You have accessJournal of UrologyImaging/Radiology: Uroradiology I1 Apr 20102019 PERFORMANCE OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC UROGRAPHY FOR THE DETECTION OF BLADDER TUMORS IN PATIENTS EVALUATED FOR MICROSCOPIC HEMATURIA Bernardo Aguilar-Davidov, Jose Arturo Ramirez-Muciño, Mariano Sotomayor, Ricardo Castillejos-Molina, Guillermo Feria-Bernal, and Francisco Rodriguez-Covarrubias Bernardo Aguilar-DavidovBernardo Aguilar-Davidov More articles by this author , Jose Arturo Ramirez-MuciñoJose Arturo Ramirez-Muciño More articles by this author , Mariano SotomayorMariano Sotomayor More articles by this author , Ricardo Castillejos-MolinaRicardo Castillejos-Molina More articles by this author , Guillermo Feria-BernalGuillermo Feria-Bernal More articles by this author , and Francisco Rodriguez-CovarrubiasFrancisco Rodriguez-Covarrubias More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.2052AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The prevalence of microscopic hematuria varies from 0.19% to 21% depending on the studied population. In patients without risk factors for primary renal disease, a complete urologic evaluation should be performed, and this includes imaging of the upper urinary tract followed by cystoscopic examination. Nevertheless, this recommendation was established before the widespread use of computed tomographic urography (CTU), which seems to provide accurate information of the urinary tract anatomy including the bladder. Some authors report very high performance of CTU making controversial the need of cystoscopy. Our objective was to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, and accuracy of CTU for the detection of bladder tumors in patients with microscopic hematuria. METHODS Institutional review board approval was obtained for this retrospective review of medical records of patients with microscopic hematuria initially evaluated with CTU and cystoscopy afterwards from January 2006 to April 2009. Patients with history of macroscopic hematuria in the last year or with urinary tract infection were excluded. A total of 101 patients were eligible for analysis. Official radiologist report of CTU detecting a bladder lesion suspicious of malignancy was considered positive. Since cystoscopy is the gold standard for the evaluation of bladder pathology, this study was considered the control. Cystoscopy was classified as positive when a lesion requiring biopsy or resection was found. Performance characteristics of CTU were determined by using the cystoscopic findings. RESULTS There were three CTU positive reports, two of which were confirmed by cystoscopy (true positive). In 3 additional patients CTU failed to detect a bladder tumor. The histologic report was transitional cell carcinoma in 3 patients, 1 papilloma, and 1 malacoplakia. Based on these results the CTU sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for bladder tumor detection is 40%, 99%, 67%, 97%, and 96%. CONCLUSIONS Although CTU has a high specificity, its sensitivity is limited. For this reason conventional cystoscopy should be considered the standard for the initial evaluation for patients with microscopic hematuria. Mexico City, Mexico© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 183Issue 4SApril 2010Page: e783 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Bernardo Aguilar-Davidov More articles by this author Jose Arturo Ramirez-Muciño More articles by this author Mariano Sotomayor More articles by this author Ricardo Castillejos-Molina More articles by this author Guillermo Feria-Bernal More articles by this author Francisco Rodriguez-Covarrubias More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract