Community Nursing Homes Research Articles

COVID-19 Infection and Mortality in State Veterans Homes: A Multilevel Approach

ObjectivesSome state veterans homes (SVHs) received media attention in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic because of allegations of poor infection control and excess mortality. However, little research has investigated how these facilities differ from community nursing homes (CNHs) and what the geographical trends of these infection and mortality differences are. We aimed to test (1) whether infection was overall lower in SVHs than CNHs, (2) whether mortality was overall lower in SVHs than CNHs, as well as the geographic distribution of nursing home infection and mortality across the United States. DesignRetrospective nationwide cohort study. Setting and ParticipantsSkilled nursing facilities in the United States from May 2020 to July 2022 during the COVID-19 pandemic. MethodsUsing multilevel negative binomial regression, we modeled COVID-19 infection and mortality rates in skilled nursing homes, testing for overall SVH differences from May 2020 to July 2022, placing random effects on counties to calculate adjusted county-level infection and mortality rates. ResultsSVHs experienced 18% fewer cases but 25% more deaths overall compared with CNHs. Counties with the highest levels of facility infection, including counties with SVHs, were situated mainly in Midwestern, Atlantic, and Southern states, with the majority of counties with low infection levels in Central and Western states. Counties with the highest levels of facility mortality emerged in Rust Belt and Midwestern states down to Southern states, with the lowest levels of county-level mortality, particularly among counties containing SVHs, occurring westward to Central and Western states. Conclusion and ImplicationsSVHs experienced lower infection levels but higher mortality levels than CNHs, and fewer extremely high infection and mortality rates in counties containing SVHs despite higher mortality risk in SVHs, calling attention to unobserved facility-level differences such as gender and age distributions and future research opportunities using more granular geographical aggregations to better understand facility-level SVH risk within the broader neighborhood context.

A comparison of end-of-life care quality for Veterans receiving hospice in VA nursing homes and community nursing homes.

While the Veterans Health Administration (VA) has long provided hospice care within VA community living centers (CLCs, i.e., VA nursing homes), an increasing number of Veterans are receiving hospice in VA-contracted community nursing homes (CNHs). However, little data exist about the quality of end-of-life (EOL) care provided in CNHs. The aim of this study was to compare family ratings of the quality of EOL care provided to Veterans receiving hospice in VA CLCs and VA-contracted CNHs. We conducted a retrospective analysis of national data from VA's electronic medical record and Bereaved Family Survey (BFS) for Veterans who received hospice in VA CLCs or VA-contracted CNHs between October 2021 and March 2022. The final sample included 1238 Veterans who died in either a CLC (n = 1012) or a CNH (n = 226) and whose next-of-kin completed the BFS. Our primary outcome was the BFS global rating of care received in the last 30 days of life. Secondary outcomes included BFS items related to symptom management, communication, emotional and spiritual support, and information about burial and survivor benefits. We compared unadjusted and adjusted proportions for all BFS outcomes between those who received hospice in CLCs and CNHs. The adjusted proportion of family members who gave the best possible rating (a score of 9 or 10 out of a possible 10) for the overall care received near EOL was more than 13 percentage points higher for Veterans who received hospice in VA CLCs compared to VA-contracted CNHs. Our findings also revealed quality gaps of even greater magnitude in specific EOL care-focused domains. Our findings document inadequacies in the quality of multiple aspects of EOL care provided to Veterans in CNH-based hospice and illuminate the urgent need for policy and practice interventions to improve this care.

Barriers and facilitators to goals of care conversations with Veteran residents of community nursing homes.

Despite evidence that structured goals of care conversations (GoCCs) and documentation of life-sustaining treatment (LST) preferences improve the delivery of goal-concordant care for seriously ill patients, rates of completion remain low among nursing home residents. The Preferences Elicited and Respected for Seriously Ill Veterans through Enhanced Decision-Making (PERSIVED) program aims to improve the consistent documentation of LST preferences among Veterans receiving care in veterans affairs (VA)-paid community nursing homes (CNH); however, the barriers and facilitators of completing and documenting GoCCs in this unique context of care have not been described. We conducted semi-structured, qualitative interviews with key stakeholders of the VA CNH programs located at six VA Medical Centers between July 2021 and July 2022. With a rapid approach to analysis, interview transcripts were reduced into memo templates using the Tailored Implementation for Chronic Disease Checklist and coded and analyzed using qualitative data analysis software. The 40 participants consisted of nurses (n = 13), social workers (n = 25), and VA physicians (n = 2). Most participants felt confident about conducting GoCC; however, several barriers were identified. At the staff level, our results indicated inconsistent completion of GoCC and documentation due to a lack of training, confusion about roles and responsibilities, and challenging communication within the VA as well as with CNH. At the organizational level, there was a lack of standardization across sites for how LST preferences were documented. At the patient level, we found key barriers related to patient and family readiness and issues finding surrogate decision makers. While COVID-19 brought end-of-life issues to the forefront, lockdowns hindered communication about the goals of care. Findings from this pre-implementation evaluation revealed multi-level barriers in conducting and documenting GoCCs with Veterans receiving VA-paid CNH care, as well as several facilitators that can be used to inform strategies for improvement.

Psychometric Evaluation of the Veterans Affairs Bereaved Family Survey in Community Nursing Homes.

For over a decade, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has used the Bereaved Family Survey (BFS) to measure the quality of end-of-life (EOL) care in VA inpatient settings. In 2019, VA developed a revised version of the BFS to evaluate the quality of EOL care for Veterans who received hospice services in VA-contracted community nursing homes (CNHs). The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the psychometric properties and factor structure of the BFS-CNH. The BFS-CNH was administered to the next-of-kin of Veterans who died in a VA-contracted CNH with hospice care between October 2019 and April 2020. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used with the 10 core items of the BFS-CNH that were derived from the inpatient BFS to evaluate whether the BFS-CNH exhibited a similar factor structure to the inpatient version. Cronbach's alpha was used to assess internal consistency/reliability of the identified factors and linear regression models were used to evaluate construct validity of the identified BFS-CNH factor scores and individual items. The EFA revealed a three-dimension solution that corresponded to factors on the inpatient BFS, including Care and Communication, Emotional and Spiritual Support and Death Benefits. Cronbach's alpha coefficients for all three factors indicated acceptable internal consistency. Our findings provide support for use of the BFS-CNH to evaluate the quality of EOL care provided to Veterans in CNHs and lay the foundation for future comparisons of BFS ratings between VA inpatient and CNH settings.

Veterans Health Administration Staff Perceptions of Overseeing Care in Community Nursing Homes During COVID-19.

IntroductionThe Veterans Health Administration (VA) contracts with non-VA owned and operated community nursing homes (CNHs) to provide Veterans nursing home care. This study explored VA staffs’ experiences coordinating care with CNH staff during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsQualitative study interviewing VA staff overseeing and coordinating care for CNH Veterans. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using inductive and deductive thematic analysis.ResultsThree themes influenced care coordination. (1) Pre-established working relationships strengthened trust in CNH staff and remote access to CNH electronic medical records (EMRs). (2) Remote oversight proved challenging as virtual visits did not fully capture Veterans’ needs and Veterans experienced challenges due to cognitive status, hearing impairment, and discomfort with technology. (3) Partnerships strengthened as VA staff provided CNHs personal protective equipment, COVID-19 testing, infection control education, and emotional support.DiscussionDespite pre-existing relationships and improved partnerships, most VA staff felt uncertain about the quality of oversight provided through remote monitoring and preferred in-person interactions. However, they found benefit in remote access to CNH EMRs and shared optimism with expanding virtual care.ConclusionsFostering strong partnerships between VAs and CNHs improve care coordination during crises like the COVID-19 pandemic and for daily care.

Antipsychotic Prescribing in VA-Contracted Community Nursing Homes and Incident Use Among Veterans

Community-dwelling adults with dementia are at higher risks than counterpart without dementia of poor health outcomes, and those with dementia and co-occurring conditions face even greater risks. Optimal treatment for dementia includes functional and psychosocial support through long-term services and supports (LTSS), but use remains low. Our study investigated whether case management provided in primary care and in dementia care settings facilitated LTSS use for Veterans with dementia and comorbidities. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 2019 VA-paid health care on a cohort of Veterans with dementia, defined by clinical diagnoses (International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision). Receipt of case management was measured by whether or not a Veteran enrolled in a VA (1) home-based primary care, (2) geriatric primary care, or (3) dementia clinic. Comorbidities were measured by an adapted Elixhauser comorbidities index and dichotomized as ≤ 3 or ≥ 4 comorbidities. LTSS use was measured by whether or not Veterans used home health, home respite, adult day care, hospice, or veteran-directed care. Multivariate logistic regressions showed that LTSS use was higher for enrollees in each case management program compared to Veterans not enrolled in any. LTSS use was also higher for enrollees in each primary care program with more comorbidities than program counterparts with fewer comorbidities. Case management in primary care settings may facilitate functional and psychosocial support to meet dementia and non-dementia related needs for adults who have dementia with comorbidities.

Antipsychotic initiation and new diagnoses excluded from quality-measure reporting among Veterans in community nursing homes contracted by the Veterans Health Administration in the United States.

ObjectivesTo assess whether prevailing antipsychotic use rates in community nursing homes (CNH) influence new initiation of antipsychotics and diagnosis with antipsychotic indications among Veterans.MethodsWe used linked 2013–2016 Veterans Administration (VA) data, Medicare claims, Nursing Home Compare, and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. The exposure was the proportion (in quintiles) of all CNH residents prescribed antipsychotics in the quarter preceding a Veteran's admission date. Using adjusted logistic regression, we analyzed two outcomes measured using MDS: antipsychotic initiation, and new diagnosis of an antipsychotic quality‐measure exclusionary condition (i.e., schizophrenia, Tourette's syndrome, or Huntington's disease).ResultsAmong 8201 Veterans without an indication for antipsychotics at baseline, 21.1% initiated antipsychotics and 3.5% were newly diagnosed with any exclusionary diagnosis after CNH admission. Schizophrenia accounted for almost all (96.8%) the new diagnoses. Antipsychotic initiation increased with higher CNH antipsychotic use rates: OR = 2.55, 95% CI: 2.08–‐3.12, quintile 5 versus 1. CNHs with the highest prevalent use of antipsychotics were associated with increased odds of Veterans acquiring an exclusionary diagnosis (OR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.32–3.32, quintile 5 vs. 1).ConclusionsIncident antipsychotic use is common among Veterans admitted to CNHs. CNH antipsychotic prescribing practices are associated with Veterans being newly diagnosed with antipsychotic prescription indications, primarily schizophrenia.

Reducing Fluoroquinolone Use and Clostridioides difficile Infections in Community Nursing Homes Through Hospital–Nursing Home Collaboration

ObjectiveNursing homes (NHs) are an important target for antibiotic stewardship (AS). We describe a collaborative model to reduce Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) in NHs through optimization of antibiotic use including a reduction in high-risk antibiotics such as fluoroquinolones. DesignQuasi-experimental, pre- and post-intervention study. Setting and participantsSix NHs in Monroe County, NY. MethodsA hospital-based AS expert team assisted NHs in identifying targets for improving antibiotic use. Interventions included (1) collaboration with a medical director advisory group to develop NH consensus guidelines for testing and treatment of 2 syndromes (urinary tract infections and pneumonia) for which fluoroquinolone use is common, (2) provision of multifaceted NH staff education on these guidelines and education of residents and family members on the judicious use of antibiotics, and (3) sharing facility-specific and comparative antibiotic and CDI data. We used Poisson regression to estimate antibiotic use per 1000 resident days (RD) and CDIs per 10,000 RD, pre- and post-intervention. Segmented regression analysis was used to estimate changes in fluoroquinolone and total antibiotic rates over time. ResultsPostintervention, the monthly rate of fluoroquinolone days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 RD significantly decreased by 39% [rate ratio (RR) 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59-0.62, P < .001] across all NHs and the total antibiotic DOT decreased by 9% (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.90-0.92, P < .001). Interrupted time series analysis of fluoroquinolone and total DOT rates confirmed these changes. The quarterly CDI rate decreased by 18% (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.99, P = .042). Conclusions and implicationsA hospital-NH partnership with a medical director advisory group achieved a significant reduction in total antibiotic and fluoroquinolone use and contributed to a reduction in CDI incidence. This approach offers one way for NHs to gain access to AS expertise and resources and to standardize practices within the local community.

TRANSITIONAL CARE OUTCOMES IN VETERANS RECEIVING POST-ACUTE CARE IN A SKILLED NURSING FACILITY

More than 200,000 Veterans transition between hospital and skilled nursing facility (SNF) annually. Capturing outcomes of these transitions has been challenging because older adult Veterans receive care at VA and non-VA hospitals, and four different kinds of SNFs: VA-owned and -operated Community Living Centers (CLCs), VA-contracted community nursing homes (CNHs), State Veterans Homes (SVHs), and non-VA community SNFs. We used a novel data source which concatenates VA, Medicare, and Medicaid data into longitudinal episodes of care for Veterans, to calculate the rate of adverse outcomes associated with the transition from hospital to SNF in all enrolled Veterans age 65 and older undergoing this transition 2012-2014. The composite primary outcome included Emergency Department (ED) visits, rehospitalizations, and mortality (not in the context of hospice) within 7 days of hospital discharge to SNF. We used multivariable logistic regression to adjust for Veteran and hospital characteristics and hospital random effects. In the 388,339 Veterans discharged from 1502 hospitals in our sample, we found more than 4 in 5 Veteran transitions (81.7%) occurred entirely outside the VA system. The overall 7-day outcome rate was 10.7%. After adjustment, VA hospitals had lower adverse outcome rates than non-VA hospitals (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.74-0.86). VA hospital-CLC transitions had the lowest adverse outcome rates; in comparison, non-VA hospital-CNH (OR 2.51, 95% CI 2.09-3.02) and non-VA hospital-CLC (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.81-2.79) had the highest rates. These findings raise important questions about the VA’s role as a major provider and payer of post-acute care in SNF.

A 2-Year Pragmatic Trial of Antibiotic Stewardship in 27 Community Nursing Homes.

To determine if antibiotic prescribing in community nursing homes (NHs) can be reduced by a multicomponent antibiotic stewardship intervention implemented by medical providers and nursing staff and whether implementation is more effective if performed by a NH chain or a medical provider group. Two-year quality improvement pragmatic implementation trial with two arms (NH chain and medical provider group). A total of 27 community NHs in North Carolina that are typical of NHs statewide, conducted before announcement of the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services antibiotic stewardship mandate. Nursing staff and medical care providers in the participating NHs. Standardized antibiotic stewardship quality improvement program, including training modules for nurses and medical providers, posters, algorithms, communication guidelines, quarterly information briefs, an annual quality improvement report, an informational brochure for residents and families, and free continuing education credit. Antibiotic prescribing rates per 1000 resident days overall and by infection type; rate of urine test ordering; and incidence of Clostridium difficile and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Systemic antibiotic prescription rates decreased from baseline by 18% at 12 months (incident rate ratio [IRR] = 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.69-0.98) and 23% at 24 months (IRR = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.65-0.90). A 10% increase in the proportion of residents with the medical director as primary physician was associated with a 4% reduction in prescribing (IRR = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.92-0.99). Incidence of C. difficile and MRSA infections, hospitalizations, and hospital readmissions did not change significantly. No adverse events from antibiotic nonprescription were reported. Estimated 2-year implementation costs per NH, exclusive of medical provider time, ranged from $354 to $3653. Antibiotic stewardship programs can be successfully disseminated in community NHs through either NH administration or medical provider groups and can achieve significant reductions in antibiotic use for at least 2 years. Medical director involvement is an important element of program success. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:46-54, 2019.

Regional variation in post-stroke multidisciplinary rehabilitation care among veteran residents in community nursing homes.

IntroductionEffective post-acute multidisciplinary rehabilitation therapy improves stroke survivors’ functional recovery and daily living activities. The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) places veterans needing post-acute institutional care in private community nursing homes (CNHs). These placements are made under the same rules and regulations across the VA health care system and through individual per diem contracts between local VA facilities and CNHs. However, there is limited information about utilization of these veterans’ health services as well as the geographic variation of the service utilization.AimThe aims of this study were to determine rehabilitation therapy and restorative nursing care utilization by veterans with stroke in VA-contracted CNHs and to assess risk-adjusted regional variations in the utilization of rehabilitation therapy and restorative nursing care.MethodsThis retrospective study included all veterans diagnosed with stroke residing in VA-contracted CNHs between 2006 and 2009. Minimum Dataset (a health status assessment tool for CNH residents) for the study CNHs was linked with veterans’ inpatient and outpatient data within the VA health care system. CNHs were grouped into five VA-defined geographic regions: the North Atlantic, Southeast, Midwest, Continental, and Pacific regions. A two-part model was applied estimating risk-adjusted utilization probability and average weekly utilization days. Two dependent variables were rehabilitation therapy and restorative nursing care utilization by veterans during their CNH stays.ResultsThe study comprised 6,206 veterans at 2,511 CNHs. Rates for utilization of rehabilitation therapy and restorative nursing care were 75.7% and 30.1%, respectively. Veterans in North Atlantic and Southeast CNHs were significantly (p<0.001) more likely to receive rehabilitation therapies than veterans from other regions. However, veterans in Southeast CNHs were significantly (p<0.001) less likely to receive restorative nursing care compared with veterans in all other regions, before and after risk adjustment.ConclusionThe majority of veterans with stroke received rehabilitation therapy, and about one-third had restorative nursing care during their stay at VA-contracted CNHs. Significant regional variations in weekly days for rehabilitation therapy and restorative nursing care utilization were observed even after adjusting for potential risk factors.

Urine Culture Testing in Community Nursing Homes: Gateway to Antibiotic Overprescribing.

OBJECTIVE To describe current practice around urine testing and identify factors leading to overtreatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in community nursing homes (NHs) DESIGN Observational study of a stratified random sample of NH patients who had urine cultures ordered in NHs within a 1-month study period SETTING 31 NHs in North Carolina PARTICIPANTS 254 NH residents who had a urine culture ordered within the 1-month study period METHODS We conducted an NH record audit of clinical and laboratory information during the 2 days before and 7 days after a urine culture was ordered. We compared these results with the urine antibiogram from the 31 NHs. RESULTS Empirical treatment was started in 30% of cases. When cultures were reported, previously untreated cases received antibiotics 89% of the time for colony counts of ≥100,000 CFU/mL and in 35% of cases with colony counts of 10,000-99,000 CFU/mL. Due to the high rate of prescribing when culture results returned, 74% of these patients ultimately received a full course of antibiotics. Treated and untreated patients did not significantly differ in temperature, frequency of urinary signs and symptoms, or presence of Loeb criteria for antibiotic initiation. Factors most commonly associated with urine culture ordering were acute mental status changes (32%); change in the urine color, odor, or sediment (17%); and dysuria (15%). CONCLUSIONS Urine cultures play a significant role in antibiotic overprescribing. Antibiotic stewardship efforts in NHs should include reduction in culture ordering for factors not associated with infection-related morbidity as well as more scrutiny of patient condition when results become available. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:524-531.

Medical Foster Homes: Can the Adult Foster Care Model Substitute for Nursing Home Care?

To compare characteristics, healthcare use, and costs of care of veterans in the rapidly expanding Veterans Health Administration (VHA) medical foster home (MFH) with those of three other VHA long-term care (LTC) programs. Descriptive, unmatched study. VHA MFHs, home-based primary care (HBPC), community living centers (CLCs), and community nursing homes (CNHs). Veterans newly enrolled in one of the four LTC settings in calendar years 2010 or 2011. Using VA and Medicare data from fiscal years 2010 and 2011, demographic characteristics, healthcare use, and costs of 388 veterans in MFHs were compared with 26,037 of those in HBPC, 5,355 in CLCs, and 5,517 in CNHs in the year before and the year after enrollment. Veterans enrolled in the MFH program were more likely to be unmarried than those in other LTC programs and had higher levels of comorbidity and frailty than veterans receiving HBPC but had similar levels of comorbidity, frailty, and healthcare use as those in CLCs and CNHs. MFH veterans incurred lower costs than those in CNHs and CLCs. MFHs served a distinct subset of veterans with levels of comorbidity and frailty similar to those of veterans cared for in CLCs and CNHs at costs that were comparable to or lower than those of the VHA. Propensity-matched comparisons will be necessary to confirm these findings.

Poststroke Rehabilitation and Restorative Care Utilization

Effective poststroke rehabilitation care can speed patient recovery and minimize patient functional disabilities. Veterans affairs (VA) community living centers (CLCs) and VA-contracted community nursing homes (CNHs) are the 2 major sources of institutional long-term care for Veterans with stroke receiving care under VA auspices. This study compares rehabilitation therapy and restorative nursing care among Veterans residing in VA CLCs versus those Veterans in VA-contracted CNHs. Retrospective observational. All Veterans diagnosed with stroke, newly admitted to the CLCs or CNHs during the study period who completed at least 2 Minimum Data Set assessments postadmission. The outcomes were numbers of days for rehabilitation therapy and restorative nursing care received by the Veterans during their stays in CLCs or CNHs as documented in the Minimum Data Set databases. For rehabilitation therapy, the CLC Veterans had lower user rates (75.2% vs. 76.4%, P=0.078) and fewer observed therapy days (4.9 vs. 6.4, P<0.001) than CNH Veterans. However, the CLC Veterans had higher adjusted odds for therapy (odds ratio=1.16, P=0.033), although they had fewer average therapy days (coefficient=-1.53±0.11, P<0.001). For restorative nursing care, CLC Veterans had higher user rates (33.5% vs. 30.6%, P<0.001), more observed average care days (9.4 vs. 5.9, P<0.001), higher adjusted odds (odds ratio=2.28, P<0.001), and more adjusted days for restorative nursing care (coefficient=5.48±0.37, P<0.001). Compared with their counterparts at VA-contracted CNHs, Veterans at VA CLCs had fewer average rehabilitation therapy days (both unadjusted and adjusted), but they were significantly more likely to receive restorative nursing care both before and after risk adjustment.

Into the Community: Development of a Collaborative Educational Program Between a Geriatric Fellowship and a Community Nursing Home

Long term care is critical for geriatric medical education. Many of the frailest and most vulnerable older adults are cared for in nursing homes (NH) where many of the geriatric competencies are easily taught. NHs are also an ideal setting for learning about health systems, interdisciplinary teamwork, and transitions of care. However, there are only a few reports of teaching NHs and trainees’ exposure to long term care is variable overall. We describe the development of a collaborative educational program between a geriatric fellowship and a community NH that enhances the fellows’ education and offers educational opportunities for other post-graduate trainees.

Prevalence of Parkinson Disease and Parkinson Disease Dementia in Community Nursing Homes

To estimate the prevalence of Parkinson disease (PD) and Parkinson disease dementia (PDD) in community nursing homes. To estimate how many residents who meet criteria for PDD have been diagnosed with PDD and prescribed a Federal Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatment for PDD. Three private Saint Louis metropolitan area nursing homes. Fifty-five residents with a chart diagnosis of PD from a total of 714 residents were identified. Sixteen subjects or families did not give consent and two were excluded from the study because advanced stage of the illness impaired evaluation. Thirty-seven subjects with an established diagnosis of PD participated in the study. A chart review was used to identify the study sample: residents with an established diagnosis of PD. Consent was obtained from the nursing home administration, families or guardians, and the residents themselves (where applicable). Study data were obtained from review of residents' medical charts, family/caregiver interview, resident interview, resident cognitive testing (Mini-Mental State Examination, clock drawing test), and resident depression assessment (15-item Geriatric Depression Scale). Diagnosis of PDD was defined using existing literature and described below. Data were analyzed using SPSS version15. Of the 714 nursing home residents, 55 (7.7%) met criteria for PD. Of these, 37 participated in the study and 18 (48.6%) met criteria for PDD. None were diagnosed with PDD in the charts and 11.1% (2 of 18) were on FDA-approved treatment. In this sample of nursing home residents, the prevalence of PD was 7.7% and the overall prevalence of PDD was 3.7%. PDD remains an unrecognized entity in the nursing home setting. Close to half (48.65%) of nursing home residents with PD may have PDD at any given time and they remain undiagnosed and largely undertreated.

Feasibility of Quality Indicators for the Management of Geriatric Syndromes in Nursing Home Residents

<h3>Purpose</h3> The assessment and management of dementia, falls and mobility disorders, malnutrition, end-of-life issues, pressure ulcers, and urinary incontinence have been identified as important quality improvement targets for vulnerable elders residing in nursing homes. This study aimed to identify valid and feasible measures of specific care processes associated with improved outcomes for these conditions. <h3>Methods</h3> Nine experts in nursing home (NH) care participated in a modified Delphi process to evaluate potential quality indicators (QIs) for care in NHs. Panelists met and discussed potential indicators before completing confidential ballots rating validity (process associated with improved outcomes), feasibility of measurement (with charts or interviews), feasibility of implementation (given staffing resources in average community NHs), and importance (expected benefit and prevalence in NHs). The NH panel's median votes were used to identify a final set of QIs that were subsequently reviewed by a clinical oversight committee. <h3>Results</h3> Sixty-eight geriatric syndrome QIs were identified as valid and important in NH populations. Panelists assessed 12 (18%) of these QIs as having questionable feasibility to implement in average community nursing homes trying to provide quality care. Nine (13%) would not be included in systems assessing quality of care for persons with advanced dementia or poor prognosis. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Steps of care critical to the assessment and management of geriatric syndromes in NHs were identified. Feasibility is an important issue for a significant number of these, indicating that much remains to be done to design systems that efficiently and reliably implement these care processes.

Feasibility of Quality Indicators for the Management of Geriatric Syndromes in Nursing Home Residents

The assessment and management of dementia, falls and mobility disorders, malnutrition, end-of-life issues, pressure ulcers, and urinary incontinence have been identified as important quality improvement targets for vulnerable elders residing in nursing homes. This study aimed to identify valid and feasible measures of specific care processes associated with improved outcomes for these conditions. Nine experts in nursing home (NH) care participated in a modified Delphi process to evaluate potential quality indicators (QIs) for care in NHs. Panelists met and discussed potential indicators before completing confidential ballots rating validity (process associated with improved outcomes), feasibility of measurement (with charts or interviews), feasibility of implementation (given staffing resources in average community NHs), and importance (expected benefit and prevalence in NHs). The NH panel's median votes were used to identify a final set of QIs that were subsequently reviewed by a clinical oversight committee. Sixty-eight geriatric syndrome QIs were identified as valid and important in NH populations. Panelists assessed 12 (18%) of these QIs as having questionable feasibility to implement in average community nursing homes trying to provide quality care. Nine (13%) would not be included in systems assessing quality of care for persons with advanced dementia or poor prognosis. Steps of care critical to the assessment and management of geriatric syndromes in NHs were identified. Feasibility is an important issue for a significant number of these, indicating that much remains to be done to design systems that efficiently and reliably implement these care processes.

Feasibility of Quality Indicators for the Management of Geriatric Syndromes in Nursing Home Residents

<h3>Purpose</h3> The assessment and management of dementia, falls and mobility disorders, malnutrition, end-of-life issues, pressure ulcers, and urinary incontinence have been identified as important quality improvement targets for vulnerable elders residing in nursing homes. This study aimed to identify valid and feasible measures of specific care processes associated with improved outcomes for these conditions. <h3>Methods</h3> Nine experts in nursing home (NH) care participated in a modified Delphi process to evaluate potential quality indicators (QIs) for care in NHs. Panelists met and discussed potential indicators before completing confidential ballots rating validity (process associated with improved outcomes), feasibility of measurement (with charts or interviews), feasibility of implementation (given staffing resources in average community NHs), and importance (expected benefit and prevalence in NHs). The NH panel's median votes were used to identify a final set of QIs that were subsequently reviewed by a clinical oversight committee. <h3>Results</h3> Sixty-eight geriatric syndrome QIs were identified as valid and important in NH populations. Panelists assessed 12 (18%) of these QIs as having questionable feasibility to implement in average community nursing homes trying to provide quality care. Nine (13%) would not be included in systems assessing quality of care for persons with advanced dementia or poor prognosis. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Steps of care critical to the assessment and management of geriatric syndromes in NHs were identified. Feasibility is an important issue for a significant number of these, indicating that much remains to be done to design systems that efficiently and reliably implement these care processes.

Feasibility of Quality Indicators for the Management of Geriatric Syndromes in Nursing Home Residents

The assessment and management of dementia, falls and mobility disorders, malnutrition, end-of-life issues, pressure ulcers, and urinary incontinence have been identified as important quality improvement targets for vulnerable elders residing in nursing homes. This study aimed to identify valid and feasible measures of specific care processes associated with improved outcomes for these conditions. Nine experts in nursing home (NH) care participated in a modified Delphi process to evaluate potential quality indicators (QIs) for care in NHs. Panelists met and discussed potential indicators before completing confidential ballots rating validity (process associated with improved outcomes), feasibility of measurement (with charts or interviews), feasibility of implementation (given staffing resources in average community NHs), and importance (expected benefit and prevalence in NHs). The NH panel's median votes were used to identify a final set of QIs that were subsequently reviewed by a clinical oversight committee. Sixty-eight geriatric syndrome QIs were identified as valid and important in NH populations. Panelists assessed 12 (18%) of these QIs as having questionable feasibility to implement in average community nursing homes trying to provide quality care. Nine (13%) would not be included in systems assessing quality of care for persons with advanced dementia or poor prognosis. Steps of care critical to the assessment and management of geriatric syndromes in NHs were identified. Feasibility is an important issue for a significant number of these, indicating that much remains to be done to design systems that efficiently and reliably implement these care processes.