We are pleased to have been given an opportunity to respond to the comments of Robert H. Jackson on our analysis of the sacramental records from Pecos Pueblo. Comments of substance will be useful in continuing study of the Pecos materials and the records from other New Mexico missions. We published the raw data to allow other researchers the opportunity to prepare their own interpretations of the sacramental data. We believe, however, that Dr. Jackson's admittedly cursory review of our work has led him to some incorrect conclusions of his own. We recognize the need for more in-depth comparison of the Pecos Pueblo data with other Pueblo and Hispanic communities in New Mexico, and we agree with Dr. Jackson that the mission experiences of the California and Texas indigenous groups are an important comparison as well. Pecos, in particular, was a different mission community from those we are familiar with in Texas and California. Pecos was not a congregacion such as described by Jackson (I994a, I994b) in Texas and California. The Pecos were not resettled into a mission enclave by the priests; rather, the priests entered an established population center and achieved their converts at Pecos through a long process of negotiation and accommodation (Kessell I979; Ivey i996). This may be significant in distinguishing the experiences among the New Mexico missions and the missions in California and Texas. Dr. Jackson raises some points in his review that we think clarify our analyses. We note that the description of an ailment as toz y dolor de costado was likely a respiratory ailment and certainly do not dispute Dr. Jackson's suggestion that it was likely pneumonia, which may indicate a pattern of seasonal mortality related to weather. Other episodic patterns of weather and famine-related deaths may also have occurred at Pecos. Dr. Jackson
Read full abstract