Community Health Worker Programs Research Articles

Development of the iManage SCD mobile health application for transition

ObjectiveThis paper outlines the design and implementation of iManage SCD, a self-management mobile health application for adolescents and young adults (AYA) with sickle cell disease (SCD) during transition from pediatric to adult health care. MethodsThe Integrate, Design, Assess, Share (IDEAS) framework, emphasizing user insights, iterative design, rigorous assessment, and knowledge sharing, guided the development process. The design team consisted of researchers, psychologists, physicians, social workers, AYA with SCD, and parents of AYA with SCD (n = 16) across three states. Qualitative focus groups and interviews were conducted and analyzed using thematic analysis across the integrate and design phases. Point of use feedback from AYA with SCD was used to assess feasibility and acceptability. ResultsThe development process was centered around tenants of the Social-ecological Model of Adolescent and Young Adult Readiness to Transition. Development integrated multidisciplinary perspectives, fostering a person-centered approach. The iterative design process involved collaboration with a digital health firm, Agency39A. Health equity and implementation considerations were addressed at individual, community, and healthcare system levels. Themes that emerged from focus groups with AYA, clinicians, and researchers in the integrate and design phases of development included recommendations for content and user experience features. ConclusionsiManage SCD emerges as a comprehensive, user-friendly mobile health application, incorporating theoretical principles and direct user input. The development process demonstrated feasibility and acceptability, and the paper discusses dissemination strategies for the Community Health Workers and Mobile Health Programs to Help Young Adults with SCD Transition to Using Adult Healthcare Services (COMETS) study.

A qualitative exploration of the implementation facilitators and challenges of a community health worker program to address health disparities for people recently released from incarceration using the consolidated framework for implementation research

BackgroundDespite the potential for community health worker (CHW)-led programs to improve the health of people with justice involvement (PWJI), little is known about the practical implementation of such models. We explored barriers and facilitators to implementation of a municipal CHW program, the Health Justice Network (NYC HJN), led by the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) in partnership with three reentry-focused community-based organizations (CBOs) and three federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) that was designed to serve the health and social service needs of PWJI.MethodsEighteen in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of CHWs, partner site supervisors, and DOHMH staff. Interviews were conducted virtually and transcribed verbatim. Codes and themes were developed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to understand facilitators and barriers to NYC HJN implementation.ResultsImportant facilitators to implementation included: lived experience of CHWs, as well as NYC HJN’s voluntary nature, lack of onerous eligibility criteria, and prioritization of participant needs. One barrier was the lack of a formal implementation protocol. Themes identified as facilitators in some instances and barriers in others were CHW integration into site partners, the expansive scope of work for CHWs, the integration of a trauma-informed approach, values alignment and existing infrastructure, leadership engagement, CHW training and support, and input, feedback, and communication.ConclusionsFindings will help inform how to successfully implement future CHW-led interventions for PWJI with municipal, health, and social service partners.

Expanded roles of community health workers beyond malaria in the Asia-Pacific: A systematic review.

In the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS), community health workers (CHWs) are a key component of malaria elimination strategies. As malaria declines, support for, and uptake of, malaria services may also subsequently decrease. Expanding their roles beyond malaria has been proposed to sustain the services. A systematic review was conducted to identify and characterize programmes with CHWs providing services in addition to those for malaria in the Asia Pacific. This review describes the expanded roles, identifies evidence of impact or success of the programmes, and explores strategies to ensure sustainability and factors for effective implementation to inform the design of malaria CHW programmes. Searches were conducted in 6 databases, for grey literature, and in bibliographies of retrieved articles. Data were extracted from 38 published articles, 12 programme reports, and 4 programme briefs and analysed using thematic coding and descriptive analysis. Twenty-nine programmes were identified with CHWs performing both malaria and non-malaria roles in the Asia Pacific. There was evidence of impact on malaria incidence in 4 of these, none on malaria mortality, and 4 on other diseases. Monitoring and evaluation mechanisms, multi-sectoral stakeholder collaborations, and adequate training and consistent supervision of CHWs were key to effective programme implementation. Integration of programmes into broader health services, ongoing political and funding support, and engagement with local communities were found to contribute to sustaining provision of health services by CHWs. Expanding CHW roles depends on programme management and strengthening linkages with local health systems. To sustain malaria CHW services, countries need adequate policies and financing, and sufficiently strong health systems to deliver basic health services that are adapted to the health needs of the community which means transitioning away from vertical disease programs. Further research should explore programmes that have not been captured in this review and address gaps in measuring malaria outcomes.

Assessing the Impact of Community Health Workforce on the Efficiency and Accessibility of Healthcare Delivery

The role of Community Health Workers (CHWs) in improving healthcare delivery, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), has garnered increased attention due to their ability to bridge the gap between formal health systems and underserved communities. This study assesses the impact of CHWs on healthcare accessibility, efficiency, and quality. CHWs have been instrumental in expanding healthcare access, especially in rural and remote areas, by providing primary care, maternal and child health services, and chronic disease management. Additionally, CHWs enhance health system efficiency by alleviating the burden on overworked health professionals, enabling them to focus on more specialized care. However, challenges remains regarding the sustainability of CHW programs, including inadequate training, compensation, and integration into formal healthcare systems, which can affect the quality of care. Addressing these challenges through sustained investment, political support, and better integration is critical for maximizing the potential of CHWs to transform healthcare delivery, reduce health disparities, and promote health equity.

Transition and change: opportunities and challenges of CHW programme reform for community health systems and vertical disease programmes in Liberia

BackgroundGlobally, community health worker (CHW) programmes are critical to addressing health worker shortages and have been recognised as critical pillars within the drive towards universal health coverage (UHC). In 2016, the Liberian Ministry of Health launched the National Community Health Services Policy 2016–2021, which included significant CHW programme reform to address ongoing health workforce capacity gaps in the country. However, little consideration was given to the impact of such reforms on ongoing health interventions that rely heavily on the use of CHW cadres. Our study explores how CHW programme reform in Liberia influenced performance of CHWs involved in the delivery of Neglected Tropical Disease (NTD) programmes to elucidate how health systems reform can impact the delivery of routine health interventions and vice versa.MethodsWe used a qualitative case study approach conducted between March 2017 and August 2018. Our instrumental case study approach uses qualitative methods, including document review of five CHW and NTD program-related policy documents; 25 key informant interviews with facility, county, and national level decision-makers; and 42 life and job histories with CHWs in Liberia. Data were analysed using a thematic framework approach, guided by Kok et al. framework of CHW performance. Data were coded in QRS NVIVO 11 Pro.ResultsOur findings show that CHW programme reform provides opportunities and challenges for supporting enhanced CHW performance. In relation to health system hardware, we found that CHW programme reform provides better opportunities for: formal recognition of CHWs; strengthening capacity for effective healthcare delivery at the community level through improved and formalised training; a more formal supervision structure; and provision of monthly incentives of 70 US dollars. Efficiency gaps in routine intervention delivery can be mitigated through the strengthening of these hardware components. Conversely, supervision deficits in routine CHW functioning can be supported through health interventions. In relation to systems software, we emphasise the ongoing importance of community engagement in CHW selection that is responsive to gendered power hierarchies and accompanied by gendered transformative approaches to improving literacy.ConclusionsThis study shows how CHW programme reform provides opportunities and challenges for health system strengthening that can both positively and negatively impact the functioning of routine health interventions. By working together, CHW programmes and routine health interventions have the opportunity to leverage mutually beneficial support for CHWs, which can enhance overall systems functioning by enhancing CHW performance.

Improving possible serious bacterial infection (PSBI) management in young infants when referral is not feasible: lessons from embedded implementation research in Ethiopia and Kenya

BackgroundSepsis is a leading cause of neonatal mortality, despite the availability of effective treatment of possible serious bacterial illness (PSBI), including when referral to a hospital is not feasible. Gaps in access and delivery worsened during COVID-19. We conducted embedded implementation research in Ethiopia and Kenya aimed at mitigating the impact of COVID-19 and addressing various implementation challenges to improve PSBI management.MethodsThe implementation research projects were implemented at the subnational level in Ethiopia and Kenya between November 2020-June 2022 (Ethiopia) and December 2020-August 2022 (Kenya). Guided by the implementation research frameworks, both projects conducted mixed formative quantitative and exploratory research from April to May 2021, followed by summative evaluations conducted between June and July 2022. Frameworks encompassed Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM), as well as health systems framework that incorporates cascades of care and World Health Organization Health Systems Building Blocks. Results were synthesized across the projects through document review and sharing cross-project measures and strategies through a project community of practice.ResultsDespite differences in settings across the projects, cross-cutting facilitators included community health worker program and support, and existence of guidelines for PSBI management at primary care levels. Barriers included community attitudes towards seeking care for sick newborns, COVID-19 risks and fear, and lack of health care worker competence. Country-specific contextual barriers included supply chain issues, civil conflict (Ethiopia), and labor strikes (Kenya). Strategies chosen to mitigate barriers and support implementation and sustainability in both settings included leveraging community health workers to address resistance to care-seeking, health workers’ training, COVID-19 infection prevention measures, stakeholder engagement, and advocacy to integrate PSBI management into existing programs, policies, and training. Other strategies addressing emerging project-specific barriers, included improving follow-up through a community health desk and PSBI mobile app (Kenya) and supply chain strengthening (Ethiopia). Both projects improved PSBI management coverage, increased adoption and uptake, and informed national policy changes supporting potential for sustainability.ConclusionsPragmatic embedded implementation research effectively supports the identification of barriers and mapping to strategies designed to increase effective coverage of PSBI management when referral is not feasible during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite differences in context, cross-cutting strategies identified could inform broader scale-up in the region, including during future health system shocks.

Reinforcing community health workers program in africa for universal health coverage and global health security: A call for concerted efforts.

Reinforcing community health workers program in africa for universal health coverage and global health security: A call for concerted efforts.

Implementing and monitoring high-quality community health worker care in adult primary care at New York City Health + Hospitals

BackgroundThis study describes how New York City (NYC) Health + Hospitals implemented a large-scale Community Health Worker (CHW) program in adult primary care clinics between January 2022 and December 2023 and established metrics to monitor program implementation. This study is timely as healthcare systems consider how to scale high-quality CHW programs.MethodsWe collected metrics in the following areas: (1) Workforce demographics, team structure, and training; (2) Enrolled patient demographics; (3) Patient-centered metrics, such as patient counts (e.g. patients outreached and enrolled) and engagement (e.g. median time in program, caseloads per CHW), and goals (e.g. median number of goals identified and completed). Metrics are based on standard data elements captured through CHW documentation in the electronic health record collected during program implementation. Data cleaning is completed using SQL queries and R scripts.ResultsIn June 2023, there were a total of 97 CHW and 22 CHW Supervisor staff lines in adult primary care across 17 healthcare sites. There were 4.6 CHWs to 1 CHW supervisor on average though this ranged by facility from 1:1 to 1:6. Compared to the population that receives primary care at NYC H + H, CHWs served more African American/Black patients (40% vs. 32%) and an older patient population (35% older than 65 vs. 21% older than 65). From January 2022 to December 2023, 13,812 patients were outreached by CHWs. Of these, 9,069 (66%) were referred by clinicians, 7,331 (53%) were enrolled, and 5,044 (37%) successfully graduated. The median number of goals identified by patients was four, and the median number of goals completed with a CHW per patient was three. The top three goals were primary care engagement (47%), specialty care engagement (46%), and food insecurity (45%).ConclusionEstablishing clear implementation and process metrics helps to ensure that CHWs embedded in health systems can meaningfully engage adult patients in health care, address patient-centered goals, and connect patients to community and government services.

Addressing Hypertension Disparities via Systems Dynamics: Insights From Community Health Connections.

Background and objective Hypertension remains a major public health challenge in the United States, disproportionately affecting various demographic groups. Significant disparities persist in hypertension prevalence and control due to interactions between socioeconomic factors, healthcare access, and systemic inequities. In this study, we aimed todetermine the impact of socioeconomic and healthcare factors on hypertension control among patients at Community Health Connections (CHC), a Federally Qualified Health Center serving 36 communities in North Central Massachusetts, and identify effective interventions using systems dynamics modeling to promote health equity. Materials and methods This was a retrospective observational study using data from 2023 CHC patients, and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011-2014. Systems dynamics modeling was employed to visualize interactions among factors influencing hypertension outcomes. The study included 4,870 CHC patients. Participants were selected based on clinical records and comprised 3,690 White participants (76%), 464 Black/African American participants (10%), 108 Asian participants (2%), and 608 classified as Other/Non-reported (12%). The cohort included 2,490 males (51%) and 2,380 females (49%). Socioeconomic factors (e.g., race, age, insurance status) and healthcare access were the study variables. The primary outcome was hypertension control, defined as a blood pressure reading of <140/90 mmHg. The study measured control rates across different demographic groups and assessed the impact of socioeconomic and healthcare factors on these rates. Results Among the 4,870 CHC patients, 3,007 (62%) achieved hypertension control. The overall hypertension control rate varied significantly by race: White: 68.6%, Black/African American: 61.6%, Asian: 63.2%, and Other/Non-reported: 65.6%. Insured patients had a control rate of 67.7%, compared to 37.5% for uninsured patients (p<0.001). Systems dynamics models illustrated how socioeconomic disparities and healthcare access issues amplify health inequities. Key interventions identified include, but are not limited to, multidisciplinary care teams, community health worker programs, and telehealth services. Conclusions Addressing hypertension disparities among CHC patients requires a systemic approach integrating socioeconomic, healthcare, and policy-related interventions. Systems dynamics modeling provides a framework for designing and implementing targeted interventions, enhancing health equity, and improving hypertension control outcomes in underserved populations. Further research is needed to test the effectiveness of these interventions before their broad implementation.

Expanded roles of community health workers to sustain malaria services in the Asia-Pacific: A landscaping survey.

Malaria Community Health Workers (CHWs) in the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) are an important component of malaria elimination efforts. As malaria declines with intensified efforts to eliminate by 2030, expanding their roles beyond malaria could help to sustain funding and provision of malaria services at the community level. Evidence of how programmes have implemented and managed CHWs performing both malaria and non-malaria roles across the Asia-Pacific region can provide insight into the viability of this strategy. A short survey was distributed to national malaria programmes and implementing organizations in the Asia-Pacific region in 2021-2022. The survey identified CHW programmes in the region, and collected information on malaria and non-malarial services provided by CHWs, characteristics of each identified programme, and the impact of COVID-19 on these programmes. 35 survey responses identified 28 programmes in 14 countries. The most frequently reported services provided by malaria CHWs were health promotion and education for malaria (13/14 countries) and other diseases (11/14); and COVID-19 related activities (10/14). Most programmes were financed wholly through donor funding (18/28 programmes), or donor plus government funding (6/28). Of 21 programmes which performed programme evaluation, only 2 evaluated their impacts on diseases beyond malaria. Declining donor funding, and COVID-19 related travel and activity restrictions were identified as implementation challenges. CHWs across the Asia Pacific provide a range of health services with malaria and are resilient under changing public health landscapes such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Further investigation into the impact of additional roles on malaria CHW performance and targeted health outcomes is needed to verify the benefits and feasibility of role expansion. As the GMS approaches elimination, and funding declines, verifying the cost effectiveness of malaria CHW programmes will be vital to persuade donors and countries to invest in malaria CHWs to sustain malaria services, and strengthen community-based health care.

Implementing a Population-Based Social Determinants of Health Intervention: Early Lessons Learned from Collaboration between Clinical and Community Organizations

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to understand the barriers and facilitators among diverse health care and community organization stakeholders implementing a populationbased social determinants of health (SDOH) intervention. The SDOH intervention included three core programs: SDOH screening, a community health worker program, and a digital referral platform. After one year of implementation, we conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with clinical and community-based organization stakeholders about (1) the three SDOH programs, (2) organizational implementation strategies, (3) interactions with partner organizations, and (4) perceived target population needs. Findings from the first year of implementation highlighted several factors to consider when designing and implementing SDOH programming, including (1) the successful features of the three SDOH programs, (2) the local implementation strategies and challenges across organizations, (3) the impact of broader community needs and resource availability on implementation, and (4) the importance of intentionally fostering relationships and collaboration among partner organizations.

Healthcare workers’ views on decentralized primary health care management in Lesotho: a qualitative study

BackgroundLesotho experienced high rates of maternal (566/100,000 live births) and under-five mortality (72.9/1000 live births). A 2013 national assessment found centralized healthcare management in Ministry of Health led to fragmented, ineffective district health team management. Launched in 2014 through collaboration between the Ministry of Health and Partners In Health, Lesotho’s Primary Health Care Reform (LPHCR) aimed to improve service quality and quantity by decentralizing healthcare management to the district level. We conducted a qualitative study to explore health workers’ perceptions regarding the effectiveness of LPHCR in enhancing the primary health care system.MethodsWe conducted 21 semi-structured key informant interviews (KII) with healthcare workers and Ministry of Health officials purposively sampled from various levels of Lesotho’s health system, including the central Ministry of Health, district health management teams, health centers, and community health worker programs in four pilot districts of the LPHCR initiative. The World Health Organization’s health systems building blocks framework was used to guide data collection and analysis. Interviews assessed health care workers’ perspectives on the impact of the LPHCR initiative on the six-health system building blocks: service delivery, health information systems, access to essential medicines, health workforce, financing, and leadership/governance. Data were analyzed using directed content analysis.ResultsParticipants described benefits of decentralization, including improved efficiency in service delivery, enhanced accountability and responsiveness, increased community participation, improved data availability, and better resource allocation. Participants highlighted how the reform resulted in more efficient procurement and distribution processes and increased recognition and status in part due to the empowerment of district health management teams. However, participants also identified limited decentralization of financial decision-making and encountered barriers to successful implementation, such as staff shortages, inadequate management of the village health worker program, and a lack of clear communication regarding autonomy in utilizing and mobilizing donor funds.ConclusionOur study findings indicate that the implementation of decentralized primary health care management in Lesotho was associated a positive impact on health system building blocks related to primary health care. However, it is crucial to address the implementation challenges identified by healthcare workers to optimize the benefits of decentralized healthcare management.

Evidence of health system resilience in primary health care for preventing under-five mortality in Rwanda and Bangladesh: Lessons from an implementation study during the Millennium Development Goal period and the early period of COVID-19.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to disruptions of health service delivery in many countries; some were more resilient in either limiting or rapidly responding to the disruption than others. We used mixed methods implementation research to understand factors and strategies associated with resiliency in Rwanda and Bangladesh, focussing on how evidence-based interventions targeting amenable under-five mortality that had been used during the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) period (2000-15) were maintained during the early period of COVID-19. We triangulated data from three sources - a desk review of available documents, existing quantitative data on evidence-based intervention coverage, and key informant interviews - to perform a comparative analysis using multiple case studies methodology, comparing contextual factors (barriers or facilitators), implementation strategies (existing from 2000-15, new, or adapted), and implementation outcomes across the two countries. We also analysed which health system resiliency capabilities were present in the two countries. Both countries experienced many of the same facilitators for resiliency of evidence-based interventions for children under five, as well as new, pandemic-specific barriers during the early COVID-19 period (March to December 2020) that required targeted implementation strategies in response. Common facilitators included leadership and governance and a culture of accountability, while common barriers included movement restrictions, workload, and staff shortages. We saw a continuity of implementation strategies that had been associated with success in care delivery during the MDG period, including data use for monitoring and decision-making, as well as building on community health worker programmes for community-based health care delivery. New or adapted strategies used in responding to new barriers included the expanded use of digital platforms. We found implementation outcomes and strong resilience capabilities, including awareness and adaptiveness, which were related to pre-existing facilitators and implementation strategies (continued and new). The strategies and contextual factors Rwanda and Bangladesh leveraged to build 'everyday resilience' before COVID-19, i.e. during the MDG period, likely supported the maintained delivery of the evidence-based interventions targeting under-five mortality during the early stages of the pandemic. Expanding our understanding of pre-existing factors and strategies that contributed to resilience before and during the pandemic is important to support other countries' efforts to incorporate 'everyday resilience' into their health systems.

Documenting Community Health Worker Compensation Schemes and Their Perceived Effectiveness in Seven sub-Saharan African Countries: A Qualitative Study.

Community health worker (CHW) incentives and remuneration are core issues affecting the performance of CHWs and health programs. There is limited documentation on the implementation details of CHW financial compensation schemes used in sub-Saharan African countries, including their mechanisms of delivery and effectiveness. We aimed to document CHW financial compensation schemes and understand CHW, government, and other stakeholder perceptions of their effectiveness. A total of 68 semistructured interviews were conducted with a range of purposefully selected key informants in 7 countries: Benin, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Malawi, Mali, Niger, and Zambia. Thematic analysis of coded interview data was conducted, and relevant country documentation was reviewed, including any documents referenced by key informants, to provide contextual background for qualitative interpretation. Key informants described compensation schemes as effective when payments are regular, distributions are consistent, and amounts are sufficient to support health worker performance and continuity of service delivery. CHW compensation schemes associated with an employed worker status and government payroll mechanisms were most often perceived as effective by stakeholders. Compensation schemes associated with a volunteer status were found to vary widely in their delivery mechanisms (e.g., cash or mobile phone distribution) and were perceived as less effective. Lessons learned in implementing CHW compensation schemes involved the need for government leadership, ministerial coordination, community engagement, partner harmonization, and realistic transitional financing plans. Policymakers should consider these findings in designing compensation schemes for CHWs engaged in routine, continuous health service delivery within the context of their country's health service delivery model. Systematic documentation of the tasks and time commitment of volunteer status CHWs could support more recognition of their health system contributions and better determination of commensurate compensation as recommended by the 2018 World Health Organization Guidelines on Health Policy and System Support to Optimize Community Health Worker Programs.

44-PUB: Electronic Health Record (EHR) Tools to Focus Care and Track Outcomes in a Community Health Worker Program (CHW) for Youth with Type 1 Diabetes

44-PUB: Electronic Health Record (EHR) Tools to Focus Care and Track Outcomes in a Community Health Worker Program (CHW) for Youth with Type 1 Diabetes

Addressing Healthcare Disparities through Community-Based Hospital Management Initiatives

Addressing healthcare disparities among underserved communities has become a pressing concern for healthcare providers and policymakers alike. This study aims to investigate the role of community-based hospital management initiatives in mitigating healthcare disparities and improving access to quality care. Utilizing a qualitative research approach, the study employs a multiple case study methodology to explore successful community-based hospital management initiatives implemented in various regions. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews with hospital administrators, healthcare professionals, and community stakeholders, as well as document analysis of hospital policies and reports. The findings reveal that community-based hospital management initiatives, such as community health worker programs, culturally tailored healthcare services, and collaborative partnerships with local organizations, can effectively address healthcare disparities by enhancing healthcare accessibility, cultural competence, and community engagement. However, the study also highlights challenges faced by hospitals, including limited resources, language barriers, and social determinants of health that require a multifaceted approach. The research concludes that community-based hospital management initiatives have the potential to bridge the gap in healthcare disparities, but their success relies on strong leadership, sustainable funding, and a genuine commitment to community empowerment and collaborative efforts with various stakeholders.

Harlem Health Advocacy Partners: A Local Health Department's Place-Based Community Health Worker Program.

In January 2015, the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene launched Harlem Health Advocacy Partners (HHAP), a place-based initiative to demonstrate the capacity of a CHW workforce to improve the health of residents of public housing. The long-term goal of HHAP is to improve the population health of residents of public housing in East and Central Harlem and to close racial gaps in health and social outcomes. A variety of evaluation approaches have been used to assess the initiative. This paper describes the HHAP model and methods for evaluating the program.

Impact of medical innovations on quality of care in low income settings

Access to high-quality healthcare remains a challenge in low-income settings, primarily due to resource constraints and limited access to medical innovations. This systematic review examines the impact of medical innovations on the quality of care in low-income settings. Through a comprehensive analysis of relevant literature, this paper highlights the various medical innovations that have been implemented in low-income settings and evaluates their effectiveness in improving healthcare outcomes and patient satisfaction. The review identifies three broad categories of medical innovations: technological innovations, innovative healthcare delivery models, and novel treatment modalities. Technological innovations encompass a wide range of advancements, including telemedicine, mobile health (mHealth) applications, and point-of-care diagnostics. These innovations have shown promise in improving access to healthcare services, enhancing diagnostic accuracy, and facilitating remote monitoring and follow-up care in low-resource settings. Innovative healthcare delivery models, such as community health worker programs, task shifting, and mobile clinics, have also been implemented to overcome barriers to healthcare access in low-income settings. These models prioritize community engagement, decentralization of services, and task delegation to non-physician healthcare providers to expand coverage and reach underserved populations. Furthermore, novel treatment modalities, including affordable and portable medical devices, point-of-care testing kits, and low-cost medications, have been developed to address the specific healthcare needs of low-income populations. These innovations aim to improve treatment efficacy, reduce treatment costs, and minimize the burden of disease in resource-limited settings. The review synthesizes evidence from a diverse range of studies to assess the impact of these medical innovations on healthcare outcomes and patient satisfaction. Key findings suggest that while medical innovations hold promise in enhancing quality of care, several challenges including limited resources, infrastructure constraints, and training requirements need to be addressed to maximize their impact. The paper concludes by emphasizing the importance of tailored approaches and sustainable strategies for implementing medical innovations in low-income settings. By fostering partnerships, leveraging existing infrastructure, and investing in capacity building initiatives, stakeholders can effectively integrate medical innovations into healthcare delivery systems and improve access to high-quality care for underserved populations. This systematic review contributes to the growing body of literature on healthcare innovation and provides valuable insights for policymakers, healthcare providers, and researchers seeking to address the healthcare needs of low-income populations and achieve health equity on a global scale.

“Buffalo Face the Storm:” Lessons Learned from an American Indian Palliative Care Community Health Worker Program

“Buffalo Face the Storm:” Lessons Learned from an American Indian Palliative Care Community Health Worker Program

Designing a Community Health Worker (CHW) Certificate Training that Centers Marginalized Youth’s Health and Wellness

The genesis of the youth Community Health Worker (CHW) and Citizen/Community Science (CS) training is rooted in interdisciplinary research and the lived experiences of families in Chicago and Urbana-Champaign. Dr. Mendenhall and colleagues’ (Drs. Robinson, Roberts and Rodriquez-Zas) South Chicago’s Black Mothers’ Resiliency Project provide dinsights into Black women’s experiences with genomics, trauma, and community science. Black women’s testimonies highlighted the health impacts of living in neighborhoods with high levels of gun violence and the resilience strategies they employ. This led to the development of a youth-centered CHW and CS training program, aimed at addressing health disparities. The program trained high school students and young adults (up to age 24) as CHWs and CSs, focusing on the objectives of (1) embedding culturally competent health workers in marginalized communities; (2) amplifying community voices; (3) collecting, analyzing, and quantifying observational data to inform policy decision-making; (4) amplifying community voices in healthcare discussions and (5) creating community health care worker training certification for youth. Over three years, the program trained over 50 participants, incorporating elements of wellness, art, and entrepreneurship.Based on ethnographic notes participants reported increases in wellness such as reduced anxiety and increased empowerment. The program’s long-term goals include creating employment opportunities for graduates and contributing to improved community health outcomes. This initiative represents a step towards addressing racial trauma and promoting community healing through youth-led innovation and empowerment.