaps among at-risk populations.

Colorectal cancer screening completion by patients due or overdue for screening after reminders: a retrospective study

BackgroundPatient and clinician reminders were implemented as part of an adherence improvement project at University of Florida (UF) Internal Medicine Clinics. We sought to assess colorectal cancer (CRC) screening completion rates among patients not up-to-date with screening following distribution of reminders and to identify characteristics correlated with screening outcomes.MethodsRetrospective chart review was performed for patients not up-to-date with CRC screening for whom at least one reminder (patient and/or clinician) was issued in June 2018. The primary endpoint, the completion of a CRC screening test, is characterized as the ratio of completed screening tests to the number of patients not up-to-date with screening. All analyses were performed using R 4.0 software.ResultsOf the 926 patients included, 403 (44%; 95% CI, 0.40–0.47) completed a CRC screening test within 24 months following a reminder. Family history of CRC (relative risk (RR) 1.33; P = 0.007), flu immunization within two years of the reminder (RR 1.23; P = 0.019), and receiving a patient reminder either alone (RR 1.62; P < 0.001) or in combination with a clinician reminder (RR 1.55; P = 0.006) were positively associated with CRC screening completion. Reporting being divorced, separated, or widowed was negatively associated with screening completion (RR 0.70; P = 0.004).ConclusionReminders, in particular patient reminders, seem to be an effective method to enhance screening among patients not up-to-date with CRC screening. This study suggests that reminder efforts should be focused at the level of the patients and provides insight on target populations for practical interventions to further increase CRC screening adherence.

Research Priorities to Support Women Veterans' Reproductive Health and Health Care Within a Learning Health Care System.

Research Priorities to Support Women Veterans' Reproductive Health and Health Care Within a Learning Health Care System.

Effectiveness of a Breast Cancer Education Screening and NavigaTion (BEST) Intervention among Hispanic Women.

In the United States, breast cancer remains one of the most diagnosed cancers among females and remains the second leading cause of cancer death. In addition, breast cancer is most likely diagnosed at an advanced stage among Hispanic females in the United States due to lower mammogram utilization. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a multilevel, multicomponent community-based breast cancer screening intervention called the Breast Cancer Education Screening and NavigaTion (BEST) program. The primary outcome was the completion of a screening mammogram 4 months post-intervention. We used a pragmatic approach for evaluation, utilizing a quasi-experimental delayed intervention design. We recruited women from the community aged between 50 and 75, uninsured or underinsured, and overdue for screening. Six hundred participants were recruited (300 intervention and 300 control). Among completers, the screening rate was 97% in the intervention group and 4.4% in the control group (RR = 22.2, 95% CI: 12.5-39.7, p < .001). In multivariable analysis, age ≥ 65 (RR = 1.29, p = .047), perceived benefits (RR = 1.04, p = .026), curability (RR = 1.24, p < .001), subjective norms (RR = 1.14, p = .014), and fatalism (RR = .96, p = .004) remained significantly associated with screening outcome. A multicomponent, bilingual, and culturally tailored intervention effectively facilitated breast cancer screening completion in an underserved population of Hispanic women. Individuals with improved screening outcomes were more likely to have higher positive beliefs. Our study has important implications regarding using multicomponent interventions in increasing breast cancer screening completion in poorly screened populations. It also highlights differences in health belief motivation for breast cancer screening completion.

Fatalistic cancer beliefs and self-reported cancer screening behaviors among diverse urban residents.

Cancer fatalism-the belief that death is inevitable when cancer is present-has been identified as a barrier to cancer screening, detection, and treatment. Our study examined the relationship between self-reported cancer fatalism and adherence to cancer screening guidelines of the breasts, cervix, colon, and prostate among a diverse sample of urban-dwelling adults in Brooklyn, New York. Between May 2019 and August 2020, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of adults 40 + years of age (n = 2,341) residing in Brooklyn neighborhoods with high cancer mortality. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the odds of reporting cancer screening completion across three fatalistic cancer belief categories (low, med, high). Participants' median age was 61 (IQR 51, 71) years, 61% were women, 49% self-identified as non-Hispanic black, 11% Hispanic, 4% Asian, and 6% more than one race. There were no statistically significant differences in the proportion of low, some, or high fatalistic beliefs identified among male respondents compared to women. Among women, we observed that high fatalistic cancer beliefs were associated with higher odds (OR 2.01; 95% CI 1.10-3.65) of completing breast but not cervical (1.04; CI 0.55-1.99) or colon (1.54; CI 0.88-2.69) cancer screening. Men with high fatalistic cancer beliefs had a trend towards lower odds of prostate screening (OR 0.53: 95% CI 0.18-1.57) compared to men with low fatalistic beliefs, but neither was statistically significant. Findings suggest that high fatalistic cancer beliefs may be an important factor in cancer screening utilization among women. Further examination in longitudinal cohorts with a larger sample of men may be needed in order to identify any significant effect.

Disparate access to breast cancer screening and treatment

BackgroundBarriers to breast cancer screening remain despite Medicaid expansion for preventive screening tests and implementation of patient navigation programs under the Affordable Care Act. Women from underserved communities experience disproportionately low rates of screening mammography. This study compares barriers to breast cancer screening among women at an inner-city safety-net center (City) and those at a suburban county medical center (County). Inner city and suburban county medical centers’ initiatives were studied to compare outcomes of breast cancer screening and factors that influence access to care.MethodsWomen 40 years of age or older delinquent in breast cancer screening were offered patient navigation services between October 2014 and September 2019. Four different screening time-to-event intervals were investigated: time from patient navigation acceptance to screening mammography, to diagnostic mammography, to biopsy, and overall screening completion time. Barriers to complete breast cancer screening between the two centers were compared.ResultsWomen from lowest income quartiles took significantly longer to complete breast cancer screening when compared to women from higher income quartiles when a barrier was present, regardless of barrier type and center. Transportation was a major barrier to screening mammography completion, while fear was the major barrier to abnormal screening work up.ConclusionDisparity in breast cancer screening and management persists despite implementation of a patient navigation program. In the presence of a barrier, women from the lowest income quartiles have prolonged breast cancer screening completion time regardless of center or barrier type. Women who experience fear have longest screening time completion. Future directions aim to increase resource allocation to ameliorate wait times in overburdened safety-net hospitals as well as advanced training for patient navigators to alleviate women’s fears.

Redlining, structural racism, and lung cancer screening disparities.

The objective of this study was to understand the effect of historical redlining (preclusion from home loans and wealth-building for Black Americans) and its downstream factors on the completion of lung cancer screening in Boston. Patients within our institution were identified as eligible for lung cancer screening on the basis of the United State Preventive Service Task Force criteria and patient charts were reviewed to determine if patients completed low-dose computed tomography screening. Individual addresses were geocoded and overlayed with original 1930 Home Owner Loan Corporation redlining vector files. Structural equation models were used to estimate the odds of screening for Black and White patients, interacted with sex, in redlined and nonredlined areas. Black patients had a 44% lower odds of screening compared with White (odds ratio [OR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52-0.85). With race as a mediator, Black patients in redlined areas were 61% less likely to undergo screening than White patients (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.24-0.64). Similarly, in redlined areas Black women had 61% (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.21-0.73) and Black men 47% (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29-0.98) lower odds of screening compared with White men in redlined areas. Despite higher rates of lung cancer screening in redlined areas, Black race mediated worse screening rates in these areas, suggesting racist structural factors contributing to the disparities in lung cancer screening completion among Black and White patients. Furthermore, these disparities were more apparent in Black women, suggesting that racial and gender intersectional discrimination are important in lung cancer screening completion.