Community-based Palliative Care Services Research Articles

Facilitators of and Barriers to Interdisciplinary Communication and Collaboration in Palliative Care and Primary Care (S764)

•Describe the facilitators of interdisciplinary collaboration to coordinate care for older adults living longer with serious illnesses.•Identify and describe the barriers to interdisciplinary collaboration to coordinate care for older adults living longer with serious illnesses.•Describe strategies to promote interdisciplinary communication and collaboration and awareness of primary and secondary palliative care. As a component of advanced illness management, palliative care in the outpatient setting can address the complex care needs of older adults living longer with serious illnesses. Communication and collaboration between primary care and palliative care providers is needed to deliver complex care management and to coordinate care, yet optimal strategies for collaboration are ill defined. This exploratory study revealed insights into the study question: What are the facilitators of and barriers to interdisciplinary interactions to coordinate care? Participants were selected through snowball sampling from large academic and community healthcare systems with established community-based palliative care services. Twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted, including primary care and palliative care providers and their patients and families. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Participants completed a brief survey regarding their background, education and experience with palliative care. Transcripts and field notes were analyzed using Grounded Theory techniques. Four major themes emerged from the data: (i) role clarity, (ii) feedback and collaboration, (iii) workforce need, and (iv) education. Interdisciplinary collaboration to coordinate care was facilitated by defining roles and responsibilities; frequent in person, email, or EMR communication; and education of primary care providers and patients and families regarding primary and secondary palliative care. Barriers that negatively impacted working relationships among primary care and palliative care providers included poor feedback that prevented a shared understanding of patient’s needs and goals of care. Other contributing factors were non-involvement of primary care providers when specialists referred patients to palliative care, lack of resources, and an unclear concept of community-based palliative care. Data suggest the need for greater attention to processes that promote communication and collaboration as well as strategies to promote a greater awareness of primary and secondary palliative care.

Abstracts from theCenter to Advance Palliative Care National Seminar Pathways to Quality Palliative CareNovember 13–15, 2014Orlando, Florida

Abstracts from theCenter to Advance Palliative Care National Seminar Pathways to Quality Palliative Care<i>November 13–15, 2014</i><i>Orlando, Florida</i>

The present and future of community/home-based palliative care in Taiwan

In Taiwan, the Department of Health (DOH) has implemented regulations and policies related to hospice and palliative care since 1995. Taiwan is the first country in Asia to have a Natural Death Act, promulgated in 2000. Although recognition of the need for palliative care in non-cancer terminally ill patients is increasing, at present, the needs of these patients are often not met. Moreover, while a majority of the population prefers to die at home, the percentage of patients who die in the home setting remains small. The palliative care system should be adjusted to improve the accessibility and continuity of care based on the needs of patients. Therefore, the Jin-Shan Branch of the National Taiwan University Hospital has run a pilot community palliative care service model since 2012. National Health Insurance reimbursement was introduced in 2014 for community-based palliative care services. Establishing a formal system of community-based palliative care should be encouraged in order to improve the quality of care at the end of life and to allow more patients to receive end-of-life care and die in their own communities. This system will require that skilled nurses provide discharge planning, symptoms control, end-of-life communications, social-resources integration, and social-support networks in order to achieve a high quality of end-of-life care.

Promoting palliative care in the community: Production of the primary palliative care toolkit by the European Association of Palliative Care Taskforce in primary palliative care

Background: A multidisciplinary European Association of Palliative Care Taskforce was established to scope the extent of and learn what facilitates and hinders the development of palliative care in the community across Europe. Aim: To document the barriers and facilitators for palliative care in the community and to produce a resource toolkit that palliative care specialists, primary care health professionals or policymakers, service developers, educationalists and national groups more generally could use to facilitate the development of palliative care in their own country. Design: (1) A survey instrument was sent to general practitioners with knowledge of palliative care services in the community in a diverse sample of European countries. We also conducted an international systematic review of tools used to identify people for palliative care in the community. (2) A draft toolkit was then constructed suggesting how individual countries might best address these issues, and an online survey was then set up for general practitioners and specialists to make comments. Iterations of the toolkit were then presented at international palliative care and primary care conferences. Results: Being unable to identify appropriate patients for palliative care in the community was a major barrier internationally. The systematic review identified tools that might be used to help address this. Various facilitators such as national strategies were identified. A primary palliative care toolkit has been produced and refined, together with associated guidance. Conclusion: Many barriers and facilitators were identified. The primary palliative care toolkit can help community-based palliative care services to be established nationally.

Reaching out to Ray: delivering palliative care services to a homeless person in Melbourne, Australia

Most terminally ill people express a preference for dying at home. Within established models of palliative care, achieving death at home is a particular challenge for homeless people. This paper describes a quality-improvement project undertaken by a community-based palliative care service in Melbourne, Australia, to understand homeless people's palliative care needs and the challenges that workers face. Six semi-structured interviews with workers in hospital and community-based settings were undertaken and a case study documented. The results were used to initiate discussion about how policy and protocols for the community-based palliative care service might serve this population more effectively. The findings confirmed that homeless people have complex psychosocial and medical needs. They may be periodically uncontactable or living in unsafe settings, experience isolation from social support networks, and have issues of compliance with treatment protocols exacerbated by mental health problems and/or substance abuse. Service providers had particular challenges in meeting the palliative care needs of homeless people. A flexible, compassionate, and coordinated response is required, and more work is needed to explore how the needs of this particular group can be met.

Delivery Strategies to Optimize Resource Utilization and Performance Status for Patients With Advanced Life-Limiting Illness: Results From the “Palliative Care Trial” [ISRCTN 81117481

ContextEvidence-based approaches are needed to improve the delivery of specialized palliative care. ObjectivesThe aim of this trial was to improve on current models of service provision. MethodsThis 2×2×2 factorial cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted at an Australian community-based palliative care service, allowing three simultaneous comparative effectiveness studies. Participating patients were newly referred adults, experiencing pain, and who were expected to live >48 hours. Patients enrolled with their general practitioners (GPs) and were randomized three times: 1) individualized interdisciplinary case conference including their GP vs. control, 2) educational outreach visiting for GPs about pain management vs. control, and 3) structured educational visiting for patients/caregivers about pain management vs. control. The control condition was current palliative care. Outcomes included Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Status (AKPS) and pain from 60 days after randomization and hospitalizations. ResultsThere were 461 participants: mean age 71 years, 50% male, 91% with cancer, median survival 179 days, and median baseline AKPS 60. Only 47% of individuals randomized to the case conferencing intervention received it; based on a priori-defined analyses, 32% of participants were included in final analyses. Case conferencing reduced hospitalizations by 26% (least squares means hospitalizations per patient: case conference 1.26 [SE 0.10] vs. control 1.70 [SE 0.13], P=0.0069) and better maintained performance status (AKPS case conferences 57.3 [SE 1.5] vs. control 51.7 [SE 2.3], P=0.0368). Among patients with declining function (AKPS <70), case conferencing and patient/caregiver education better maintained performance status (AKPS case conferences 55.0 [SE 2.1] vs. control 46.5 [SE 2.9], P=0.0143; patient/caregiver education 54.7 [SE 2.8] vs. control 46.8 [SE 2.1], P=0.0206). Pain was unchanged. GP education did not change outcomes. ConclusionA single case conference added to current specialized community-based palliative care reduced hospitalizations and better maintained performance status. Comparatively, patient/caregiver education was less effective; GP education was not effective.

Palliative care needs of terminally ill people living alone: A service provider perspective

Community-based palliative care services face challenges in meeting the needs of terminally ill clients who live alone without a primary caregiver. Yet, there is a dearth of literature on the perceptions of health service providers (HSPs) regarding the care needs and possible management options to assist this growing group to remain at home. This paper investigated the support needs of people living alone with a terminal illness from a service provider perspective. In depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine HSPs from community based services in three Australian states. Four main themes emerged: care challenges, differences in care provision, appropriate approaches to care and essentials for an effective service such as 24 h care, cost-free provision of personal alarm systems, supported and coordinated housekeeping services, funded respite care and financial care packages. HSPs expressed a respect for the autonomy and independence of the clients, yet felt pressured to ensure that safe and attentive care was possible. HSPs recognised the central importance of maintaining the independence and autonomy of palliative care clients living alone. This study is the first in-depth account of what HSPs perceive they need to effectively look after home alone dying clients. The study provided directions to inform service planning for this growing and challenging population group regarding adequate and timely services that will lead to more complying with the clients' wishes, more care being delivered at home, a reduction in hospitalisations, a better quality of life and a capacity to die at home.

The Prevalence of Bowel Problems Reported in a Palliative Care Population

ContextConstipation and other disturbances of bowel function are distressing problems for people with specialist palliative care needs. Recent observations suggest that such problems may worsen as people become more unwell, but the changes in intensity over time are not well documented. ObjectivesThe objectives of this work were to understand the prevalence, intensity, and progression of self-reported bowel disturbances across a community palliative care population, which included people with cancer and noncancer diagnoses. MethodsAll people referred to a community-based palliative care service over a period of 6.3 years had their bowel problem scores reported, using a numerical rating score at every clinical encounter until their death, at four discrete time points, namely, 90, 60, 30, and seven days before death. This allowed change over three time periods to be considered. At the same time, other symptom scores were collected including nausea, fatigue, pain, appetite problems, and breathing problems. Patients were categorized according to the underlying disease that accounted for their referral to palliative care, namely, cancer diagnoses (upper gastrointestinal cancers, lower gastrointestinal cancers, cancers of the associated digestive organs, and other cancers) and nonmalignant diagnoses. Group differences over the time periods were assessed using analysis of variance. Bivariate analysis was used to explore the relationship between bowel disturbances and other symptoms using Spearman's Rho correlation. ResultsFor 7772 patients, data were collected an average of 22.5 times, generating 174,783 data collection points over an average of 98.6 days on the service. At the time of referral to the service, 3248 (42.4%) people had disturbed bowel scores, 548 (7.2%) of whom described these as severe. Only 1020 (13.1%) people never described disturbed bowel function over their time in palliative care. At each time point, approximately one-third were experiencing disturbed bowel function, with proportionally greater numbers of people experiencing more significant problems as death approached (Χ2 (9)=119.3; P<0.001). Most referrals to the service were because of cancer diagnoses, with no significant differences noted between the bowel disturbance scores of those with cancer diagnoses compared with those with nonmalignant disease. Associations between bowel problem score and appetite problems, nausea, breathing problems, fatigue, and pain were explored. Although weak, there were statistically significant associations between all symptoms and bowel problem scores except for breathing problems. ConclusionIn conclusion, disturbed bowel function consistently remains a problem for people under the care of palliative care services, with the proportion of people with severe problems increasing as death approaches. This is despite the time and number of interventions currently used to palliate these problems.

MECC Regional Initiative in Pediatric Palliative Care

In all the major medical centers throughout the Middle East, there is a functioning pediatric hematology oncology department. In almost all countries, opioids such as morphine, oxycodone, and fentanyl are available. Pediatric palliative care services are still in their infancy and await further recognition and development. Unfortunately, there are still countries in the Middle East where children with cancer are diagnosed when the disease is already at stage III or IV, when the only option left is palliation. To decrease the incidence of late presentation, more effort is needed concerning public awareness, and concomitantly, an urgent need to develop hospital-based and community-based palliative and supportive care services. The initial step in this direction would involve more training of health care providers: Pediatricians, Pediatric Oncologists, Oncology Nurses, and Social Workers with updated pharmacological and nonpharmacological modalities of treatment.

Use of dependency and prioritization tools by clinical nurse specialists in palliative care: an exploratory study

The principal aim was to assess the utility of three needs assessment/dependency tools for use in community-based palliative care services. Specific objectives were to assess a sample of patients receiving specialist palliative care community nursing using these tools, to assess the predictive ability of each tool, and to explore the utility of prioritizing and measuring patient dependency from a clinical nurse specialist (CNS) perspective. In phase 1, 22 community-based CNSs completed the Vale prioritization tool for all patients visited during a 3-month period (n=162). They also completed either the Graves and Payne (2007) or the Birch et al (1997) dependency tool after each visit. In phase 2 a focus group (n=8) and two one-to-one interviews with CNS participants explored the perceived utility of all three tools. The Vale prioritization tool appeared to be the most useful for prioritizing patient need and managing workload. Statistical analysis highlighted minimal differences between the two dependency tools, neither of which predicted length of visit. Three themes were identified from phase 2: difficulties with routine administration, points of divergence between the two dependency tools, and workload concerns. While the Vale prioritization tool emerged as the most useful, the findings raise questions about the overall utility and practical application of these kinds of tools with community-based palliative care patients. Further research is needed to identify/develop, adapt, and evaluate appropriate, setting-specific dependency tools for use with this population.

Massachusetts' Pediatric Palliative Care Network: Successful Implementation of a Novel State-Funded Pediatric Palliative Care Program

U.S. children with life-limiting illness face barriers to accessing palliative care. In 2006, Massachusetts signed into law a statute providing for the creation and funding of the Pediatric Palliative Care Network (PPCN). This innovative, exclusively state-funded program provides comprehensive direct and consultative community-based pediatric palliative care services including: (1) pain and symptom management, (2) case management and assessment, (3) social services, counseling, and bereavement services, (4) volunteer support services, (5) respite services, and (6) complementary therapies. Provision of care is through a network of state-licensed hospice programs, and an array of professional and volunteer services. To describe Massachusetts' experience in implementing a novel pediatric palliative care program. Enrollment and service trends were identified using Massachusetts Department of Public Health administrative data. Responses to a written family satisfaction survey provided to each family enrolled on PPCN are summarized. In fiscal year 2010, PPCN partnered with 11 hospice programs to provide services to 227 children with life-limiting illness. A total of $680,850 (86.7%) of state funding went to direct contract funds for hospices. Admitting diagnoses included cancer (30%), chromosomal abnormalities (17%), neurodegenerative disorders (15%), and other (38%). There were 11 deaths, 100% of which occurred in the family's requested location. Median length of stay on service prior to death was 233 days. Families most commonly implemented psychosocial and case management services, followed by complementary therapies, and volunteer services. Successful implementation of a statewide pediatric palliative care program as modeled in Massachusetts is highly feasible at relatively low cost.

The meaning of being in transition to end-of-life care for female partners of spouses with cancer

Female partners of cancer patients are at high risk for psychological distress. However, the majority of studies have focused on measurement of female partners' psychological distress during diagnosis and early treatment. There is a gap in the literature with regard to qualitative studies that examine the experiences of female partners of spouses with cancer during the transition to end-of-life care. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore the meaning of being in transition to end-of-life care among female partners of spouses with cancer. An interpretive phenomenological approach based on Gadamer's (1960/1975) philosophy was used to gain a deeper understanding of the phenomenon of end-of-life transition. Eight female partners from two in-patient hospices and a community-based palliative care service were interviewed using a semistructured approach. Three major themes and associated subthemes were identified that outlined female partners' experiences. One major theme, Meaning of Our Lives, included the subthemes Our Relationship, Significance of His Life, and Searching for Understanding. In another theme, Dying with Cancer, partners undertook the Burden of Caring, experienced an Uncertain Path and were Looking for Hope. In the last theme, Glimpses of the Future, participants Faced Tomorrow and confirmed their Capacity to Survive. The results centered on three major concepts: meaning making, anticipatory mourning, and hope. Although meaning making has been identified as a fundamental way in which bereaved individuals cope with loss, results of this study suggested that female partners made meaning of their situations before their spouses' deaths. Participants also spontaneously described aspects of anticipatory mourning, thus, validating a concept that has been widely accepted despite limited research. Another finding was that participants shouldered the responsibility of adjusting spouses' hopes in order to help them to cope. Implications for practice and research are drawn from these findings.

Cancer pain management at home (II): does age influence attitudes towards pain and analgesia?

Older patients experience a higher prevalence of pain, including cancer pain, than other age groups and tend to receive poorer pain management. The reasons for unnecessary suffering resulting from pain among older patients are not well understood. This study aimed to identify barriers to cancer pain management for older patients living at home and to compare these with a younger control group. Patients newly referred to community-based palliative care services were interviewed about their pain and related issues. Data included pain impact (BPI), mood (HAD), health (EuroQol), and barriers to reporting of pain and analgesic use (Barriers Questionnaire). Fifty-eight patients aged 75 or over and 32 people aged 60 or under were interviewed. Both groups reported that beliefs about the use of analgesics was the greatest barrier to effective pain management. Older patients reported that beliefs about the use of analgesics and communicating with medical staff were significantly more important barriers to pain management than for younger patients. Overall, factors such as communication with medical staff and fatalism were ranked lower than barriers related to medication. Younger patients reported significantly greater sleep disturbance due to pain and greater anxiety. Older age appears to influence attitudes towards pain and analgesia. Factors such as poorer knowledge about taking analgesia, reluctance to communicate with medical staff, poorer performance status, and being more likely to live alone suggest that older patients may require greater support in the management of their cancer pain than younger patients. Targeted interventions are needed to test this proposition.

Hospice and Palliative Care Development in India: A Multimethod Review of Services and Experiences

Palliative care has been developing in India since the mid-1980s, but there is a dearth of evidence about service provision on which to base national policy and practice. The aim of this study was to assess the current state of palliative care in India, mapping the existence of services state by state, and documenting the perspectives and experiences of those involved. A multimethod review was used, which included synthesis of evidence from published and grey literature, ethnographic field visits, qualitative interviews with 87 individuals from 12 states, and collation of existing public health data. The review identified 138 hospice and palliative care services in 16 states and union territories. These are mostly concentrated in large cities, with the exception of Kerala, where they are much more widespread. Nongovernmental organizations, public and private hospitals, and hospices are the predominant sources of provision. We were unable to identify palliative care services in 19 states/union territories. Development of services is uneven, with greater provision evident in the south than the north, but for the majority of states, coverage is poor. Barriers to the development of palliative care include: poverty, population density, geography, opioid availability, workforce development, and limited national palliative care policy. Successful models exist for the development of affordable, sustainable community-based palliative care services. These have arisen from adapting Western models of hospice and palliative care for implementation in the Indian cultural context. Further work is required to ensure that the growing interest in hospice and palliative care in India is used to increase the momentum of progress.

Symptom pathways from referral to death: measuring palliative care outcomes

This article reports on the first stage of a process to develop a clinical performance indicator for a community-based palliative care service that may inform the development of an agreed set of indicators for the whole sector. The study explores whether symptom data that are routinely collected to plan and monitor the care being provided by a community-based palliative care service also have the potential to be used to audit care against standards, compare services, and inform funders or purchasers. The article looks at the symptom distress scores of patients over the whole episode of their care from referral to death, by constructing pathways for each symptom (pain, insomnia, appetite, nausea, bowel, breathing problems, fatigue and pain). How these data may provide a multi-purpose measure of clinical outcomes is then discussed. It is concluded that, following further research to establish the symptom assessment scale's reliability and validity in different settings, it should be considered for universal adoption by palliative care services.

Providing a children's palliative care service in the community through fixed‐term grants: the staff perspective

Children's palliative care services have recently been awarded fixed-term grants, aimed at improving the provision of care for children with life-limiting conditions in the community. We report findings of a qualitative study to investigate the experience of a cohort of community children's nurses from teams involved in setting up or extending community-based children's palliative care services. The purpose of the study was to identify factors that affect service delivery, from the staff perspective, and to suggest ways of promoting their sustainable development. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 21 nurses from 12 different teams providing palliative care for children at home and in hospices. Participants were questioned about the services they provided and their own roles in that provision. NVIVO qualitative data analysis software was used to explore themes arising from the transcribed recorded interviews. Key findings were the importance of physical location in facilitating multidisciplinary communication, the importance of defining role boundaries between existing and new providers of children's palliative care, and the potentially detrimental impact of insecure funding on referral patterns and recruitment to posts. Staff named the opportunity to offer direct 'hands-on' care to families, access to work-based support and networking opportunities as important factors in helping them cope with the stresses involved in managing finite resources and the emotional challenges of their work. The maintenance of a mixed caseload with a significant proportion of direct care, provision of ongoing support and clearly defined roles are recommended as means of bolstering the ability of staff to develop their services. The deliberate locating of services to enhance communication between staff and guidance on the preparation of funding applications may further contribute to the sustainability of these services.

Hospice and Palliative Care Development in Africa: A Multi-Method Review of Services and Experiences

There is a paucity of information on hospice and palliative care provision in Africa and only a weak evidence base upon which to build policy and practice development. We set out to assess the current state of provision across the continent, mapping the existence of services country by country and exploring the perspectives and experiences of those involved. A multi-method review was conducted involving a synthesis of evidence from published and gray literature, ethnographic field visits to seven countries, qualitative interviews with 94 individuals from 14 countries, and the collation of existing public health data. Forty-seven African countries were reviewed, involving the assistance of numerous hospice and palliative care activists, including clinicians, managers, volunteers, policy makers, and staff of donor organizations. The 47 countries of Africa could be grouped into four categories: no identified hospice or palliative care activity (21 countries); capacity building activity is underway to promote hospice and palliative care delivery (11 countries); localized provision of hospice and palliative care is in place, often heavily supported by external donors (11 countries); and hospice and palliative care services are approaching some measure of integration with mainstream service providers and gaining wider policy recognition (four countries). Overall, services remain scattered and piecemeal in most African countries, and coverage is poor. Nongovernmental organizations are the predominant source of provision. Major difficulties relate to opioid availability, workforce development, and achieving sustainable critical mass. Models exist in Uganda, Kenya, South Africa, and Zimbabwe for the development of affordable, sustainable community-based hospice and palliative care services, but sensitivity is required in adopting Western models of hospice and palliative care for implementation in the African cultural context. Overall, interest in the development of hospice and palliative care in Africa has never been greater.

Utilization and costs of the introduction of system-wide palliative care in Alberta, 19932000

De-institutionalization of health care services provided to terminally ill cancer patients is a cost-effective strategy that underpins health care reforms in Canada. The objective of this study therefore is to evaluate the economic implications associated with Canadian innovations in the delivery of palliative care services. We identified 16,282 adults who died of cancer between 1993 and 2000 in two Canadian cities with newly introduced palliative care programs. Linkage of administrative databases was used to measure healthcare resource utilization. We sought to describe the utilization of palliative care services and its consequences for overall health care system costs. Use of palliative services increased from 45 to 81% of cancer patients during the study period. Identifiable public health care services cost dollars 28093Cdn/patient (19033US dollars, 11,508GBł, 17,778 euro) for terminally ill cancer patients in their last year of life. Acute care accounted for two-thirds (67%) of these costs; physician (10%), residential hospice care (8%), nursing homes (6%), home care (6%) and prescription medications (3%) comprise the remainder. Increased costs associated with the introduction of palliative care programs were offset by cost savings realized when terminally ill cancer patients spent less time in hospital. Palliative home care and residential hospice care accounted for the bulk of this substitution effect. Cost neutrality was observed from the public perspective. These results demonstrate that the introduction of comprehensive and community-based palliative care services resulted in increased palliative care service delivery and cost neutrality, primarily achieved through a decreased use of acute care beds.

Palliative care management services in a Medicare Social HMO

Background Elderplan, a Medicare Social HMO in New York City currently serves 14,000 frail community-dwelling elderly members. The Social HMO, unlike the traditional Medicare HMO, couples a broad range of community-based chronic care benefits with an extensive medical benefit package, which helps maintain the frail elderly in their homes. Elderplan is a participating agency of the Metropolitan Jewish Health System (MJHS). In 2000, under a grant from the United Hospital Fund, MJHS created its Quality of Life program, a community-based palliative care service for older adults living with advanced illness. In 2002, MJHS expanded its Quality of Life program into Elderplan. The program utilizes a specialized, interdisciplinary care management intervention to deliver palliative care services to patients living with advanced, chronic illness who are not enrolled in hospice. The program’s goals are to improve quality of life, facilitate dignified end-of-life care and decisionmaking processes, and reduce inappropriate

Equity of access to adult hospice inpatient care within north-west England.

There is a growing debate about the question of equity of access to hospice and palliative care services. Even countries with relatively well developed palliative care systems are considered to have problems of access and inequity of provision. Despite these concerns, we still lack a relevant evidence base to serve as a guide to action. We present an analysis of access to adult hospice inpatient provision in the north-west region of England that employs Geographical Information Systems (GIS). Measures of the possible demand for, and supply of, hospice inpatient services are used to determine the potential accessibility of cancer patients, assessed at the level of small areas (electoral wards). Further, the use of deprivation scores permits an analysis of the equity of access to adult inpatient hospice care, leading to the identification of areas where additional service provision may be warranted. Our research is subject to a number of caveats--it is limited to inpatient hospice provision and does not include other kinds of inpatient and community-based palliative care services. Likewise, we recognise that not everyone with cancer will require palliative care and also that palliative care needs exist among those with nonmalignant conditions. Nevertheless, our methodology is one that can also be applied more generally.