MEDIEVAL London was proportionately more dominated by fish and flesh sales than it is today. As early as the twelfth century, Eastcheap was almost entirely a meat market and Philip E. Jones expresses some surprise that the East side of the City had developed in this way, since it was furthest from supplies in Smithfield.' Fishmongers, too, were found at Eastcheap, while in West Cheap poulterers traded and to the West again, closer to Smithfield, was another enclave of Butchers and Fishmongers in the Shambles of St. Nicholas, which today is Newgate Street, Holborn. (Illustration 1) In 1283 a grant given by Edward I established a further market between the two already there, on an open space known as Les Stokkes. The market house built by the City was rented to a fishmonger, John Benere, and six others, to sub-let for both fish and flesh sales. There was room for seventy-one stalls inside and over twenty inferior places outside in this new market which continued alongside those already in use. It seems quite extraordinary that such accommodation was needed; most other traders were limited to a single street, and the proliferation of food markets makes one think that from the thirteenth century on Londoners expected a remarkably high standard of diet. Initially, Fishmongers were even better provided. They also had Bridge Street, Old Fish Street and Stock-fishmonger's Row by London Bridge. A charter of 1399 tried to limit them to Bridge Street, Old Fish and Les Stokkes, but in 1416 attempts were still being made to keep them to their five main venues. Information from disputes in Les Stokkes leads me to the conclusion that on meat days the Butchers used most of the better stalls, and on fish days, when meat was still allowed to the sick and to children under thirteen, the Butchers so licensed moved to the inferior positions. Although the authorities treated fish and flesh as one trade and of necessity Butchers and Fishmongers normally worked together amicably, competitive tensions, which could be called those between Carnival and Lent, inevitably broke out in their trading situations. One repeated quarrel was the question of who was to have the dominant selling places on the Eves of Christmas and Easter; the point being whether it was more correct, on the day before a return to meat, to observe the fast of the day in question, or to anticipate the feast of the following day. This was an annual dispute from 1361 with the Butchers eventually obtaining Easter Eve, but in 1443, two days before the Feast of St. Bartholomew, one fishmonger was wounded and the Butchers were constrained to enter into a bond to keep the peace. There was also as much conflict between Butchers and the Citizens of London on account of the smell of the trade. In Erasmus' Colloquy A Fish Diet the Fishmonger taunts his rival with the comment that 'people would rather have ten pimps than one butcher for a neighbour'.2 In the London Shambles slaughtering was done without access to the river and resulted in notorious byways, such as Stinking Lane, and rotting detritus which found its way into the Grey Friars garden. As an Ordinance of 1361, which introduced measures to improve sanitation, put it, 'the slaughter of cattle caused an