Completed Trials Research Articles

Impact of Discontinuing Both Hypertonic Saline and Dornase Alfa after Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor in Cystic Fibrosis.

Rationale: Evaluating approaches to reduce treatment burden is a research priority among people with cystic fibrosis on highly effective modulators, including elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI). Objectives: We sought to evaluate the impact of discontinuing both hypertonic saline (HS) and dornase alfa (DA) versus continuing both therapies among a subgroup of participants in the SIMPLIFY study who sequentially participated in trials evaluating the independent clinical effects of discontinuing HS and DA. Methods: SIMPLIFY participants ≥12 years old on ETI and constituting a subgroup using both HS and DA at study entry were randomized to the HS or DA trial and then randomized 1:1 to continue or discontinue the applicable therapy for 6 weeks. After completion of the first trial, eligible participants could enroll in the second trial beginning with a 2-week run-in. Study outcomes were compared across the duration of SIMPLIFY participation between a cohort remaining on both therapies during SIMPLIFY and a cohort that sequentially discontinued both as a result of trial randomizations. Multivariable regression models were used to estimate treatment differences, adjusted for time between trials, trial order, baseline age, sex at birth, and percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV1) at study entry. Results: Forty-three participants discontinued both therapies by the end of SIMPLIFY, and 63 remained on both, with overall average ppFEV1 of 96.7% at study entry and 3.9 months as the average duration of follow-up from beginning of the first trial to completion of the second trial, including time between trials. No clinically meaningful difference in the change in ppFEV1 from baseline to completion of the second trial was observed between those who discontinued and those who remained on both therapies (difference: 0.22% off-on; 95% confidence interval = -1.60, 2.03). Changes in lung clearance index at 2.5% starting concentration, patient-reported outcomes, and safety outcomes were also comparable. Patient-reported treatment burden, as measured by a Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised subscale, significantly decreased in those who discontinued both therapies. Conclusions: SIMPLIFY participants who sequentially discontinued both HS and DA experienced no meaningful changes in clinical outcomes and reported decreased treatment burden as compared with those who remained on both therapies. These data continue to inform a new era of postmodulator care of people with cystic fibrosis.

The influence of menstrual cycle phase on isokinetic knee flexor and extensor strength in female soccer players: a pilot study

ABSTRACT The prevalence of anterior cruciate ligament injury in female soccer players has been attributed to hormonal fluctuations during the menstrual cycle (MC), with injury incidence greatest during the follicular phase. Eight, eumenorrheic, collegiate soccer players (19.5 ± 0.75 years, 1.62 ± 4.90 cm, 61.12 ± 7.6 kg mean ± SD) completed eccentric knee flexor and concentric knee extensor trials at 60 and 240°·s−1 during the follicular, ovulation and luteal phases of their MC. Peak torque and corresponding angle of peak torque were maintained across all phases of the MC, irrespective of testing modality and speed (p ≥ 0.149). Strength ratios defined using peak torque were also not sensitive to MC phase (p ≥ 0.933). However, Functional Range in eccentric knee flexion was significantly lower during the follicular phase (p = 0.017), at both testing speeds. This supports epidemiological observations but highlights the importance of analysing isokinetic data beyond the peak of the strength curve. Interpretation of isokinetic data should therefore focus on points of “weakness” as opposed to maximum strength, whilst (p)rehabilitative strategies should consider strength through range of motion, and at different speeds. Eccentric hamstring strength was observed to decrease significantly at the higher speed, contrary to observations in elite male players, and potentially reflecting a differential training adaptation.

Factors associated with non-publication of clinical trials in cardiovascular medicine: a cross-sectional analysis

Abstract Background/introduction Cardiovascular medicine is the fourth most-funded area of clinical research as it received an estimate for 7% of the total research funding. Nearly 8% of all clinical trials are cardiovascular-related (1,2). Non-publication of the registered clinical trials wastes money and time, encourages dissemination bias, and creates a body of possibly inaccurate literature, all of which obstruct scientific advancement. (3) Purpose To study the factors associated with the non-publication of cardiovascular clinical trials between January 2000 and June 2022. Methods We performed a cross-sectional analysis using ClinicalTrials.gov to determine all completed, discontinued, published, and unpublished cardiovascular medicine clinical trials between January 2000 and June 2022. For each trial, data on the trial phase, funding source, intervention type, enrolment size, trial completion, and publication status were extracted and subjected to logistic regression to determine clinical trial publication predictor factors. Results Among 3946 trials in cardiovascular medicine registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, there were 3215 completed trials included in the analysis. Of these, 34.2% (n=1100) were unpublished. On multivariate logistic regression, triple-blinded and quadruple-blinded trials were less likely to be unpublished compared to open-label trials (odds ratio [OR] 0.622; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-0.85; p=0.003) and (OR 0.54; CI 0.42-0.69; p<0.001), respectively. Enrolment of 100 participants or more was associated with a decreased likelihood of non-publication (OR 0.46; CI 0.39-0.55; p<0.001). In addition, randomised trials were less likely to be unpublished than non-randomised trials (OR 0.67; CI 0.50-0.88; p=0.004). There was no significant effect of the intervention type, phase of the trial, trial participants' age and gender, or the trial funding resource on the publication status of cardiovascular medicine clinical trials. Conclusions It is observed that a considerable number of clinical trials in cardiovascular medicine remain unpublished. This issue raises some concerns regarding the risks and discomfort participants may encounter during the trial, while no results are added to the literature. Blinding of the trials, enrolment size, and allocation methods are the main predictors of trial publication.Forest plot of logistic regression

Semaglutide for the treatment of resistant hypertension

Abstract Background Treatment options for resistant hypertension (RH) are often limited by medication intolerance and adverse effects. Novel approaches to treatment are required. The disease of obesity affects 70% of patients with RH. Purpose To determine if a weight centric approach using semaglutide improved BP control in patients with RH. Methods Individual participant data from three randomised placebo-controlled trials (STEP 1, 3 and 4) examining the effect of semaglutide 2.4mg on body weight over 68 weeks were included. Participants on >4 anti-hypertensive medications or those with systolic BP (SBP) >130mmHg at baseline and 3 anti-hypertensive medications including a diuretic were considered to have RH. Firstly, the change in SBP comparing those on semaglutide to placebo was analysed with baseline systolic BP as a covariate in an ANCOVA model. Then, the RH group was subdivided into those with SBP above or below 130mmHg at baseline and BP response to semaglutide assessed. Analyses were performed using R Software version 4.0.3. Results In the pooled analysis of 3136 trial participants, 111 met the criteria for RH. Compared to placebo, participants on semaglutide had a SBP reduction of -4.93mmHg, adjusted for SBP baseline to -3.16mmHg (95%CI -8.69 to 2.37). For those with RH and a baseline SBP > 130mmHg on semaglutide, the SBP change was -10.94mmHg. This change was 4.54mmHg for those with a SBP < 130mmHg. The diastolic BP changes were -3.62 and 2.79mmHg respectively (Figure 1). At trial completion, 36% of those on semaglutide did not meet the criteria for RH. Conclusions The effect of semaglutide on BP for patients with RH is modest. A greater BP reduction is evident for those with a higher baseline SBP. Targeting excess body weight with semaglutide is a viable treatment option for patients with RH and uncontrolled BP.

Advancing Immunotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic cancer remains one of the deadliest malignancies, with a consistently low five-year survival rate for the past several decades. This is in stark contrast to other cancers, which have seen significant improvement in survival and prognosis due to recent developments in therapeutic modalities. These modest improvements in pancreatic cancer outcomes have primarily resulted from minor advances in cytotoxic chemotherapeutics, with limited progress in other treatment approaches. A major focus of current therapeutic research is the further development of immunomodulatory therapies characterized by antibody-based approaches, cellular therapies, and vaccines. Although initial results utilizing immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer have been mixed, recent clinical trials have demonstrated significant improvements in patient outcomes. In this review, we detail these three approaches to immunomodulation, highlighting their common targets and distinct shortcomings, and we provide a narrative summary of completed and ongoing clinical trials that utilize these approaches to immunomodulation. Within this context, we aim to inform future research efforts by identifying promising areas that warrant further exploration.

Plasma Protein Biomarkers and Long-Term Cardiovascular Mortality Risk in Patients With Chronic Coronary Heart Disease.

Protein biomarkers that reflect different pathophysiological pathways have been associated with the risk of adverse cardiovascular events. However, it is uncertain whether these associations are sustained with increasing years after the biomarkers are measured. In this cohort study, 7745 patients with coronary heart disease who participated in the LIPID (Long-Term Intervention With Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease) trial, BNP (B-type natriuretic peptide), troponin I, cystatin-C, C-reactive protein, d-dimer and midregional proadrenomedullin were measured at baseline and after 1 year. Discrimination of plasma biomarker concentrations for cardiovascular death were evaluated in landmark analyses from 1 year for the next 5 years of the randomized trial, and for 10 additional years after trial completion. All 6 biomarkers were associated with risk of cardiovascular death (n=1903) both during and after the clinical trial (each P<0.001). C-statistics for BNP were 0.706 and 0.704; cystatin-C, 0.686 and 0.693; troponin I, 0.686 and 0.689; C-reactive protein, 0.655 and 0.684; d-dimer, 0.670 and 0.679, and midregional adrenomedullin, 0.686 and 0.688, respectively. In multivariable models, adding all 6 biomarkers to models with clinical risk factors increased the C-statistic for cardiovascular death from 0.709 to 0.775 during the clinical trial, and from 0.713 to 0.751 during 10-year follow-up after the randomized trial (P<0.001 for both). In patients with chronic coronary heart disease, biomarkers that reflect different pathophysiological pathways are associated with the risk of cardiovascular death for at least the next 15 years.

Uptake of health economic evaluations alongside clinical trials in Australia: an observational study.

Australia's clinical trials sector is highly productive with continued sector investment needed to enhance research impact. Generating economic evidence alongside trials has the potential to facilitate the implementation of trial results into practice. Ascertaining the use of health economic evaluations alongside clinical trials can assist in determining whether clinical trials fully realize and operationalize their potential to change policy and practice. The aims of this study were to ascertain the uptake of health economic evaluations alongside Australian-led clinical trials and explore associations between uptake and trial characteristics. This observational study comprised a descriptive analysis of clinical trials registries, a cross-sectional survey of Australian Clinical Trials Alliance (ACTA) networks, and a subgroup analysis of completed acute care trials. Descriptive analyses of trial registrations were conducted, with logistic regressions used to identify predictors of proposing and subsequently publishing a health economic evaluation alongside acute care trials. Few randomized Australian-led clinical trials (11% of 9251) and ACTA network trials (43% of 227) proposed a health economic evaluation. In the subgroup analysis, 22% of the 324 acute care trials and 53% of the 38 ACTA network acute care trials proposed a health economic evaluation. Acute care trials funded by government bodies were significantly more likely to propose and publish a health economic evaluation than those funded by hospitals, universities, and other funders, after adjusting for phase, registration year, primary sponsor type, and comparator. Current uptake of health economic evaluations alongside Australian-led clinical trials is low, with uptake higher among the subset of ACTA network trials. This is despite economic evidence playing an increasingly prominent role in health system management, as well as rising health expenditure, limited budgets, and competing demands. There is significant opportunity to embed health economic evaluations alongside clinical trials, particularly phase 3 trials, to increase research outputs and optimize research translation. Investing in clinical trial networks that support funding for a health economist or a health economic evaluation may be an effective strategy to increase the uptake of health economic evaluations alongside trials.

Adaptive Trials in Stroke: Current Use and Future Directions.

Inclusion of adaptive design features in a clinical trial provides preplanned flexibility to dynamically modify a trial during its conduct while preserving validity and integrity. Adaptive trials are needed to accelerate the conduct of more efficient, informative, and ethical clinical research in the field of neurology. Stroke is a natural candidate for adoption of these innovative approaches to trial design. This Research Methods in Neurology article is informed by a scoping review that identified 45 completed or ongoing adaptive clinical trials in stroke that were appraised: 15 trials had published results with or without a published protocol and 30 ongoing trials (14 trials had a published protocol, and 16 trials were registered only). Interventions spanned acute (n = 28), rehabilitation (n = 8), prevention (n = 8), and rehabilitation and prevention (n = 1). A subsample of these trials was selected to illustrate the utility of adaptive design features and discuss why each adaptive feature was incorporated in the design to best achieve the aim; whether each individual feature was used and whether it resulted in expected efficiencies; and any learnings during preparation, conduct, or reporting. We then discuss the operational, ethical, and regulatory considerations that warrant careful consideration during adaptive trial planning and reflect on the workforce readiness to deliver adaptive trials in practice. We conclude that adaptive trials can be designed, funded, conducted, and published for a wide range of research questions and offer future directions to support adoption of adaptive trial designs in stroke and neurologic research more broadly.

Clinical applications and therapeutic potentials of advanced nanoparticles: a comprehensive review on completed human clinical trials

Nanoparticles are attractive therapeutic tools due to their distinctive characteristics, including more accurate drug delivery, improved bioavailability, and enhanced targeted therapy. This review offers a comprehensive analysis of the therapeutic potentials of cutting-edge nanoparticles as demonstrated in human clinical trials, based on empirical evidence. Through systematic searches of major scientific databases, relevant studies published up to March 2024 were included, focusing on clinical trials utilizing advanced nanoparticles for therapeutic purposes. The review discusses the diverse applications of nanoparticles in oncology, infectious diseases, neurology, and other medical fields. Additionally, it scrutinizes the safety profiles, efficacy outcomes, and challenges associated with nanoparticle-based therapies. The findings underscore significant progress in translating nanoparticle research into clinical practice and highlight the potential of these innovative platforms to revolutionize medical treatments. This review contributes valuable insights into the growing field of nanoparticle-based therapeutics, fostering a deeper understanding of their clinical applications and implications in medical practice.

A Clustering Ensemble Method for Drug Safety Signal Detection in Post-Marketing Surveillance.

Post-marketing surveillance refers to the process of monitoring the safety of drugs once they reach the market, after the successful completion of clinical trials. In this work, we investigate a computational approach using data mining tools to detect safety signals from post-market safety databases, or in other words, to identify adverse events (AEs) with disproportionately high reporting rates compared to other AEs, associated with a particular drug or a drug class. Essentially, we view this as a problem of cluster analysis-based anomaly detection on post-market safety data, where the goal is to 'unsupervisedly' detect the anomalous or the signal AEs. Our findings demonstrate the potential of using a clustering ensemble method to detect drug safety signals. It employs multiple clustering or anomaly detection algorithms, followed by a performance comparison of the candidate algorithms based on a collection of appropriate measures of goodness of clustering results. The method is general enough to include any number of clustering or anomaly detection algorithms and goodness measures, and performs better than any of the candidate algorithms in identifying the signal AEs. Extensive simulation studies illustrate that the ensemble method detects the AE signals from synthetic post-market safety datasets pretty accurately across the different scenarios explored. Based on the cases reported to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) between 2013 and 2022, we further demonstrate that the ensemble method successfully identifies and confirms most of the adverse events that are known to occur most frequently in reaction to antiepileptic drugs and -lactam antibiotics.

Maintenance Therapy Post-Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with T-Cell Lymphomas.

Given the poor outcomes for peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL), stem cell transplant (SCT) remains an important therapeutic approach. Post-SCT relapse is common and maintenance therapy post-SCT is increasingly being utilized. Here we review the use of post-SCT maintenance therapy for PTCL patients. Maintenance therapy is increasingly utilized to decrease post-SCT relapse and improve outcomes in PTCL. Ongoing and completed post-SCT maintenance trials utilizing agents such as romidepsin, brentuximab vedotin, duvelisib, and pembrolizumab have shown efficacy in decreasing relapse. Further, additional agents with efficacy in PTCL have emerged that may inform future maintenance approaches. Maintenance therapy is a promising approach to maintain response after SCT in PTCL. While several trials are ongoing to evaluate maintenance therapy in PTCL, current data suggests this may be an effective method to decrease post-SCT relapse.

TARGETED THERAPY IN DIFFUSE INTRINSIC PONTINE GLIOMA: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES

Abstract AIMS Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is a devastating pediatric brain tumor, marked by its poor prognosis and frequent recurrence despite conventional therapy. Our review examines the molecular landscape of DIPG, highlighting key factors driving tumor progression. We evaluate the therapeutic potential of various monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting these factors, providing insights into their mechanisms and ongoing clinical trials. Our aim is to guide future investigations and immunotherapeutic strategies for DIPG. METHOD A narrative review was conducted using the PubMed database to identify relevant review articles, clinical trials, and observational studies published within the past 10 years, focusing on the use of mAbs in DIPG. The search terms “monoclonal antibodies”, “diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma”, and “targeted therapy” were employed. Additionally, a search was conducted on clinicaltrials.gov to gather information on ongoing and completed clinical trials. RESULTS Current human clinical trials on the checkpoint inhibitors anti-PD-1 (Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Balstilimab, Cemiplimab), anti-PD-L1 (Durvalumab), and anti-CTLA-4 (Ipilimumab, Zalifrelimab) have not demonstrated significant improvement in overall patient survival. One major limitation has been the small sample size and limited expression of such markers in DIPG. Conversely, combination therapies involving anti-VEGF (Bevacizumab) and anti-EGFR (Nimotuzumab and Cetuximab) have shown promising results in small sample studies, but these results are not conclusive. Trials on anti-CD276 (Omburtamab) and CD40 agonist (APX005M) have shown no specific clinical or tumor outcomes in DIPG. Newer emerging agents like anti-TIM3 and anti-IL13Ra2 have shown very favorable results in in-vivo and in-vitro studies. CONCLUSION Current evidence is insufficient to support the use of mAbs in DIPG. More large-size studies investigating the combinations of checkpoint inhibitors with different therapeutic agents are needed. Additionally, the promising results seen with anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR mAbs in their respective combination therapies warrant exploration in large-scale studies to draw more accurate conclusions. Furthermore, human trials should be conducted on anti-TIM3 and anti-IL13Ra2.

Combination makes strength: a narrative review of transarterial radioembolization plus immune checkpoint inhibitors for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) are now regarded as promising and versatile therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Combining TARE and ICIs may offer synergistic antineoplastic effects by integrating local and systemic tumor control. This review critically discusses recent preclinical evidence supporting the TARE-ICI combination strategy, completed and ongoing clinical trials, and the challenges in identifying optimal target populations and treatment protocols. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in multiple electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) from January 1999 to January 2024. The first part of the search was directed at identifying concluded studies regarding the TARE-ICIs combination. The second part aimed at identifying ongoing clinical trials exploring the Clinicaltrials.gov database. The combination of TARE and ICIs is a promising strategy, supported by preclinical evidence of immune activation post-TARE and potential synergies with ICIs. Early-phase clinical trials have reported encouraging efficacy. However, significant heterogeneity exists among these studies, particularly concerning target populations and treatment schedules. The current evidence on TARE-ICI is favorable and promising in improving outcomes of patients with HCC. Further conclusive and higher levels of evidence are pending.

Trigger Point Injections for Myofascial Pain in Terminal Cancer: A Randomized Trial.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single trigger point injection (TPI) of a local anesthetic for the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) in patients with incurable cancer. This multicenter, exploratory, open-label, randomized comparative trial was conducted in five specialized palliative care departments. Hospitalized patients with incurable cancer who had been experiencing pain related to MPS were randomized to receive either a TPI of 1% lidocaine plus conventional care (TPI group) or conventional care alone (control group). The short-term efficacy and occurrence of adverse events were compared between groups. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who experienced a reduction in pain scores of ≥ 50%, assessed using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale, at 3 days post-intervention. Adverse events were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. Fifty patients were enrolled, and the trial completion rate was 100%. The proportion of patients who experienced an improvement in Numerical Rating Scale pain scores of ≥ 50% was 70.8% (95% confidence interval, 52.4% to 89.2%) in the TPI group and 0.0% in the control group; the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). In the TPI group, one case (4.2%) of Grade 1 nausea and one case (4.2%) of Grade 1 somnolence were reported. A single TPI of a local anesthetic is safe and efficacious in inducing an immediate reduction in MPS-related pain in patients with incurable cancer.

Consideration of factors of low accrual and methods for setting appropriate accrual periods: Japan Clinical Oncology Group study

BackgroundPoor patient accrual can delay reporting of clinical trials and, consequently, the development of new treatments. For reducing the risk of additional resource requirements, a method for setting planned accrual periods with minimal deviation from the actual accrual periods is desirable. Risk factors for poor patient accrual and the appropriate method of estimating the required accrual period for timely completion of clinical trials were evaluated using the data of trials conducted by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group.MethodsThe study included 199 trials that started patient accrual between January 1, 1990, and June 30, 2021. The explanatory variables included factors that could be evaluated prior to trial commencement. We also evaluated whether the estimation methods for accrual pace could lead to completion within the planned accrual period.ResultsApproximately 23.6% of trials were completed within the planned accrual period. The risk factors for trial extension included planned accrual periods > 3 years (reference group: ≤ 3 years, odds ratio [OR] 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15–0.92, P = 0.033) and stratified trial design (reference group: nonrandomized phase II trials, nonrandomized phase III trial [OR: 3.28, 95% CI: 0.99–10.9, P = 0.051], randomized phase II trial [OR: 3.91, 95% CI: 0.75–20.30, P = 0.105], and randomized phase III trial [OR: 9.29, 95% CI: 3.39–25.40, P < 0.001]). The method of estimating the accrual pace based on past clinical trials facilitated timely completion of the trial (OR: 3.51; 95% CI: 1.73–7.10, P < 0.001), unlike the estimation method based on survey evaluation of the accrual pace for participating institutions (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.56–2.26, P = 0.751). Furthermore, the discrepancy between planned and actual accrual periods was minimal when using the methods of considering the accrual pace of past clinical trials.ConclusionsConsidering the accrual pace of past clinical trials is useful for estimating the required accrual period if data from past trials are available. When conducting a survey, it is necessary to be cautious of overestimating the cases at each facility.

7373 CAM2029, Octreotide Subcutaneous Depot, Provides Sustained Biochemical Control of Acromegaly: Interim Results From a Phase 3 Study (ACROINNOVA 2)

Abstract Disclosure: D. Ferone: Consulting Fee; Self; Camurus AB, Recordati, Novartis-AAA, Ipsen. Grant Recipient; Self; Camurus AB, Recordati, Novartis-AAA, Ipsen. Research Investigator; Self; Camurus AB. J. Silverstein: Consulting Fee; Self; Xeris Pharmaceuticals. Research Investigator; Self; Camurus AB. P. Freda: Research Investigator; Self; Camurus AB. L. Katznelson: Advisory Board Member; Self; Camurus AB, Recordati. F. Gatto: Advisory Board Member; Self; Camurus AB. Research Investigator; Self; Camurus AB. P. Kadioglu: None. P. Maffei: Research Investigator; Self; Camurus AB. J. Seufert: Research Investigator; Self; Camurus AB. J.L. Spencer-Segal: Advisory Board Member; Self; Camurus AB. Research Investigator; Self; Camurus AB. E. Isaeva: None. A. Dreval: None. M. Harrie: Employee; Self; Camurus AB. Stock Owner; Self; Camurus AB. A. Svedberg: Employee; Self; Camurus AB. Stock Owner; Self; Camurus AB. A.M. Pedroncelli: Employee; Self; Camurus AB. Stock Owner; Self; Camurus AB. F. Tiberg: Employee; Self; Camurus AB. Stock Owner; Self; Camurus AB. Background: Acromegaly is characterized by excess growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) production. A key treatment goal is long-term biochemical control to minimize adverse effects of prolonged excess GH. CAM2029 is a novel, subcutaneous, octreotide depot, designed for convenient monthly self-administration using a pre-filled injection/pen. In a 24-week Phase 3 trial (ACROINNOVA 1, NCT04076462), CAM2029 achieved superior IGF-1 control vs placebo (IGF-1 ≤ upper limit of normal [ULN]: 72.2 vs 37.5%; P=0.0018) in acromegaly patients previously controlled with standard-of-care (SoC; octreotide long-acting repeatable/lanreotide Autogel). On trial completion, patients could roll over to a Phase 3, 52-week, open-label, long-term safety trial (ACROINNOVA 2, NCT04125836). Here, we report data from an interim analysis of roll-over patients in ACROINNOVA 2. Methods: Roll-over patients received monthly CAM2029 20 mg for 28 weeks in ACROINNOVA 2. Primary endpoint: occurrence of adverse events (AEs). Key secondary endpoints: proportion of patients with available assessments who had (i) IGF-1 ≤1x ULN (mean of weeks 50/52 measurements) and (ii) both IGF-1 ≤1x ULN (weeks 50/52 mean) and mean GH &amp;lt;2.5 µg/L (week 52). Data are reported according to prior treatment in ACROINNOVA 1. Safety data from the whole trial period are reported. Results: Fifty-four of the 64 patients completing ACROINNOVA 1 (prior CAM2029 n=36; prior placebo n=18) entered ACROINNOVA 2. At data cut-off (May 23, 2023) 28 and 15 patients in the prior CAM2029 and prior placebo groups, respectively, had completed treatment week 52; 7 and 3 were ongoing; 1 and 0 had discontinued. The medication was well tolerated with a safety profile comparable to SoC treatment; no new safety signals were observed. One treatment-related serious AE (cholelithiasis, moderate severity, resolved) occurred in the prior placebo group. Injection site treatment-emergent AEs (Grade ≤2) occurred in 50% of patients in the prior CAM2029 (18/36) and prior placebo (9/18) groups. Of evaluable patients in the prior CAM2029 and prior placebo groups, 89.3% (25/28) and 100% (15/15) had IGF ≤1x ULN at weeks 50/52; 88.5% (23/26) and 100% (14/14) had both IGF ≤1x ULN (week 50/52) and GH &amp;lt;2.5 µg/L (week 52). Mean IGF-1 levels remained &amp;lt;ULN throughout the 52-week study period for the prior CAM2029 group; in the prior placebo group, mean IGF-1 increased above 1x ULN during placebo treatment, returning to &amp;lt;ULN after switching to CAM2029 for 28 weeks. All patients previously treated with placebo regained IGF-I control upon switching to CAM2029. Conclusions: The safety profile of CAM2029 was consistent with SoC, with no new or unexpected safety signals during extended treatment. CAM2029 provided persistent control of IGF-1 and GH during 52 weeks of treatment. All patients in the prior placebo group regained biochemical control of acromegaly after switching to CAM2029. Presentation: 6/1/2024

Retraction notice to Gedatolisib Associated Acute Myocarditis in a Patient With Breast Adenocarcinoma: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;83(13 Suppl):3575.

The abstract "Gedatolisib Associated Acute Myocarditis in a Patient with Breast Adenocarcinoma" has been retracted at the request of the Editor-in-Chief because it was published before the completion of the clinical trial and full analysis of all data. There are no concerns about the findings as reported. This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/article-withdrawal).

Design and Rationale of a Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial of Early Dronedarone versus Usual Care to Change and Improve Outcomes in Persons with First-Detected Atrial Fibrillation – The CHANGE AFIB Study

BackgroundWhile there are several completed clinical trials that address treatment strategies in patients with symptomatic and recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF), there are no randomized clinical trials that address first-line rhythm control of new-onset AF. Recent data suggest that early initiation of rhythm control within 1 year can improve outcomes. MethodsIn this open-label pragmatic clinical trial nested within the Get With The Guidelines Atrial Fibrillation registry, approximately 3,000 patients with first-detected AF will be enrolled at approximately 200 sites. Participants will be randomized (1:1) to treatment with dronedarone in addition to usual care versus usual care alone. The primary endpoint will be time to first cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization or death from any cause through 12 months from randomization. Secondary endpoints will include a WIN ratio (all-cause death, ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, heart failure hospitalization, acute coronary hospitalization), CV hospitalization, and all-cause mortality. Patient reported outcomes will be analyzed based on change in Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT) and change in Mayo AF-Specific Symptom Inventory (MAFSI) from baseline to 12 months. ConclusionCHANGE AFIB will determine if treatment with dronedarone in addition to usual care is superior to usual care alone for the prevention of CV hospitalization or death from any cause in patients with first-detected AF. The trial will also determine whether initiation of rhythm control at the time of first-detected AF affects CV events or improves patient reported outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov #- NCT05130268

Poor registration and publication practices in clinical trials of targeted therapeutics for endocrine and metabolic diseases: an observational study

ObjectiveTo assess the completeness and concordance of reporting in registries and corresponding publications of interventional trials on targeted therapeutics for endocrine and metabolic disorders. Study Design and SettingWe searched clinical trial registries in September 2022 for completed interventional trials of target therapeutics for endocrine and metabolic disorders registered from 2005 onwards. We used ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registration Platform (WHO ICTRP) registration requirements to extract data and assess the completeness of initial entry and final updates to trial registration and concordance with their published journal articles. ResultsAmong 149 clinical trials included, 121 (81%) had corresponding publications. Missing mandatory registration data items were identified in 88 (67%) trials at the initial registration, 17 (13%) at the last registration, and in 85 (77%) corresponding publications. All trials showed changes between initial registration and final registration update, and 98% showed changes from the initial registration to publication. Changes between initial registration and final update were most common in the categories ‘Completion date’ (92%), ‘Key secondary outcomes’ (82%), and ‘Date of first enrolment’ (70%). Changes between initial registration and publication were most common in categories ‘Sample size’ (91%), ‘Key inclusion and exclusion criteria’ (81%), ‘Key secondary outcomes’ (84%), and ‘Completion date’ (83%). ConclusionDespite the legal and journal registration requirements, the completeness and consistency of reporting mandatory data items in registries and corresponding publications regarding targeted therapeutics for endocrine and metabolic disorders are inadequate. Our findings raise questions about the integrity and reliability of clinical trials focusing on targeted therapeutics.

Albumin adjuvant therapy for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion (AMASS-LVO): rationale, design, and protocol for a phase 1, open-label, clinical trial.

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is an acute brain injury caused by sudden occlusion of a blood vessel. Endovascular therapy is the most effective way to restore blood flow. However, despite the restoration of blood flow in some patients, their clinical prognosis often remains unsatisfactory. Albumin has shown neuroprotective effects in animal models of AIS. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of local arterial infusions of 20% human serum albumin solution as an adjuvant therapy after endovascular therapy in patients with AIS. This study is a prospective, therapeutic exploratory, non-randomized, open-label, phase 1 clinical trial testing the use of 20% human serum albumin solution injected via the artery immediately after successful reperfusion in patients with AIS. The study is divided into two stages. In the first stage, a single-dose-finding will explore the maximum safe dose according to the 3 + 3 dose escalation principle;, with the maximum dose being 0.60 g/kg. After recanalizing the occluded blood vessel, human serum albumin solution will be injected into the internal carotid artery region through a guiding catheter for 30 min. The second stage involves an albumin adjuvant therapy cohort (AT) and an endovascular treatment lonely cohort (ET). The AT cohort will encompass at least 15 additional participants to complete safety trials at the maximum safe dose determined in the first stage. The ET cohort will include well-matched patients receiving endovascular therapy alone, derived from a contemporaneous prospective registry, who will be excluded from having cardiopulmonary disorders and from receiving any neuroprotective therapy. The primary outcome of this study will be symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Efficacy outcomes will include the proportion of patients with the progression of cerebral infarction volume, a modified Rankin Scale of 0-2 on day 90 after randomization. An exploratory secondary outcome will be the analysis of thromboinflammatory and neuroprotective molecule profiles. This pilot trial aims to explore the safety and efficacy of arterial infusion of an albumin solution after occlusive vessel opening in AIS. The results will provide data parameters for subsequent tests on the arterial infusion of albumin solutions. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05953623.