Community Nursing Homes Research Articles

Nursing Documentation of Telephone Communication With Physicians in Community Nursing Homes

Objective The objective of this study was to describe the nursing documentation of telephone communication with physicians in community nursing homes. Design We conducted a prospective observational study evaluating nursing documentation of all telephone calls to one physician group. Setting We studied two proprietary community nursing homes in Baltimore, Maryland. Measurements Data were collected by physicians at the time of each call regarding the time, day, nursing facility, reason for the call, and any orders given. Calls were also categorized as to whether documentation was necessary by defined criteria. The nursing home charts were then reviewed for the presence of documentation of 1) the issue that prompted the call, 2) physician's participation in the matter, and 3) any orders given by the physician. The relationships between the characteristics of the telephone calls and the rates of documentation were then analyzed. Results There were 248 calls from the two nursing homes during the 2-month study period. Nursing documentation of the issue that prompted the call was present for 80% of total calls. This documentation was more likely to be present with calls for change of patient status and notification of laboratory/radiograph results compared with calls for other issues (117 of 125 [94%] vs. 57 of 63 [90%] vs. 24 of 60 [40%], respectively; χ 2 = 78.3, P 2 = 60.8, P 2 = 10.0, P = 0.007). Physicians indicated that orders were given during 69% of calls, but orders were only documented for 79% of these interactions. No characteristics of the call were associated with likelihood of order documentation. Conclusions In this study, documentation of issues that lead to telephone calls to physicians was not always present. Similarly, orders given by the physician were absent over 20% of the time. Nurses, physicians, and facilities should develop efficient and routine strategies to optimize rates of documentation of telephone communication with physicians.

Nursing documentation of telephone communication with physicians in community nursing homes.

The objective of this study was to describe the nursing documentation of telephone communication with physicians in community nursing homes. We conducted a prospective observational study evaluating nursing documentation of all telephone calls to one physician group. We studied two proprietary community nursing homes in Baltimore, Maryland. Data were collected by physicians at the time of each call regarding the time, day, nursing facility, reason for the call, and any orders given. Calls were also categorized as to whether documentation was necessary by defined criteria. The nursing home charts were then reviewed for the presence of documentation of 1) the issue that prompted the call, 2) physician's participation in the matter, and 3) any orders given by the physician. The relationships between the characteristics of the telephone calls and the rates of documentation were then analyzed. There were 248 calls from the two nursing homes during the 2-month study period. Nursing documentation of the issue that prompted the call was present for 80% of total calls. This documentation was more likely to be present with calls for change of patient status and notification of laboratory/radiograph results compared with calls for other issues (117 of 125 [94%] vs. 57 of 63 [90%] vs. 24 of 60 [40%], respectively; chi(2) = 78.3, P <0.0001). Calls that were categorized as "documentation necessary" by the Medical Director were more likely to be documented than calls that were not (132 of 150 [88%] vs. 9 of 35 [26%], respectively; chi(2) = 60.8, P <0.001). Of the 198 calls with any form of documentation, specific mention of physician participation in the communication was present in 89% of these calls. This documentation of physician participation was more likely to be present with calls for laboratory/radiograph notification than with calls for change of patient status or calls for other reasons (57 of 57 [100%] vs. 99 of 117 [85%] vs. 20 of 24 [83%], respectively; chi(2) = 10.0, P = 0.007). Physicians indicated that orders were given during 69% of calls, but orders were only documented for 79% of these interactions. No characteristics of the call were associated with likelihood of order documentation. In this study, documentation of issues that lead to telephone calls to physicians was not always present. Similarly, orders given by the physician were absent over 20% of the time. Nurses, physicians, and facilities should develop efficient and routine strategies to optimize rates of documentation of telephone communication with physicians.

Continuity of do-not resuscitate orders between hospital and nursing home settings.

To determine the relationship between interinstitutional communication and continuity of advance directives from hospital to nursing home (NH) settings. Retrospective chart review of discharges to hospital affiliated or community NHs. Teaching Veterans Affairs Hospital and affiliated and community nursing homes. Demographic characteristics, medical diagnoses, presence of advance directives, and documentation that relates to the topic. A total of 83 patients were discharged to either setting. Before discharge to a NH, the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cancer was higher among those who had a DNR order. Overall, subsequent discussions about advance directives were equally common in NHs. Having a hospital discussion about advance directives or having a hospital DNR order were associated with a higher rate of advance directive discussions in NHs. Hospital DNR orders were continued for 93% and 41% of patients admitted to the hospital-affiliated NH compared with community NHs, respectively (P < .001). Specific communication of hospital DNR status to the receiving NH was associated with better continuity of DNR orders (49% vs 9%, P = .001). Factors that predicted continuity of DNR orders in logistic regression analysis correctly included hospital DNR status, communication of advance directives to the receiving NH, and NH advance directive discussions. There is higher continuation rate of DNR orders between the hospital under study and its affiliated NH than to community NHs despite a similar frequency of confirmation discussions. Completing advance directives before patients are discharged to NHs, communication of advance directives to the receiving NH, and follow-up discussions at the NH may improve the continuity of advance directives between hospitals and nursing homes.

Behavioral Treatments and Pharmacotherapy: Acceptability Ratings by Elderly Individuals in Residential Settings

We presented residents of a life care community and several nursing homes with written scenarios depicting a 75-year-old woman with a behavior problem. The client in the case varied by cognitive capacity (impaired or intact) and behavior problem (aggression, verbal abuse, or noncompliance). Participants rated three treatments with Kazdin's (1980) Treatment Evaluation Inventory: differential reinforcement of incompatible behavior (DRI), time-out, and haloperidol. All treatments were considered acceptable, and DRI was rated the most acceptable. Ratings for haloperidol and time-out varied by whether the case client was described as demented.