Complete Early Virological Response Research Articles

1423 INTERIM ANALYSIS OF AN INTERFERON (IFN)- AND RIBAVIRIN (RBV)-FREE REGIMEN OF DACLATASVIR (DCV), ASUNAPREVIR (ASV), AND BMS-791325 IN TREATMENT-NAIVE, HEPATITIS C VIRUS GENOTYPE 1-INFECTED PATIENTS

13.6±1.8 g/dL [8.8–17.5], respectively. After 12W, a complete early virological response was obtained in 34 (83%) boceprevir patients and in 35 (61%) telaprevir patients (p = 0.026). Among 17 boceprevir and 16 telaprevir patients, 14 (82%) and 7 (43%) achieved an end of treatment response (EOT) with an undetetectable viral load, respectively (p = 0.032). Among 9 boceprevir and 5 telaprevir patients, 6 and 1 achieved SVR12, respectively. Among 6 patients in the boceprevir group, 3 achieved SVR24. In the telaprevir group, 29 patients discontinued therapy (serious adverse events, n = 13; virological breakthrough, n = 6; non-response, n = 9). In the boceprevir group, 14 patients discontinued therapy (serious adverse events, n = 5; virological breakthrough, n = 2; non-response, n = 4; retransplantation, n = 1). Four patients died in a context of infectious disorders: boceprevir, n = 2 (W20/W24); telaprevir, n = 2 (W2/W9). The most common side effect was anemia in 85% of patients: 95% and 96% in boceprevir and telaprevir groups received erythropoietin alone or combined with ribavirin dose reduction. Conclusion: In liver transplanted patients, EOT rate was 82% and 38% with boceprevir and telaprevir, respectively. Among the overall population, 44% of patients discontinued therapy because of treatment failure or occurrence of serious adverse events.

1424 SYNERGISTIC INTERACTIONS OF HCV NS5A REPLICATION COMPLEX INHIBITORS SENSITIZE RESISTANT VARIANTS AND ENHANCE THE EFFICACY OF DACLATASVIR (DCV, BMS-790052) IN VITRO AND IN VIVO

13.6±1.8 g/dL [8.8–17.5], respectively. After 12W, a complete early virological response was obtained in 34 (83%) boceprevir patients and in 35 (61%) telaprevir patients (p = 0.026). Among 17 boceprevir and 16 telaprevir patients, 14 (82%) and 7 (43%) achieved an end of treatment response (EOT) with an undetetectable viral load, respectively (p = 0.032). Among 9 boceprevir and 5 telaprevir patients, 6 and 1 achieved SVR12, respectively. Among 6 patients in the boceprevir group, 3 achieved SVR24. In the telaprevir group, 29 patients discontinued therapy (serious adverse events, n = 13; virological breakthrough, n = 6; non-response, n = 9). In the boceprevir group, 14 patients discontinued therapy (serious adverse events, n = 5; virological breakthrough, n = 2; non-response, n = 4; retransplantation, n = 1). Four patients died in a context of infectious disorders: boceprevir, n = 2 (W20/W24); telaprevir, n = 2 (W2/W9). The most common side effect was anemia in 85% of patients: 95% and 96% in boceprevir and telaprevir groups received erythropoietin alone or combined with ribavirin dose reduction. Conclusion: In liver transplanted patients, EOT rate was 82% and 38% with boceprevir and telaprevir, respectively. Among the overall population, 44% of patients discontinued therapy because of treatment failure or occurrence of serious adverse events.

Relevance of the Core 70 and IL-28B polymorphism and response-guided therapy of peginterferon alfa-2a ± ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C of Genotype 1b: a multicenter randomized trial, ReGIT-J study

BackgroundWe conducted a multicenter randomized clinical trial to determine the optimal treatment strategy against chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) with genotype 1b and a high viral load (G1b/high).MethodsThe study subjects included 153 patients with G1b/high. Patients were initially treated with PEG-IFNα-2a alone and then randomly assigned to receive different treatment regimens. Ribavirin (RBV) was administered to all patients with HCV RNA at week 4. Patients negative for HCV RNA at week 4 were randomly assigned to receive PEG-IFNα-2a (group A) or PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV (group B). Patients who showed HCV RNA at week 4 but were negative at week 12 were randomly assigned to receive weekly PEG-IFNα-2a (group C) or biweekly therapy (group D). Patients who showed HCV RNA at week 12 but were negative at week 24 were randomly assigned to receive PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV (group E) or PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV/fluvastatin (group F).ResultsOverall, the rate of sustained virological response (SVR) was 46 % (70/153). The total SVR rate in the group (A, D, and F) of response-guided therapy was significantly higher than that in the group (B, C, and E) of conventional therapy [70 % (38/54) versus 52 % (32/61), p = 0.049]. Although IL28-B polymorphism and Core 70 mutation were significantly associated with efficacy, patients with rapid virological response (RVR) and complete early virological response (cEVR) achieved high SVR rates regardless of their status of IL-28B polymorphism and Core 70 mutation.ConclusionIn addition to knowing the IL-28B polymorphism and Core 70 mutation status, understanding the likelihood of virological response during treatment is critical in determining the appropriate treatment strategy.

DGI-003 Analysis of Clinical Effectiveness of Treatment with Peginterferon Plus Ribavirin in Chronic Hepatitis C Mono-Infected Patients

Background Pegylated interferon (Peg-INF) in combination with ribavirin (RBV) is currently the gold standard treatment in chronic hepatitis C (HCV) patients, achieving viral eradication in approximately 50–60% of patients in...

A multicenter survey of re‐treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin combination therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C in Japan

This study aimed to clarify the factors associated the efficacy of re-treatment with pegylated interferon (PEG IFN) plus ribavirin combination therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C who had failed to respond to previous treatment. One hundred and forty-three patients who had previously shown relapse (n = 79), non-response (n = 34) or intolerance (n = 30) to PEG IFN plus ribavirin were re-treated with PEG IFN plus ribavirin. Twenty-five patients with intolerance to previous treatment completed re-treatment and the sustained virological response (SVR) rates were 55% and 80% for hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 and 2, respectively. On re-treatment of the 113 patients who completed the previous treatment, the SVR rates were 48% and 63% for genotype 1 and 2, respectively. Relapse after previous treatment and a low baseline HCV RNA level on re-treatment were associated with SVR in genotype 1 (P < 0.001). Patients with the interleukin-28B major genotype responded significantly better and earlier to re-treatment, but the difference in the SVR rate did not reach a significant level between the major and minor genotypes (P = 0.09). Extended treatment of 72 weeks raised the SVR rate among the patients who attained complete early virological response but not rapid virological response with re-treatment (72 weeks, 73%, 16/22, vs 48 weeks, 38%, 5/13, P < 0.05). Relapse after previous treatment and a low baseline HCV RNA level have predictive values for a favorable response of PEG IFN plus ribavirin re-treatment for HCV genotype 1 patients. Re-treatment for 72 weeks may lead to clinical improvement for genotype 1 patients with complete early virological response and without rapid virological response on re-treatment.

Prediction of Sustained Virologic Response Based on Week 4 and Week 12 Response in Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 Patients Treated with Peginterferon and Ribavirin: Assessment in a Favorable IL28B Allele-Prevalent Area

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate rapid virologic response (RVR) rate after peginterferon (PegIFN) and ribavirin (RBV) dual combination therapy in Korean hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 patients whose IL28B polymorphism is generally favorable. This study also assessed the value of RVR in predicting sustained virologic response (SVR). Methods: Treatment-naïve HCV genotype 1 patients who underwent initial treatment with either PegIFN-α-2a or α-2b and RBV were retrospectively evaluated. From 148 patients, 115 met inclusion criteria for the final analysis. Results: Overall RVR rate was 47.8% and SVR rate was 67.8% (78/115). Positive RVR had the highest positive predictive value (PPV) for achieving SVR, whereas it had the lowest negative predictive value (NPV). Undetectable HCV RNA at treatment week 12, namely complete early virologic response (cEVR), had high PPV as well as high NPV. Factors predisposing SVR were absence of liver cirrhosis and achievement of RVR or cEVR. Conclusion: This study showed RVR rate close to 50% in HCV genotype 1 patients treated with dual combination therapy in the region where favorable IL28B polymorphism is reported to be as high as 90%. Even for the patients who failed to achieve RVR, positive cEVR demonstrated a fair chance of achieving SVR.

Alanine aminotransferase normalization at week 8 predicts viral response during hepatitis C treatment

To investigate alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and sustained virological response (SVR) in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) during peginterferon-ribavirin treatment. One hundred and fifty-one genotype 1 CHC patients underwent treatment for 48 wk with peginterferon and ribavirin, and were retrospectively divided into two groups as having a rapid virological response (RVR) (Group 1, n = 52) and not having an RVR (Group 2, n = 99). We also subdivided each group into two according to the initial ALT level being high (Group 1h and Group 2h) or normal (Group 1n and Group 2n). HCV RNA and ALT levels were measured at baseline; at 4, 12, 24 and 48 wk during the treatment period; and at 24 wk follow-up. ALT levels were also obtained at 8 wk. According to the results of ALT, patients were enrolled in either the follow-up abnormal or follow-up normalized ALT groups at each interval. Patients with high and normal ALT levels were compared for each interval in terms of SVR. The SVR rates were 83% vs 40% (P = 0.000), 82% vs 84% (P = 0.830), and 37% vs 44% (P = 0.466) when comparing Group 1 with 2, 1h with 1n, and 2h with 2n, respectively. In Group 2h, the SVR rates were 34% vs 40% (P = 0.701), 11% vs 52% (P = 0.004), 12% vs 50% (P = 0.007), 7% vs 50% (P = 0.003), 6% vs 53% (P = 0.001), and 0% vs 64% (P = 0.000) when comparing patients with high and normalized ALT levels at week 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 and 72, respectively. The multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that RVR (OR = 7.05; 95%CI: 3.1-16.05, P = 0.000), complete early virological response (cEVR) (OR = 17.55; 95%CI: 6.32-48.76, P = 0.000), normalization of ALT at 8 wk (OR = 3.04; 95%CI: 1.31-7.06, P = 0.008), and at 12 wk (OR = 4.21; 95%CI: 1.65-10.76, P = 0.002) were identified as independent significant predictive factors for SVR. Normalization of ALT at 8 wk may predict viral response during peginterferon-ribavirin treatment in genotype-1 CHC patients especially without RVR.

Predictors of Complete Early Virological Response to Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin in Egyptian Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 4

We aim to determine the baseline factors associated with partial and cEVR by analyzing the data of 1861 Egyptian patients treated for 12 weeks with a course of Peg-IFN plus RBV. Base line data of 1861 Egyptian patients with chronic hepatitis C coming at Cairo-Fatemic Hospital for HCV treatment were studied including full clinical, Ultrasonographic examination, laboratory evaluation and liver biopsy. The most significant variables in relation to complete early virological response were low Hb level (13 gm/dl) with p 0.01, the stage of fibrosis p value p value were associated with less achievement of c EVR. We conclude that identifying the most significant predictors of response such as Hb, stage of fibrosis F, at baseline before initiating treatment is mandatory to predict which patient will be more expected to achieve a cEVR and thus reducing the side-effects and healthcare costs associated with interferon therapies.

Addition of Nitazoxanide to PEG-IFN and Ribavirin to Improve HCV Treatment Response in HIV-1 and HCV Genotype 1 Coinfected Persons Naïve to HCV Therapy: Results of the ACTG A5269 Trial

Background: We hypothesized that nitazoxanide (NTZ) added to pegylated interferon alfa-2a (PEG-IFN) and weight-based ribavirin (WBR) would improve hepatitis C virus (HCV) virologic responses in HCV treatment-naïve HIV-1/HCV genotype 1 coinfected persons. Methods: Prospective, single-arm study in which subjects received 4-week lead-in (NTZ 500 mg twice daily) followed by 48 weeks of NTZ, PEG-IFN, and WBR. We compared the HCV virologic responses of these subjects to historical controls from the completed ACTG study A5178 who received PEG-IFN and WBR and had similar subject characteristics. Primary endpoints were early virologic response and complete early virologic response (EVR and cEVR). Results: Among 67 subjects (78% male; 48% Black; median age, 50 years), EVR was achieved in 65.7% (90% CI, 55.0%–75.3%), cEVR in 38.8% (28.8%–49.6%). and SVR in 32.8% (23.4%–43.5%). EVR was higher with NTZ (51.4% in A5178; P = .03), but the sustained virologic response (SVR) proportion was similar (27.3% in A5178; P = .24). In contrast to A5178, SVR was similar across IL28B genotypes. Overall, NTZ was safe and well-tolerated. Conclusion: Whereas EVR proportion improved significantly in this pilot study, the addition of NTZ to PEG-IFN/WBR did not significantly improve SVR compared to historical controls. NTZ may be associated with an attenuation of the effect of IL28B on HCV treatment response.

Study of using an individualized treatment strategy to treat patients with chronic hepatitis C

To investigate the outcomes of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients treated with antiviral regimens of interferon (IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) using individualized doses and durations. This study was designed as an open-label, prospective clinical trial to analyze the virological responses of 169 CHC patients who received individualized dosages of IFNa-2b or pegylated (Peg)IFNa-2a combined with RBV based on their weight ( less than 60 kg or more than or equal to 60 kg), age (less than 65 years or 65-75 years), morbid state (liver cirrhosis or not), and complications (such as heart disease, diabetes, thyroid disorder). Treatment duration was calculated using the time required to induce HCV RNA negativity. The rates of virological response and adverse effects among the different groups were compared. The IFNa-2b treatment was given to 116 patients, and PegIFNa-2a was given to 53 patients. Compared to the IFNa-2b group, the PegIFNa-2a group showed significantly higher rates of complete early virological response (cEVR; 76.7% vs. 92.5%, P less than 0.05) and sustained virological response (SVR; 53.6% vs. 92.3%, P less than 0.05) among the patients who had completed their course of treatment; the rapid virological response (RVR) rate was also higher for the PegIFNa-2a group but the difference did not reach statistical significance (48.7% vs. 60.4%, P more than 0.05). Seventy-eight patients received the routine dose, and 91 patients received the low dose; there were no significant differences between these two groups for RVR (53.8% vs. 58.9%, P more than 0.05), cEVR (78.0% vs. 80.8%, P more than 0.05), or SVR (65.5% vs. 58.3%, P more than 0.05). Use of an individualized antiviral treatment strategy designed according to the patient's baseline condition, early viral kinetics, and tolerability to adverse reactions can achieve a high rate of SVR, as well as improve the safety, prognosis, and cost-effectiveness associated with treating CHC patients.

Combination of fluvastatin with pegylated interferon/ribavirin therapy reduces viral relapse in chronic hepatitis C infected with HCV genotype 1b

Although the anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) effect of statins in vitro and clinical efficacy of fluvastatin combined with Pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN)/ribavirin therapy for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) have been reported, the details of clinical presentation are largely unknown. We focused on viral relapse that influences treatment outcome, and performed a post-hoc analysis by using data from a randomized controlled trial. Thirty-four patients in the fluvastatin group and 33 patients in the non-fluvastatin group who achieved virological response (complete early virological response [cEVR] or late virological response [LVR]) with PEG-IFN/ribavirin therapy were subjected to this analysis. Factors contributing to viral relapse were identified by using multiple logistic regression analysis. Relapse rate in patients with cEVR was significantly lower in the fluvastatin group (2 of 23, 8.7%) than in the non-fluvastatin group (9 of 26, 34.6%; P = 0.042). The use of fluvastatin decreased relapse rate in patients with LVR (27.3% vs 57.1%), though not significantly. Overall, relapse rate was significantly lower in the fluvastatin group (14.7%; 5 of 34) than in the non-fluvastatin group (39.4%; 13 of 33; P = 0.027). Multivariate analysis identified absence of fluvastatin (P = 0.027, odds ratio [OR] = 3.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05-15.11) and low total ribavirin dose (P = 0.002, OR = 2.41, 95% CI = 1.38-4.19) as independent factors contributing to relapse. The concomitant addition of fluvastatin significantly suppressed viral relapse, resulting in the improvement of sustained virological response rate, in PEG-IFN/ribavirin therapy for CHC patients with HCV genotype 1b and high viral load.

Fluvastatin helps interferon‐based therapy in chronic hepatitis C: Fact or fiction?

Fluvastatin helps interferon‐based therapy in chronic hepatitis <scp>C</scp>: Fact or fiction?

Profound week 4 interferon responsiveness is mandatory for hepatitis C genotype 1 patients with unfavorable IL-28B genotype

BackgroundViral kinetics and host interleukin 28B (IL-28B) genotype determine treatment outcome in hepatitis C virus genotype 1 (HCV-1) infection. ObjectivesWe aimed to explore the interplay between interferon responsiveness at treatment week 4 and IL28B genotype in the achievement of a sustained virological response (SVR; undetectable HCV RNA 24-weeks after end-of-treatment). Study designsRs8099917 genotypes were determined in 528 HCV-1 patients with peginterferon/ribavirin. Interferon responsiveness were evaluated by the degree of week 4 viral reduction: <1 log10 IU/mL, 1–2 logs10 IU/mL, 2–3 logs10 IU/mL, 3–4 logs10 IU/mL and ≥4 logs10 IU/mL reduction and/or undetectable HCV RNA, respectively. ResultsThe SVR rate was significantly higher in patients with great interferon responsiveness at week 4. A great interferon responsiveness was associated with younger age (P<0.0001), lower body mass index (P=0.0056), lower aspartate aminotransferase levels (P=0.0009), higher hemogloblin concentration (P=0.0033), higher platelet counts (P<0.0001), male gender (P<0.0001) and rs809997 TT-genotype (P<0.0001). Comparing to non-TT genotype patients, TT genotype patients had a significantly higher SVR rate with moderate viral reduction (1–3 logs10 IU/mL) at week 4 (58.9% vs. 18.2%, P<0.001), and the SVR rate did not differ between TT/non-TT patients on the extreme ends (<1 or >3 log10 IU/mL reduction) of week 4 interferon responsiveness. For non-TT genotype carriers who were with <3 logs10 reduction, none (0/15) could have a complete early virological response and only 10.9% (7/64) of the patients had an SVR. ConclusionsMore profound interferon responsiveness is mandatory for HCV-1 patients with unfavorable IL-28B genotype.

Efficacy and Safety of Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a or Alfa-2b Plus Ribavirin for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to examine the efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) alfa-2a and peg-IFN alfa-2b plus ribavirin (RBV) in children and adolescents with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. Clinical trials examining peg-IFN alfa-2a or peg-IFN alfa-2b plus RBV among persons ages 3-18 years with HCV were included. Data were abstracted for complete early virologic response (EVR), sustained virologic response (SVR), relapse, treatment discontinuations, hematologic and dermatologic adverse events, and growth inhibition. Eight trials met the inclusion criteria. Results indicate that 70% of subjects (95% confidence interval [CI], 58%-81%) achieved EVR, and 58% (95% CI, 53%-64%) achieved SVR. EVR and SVR were higher for those with HCV genotypes 2/3 than 1/4. Discontinuation due to adverse events and discontinuation due to viral breakthrough were each 4%, discontinuation due to a lack of response was 15%, and relapse was 7%. Anemia, neutropenia, leukopenia, and thrombcytopenia were 11%, 32%, 52%, and 5%, respectively. Alopecia, injection site erythema, and pruritus were 13%, 27%, and 10%, respectively. Small growth inhibitions were observed during treatment. The results of this meta-analysis indicate that peg-IFN/RBV combination treatment is effective and safe in treating children and adolescents with HCV.

Ramsay Hunt syndrome with trochlear nerve involvement and EEG abnormalities: Multicranial neuritis or encephalitis?

Viral kinetics and host interleukin 28B (IL-28B) genotype determine treatment outcome in hepatitis C virus genotype 1 (HCV-1) infection.We aimed to explore the interplay between interferon responsiveness at treatment week 4 and IL28B genotype in the achievement of a sustained virological response (SVR; undetectable HCV RNA 24-weeks after end-of-treatment).Rs8099917 genotypes were determined in 528 HCV-1 patients with peginterferon/ribavirin. Interferon responsiveness were evaluated by the degree of week 4 viral reduction: <1 log10 IU/mL, 1–2 logs10 IU/mL, 2–3 logs10 IU/mL, 3–4 logs10 IU/mL and ≥4 logs10 IU/mL reduction and/or undetectable HCV RNA, respectively.The SVR rate was significantly higher in patients with great interferon responsiveness at week 4. A great interferon responsiveness was associated with younger age (P < 0.0001), lower body mass index (P = 0.0056), lower aspartate aminotransferase levels (P = 0.0009), higher hemogloblin concentration (P = 0.0033), higher platelet counts (P < 0.0001), male gender (P < 0.0001) and rs809997 TT-genotype (P < 0.0001). Comparing to non-TT genotype patients, TT genotype patients had a significantly higher SVR rate with moderate viral reduction (1–3 logs10 IU/mL) at week 4 (58.9% vs. 18.2%, P < 0.001), and the SVR rate did not differ between TT/non-TT patients on the extreme ends (<1 or >3 log10 IU/mL reduction) of week 4 interferon responsiveness. For non-TT genotype carriers who were with <3 logs10 reduction, none (0/15) could have a complete early virological response and only 10.9% (7/64) of the patients had an SVR.More profound interferon responsiveness is mandatory for HCV-1 patients with unfavorable IL-28B genotype.

Peginterferon-α-2b and Ribavirin for Hepatitis C Recurrence Postorthotopic Liver Transplantation

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of peginterferon-α-2b plus ribavirin in patients with recurrent hepatitis C after orthotopic liver transplant. Reinfection of liver allografts in hepatitis C virus -infected transplant recipients begins immediately after transplantation. Treatment of these patients is challenging because of poor tolerability. A multicenter, open-label study enrolling patients with persistent viremia after primary orthotopic liver transplant for cirrhosis related to hepatitis C virus infection. Patients received peginterferon-α-2b (1.5 µg/kg/wk) plus ribavirin (400 to 1200 mg/d administered using a dose-escalating regimen and according to body weight) for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response (SVR). In total, 125 patients started treatment and 58.4% completed 48 weeks. SVR rate was 28.8% (G1, 23.8%; G2/3, 55.0%), end-of-treatment response rate was 40.8%, and relapse rate was 18.2%. SVR was 55% among patients who completed treatment. Genotype 2/3 infection, male sex, baseline hemoglobin>14 g/dL, 80:80:80 compliance, rapid virologic response (RVR), and complete early virologic response (cEVR) were predictors of SVR. SVR was higher among patients with RVR compared with those without RVR (83.3% vs. 25.7%; P=0.0098), and among patients with cEVR compared with those without EVR (66.7% vs. 1.8%; P<0.0001). Thirty-eight patients discontinued because of an adverse event and 69 required dose reduction or interruption. Anemia (74%) and neutropenia (30%) were common, and rejection was low (3.2%). SVR was low in this study. Anemia was a particular challenge in achieving maximal ribavirin therapeutic exposure and may account in part for the lower SVR.

Interleukin 28B Genetic Polymorphisms Play a Minor Role in Identifying Optimal Treatment Duration in HCV Genotype 1 Slow Responders to Pegylated Interferon plus Ribavirin

Pegylated interferon and ribavirin for 72 weeks improve sustained virological response (SVR) in HCV genotype 1 (HCV-1) slow viral responders. Whether interleukin 28B (IL28B) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes and on-treatment viral responses can identify non-rapid virological response (RVR) patients who benefit from 48 or 72 weeks of therapy remains unclear. Treatment-naive HCV-1 patients who failed to achieve RVR were randomly assigned to receive 48 (n=168) or 72 (n=167) weeks of therapy. Baseline factors and on-treatment virological responses at weeks 8 and 12 were evaluated for SVR in 289 compliant patients who received ≥80% of drug dosages and treatment duration, and had end of follow-up viral response. The stratified SVR rates for independent factors were compared by treatment duration. Treatment duration, IL28B rs8099917 genotypes, cirrhosis, week-8 viral response (undetectable HCV RNA at treatment week 8) and complete early virological response (cEVR) predicted SVR. In week-8 viral response patients, the SVR rates of 72-week and 48-week treatment were similar (75-88%), regardless of IL28B SNP genotypes or cirrhosis. In non-week-8 viral response patients who achieved cEVR, the SVR rate of 72-week treatment was higher than that of 48-week treatment for non-cirrhotic patients, regardless of IL28B SNP genotypes (91-100% versus 13-44%; P=0.001). Although IL28B SNP genotypes predict SVR, they play a minor role when on-treatment viral responses are taken into consideration. On-treatment viral responses at weeks 8 and 12 are the key determinants to decide the optimal treatment duration in HCV-1 patients without RVR.

Results of antiviral treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C: experience of Poznan centre

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in Poland affects approximately 750 thousand persons. The prevention of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, of which approximately 20% of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus are at risk, aims at eradication of the virus by applying antiviral treatment with pegylated interferon alpha with ribavirin. In this paper the results of the standard treatment of chronic hepatitis C in a population of 169 adult patients in whom it was started in the period of 01.01.2007-30.06.2008 are analyzed. Moreover, the influence of various clinical, biochemical and viral factors on achieving therapeutic success in the form of the sustained virological response (SVR) was studied. In the group of 128 patients who received the full course of antiviral treatment, the SVR was achieved by 67.2% of patients (86 persons), whereas regarding all 169 patients who started the therapy, the sustained disappearance of viremia was found in 53.2% of patients (90 persons). Regarding 155 persons in whom the treatment was not interrupted for reasons others than virology, this value was 55.5%. For the sustained disappearance of viremia the following was favorable: genotype 3 virus, age under 40 years, body mass up to 75 kg, correct value of body mass index (BMI), low gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGTP) activity before the treatment, minimum advancement of liver fibrosis in a liver biopsy (S1), complete early biochemical response (cEBR), and moreover, the achievement of negation of viremia after 12 weeks of the treatment in a group of patients infected with genotype 1 (complete early virological response, cEVR). These factors were strongly correlated with each other and that is why an analysis by the method of logistic multiple regression was impossible. Adverse reactions to the treatment and other health problems were the reasons for earlier discontinuation of the standard therapeutic scheme in 14 patients, whereby the lack of an SVR occurred in 10 of them (71.5% which is 5.9% of the studied population).

Treatment extension may benefit female genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C patients with complete early virological response to peginterferon‐alpha‐2b and ribavirin combination therapy

Little is known about the appropriate use of peginterferon-α-2b (PEG IFN-α-2b) or ribavirin (RBV) in genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C (CH-C) patients with complete early virological response (cEVR). Female patients, especially the older, are known to experience inferior treatment outcomes. A total of 150 CH-C patients with cEVR treated for 48 weeks (n = 104) or 52-64 weeks (n = 46) with PEG IFN-α-2b and RBV combination therapy were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the benefits of extended treatment. In the 48-week group, patients without a sustained virological response (SVR) were more often female (P = 0.004) and had received a significantly lower total RBV dose (P = 0.003) than those with SVR. The SVR rate in these female patients was similar to males with hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA negativity at treatment week 8 (P = 0.413); however, it was lower than that in males with HCV RNA negativity at treatment week 12 (P = 0.005). In the 52-64-week group, although the total RBV dose (mg/kg) after treatment week 48 was less in females than in males (P = 0.027), the SVR rate in females was equivalent to that in males (P = 0.604). Genotype 1 CH-C patients treated with PEG IFN-α-2b and RBV combination therapy without SVR were more often female and had received a lower total RBV dose than males. The smaller SVR rate in female patients with cEVR compared to males may be overcome by extending treatment even if the RBV dose is lowered due to anemia.

Genetic Factors and Hepatitis C Virus Infection

It is now possible to comprehensively screen the human genome for genetic variation that influences the outomes of human disease and pharmacotherapy. The most opular approach remains the genome-wide association tudy (GWAS), in which many hundreds of thousands of enetic markers, representing common variation across he genome, are tested for association with disease. Two uccess stories of the GWAS era are reviewed here: the iscoveries of the association between interleukin-28B IL28B) polymorphism and peginterferon(pegIFN) and ribavirin (RBV) treatment response for genotype 1 HCV, as well as spontaneous clearance of acute HCV infection, and the association between inosine triphosphatase (ITPA) variation and RBV-induced hemolytic anemia. The discovery that IL28B variation is associated with the response to treatment with peginterferon alfa (pegIFN) and ribavirin (RBV) for genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV) was made by 4 independent groups in late 2009 and early 2010.1–4 All identified single nucleotide polymorphisms SNPs) that tag a haplotype block on chromosome 19 spaning IL28B, coding for IFN3, and which strongly predict the outcomes for treatment of chronic genotype 1 HCV infection. Individuals who carry the good response variant have an approximately 2-fold higher rate of sustained virological response (SVR) (Table 1). The top discovery SNPs identified in the GWAS included rs129798601 and rs80999171–4 (note that rs12979860 was only included on the enotyping chip used for the Ge study; rs8099917 was included n the genotyping chips used in all 4 studies). A more compreensive discussion of GWAS methodology is detailed in Manoio et al,5 Pearson et al,6 and Hardy et al.7 In most populations, these 2 SNPs are in strong linkage disequilibrium and are similarly informative, the exception being individuals of African American ancestry, where rs12979860 is more closely associated with treatment outcome. The frequency of the good response allele differs according to ethnic background; it is more common in individuals of Asian Caucasian Hispanic African ancestry.1,8 IL28B allele frequency explains much of the difference in treatment response rates that have been observed between different populations. The good response variant was also noted to be less common among individuals chronically infected with HCV than healthy controls,1 consistent with geetic selection. IL28B variation was subsequently found to be ssociated with spontaneous clearance of HCV infection as ell.4,8–10 The effect size is similar, with patients carrying the ood response variant being 2-fold more likely to naturally clear cute infection. IL28B polymorphism is strongly associated with the iral kinetics of IFN response, where the major influence f the good response variant is to enhance phase 1 deline,11 increasing the rates of critical on-treatment milestones and decreasing relapse (Table 1).12 IL28B genotype is the strongest pretreatment predictor of IFN responsiveness.12 Once treatment has been started, on-treatment iral decline remains the strongest predictor of viral clearnce. Patients carrying the good response IL28B variant re more likely to achieve week-4 rapid virological reponse and week-12 complete early virological response, ut once these milestones have been achieved, SVR rates re high regardless of IL28B genotypes (Table 1). IL28B enotyping and on-treatment viral kinetics can therefore e considered complementary, one being informative prereatment, the other requiring a trial of treatment. The association between IL28B genotype and pegIFN nd RBV treatment response has been considered in a umber of different clinical scenarios. IL28B genotype is relevant to the outcomes of pegIFN and RBV treatment for genotype 1 HCV patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus, with similar effect size to that seen in HCV monoinfection.13 It is also relevant to the treatment of genotype 1 HCV in patients after orthotopic liver transplantation.14,15 Both donor and recipient IL28B genotypes have an additive influence on IFN treatment