AbstractThe reaction of (OC)4Re[μ‐E‐HCC(CO2Me)CS2]Re(CO)4, 1 with EtNH2 yielded two new complexes: Re(CO)4[C(H)C(CO2Me)C(NHEt)S], 2, (52%) and Re(CO)3(NH2Et)[C(H)C(CO2Me)C(NHEt)=S], 3a (24%) by competitive attack of the EtNH2 at the dithiocarboxylate grouping and at the hydrogen substituted olefinic carbon atom in 1. In both cases there is a loss of one of the rhenium groupings. The reaction of the sulfurized and oxygenated derivatives of 1, (OC)4Re[EC(H)C(CO2Me)CS2]Re(CO)4, 4a (E=S), 4b (E=O) with EtNH2 yielded Re(CO)4[C(H)=C(CO2Me)C(NHEt)=S], 5a, the parent carbonyl of 3a, by exclusive attack of the amine at the hydrogen substituted olefinic carbon atom. The reaction of (OC)4Re[μ‐SC(S)C(CO2Me)C(H)S]Re(CO)4,6a (an isomer of 4a) with EtNH2 produced a similar result. The reaction of 4a with Et2NH yielded Re(CO)4[μ‐S2C=C(CO2Me)C=NEt2], 5b an N‐ethyl substituted derivative of 5a. These results indicate that the addition of certain heteroatoms can have a directing effect upon the reactivity of these compounds with amines. Compounds 2 and 5a were characterized by single crystal x‐ray diffraction analyses. Crystal Data: For 2: space group = P1, a = 10.782(1) Å, b = 14.721(2) Å, c = 9.940(2) Å, a = 91.57(1)°, β = 93.61(1)°, γ = 70.774(9)°, Z = 4, 4516 reflections, R = 0.047 and for 5a: space group = P21/n, a = 11.389(2) Å, b = 9.660(2) Å, c = 14.756(3) Å, β = 103.36(2)°, Z = 4, 1601 reflections, R = 0.022.